Washington Post admits that Jack Smith is politically motivated

[gtopa1]

Fuck Off Biased Poster, that is also a Mod.
"I'm a poster first." says Meister.

Your Bullshit Claims insist that I lack integrity.
Have you looked in the mirror you piece of shit, that attacks people he disagrees with.

Fuck You and your Mod Status.

Consider yourself insulted in terms that would probably get me banned anywhere but the badlands, twatgrommet!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

BullShit.

How, be specific with actual cases.
Don't continue your bias, discuss some of Smith's 'Decisions' that YOU determine show Bias.

You have obviously done your research to make such a claim.
Just Post why you think Smith should 'recuse himself'

Don't tell me to Google it or that you've already posted it.
Those are cop-outs.

Smith even fucked up Menendez's trial!! He's a Dem hack!!!

"Special Counsel Jack Smith, tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate former President Donald Trump for allegedly wrongfully maintaining classified documents in his residence – a fairly common practice other U.S. Attorneys General have refused to prosecute – has a troubling record of failed, botched, and/or suspect prosecutions against prominent public figures.

HIS RECORD SPEAKS FOR ITSELF:​

• From 2010 to 2015, Smith served under Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder, leading the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section. The Obama Administration set in motion Democrats’ Coup against Trump from Day One of his presidency. (Excerpt from Lee Smith’s book, October 2019, “The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in U.S. History”).
• Among his more notable corruption cases, Smith prosecuted the former governor of Virginia, Robert McDonnell, a Republican. Although Smith scored a conviction against McDonnell, the case was later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous 8-0 decision. The Court observed that “there is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.” (Politico, 6/27/16). The High Court also rebuked Smith and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.”
• Smith prosecuted and convicted former Democrat vice presidential nominee John Edwards. “By not losing on any of the six felony counts for which he was being tried, John Edwards won the biggest victory of his political and legal life . . . A mistrial on five counts and an acquittal on one resulted in a clear -- if not complete -- legal vindication and a likely fatal setback for federal prosecutors seeking to convict the former U.S. senator and 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee for allegedly violating the Federal Election Campaign Act.” (U.S. News, June 1, 2012).
• Smith prosecuted Democrat Bob Menendez on public corruption charges. The case ended in a mistrial. “The way this case started was wrong, the way it was investigated was wrong, the way it was prosecuted was wrong, and the way it was tried was wrong as well,” Menendez said outside the courtroom at the time.” (Washington Examiner, 6/5/23).
• Smith prosecuted Arizona congressman Rick Renzi on corruption charges, which the Supreme Court upheld. Renzi was later pardoned by former President Trump. Renzi declared that he had been “wrongly convicted by a Department of Justice that engaged in witness tampering, illegal wiretapping, and gross prosecutorial misconduct.” (Washington Examiner, 6/5/23).

Smith is the Subject of House Investigations for Overzealous Investigations and Prosecutions

• “House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) launched a probe to conduct oversight over Special Counsel Jack Smith’s probe into former President Donald Trump for the handling of papers at Mar-a-Lago. In a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Jordan requested information about the probe to ensure the investigation is not politicized by the FBI, which suffers from a lack of public trust after improperly involving itself in the 2016 Russia hoax.” (Breitbart, 6/2/23). Prior to the House probe, Jordan asked rhetorically, “guess who was the lead person at the Justice Department looking for ways to target and prosecute the very people looking into who Lois Lerner went after? Jack Smith, the guy Merrick Garland just named as special counsel to go after President Trump.” (Breitbart, 11/21/22).
• Judicial Watch has sued the Biden Justice Department for refusing to reveal names of special counsel Jack Smith’s staff in the investigation against President Trump."

FACT SHEET: Jack Smith – A Record That Speaks for Itself

Special Counsel Jack Smith, tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate former President Donald Trump for allegedly wrongfully maintaining classified documents in his residence – a fairly common practice other U.S. Attorneys General have refused to prosecute – has a troubling...

americafirstpolicy.com

Yes I know; you're too stupid to google!!

