Mueller : Trump is guilty of obstruction. Congress should handle it. Don't bother me again.

[Hutch Starskey]

Mueller had no proof, wonder girl.

Yeah, he had no proof that Trump wasn't a damn criminal,

Why do you think this is meaningful?
Hoe does this translate, outside your world of make-believe, that Trump is a criminal?

Mueller told you very clearly that if he could have cleared Trump of obstruction, he would have. He could not. Now given that he did so in Vol1, it's not hard to see what he meant.

 

[mudwhistle]

Most important thing said: MUELLER: 'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'

MUELLER: 'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'

But, the GOP are going to continue to spin, spin, spin!

Well summed up.

And the first sentence ends the notion of exoneration...though Trump will still claim it clears him - but he is a complete manchild...never to be taken seriously.

BTW - Linda Carter was a REAL ‘WOW’ looking lady. Sheesh.

And then you idiots ignore the policy and who Mueller actually worked for.... Barr cleared him when Mueller failed to do his job... WAAA ******* WAAAA Now Mueller wants a do over..... Nope... Epic Fail....

That is called, misrepresenting Mueller's findings, dope.

Then stop doing it **** head.

LOL...

Mueller told you his findings, dope.
Guess what. They don't match Barr's.

Probably because he was inserting his own prejudices into the case.
Barr told the truth.
Mueller gave his opinion.
It wasn't his job to give his biased opinion.
Comey made the same mistake.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

100 threads a day bashing Obama and/or talking about his criminality and/or how he should be impeached.

Every day, all day, for eight years straight.

The most scandal free President in modern history, and this is what they did, non-stop from sun-up to sundown.

So who decides what a scandal is? The MSM? Yeah, those are honest enough people to trust.

 

[Third Party]

Big surprise! Shocking! Trump supporters are in denial about Mueller's comments.

I am not a Trump supporter. What Mueller's comments said to me is "I don't WANT to make a decision or testify. So, Nothing Trump says matters anymore-it is the Democrats move to HELP us or GET him.
IMPEACH OR SHUT UP! INVESTIGATE OR LEGISLATE! DO SOMETHING OR GET OUT!

 

[MarcATL]

So who decides what a scandal is? The MSM? Yeah, those are honest enough people to trust.

Should we rely on you far rightwing sycophants and hacks to declare what a scandal is?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Conversely, if there is no confidence to charge a crime, tough titty. The burden of proof is on you.

Think so?

'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'​

--- did they say so?

By not charging, YES.

Nope. He made it clear right at the outset that POLICY prevented him from doing so, so that wasn't going to happen under any circumstances, within his purview as he understood it.

In other words if he found video with a confession that Rump had shot somebody on Fifth Avenue, "POLICY" would have prevented him from "charging" anything.

Perhaps, but it wouldn't stop him from stating Trump was guilty or that punitive action should be taken against him.

 

[Pogo]

Conversely, if there is no confidence to charge a crime, tough titty. The burden of proof is on you.

Think so?

'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'​

--- did they say so?

By not charging, YES.

Nope. He made it clear right at the outset that POLICY prevented him from doing so, so that wasn't going to happen under any circumstances, within his purview as he understood it.

In other words if he found video with a confession that Rump had shot somebody on Fifth Avenue, "POLICY" would have prevented him from "charging" anything.

Perhaps, but it wouldn't stop him from stating Trump was guilty or that punitive action should be taken against him.

It would not, agreed. But that wasn't what he was charged to do.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So who decides what a scandal is? The MSM? Yeah, those are honest enough people to trust.

Should we rely on you far rightwing sycophants and hacks to declare what a scandal is?

Oh, we know what a scandal is, and Obama had his share. That is unless you want to say shipping guns to drug lords that ended up killing two of our agents isn't a scandal. Or the FACT that the three Americans in Benghazi received zero help from the White House for several hours was not a scandal. Or changing our entire healthcare system using lies was not a scandal. Or destroying hard drives that had evidence of IRS abuse was not a scandal. Or the DNC getting hacked from inside (not over the internet) and made unavailable to the FBI was not a scandal. or the FISA warrants that went on under DumBama's own nose was not a scandal.

Nothing was a scandal according to you leftists. DumBama was as pure as the wind driven snow.

 

[iceberg]

Mueller had no proof, wonder girl.

