Woah. The fact that Israel has the right to defend itself doesn't mean that right is unlimited or unconditional - at least ethically. Israel shouldn't be expected to stand by and allow rockets to be flung inside it's borders, but does that mean Israel should nuke Gaza? (yes, that's an extreme example, but it's to make a point).
Wait, what? Who is making the claim that Israel's right to defend itself is unlimited and unconditional? Certainly not me. Who is making the claim that Israel should nuke Gaza? Certainly not me.
I didn't say you were or that anyone did - I was using it as an example to show that the right to defend isn't unlimited, ok? In fact, I specifically stated that. Can we agree on that?
Are we to judge and criticize Israel for things she has not done? Are we to judge and criticize Israel's citizens for things they do not, in fact, believe. Jeez. 'Cause that seems reasonable.
What? No one is judging or criticizing Israel for things she has not done. REREAD WHAT I WROTE.
You posted a poll which states that 1/2 and 4/5's of Palestinians and Gazans, respectively, believe it is desirable or acceptable to intentionally target and murder innocent civilian non-combatants. When I suggested that this was kinda scary and not-so-cool you went on to create a false equivalency, with absolutely no factual information to back it up, that Israelis ALSO believe it is desirable or acceptable to intentionally target and murder innocent civilian non-combatants.
Yes, I posted that poll, again for a reason. There are those claiming that there is
overwhelming support among Palestinians for knife attacks on civilians. What the poll shows is no, there isn't. There is a substantial divide, particularly between WB and Gaza which really should be viewed as seperate entities.
Take your statement:
Are we to judge and criticize Israel's citizens for things they do not, in fact, believe
and apply it to the Palestinians.
I'm calling bullshit. I'm calling bullshit on the facts and lack of evidence of facts to your claim. AND I'm calling bullshit on the motivations behind your claim to equivalency. There is an almost pathological need to make Israel out to be as bad or worse than the Palestinians and the Gazans. Its projection.
And I call bullshit on your claims.
You've argued that in order to be internally consistent, you need to apply the same standards to both sides,
but do you?
I agree with the culture argument, and the discussion on the right and wrong of expelling settlers in a future Palestinian state, but you dropped the ball there when it came to the Palestinians.
You ague that the settlers should not be lumped into one label, that they are in reality a fairly diverse group (and, in looking up articles, I agreed with that point) - but over and over
you refuse to apply that to the Palestinians.
You argue that there is no discrimination in Israel - when I point it out
with facts and sources, you run around Robin Hood's barn to try and insist that it's justified by adding special conditions for Israel, that the Beduoin citizens are "special cases". WHY? You then go on to make a dishonest claim that the argument I made was that Israel should supply infrastructure and funding etc to illegal non-citizen settlements when I was specifically talking about Arab Israeli CITIZENS. You seem to have your own pathological need here to
defend against any criticism of Israel no matter what it is. Why is Israel so special it can not be criticized without name calling and slurs against those who do? It is no different than any other country. There is plenty of criticism of Palestinians and it's justified, so why is Israel on a pedestal here that we can not even talk about inequities and injustices?
I make a real effort to supply sources to back my position with facts, as I see them. You may not agree, you may have disagreements with my sources - but I look for them and I post them and I post far more sources than you do. I take your questions seriously and I try to thoughtfully answer them.
How often do we hear about Palestinians celebrating death, Palestinians being full of hate, Palestinians passing out candy when a terrorist act happens, their text books are full of hatred and calls for violence, how often do we see the same recycled pictures of kids dressed as bombers etc etc in an effort to create such an overwelming narrative that the Palestinians are utterly marginalized. It's a powerful meme.
We hear about it a lot. And, according to the information you provided in your poll, the reason we hear about it a lot is that A LOT of Palestinians and Gazans believe it. A lot of Palestinians and an terrifyingly large portion of Gazans believe that its desirable to kill innocent Jewish civilians.
Its a morally corrupt and repugnant ideology.
Yes, it is, if that is truly what it is.
Have you ever questioned the popular pro-Israeli narratives?
I didn't until I started reading about Palestinian textbooks. After years of hearing that they are full of hate and incitement of violence, and assuming that was accurate, several studies showed that no, it wasn't really. They showed that Palestinian textbooks and Israeli textbooks were pretty similar in how the portrayed "the other", the conflict, and their own historical narratives to the exclusion of the other. It showed that books were more extreme among the more religious schools in Israel and Palestine.
So what is the truth?
And why should it not be questioned?
We are allowed to question pro-Palestinian claims without our motives being called into question. Why is it different with Israel?