Greg

 

[Winco]

Consider yourself insulted in terms that would probably get me banned anywhere but the badlands, twatgrommet!!

Greg

Hi Meister. Is it possible to send this thread down to the Badlands for a few minutes. I want to say something to Winco that would probably get me banned up here. It's NOT flattering to it!!

Greg

twatgrommet!! LOLLLLLLLOOOLLL.

 

[gtopa1]

twatgrommet!! LOLLLLLLLOOOLLL.

A name that fits you better than the name your mother gave (cudos to J P Hartigan).

Greg

 

[Winco]

Yes I know; you're too stupid to google!!

Greg

FO Gregg.

Your examples show Smith Prosecuting (D) and (R).

Is your claim........

1) Smith is incompetent and often gets it wrong?
2) Smith is Biased against (R) and is a traitor?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Smith should be prosecuted.

The orange bag O' shit should be swinging from a fucking tree.

 

[Winco]

FO Gregg.

Your examples show Smith Prosecuting (D) and (R).

Is your claim........

1) Smith is incompetent and often gets it wrong?
2) Smith is Biased against (R) and is a traitor?

So us Gregg.
How is trump more honorable than the Justice Jack Smith.

Your turn Gregg.

The orange bag O' shit should be swinging from a fucking tree.

 

[gtopa1]

So us Gregg.
How is trump more honorable than the Justice Jack Smith.

Your turn Gregg.

How are you more honorable than a slug?

Greg

 

[Mac1958]

"Admits" it's politically motivated?

No, Jason Willick CLAIMS it's politically motivated. He is a columnist. An opinion writer. And judging from his Twitter feed, (https://twitter.com/jawillick?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author) not a left winger.

And Jack Smith continues.

 

[Arlette]

Truth always hurts, doesn't it, Winnie? Yeah, I am a poster first, you have issues with that?
Take it up with your psychiatrist.

First of all, Smith should have recused himself as the prosecutor. He
now is blatantly being proven to be nothing but a political hack as a prosecutor.
But, you knew that, and it didn't make any difference to you, why? You also lack integrity.
Party above 'The People'.

Recused himself for what reason?

 

[Mac1958]

Maybe Jason Willick can find out how the long upcoming procession of Republicans, Trump attorneys, Trump staffers and Trump employees who will be testifying against him in upcoming trials have been paid off by George Soros, huh?

 

[Independentthinker]

MSN

Washington Post contributor Jason Willick wrote an opinion article titled, “Politics Are Now Clearly Shaping Jack Smith’s Trump Prosecution”, criticizing Smith’s alleged bias against Donald Trump.

Willick attacked the special counsel Smith and accused him of pursuing a political agenda, particularly in relation to the charge of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results.

He also criticized Smith’s attempt to expedite the trial before the 2024 election, suggesting a political motive rather than a pursuit of justice.
“There are real legal problems with special counsel Jack Smith’s election-interference case against Donald Trump,” admitted Willick.

“The former president’s effort to overturn the 2020 election was despicable, but political lying isn’t generally a crime. Smith’s case thus must rely on some of the vaguest laws in the federal penal code, applying them in untested ways,” explained the analyst.

“Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate,” he continued.

Willick alleged that Smith was attempting to, “fast-track the Trump trial based on what can be described only as a political timetable.”

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult constantly screams that Trump is a "threat to our democracy" whilst they are the ones who are constantly using the FBI and DOJ as their political weapons.
Democrat ballot stuffing is a "threat to our democracy".
Democrat censorship is a "threat to our democracy".
The Democrat Party has less integrity than a banana republic junta.

Geeeeeeeeeeeeee, I sure am glad they admitted this, otherwise I would have never known.

 

[Nostra]

Angry???? LOLLOLLOL
Just amused that you RWI's can NEVER support an actual claim.

So, Why should Jack Smith Recuse Himself?

See the OP, Dummy.

 

[Nostra]

Smith even fucked up Menendez's trial!! He's a Dem hack!!!