Yeah, he had no proof that Trump wasn't a damn criminal,

Why do you think this is meaningful?
Hoe does this translate, outside your world of make-believe, that Trump is a criminal?

Mueller told you very clearly that if he could have cleared Trump of obstruction, he would have. He could not. Now given that he did so in Vol1, it's not hard to see what he meant.

well given the indictments and trials for those not even colluding, it would seem to me that if he had anything to pursue, he would.

you can deny it all you want but who's gonna step up and try now?

 

[MarcATL]

Oh, we know what a scandal is, and Obama had his share. That is unless you want to say shipping guns to drug lords that ended up killing two of our agents isn't a scandal. Or the FACT that the three Americans in Benghazi received zero help from the White House for several hours was not a scandal. Or changing our entire healthcare system using lies was not a scandal. Or destroying hard drives that had evidence of IRS abuse was not a scandal. Or the DNC getting hacked from inside (not over the internet) and made unavailable to the FBI was not a scandal. or the FISA warrants that went on under DumBama's own nose was not a scandal.

Nothing was a scandal according to you leftists. DumBama was as pure as the wind driven snow.

They weren't.

All of those things happened previously under other Administrations.

Your first non-scandal was started by the Bush II Administration, but you're too much of a dishonest partisan hack to express that.

You can call President Barack Hussein Obama anything you want, but scandalous, isn't one of them.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Conversely, if there is no confidence to charge a crime, tough titty. The burden of proof is on you.

Think so?

'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'​

--- did they say so?

By not charging, YES.

Nope. He made it clear right at the outset that POLICY prevented him from doing so, so that wasn't going to happen under any circumstances, within his purview as he understood it.

In other words if he found video with a confession that Rump had shot somebody on Fifth Avenue, "POLICY" would have prevented him from "charging" anything.

Perhaps, but it wouldn't stop him from stating Trump was guilty or that punitive action should be taken against him.

It would not, agreed. But that wasn't what he was charged to do.

It would have set the record straight, wouldn't it?

Please don't tell me that you believe Mueller isn't a never Trumper. Nothing would have made Mueller happier than to charge Trump with something, or at the very least, have Congress impeach him with his blessing.

It's also my belief that the reason Mueller came out to distort the facts even more is because of all the nasty things Trump continued to say about him after his report was issued. Face it, Muller hates Trump. But Mueller is not going to damage his reputation any more than it's been damaged by stating a lie or falsely charging a sitting President.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh, we know what a scandal is, and Obama had his share. That is unless you want to say shipping guns to drug lords that ended up killing two of our agents isn't a scandal. Or the FACT that the three Americans in Benghazi received zero help from the White House for several hours was not a scandal. Or changing our entire healthcare system using lies was not a scandal. Or destroying hard drives that had evidence of IRS abuse was not a scandal. Or the DNC getting hacked from inside (not over the internet) and made unavailable to the FBI was not a scandal. or the FISA warrants that went on under DumBama's own nose was not a scandal.

Nothing was a scandal according to you leftists. DumBama was as pure as the wind driven snow.

They weren't.

All of those things happened previously under other Administrations.

Your first non-scandal was started by the Bush II Administration, but you're too much of a dishonest partisan hack to express that.

You can call President Barack Hussein Obama anything you want, but scandalous, isn't one of them.

And thank you for proving my point.

 

[Pogo]

Think so?

'If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so'​

--- did they say so?

By not charging, YES.

Nope. He made it clear right at the outset that POLICY prevented him from doing so, so that wasn't going to happen under any circumstances, within his purview as he understood it.

In other words if he found video with a confession that Rump had shot somebody on Fifth Avenue, "POLICY" would have prevented him from "charging" anything.

Perhaps, but it wouldn't stop him from stating Trump was guilty or that punitive action should be taken against him.

It would not, agreed. But that wasn't what he was charged to do.

It would have set the record straight, wouldn't it?

Doesn't matter what it "would have" done. It wasn't in the directive. Simple as that.

Please don't tell me that you believe Mueller isn't a never Trumper. Nothing would have made Mueller happier than to charge Trump with something, or at the very least, have Congress impeach him with his blessing.

I wouldn't know. I don't claim to speak for him. I guess you do but I wouldn't go there.

