Mueller Just Proved His Entire Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law

[BWK]

So, are you boys and girls finished making idiots of yourselves for the night? After 1400 prosecutors said Trump obstructed, any more ridiculous arguments on the subject is not only idiotic, but it turns into rhetorical gobbly goo.

 

[WEATHER53]

It’s unravelling that Muller knew and knows his editorializing would spell trouble for him but his shot at Trump was too irresistible.

 

[wamose]

When Mueller didn't go blabbing everything to the Democratic media during his bogus investigation, I was thinking he must be a stand up guy. Now I know he's just a weasel, hell bent on covering up his own treason.

 

[georgephillip]

The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

"The key question is how Robert Mueller and his team assessed the three elements 'common to most of the relevant statutes' relating to obstruction of justice: an obstructive act, a nexus between the act and an official proceeding, and corrupt intent.

"As Mueller describes, the special counsel’s office 'gathered evidence … relevant to the elements of those crimes and analyzed them within an elements framework—while refraining from reaching ultimate conclusions about whether crimes were committed,' because of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)’s guidelines against the indictment of a sitting president.

"The below heat map is an effort to simplify Mueller’s analysis of the evidence in relation to the three common elements of the obstruction statutes.

"Instances of possibly obstructive conduct are identified by their section marking in Volume II of the report."

 

[BWK]

The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

"The key question is how Robert Mueller and his team assessed the three elements 'common to most of the relevant statutes' relating to obstruction of justice: an obstructive act, a nexus between the act and an official proceeding, and corrupt intent.

"As Mueller describes, the special counsel’s office 'gathered evidence … relevant to the elements of those crimes and analyzed them within an elements framework—while refraining from reaching ultimate conclusions about whether crimes were committed,' because of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)’s guidelines against the indictment of a sitting president.

"The below heat map is an effort to simplify Mueller’s analysis of the evidence in relation to the three common elements of the obstruction statutes.

"Instances of possibly obstructive conduct are identified by their section marking in Volume II of the report."

They won't read it for one, and what is left is ad hominem for those who exposed the truth and facts. That is literally all the Trump stooges on this forum have left. They have zero, and I do mean zero arguing points that can deliver any intelligent counter arguments.

And after last night of watching Maddow, we now have brand new evidence of slam dunk conspiracy by the campaign to collude with Ukraine to help Trump get elected by writing damaging information about Clinton tying her to international terrorism. And they did it with Ukraine. And Flynn got paid to report that information. That is an agreement to commit a conspiracy with a foreign government against a political opponent. DOJ surprises with omissions in response to Flynn document order

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:

Captain America's claim that the OLC said indicting a sitting president is impermissible is countered by something turned up by the NY Times in 2017.

“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr office memo concludes. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”

Can the President Be Indicted? A Long-Hidden Legal Memo Says Yes
When the NY Times reports this news, over two years ago now, why is Robert Mueller spreading his lie around and
we already know why sheep like you simply repeat whatever you are told.

Mueller could have indicted except for the fact he has nothing on which to indict. Wake up, clowns.

 

[BWK]

Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:

Captain America's claim that the OLC said indicting a sitting president is impermissible is countered by something turned up by the NY Times in 2017.

“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr office memo concludes. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”

Can the President Be Indicted? A Long-Hidden Legal Memo Says Yes
When the NY Times reports this news, over two years ago now, why is Robert Mueller spreading his lie around and
we already know why sheep like you simply repeat whatever you are told.

Mueller could have indicted except for the fact he has nothing on which to indict. Wake up, clowns.

Republicans insist on stupid. Okay! Good! You've been schooled about the rules, which has nothing to do with the NYT's article by the way, you've been schooled over the evidence, so "let stupid is as stupid does" for Republicans. It's at their peril, no one else's.

 

[BWK]

The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

You're too lazy to read it yourself. You're a loser, not a winner.

 

[BWK]

It’s unravelling that Muller knew and knows his editorializing would spell trouble for him but his shot at Trump was too irresistible.

Not only is that a lie, but it's a stupid counter argument.

 

[Leo123]

The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

You're too lazy to read it yourself. You're a loser, not a winner.

Come on I challenged you to back up your propaganda. You proved that’s just what your assertion is.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

You're too lazy to read it yourself. You're a loser, not a winner.