"Special Counsel Jack Smith, tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate former President Donald Trump for allegedly wrongfully maintaining classified documents in his residence – a fairly common practice other U.S. Attorneys General have refused to prosecute – has a troubling record of failed, botched, and/or suspect prosecutions against prominent public figures.

HIS RECORD SPEAKS FOR ITSELF:​

• From 2010 to 2015, Smith served under Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder, leading the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section. The Obama Administration set in motion Democrats’ Coup against Trump from Day One of his presidency. (Excerpt from Lee Smith’s book, October 2019, “The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in U.S. History”).
• Among his more notable corruption cases, Smith prosecuted the former governor of Virginia, Robert McDonnell, a Republican. Although Smith scored a conviction against McDonnell, the case was later overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous 8-0 decision. The Court observed that “there is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.” (Politico, 6/27/16). The High Court also rebuked Smith and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.”
• Smith prosecuted and convicted former Democrat vice presidential nominee John Edwards. “By not losing on any of the six felony counts for which he was being tried, John Edwards won the biggest victory of his political and legal life . . . A mistrial on five counts and an acquittal on one resulted in a clear -- if not complete -- legal vindication and a likely fatal setback for federal prosecutors seeking to convict the former U.S. senator and 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee for allegedly violating the Federal Election Campaign Act.” (U.S. News, June 1, 2012).
• Smith prosecuted Democrat Bob Menendez on public corruption charges. The case ended in a mistrial. “The way this case started was wrong, the way it was investigated was wrong, the way it was prosecuted was wrong, and the way it was tried was wrong as well,” Menendez said outside the courtroom at the time.” (Washington Examiner, 6/5/23).
• Smith prosecuted Arizona congressman Rick Renzi on corruption charges, which the Supreme Court upheld. Renzi was later pardoned by former President Trump. Renzi declared that he had been “wrongly convicted by a Department of Justice that engaged in witness tampering, illegal wiretapping, and gross prosecutorial misconduct.” (Washington Examiner, 6/5/23).

Smith is the Subject of House Investigations for Overzealous Investigations and Prosecutions

• “House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) launched a probe to conduct oversight over Special Counsel Jack Smith’s probe into former President Donald Trump for the handling of papers at Mar-a-Lago. In a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Jordan requested information about the probe to ensure the investigation is not politicized by the FBI, which suffers from a lack of public trust after improperly involving itself in the 2016 Russia hoax.” (Breitbart, 6/2/23). Prior to the House probe, Jordan asked rhetorically, “guess who was the lead person at the Justice Department looking for ways to target and prosecute the very people looking into who Lois Lerner went after? Jack Smith, the guy Merrick Garland just named as special counsel to go after President Trump.” (Breitbart, 11/21/22).
• Judicial Watch has sued the Biden Justice Department for refusing to reveal names of special counsel Jack Smith’s staff in the investigation against President Trump."

FACT SHEET: Jack Smith – A Record That Speaks for Itself

Special Counsel Jack Smith, tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate former President Donald Trump for allegedly wrongfully maintaining classified documents in his residence – a fairly common practice other U.S. Attorneys General have refused to prosecute – has a troubling...

americafirstpolicy.com

Yes I know; you're too stupid to google!!

Greg

....and that

 

[Cellblock2429]

MSN

Washington Post contributor Jason Willick wrote an opinion article titled, “Politics Are Now Clearly Shaping Jack Smith’s Trump Prosecution”, criticizing Smith’s alleged bias against Donald Trump.

Willick attacked the special counsel Smith and accused him of pursuing a political agenda, particularly in relation to the charge of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results.

He also criticized Smith’s attempt to expedite the trial before the 2024 election, suggesting a political motive rather than a pursuit of justice.
“There are real legal problems with special counsel Jack Smith’s election-interference case against Donald Trump,” admitted Willick.

“The former president’s effort to overturn the 2020 election was despicable, but political lying isn’t generally a crime. Smith’s case thus must rely on some of the vaguest laws in the federal penal code, applying them in untested ways,” explained the analyst.

“Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate,” he continued.