I do not believe Israel, targets civilians, though I do think individual soldiers might do so (as in any army and conflict where "the other" is dehumanized, which is almost all conflicts). I think Israel makes a major effort to avoid doing so in a complicated situation like urban Gaza. But does that mean I should not call into question the use of white phosphorous in Operation Cast Lead?
Yet - when someone shows a picture of Israeli children writing on bombs that will then be shot into Gaza or Israeli families celebrating the bombing of Gaza - or Israeli children playing with guns and dressing as soldiers, it suddenly becomes a different situation. It's justified, excused, or unfailingly - someone yells "false moral equivalency", ...
Because, as I have already explained, the ideology is vastly different. Hugely different. Insanely, radically different. As demonstrated in the poll which you used to begin this thread.
You are projecting a false ideology onto the Israeli culture which does not exist. Again, there is a vast moral difference between wanting your children, and your nation and your culture to be protected and safe and defended and thinking its a good thing to go around stabbing Jews.
How false is it? Israel is a diverse nation when it comes to opinions. I agree that much of the Israeli culture abhors senseless killing and that is reflected in public opinion polls and serious cultural questioning. But there is a significant minority that doesn't consider Arab citizens to be people. There was an incident several years ago when an Arab Israeli or Palestinian youth was beaten severely, and politicians were questioning what was going on in their culture. Now granted -
I have not heard of Palestinians soul-searching their own culture in this manner, so I should look for that, perhaps they do - but I give kudos to Israel for soul searching when these things happen.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/w...d-in-attack-on-palestinians-in-jerusalem.html
JERUSALEM — Seven Israeli teenagers were in custody on Monday, accused of what a police official and several witnesses described as an attempted lynching of several Palestinian youths, laying bare the undercurrent of tension in this ethnically mixed but politically divided city. A 15-year-old suspect standing outside court said, “For my part he can die, he’s an Arab.”
The police said that scores of Jewish youths were involved in the attack late Thursday in West Jerusalem’s Zion Square, leaving one 17-year-old unconscious and hospitalized. Hundreds of bystanders watched the mob beating, the police said — and no one intervened.
Two of the suspects were girls, the youngest 13, adding to the soul-searching and acknowledgment that the poisoned political environment around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has affected the moral compass of youths growing up within it.
“If it was up to me, I’d have murdered him,” the 15-year-old suspect told reporters outside court on Monday. “He cursed my mother.” The young man who was beaten unconscious, Jamal Julani, remained in the hospital.
The mob beating came on the same day that a Palestinian taxi on the West Bank was firebombed, apparently by Jewish extremists, though there have been no arrests. The two episodes, along with a new report by the United States State Department labeling attacks by Jews on Palestinians as terrorism, have opened a stark national conversation about racism, violence, and how Israeli society could have come to this point.
“There appears to be a worryingly high level of tolerance — whether explicit or implicit — for such despicable acts of violence,” The Jerusalem Post editorialized on Monday. “A clear distinction must be made between legitimate acts of self-defense aimed at protecting Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, and pointless, immoral acts of violence.”
In the popular Yediot Aharonot newspaper, a commentator asked of the 13-year-old suspect, “Where on earth does a bar-mitzvah-age child find so much evil in himself?” The article said parents should be held responsible.
But on Channel 1 news Monday night, Nimrod Aloni, the head of the Institute for Educational Thought at a Tel Aviv teachers college, said, “this cannot just be an expression of something he has heard at home.”
I don't see a "vast moral difference" because you are making false comparisons.
What is the difference between wanting your children, and your nation, and your culture to be protected and safe and defended and wanting your children to HAVE a nation, a culture, and safety?
What is the difference between living with the constant threat of rockets and alarms and bomb shelters and living with the constant threat of seeing relatives shot, arrested without charges, check point inspections, closed roads, having your home demolished or your city bombed? Both must be hugely stressful to civilians whether or not you agree with the reasons those conditions exist.
There is a difference between celebrating with an uncaring attitude exempified in an atmosphere resembling a tailgate and accepting that what is being done, while horrible is absolutely necessary.
AND there is a difference between condoning the murder of innocents and accepting that what is to be done, while horrible and tragic, is necessary. THAT is the difference in ideology. Right there.
And you have no idea whatsoever how many of those watching condone the murder of innocents rather than just wanting their children to be safe.
And can you apply that bolded statement to Palestinians?
How can you separate the two, when you are having a party and watching it? You do not find that in the least grotesque?
Is there any difference then, between celebrating the bombing of Gaza and celebrating this
Female IDF Soldier Wounded in Palestinian Stabbing Attack in West Bank