Most Palestinians in West Bank Oppose Stabbing Attacks on Israelis

No. Only a fraction of them were. The rest were by other means.

Wrong

reread the article

Also I noticed you have posted pictures of people watching the bombing and you are arguing that those pictures represent an evil just as bad as the pictures you deleated claiming they were too horrid to meet forum rules.

( My bad by the way )

However this just goes to prove that in fact there is no equivalency to the two acts.

The one you are willing to allow on the forum

The other so grotesque it required its removal.

You just proved my point beautifully. Even if I did have to risk flouting forum rules

Let me be clear on something Boston. Posting graphic pictures - dead or bloody bodies (or porn) - has certain rules associated with it. A picture of Palestinians handing out candy in celebration of another murder or Israeli's picnicing in celebration of bombing Gaza - does not break that rule. If I posted pictures of bloody gory civilian casualties from the Gaza offensive - I would be breaking the rule. Capiche?






Yet these pictures are on this board for all to see, posted by members of team palestine

If morbid or graphic images are posted - dead bodies, etc. then you need to report it. Why haven't you?






Because it does no good, the poster just repeats the same posts time and time again under American laws.

I wonder why that is ?

IF THE POSTER REPEATS THE SAME FOCKING POSTS - ie graphic imagery or morbid imagery of dead bodies then report again and we will be stricter about that poster. REPORT IT. Do you understand? If you don't report, then don't complain.
 
There are a lot of low bars in this conflict. Witness Israeli's celebrating the bombing of Gaza with a picnic to watch the bombs. That's acceptable?
Gazabadian thugmen, getting their arses stomped, is a good enough cause for a celebratory meal, of course.
 
Again? Eh. I haven't seen any polls so I don't know.
It's understandable, of course, - lefties haven't faked anything on it, yet.
But celebrating watching bombs fall is a pretty low bar (not much different than passing out candy when a terrorist murders someone)
Yeah, with so much effort, being devoted to drag jews down to the palistanian level, we see that, jews are better than arabs, otherwise the relativismo moral wouldn't be necessary, of course.
 
Wrong

reread the article

Also I noticed you have posted pictures of people watching the bombing and you are arguing that those pictures represent an evil just as bad as the pictures you deleated claiming they were too horrid to meet forum rules.

( My bad by the way )

However this just goes to prove that in fact there is no equivalency to the two acts.

The one you are willing to allow on the forum

The other so grotesque it required its removal.

You just proved my point beautifully. Even if I did have to risk flouting forum rules

Let me be clear on something Boston. Posting graphic pictures - dead or bloody bodies (or porn) - has certain rules associated with it. A picture of Palestinians handing out candy in celebration of another murder or Israeli's picnicing in celebration of bombing Gaza - does not break that rule. If I posted pictures of bloody gory civilian casualties from the Gaza offensive - I would be breaking the rule. Capiche?






Yet these pictures are on this board for all to see, posted by members of team palestine

If morbid or graphic images are posted - dead bodies, etc. then you need to report it. Why haven't you?






Because it does no good, the poster just repeats the same posts time and time again under American laws.

I wonder why that is ?

IF THE POSTER REPEATS THE SAME FOCKING POSTS - ie graphic imagery or morbid imagery of dead bodies then report again and we will be stricter about that poster. REPORT IT. Do you understand? If you don't report, then don't complain.

People on this forum

Repeat themselves

Never
 
LOL no, read it again

Quote

Of 1,200 Palestinians above 18 questioned in face-to-face interviews, 69 percent said they still supported a two state solution, with 24.8 percent calling for a single state, but with full equality. The average age of respondents was 38, and the poll had a margin of error of three percent.

read more: Most Palestinians in West Bank oppose stabbing attacks on Israelis, new poll shows - Israel News

End Quote

A survey has found a sharp split between Gaza and the West Bank over the latest wave of violence with Israel, with 79 percent in Gaza backing the stabbing attacks on Israelis, compared to 54 percent of Palestinians in the West Bank who oppose them.

Right but the interviews were conducted face to face and lets get real, how many Arab Muslims are going to admit to an Israeli interviewer they approve of terrorist acts ?

My bet is only a fraction of those who actually feel that way






A bit like the poll taken in Europe that showed that 85% of muslims were in favour of terrorism to achieve Islamic ends and needs. But in face to face interviews the numbers dropped to 30% because they were asked on camera and did not want to be known to the authorities


If it's the poll I'm thinking of, your conclusion is deceptive. Can you link to it?






Cant find it now but this is interesting



Islamic Statistics on violence, rape, terror, sharia, isis, and welfare

Let me remind you that you are the one who constantly asks for reputable unbiased sources for claims.
 
I'm not going to reply to anything that is off-topic and there is a LOT of off-topic stuff here. Post it on the appropriate thread and I will respond as I have time.


Yes, I posted that poll, again for a reason. There are those claiming that there is overwhelming support among Palestinians for knife attacks on civilians. What the poll shows is no, there isn't.
...
Take your statement: Are we to judge and criticize Israel's citizens for things they do not, in fact, believe
and apply it to the Palestinians.