Willick alleged that Smith was attempting to, “fast-track the Trump trial based on what can be described only as a political timetable.”

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult constantly screams that Trump is a "threat to our democracy" whilst they are the ones who are constantly using the FBI and DOJ as their political weapons.
Democrat ballot stuffing is a "threat to our democracy".
Democrat censorship is a "threat to our democracy".
The Democrat Party has less integrity than a banana republic junta.

/——-/

 

[The Duke]

https://oversight.house.gov/release...te-tax-exempt-groups-engaging-politics/Simply because he is going after trump?
Is that it?
You Got any Other reason not including Trump?

Too bad trump committed SO MANY crimes.

Yes, corrupting the IRS in 2010. Lerner had to step down, but he skated right away from that after he's the one who

started it.

"Admits" it's politically motivated?

No, Jason Willick CLAIMS it's politically motivated. He is a columnist. An opinion writer. And judging from his Twitter feed, (https://twitter.com/jawillick?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author) not a left winger.

And Jack Smith continues.

Like he did with the IRS?

Testimony: In 2010, Justice Department Sought Lois Lerner’s Help to Prosecute Tax Exempt Groups Engaging in Politics - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

oversight.house.gov

Well, there was a stop put to that.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

MSN

Washington Post contributor Jason Willick wrote an opinion article titled, “Politics Are Now Clearly Shaping Jack Smith’s Trump Prosecution”, criticizing Smith’s alleged bias against Donald Trump.

Willick attacked the special counsel Smith and accused him of pursuing a political agenda, particularly in relation to the charge of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results.

He also criticized Smith’s attempt to expedite the trial before the 2024 election, suggesting a political motive rather than a pursuit of justice.
“There are real legal problems with special counsel Jack Smith’s election-interference case against Donald Trump,” admitted Willick.

“The former president’s effort to overturn the 2020 election was despicable, but political lying isn’t generally a crime. Smith’s case thus must rely on some of the vaguest laws in the federal penal code, applying them in untested ways,” explained the analyst.

“Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate,” he continued.

Willick alleged that Smith was attempting to, “fast-track the Trump trial based on what can be described only as a political timetable.”

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult constantly screams that Trump is a "threat to our democracy" whilst they are the ones who are constantly using the FBI and DOJ as their political weapons.
Democrat ballot stuffing is a "threat to our democracy".
Democrat censorship is a "threat to our democracy".
The Democrat Party has less integrity than a banana republic junta.

Neocon opinions?​

okay

 

[The Duke]

Neocon opinions?​

okay

Jack Smith corrupted the IRS in 2010.

He's a megaturd.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

MSN

Washington Post contributor Jason Willick wrote an opinion article titled, “Politics Are Now Clearly Shaping Jack Smith’s Trump Prosecution”, criticizing Smith’s alleged bias against Donald Trump.

Willick attacked the special counsel Smith and accused him of pursuing a political agenda, particularly in relation to the charge of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results.

He also criticized Smith’s attempt to expedite the trial before the 2024 election, suggesting a political motive rather than a pursuit of justice.
“There are real legal problems with special counsel Jack Smith’s election-interference case against Donald Trump,” admitted Willick.

“The former president’s effort to overturn the 2020 election was despicable, but political lying isn’t generally a crime. Smith’s case thus must rely on some of the vaguest laws in the federal penal code, applying them in untested ways,” explained the analyst.

“Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate,” he continued.

Willick alleged that Smith was attempting to, “fast-track the Trump trial based on what can be described only as a political timetable.”

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult constantly screams that Trump is a "threat to our democracy" whilst they are the ones who are constantly using the FBI and DOJ as their political weapons.
Democrat ballot stuffing is a "threat to our democracy".
Democrat censorship is a "threat to our democracy".
The Democrat Party has less integrity than a banana republic junta.

What's with the weird embedded links?

 

[The Duke]

Angry???? LOLLOLLOL
Just amused that you RWI's can NEVER support an actual claim.

So, Why should Jack Smith Recuse Himself?

Yeth! Tho ANGWY!



Because he's a corrupt turd. Works for me.