Our reality is the opposite of the "reality" of you stupid Marxist-Leftist parasite *****.Trump wasn't indicted for lying, Soy Boy. If you stupid ***** (Trump included) can't find your way back to reality how is Trump going to manage an effective defense?
However, most of Trump's time as POTUS was not under oath before a court, nor was his life prior or since being POTUS.
EXCERPT:
Abstract
Sections 1621 and 1623 of title 18, variously amended, of the U.S. Code define perjury before a Federal tribunal. The elements of perjury are (1) that the declarant took an oath to testify truthfully, (2) that he willfully made a false statement contrary to that oath (3) that the declarant believed the statement to be untrue, and (4) that the statement related to a material fact. It is easy to prove that a declarant took an oath. To prove that the witness gave a willfully false statement, however, the question asked must have been unambiguous. Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled a perjury conviction cannot be based on merely unresponsive or evasive testimony calculated to mislead but containing the literal truth. Testimony is material if it can impede the proceeding or influence the decision of tribunal or investigating body and may pertain to the main issue, collateral issues, or even the credibility of witnesses. Section 1621 is violated once a declarant makes a false statement. However, Section 1623 establishes his right to recant previous false testimony. The recantation must be made in the same continuous court, the false statement must not have substantially affected the proceeding, and the falsity must not otherwise have been detected. The Declarant may then use his recantation to show an absence of intent to mislead. ...
...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Perjury | Office of Justice Programs
www.ojp.gov
"We" would make any statement by any human be made under oath.
Reality is that such is near impossible and impracticable.
I'm sure you would flunk within five minutes. As would most all here. (You just did in the post of your's I'm quoting, IMO)
Hold the same standards to your useless sock-puppet Marxist-Leftist-Socialist clones like the Clinton's, Obama's, and Biden's and we may have a venue for comparable disagreements.
So you say, but I haven't time to waste chasing down your history of posts.
Election cheaters ain't seen no attacks yet. They think they want some to declare martial law
Total Deep State Bullshit
Again, your peeps in the Swamp are openly violating laws with no harm coming to them.
Actually nobody in your imaginary Deep State has ever been prosecutedAgain, your peeps in the Swamp are openly violating laws with no harm coming to them.
Just ask member of Congress like Charley Rangel that both parties openly admit committed ethics violations, like not paying taxes
Ethics violation? Any of us would be in prison or worse.
It's a circus now.
Half the nation easily does not believe the existing laws and regulations over the decades. All of those hidden laws and regulations in legislation now is at the forefront and touted as legitimate is not.
You forgot partisan. Partisan shithead moron.
Why would they prosecute their own?
It's about subjective OPINIONS on lying politicians and I'm responding to yours.