It's also my belief that the reason Mueller came out to distort the facts even more is because of all the nasty things Trump continued to say about him after his report was issued. Face it, Muller hates Trump. But Mueller is not going to damage his reputation any more than it's been damaged by stating a lie or falsely charging a sitting President.

It's good to have beliefs.
But they should be based on something real.

 

[mudwhistle]

So who decides what a scandal is? The MSM? Yeah, those are honest enough people to trust.

Should we rely on you far rightwing sycophants and hacks to declare what a scandal is?

The only rigtwing sycophants in America are Muslims
They're far right and liberals are increasingly far left.
We're all in the middle.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well summed up.

And the first sentence ends the notion of exoneration...though Trump will still claim it clears him - but he is a complete manchild...never to be taken seriously.

BTW - Linda Carter was a REAL ‘WOW’ looking lady. Sheesh.

And then you idiots ignore the policy and who Mueller actually worked for.... Barr cleared him when Mueller failed to do his job... WAAA ******* WAAAA Now Mueller wants a do over..... Nope... Epic Fail....

That is called, misrepresenting Mueller's findings, dope.

Then stop doing it **** head.

LOL...

Mueller told you his findings, dope.
Guess what. They don't match Barr's.

Probably because he was inserting his own prejudices into the case.
Barr told the truth.
Mueller gave his opinion.
It wasn't his job to give his biased opinion.
Comey made the same mistake.

Prejudices? Opinion? WTF?
Like DOJ policies?

You do understand that the report came first and Barr misrepresented it. Not the other way around.

 

[mudwhistle]

And then you idiots ignore the policy and who Mueller actually worked for.... Barr cleared him when Mueller failed to do his job... WAAA ******* WAAAA Now Mueller wants a do over..... Nope... Epic Fail....

That is called, misrepresenting Mueller's findings, dope.

Then stop doing it **** head.

LOL...

Mueller told you his findings, dope.
Guess what. They don't match Barr's.

Probably because he was inserting his own prejudices into the case.
Barr told the truth.
Mueller gave his opinion.
It wasn't his job to give his biased opinion.
Comey made the same mistake.

Prejudices? Opinion? WTF?
Like DOJ policies?

You do understand that the report came first and Barr misrepresented it. Not the other way around.

That's nothing but your biased opinion.
You lie about everything.
Barr said case closed.
Mueller said case closed.
Barr summed up what the Mueller Report states.....then released the report.....and then Mueller goes out and simply states what's in it....just like Barr....only he emphasized his own personal opinion that has nothing to do with the law.
Case closed......but......
You want a do-over.

 

[Flopper]

Mueller clearly walked a fine line, implicating Trump enuff to do nothing more than to imply it is up to Congress to exercise their authority to act as a check on the abuse of power by the executive; just as The Constitution intended.

One would have to be a fool to think that Trump did not obstruct Mueller, Comey, and now congress. When Trumps fights, he uses every means at his disposal. Issues of legality, he leaves to his lawyers.

 

[MarcATL]

The only rigtwing sycophants in America are Muslims
They're far right and liberals are increasingly far left.
We're all in the middle.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That is called, misrepresenting Mueller's findings, dope.

Then stop doing it **** head.

LOL...

Mueller told you his findings, dope.
Guess what. They don't match Barr's.

Probably because he was inserting his own prejudices into the case.
Barr told the truth.
Mueller gave his opinion.
It wasn't his job to give his biased opinion.
Comey made the same mistake.

Prejudices? Opinion? WTF?
Like DOJ policies?

You do understand that the report came first and Barr misrepresented it. Not the other way around.

That's nothing but your biased opinion.
You lie about everything.
Barr said case closed.
Mueller said case closed.
Barr summed up what the Mueller Report states.....then released the report.....and then Mueller goes out and simply states what's in it....just like Barr....only he emphasized his own personal opinion that has nothing to do with the law.
Case closed......but......
You want a do-over.

Not my opinion at all. Barr summed up the narrative he wanted to create and then waited a month to release the report.
Mueller exposed him. It's that simple.

Do over?

No one said it was finished in the first place, dope.

 

[deanrd]

It’s like what Steve Bannon and Michael Cohen said. Once they start going after trumps finances? It’s over. He’s freaking out.

Trump might be the first president to leave office in a straight jacket.