Come on I challenged you to back up your propaganda. You proved that’s just what your assertion is.

Don't hold your breath. If Mewler can't find it BWAAK doesn't have a prayer. He thinks since he said so we have to believe it.

Left loon tactic that never works

 

[georgephillip]

Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:

Captain America's claim that the OLC said indicting a sitting president is impermissible is countered by something turned up by the NY Times in 2017.

“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr office memo concludes. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”

Can the President Be Indicted? A Long-Hidden Legal Memo Says Yes
When the NY Times reports this news, over two years ago now, why is Robert Mueller spreading his lie around and
we already know why sheep like you simply repeat whatever you are told.

Mueller could have indicted except for the fact he has nothing on which to indict. Wake up, clowns.

When the NY Times reports this news, over two years ago now, why is Robert Mueller spreading his lie around and
we already know why sheep like you simply repeat whatever you are told.

Mueller could have indicted except for the fact he has nothing on which to indict. Wake up, clowns.

The biggest reason Mueller didn't indict Trump was Trump's transformation from pro-choice Democrat to pro-life Republican just in time for the 2016 primaries. Republicans don't indict other Republicans, remember?

Mueller also recognized congress was the appropriate tool to remove Trump from the White House. And then New York courts will make sure the lying, psychotic con man dies in prison. Will you cry?

 

[georgephillip]

The evidence dupes Barr. Read the report. It's a slam dunk case for obstruction.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

Show us where exactly in the Mueller Report there is proof of obstruction. Not even Mueller could find it.

Mueller found no shortage of evidence for obstruction; although, those unwilling to read his report will continue living in ignorance:

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

"The key question is how Robert Mueller and his team assessed the three elements 'common to most of the relevant statutes' relating to obstruction of justice: an obstructive act, a nexus between the act and an official proceeding, and corrupt intent.

"As Mueller describes, the special counsel’s office 'gathered evidence … relevant to the elements of those crimes and analyzed them within an elements framework—while refraining from reaching ultimate conclusions about whether crimes were committed,' because of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)’s guidelines against the indictment of a sitting president.

"The below heat map is an effort to simplify Mueller’s analysis of the evidence in relation to the three common elements of the obstruction statutes.

"Instances of possibly obstructive conduct are identified by their section marking in Volume II of the report."

They won't read it for one, and what is left is ad hominem for those who exposed the truth and facts. That is literally all the Trump stooges on this forum have left. They have zero, and I do mean zero arguing points that can deliver any intelligent counter arguments.

And after last night of watching Maddow, we now have brand new evidence of slam dunk conspiracy by the campaign to collude with Ukraine to help Trump get elected by writing damaging information about Clinton tying her to international terrorism. And they did it with Ukraine. And Flynn got paid to report that information. That is an agreement to commit a conspiracy with a foreign government against a political opponent. DOJ surprises with omissions in response to Flynn document order

They won't read it for one, and what is left is ad hominem for those who exposed the truth and facts. That is literally all the Trump stooges on this forum have left. They have zero, and I do mean zero arguing points that can deliver any intelligent counter arguments.

According to some Democrats, there are many congressional Republicans who have not read the Mueller Report. All they are reading is Trump's solid numbers among his base. Any Republican who goes against Trump faces a primary opponent in his/her next campaign. They have no idea what's coming since there are an almost infinite supply of legitimate reasons to remove Trump from office and send him to prison for the rest of his useless life.

Impeachable Offenses New - Need to Impeach

 

[Staidhup]

Didn't work out so well did it.

 

[Wapasha]

Mueller had no evidence of obstruction so he could not say that Trump obstructed anything he just said he didn’t have the evidence to say he did not obstruct which is bullshit

Yup. Trump is declared "not innocent," and the Democrat mob in the US House is told to have at him.

It's like the judge in a murder case says he could not prove that the defendant did not murder the little girl, closes the case and declares the defendant "not innocent." Then walks him out to the waiting nob, and tells them to dispense their form of justice.

How is someone like Trump, supposed to exercise their due process Right, clear their good name and prove their innocence, when the prosecution could not cite sufficient evidence to meet the standards for probable cause that a specific crime was committed, and then closes the case, after declaring the defendant is "not innocent?"

 

[WEATHER53]

Witch hunt from the get go and now Mueller has confessed he knew from the beginning that’s all it could ever be. He still had his fun though.