The problem here is the rhetoric. If we don't accept YOUR view of transsexuality, we are haters, bigots and dehumanizers.
Okay. Transsexuals believe something about their body that's not true. So do people with eating disorders. Should we say that people who suffer from bulimia or anorexia should be accepted without question or we are haters, bigots and we are dehumanizing them? It is possible to love someone without loving the choices they are making?
Can you explain to me why anorexia and bulimia are considered "body dysmorphia" and transsexuality is not--other than a group of psychologists discovered one is in vogue and one is not?
The problem here is willful ignorance and the denial of science.
No. Explain it. Just saying "ignorance and denial" is not an explanation. Explain why believing you are fat when you are actually emaciated is an acceptable mental illness, but believing you are a woman when you are actually a man is something we must accept and embrace.
I posted a number of scientific explanations for gender dysphoria, but you people ignored them for fear of learning something that challenges you bigotry . Not wasting my time anymore
"In George Orwell’s
1984, everyman Winston Smith is tortured and brainwashed into truly believing that 2+2=5. Orwell’s message was that an unfettered State would eventually maintain the population in such propaganda-induced fear of its power that people would deny objective reality.
Such was the power of the Party and doublethink – it weakened individual liberty. Conform or else. By instilling fear in its subjects, the State crushes the intellectual notion of objective reality.
So it goes with the Democrat’s passage of The Equality Act last week. The legislation adds “gender identity” to the list of protected classes under federal civil rights law.
“Gender identity” is that bizarre concept in which one must now be treated as whatever gender one wishes to be known as, regardless of what reality dictates. "
2+2=5 Under The Democrat’s Equality Act