Your poll shows 1/2 of Palestinians and 4/5's of Gazans support knife attacks on civilians. Another poll shows that 2/3 of Palestinians support knife attacks on civilians. That adequately demonstrates what Palestinians believe and in my mind it is overwhelming support for attacks on civilians.


I do not believe Israel, targets civilians, though I do think individual soldiers might do so (as in any army and conflict where "the other" is dehumanized, which is almost all conflicts). I think Israel makes a major effort to avoid doing so in a complicated situation like urban Gaza.

And here you correct the false equivalency you attempted to build earlier. Israel does not target civilians and makes a "major effort" not to (one would assume because the vast majority of Israelis do not believe that targeting civilians is acceptable or desirable).

As opposed to Palestinians and Gazans who overwhelmingly support such attacks and carry them out and celebrate them. The difference, a marked one, is in the ideology of both sides.

I agree that much of the Israeli culture abhors senseless killing and that is reflected in public opinion polls and serious cultural questioning. But there is a significant minority that doesn't consider Arab citizens to be people. There was an incident several years ago when an Arab Israeli or Palestinian youth was beaten severely, and politicians were questioning what was going on in their culture. Now granted - I have not heard of Palestinians soul-searching their own culture in this manner, so I should look for that, perhaps they do - but I give kudos to Israel for soul searching when these things happen.

And again, thank you for correcting your own initial attempt at a false equivalency. I agree there is a minority in Israel who hold ideologies I find abhorrent. The point being that it is a small minority rather than 1/2 or 2/3 or 4/5's. And Israel and her citizens and the Jewish people in general regularly and publicly check in. Not equivalent.
What is the difference between wanting your children, and your nation, and your culture to be protected and safe and defended and wanting your children to HAVE a nation, a culture, and safety?

What is the difference between living with the constant threat of rockets and alarms and bomb shelters and living with the constant threat of seeing relatives shot, arrested without charges, check point inspections, closed roads, having your home demolished or your city bombed?

A few things come to mind (no particular order):

1. If you stopped doing morally reprehensible things, would you be safer?
2. If you stopped using violence would your children be safer?
3. If your children stopped stabbing innocent people, would they not be shot?
4. If you stopped planning terrorist attacks, would you not be arrested and imprisoned?
5. If you stopped sending suicide bombers, would you not have to suffer checkpoints?
6. If you stopped building illegal homes, would your home not be demolished?
7. If you stopped attacking Israel, would your city not be bombed?
8. If you stopped permitting rockets being set up next to your kid's school, would your kids be safer?

And you have no idea whatsoever how many of those watching condone the murder of innocents rather than just wanting their children to be safe
.

And can you apply that bolded statement to Palestinians?

I don't have to. You already kindly provided that information in the poll cited in the OP.
 
It's a fact because it's zero. You go to any Palestinian news source and find us one story of an attempted terrorist attacker thwarted by a Palestinian blowing the whistle.
Just one event. Just one.
And while you're at it, tell us how many thousands of missiles have been fired at Israeli civilians - a direct violation of the Geneva Conventions- from Palestinian civilian areas.

You made the claim, it's your job to prove it.

Note - I have never disputed the fact that rockets have been fired at Israeli civilians nor have I disputed Israel's right to defend itself.

My point is that it is obscene to celebrate with something like a picnic and binoculars, what is inevitably going to be causing the death and serious injury of thousands of civilians including children no matter how well calibrated. Is that truly something to celebrate and if so, how is it any different than the Paletinians celebrating slaughter? It's all grotesque.






And you link proves none of the above does it, as they are the words of another person. This is where we differ as you will believe everything that is bad about Israel, even after it has been proven false. I will check the evidence and make no claims until the evidence is all in.

In this case I note you forget to mention that the group was from Sderot that has faced the brunt of Palestinian terrorism over the years, so it is only to be expected they want to see justice done. Looking at the pictures I see less than 40 people sitting around looking to the distance.
Most as in this one are sombre and quiet

BsyQ9pUCIAMrIBb.jpg


Israelis gather on hillsides to watch and cheer as military drops bombs on Gaza

Bsi4-gNCUAACC-6.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg


2331149172.jpg

alalam_635407683158793260_25f_4x3.jpg



They look like they're having a good time to me.






You know your second picture down, what would you say if I told you it was a fake. You see the young man in the white shirt and black trousers, well he is a member of the British monarchy. Next to him as a British actor and lastly is another British celebrity. The lines for that part of the picture are blurred and out of focus, as if they have been altered at the pixel level.

On top of this you are adding 2 and 2 and being told the answer is 5 because this is what you want to see. The dialogue does not match the action

Prove it.





prince-william-prince-william-33458985-792-1222.jpg



Prince William

actor-leonard-rossiter-attending-a-black-tie-event-circa-1980-picture-id550414715



Leonard Rossiter.



Third man 's name eludes me
 
Yet you will not or can not condemn people celebrating the deaths of innocent people.

That is how one sided these arguments are.

You are not allowed to criticize Israel's behavior.

I'm sorry, what, exactly, is it that you want me to condemn that I have not already most strongly condemned? Shall I say it again?

Here goes:

IF ANY Israeli desires, condones, applauds, cheers, celebrates or otherwise approves of the deliberate targeting and murder of innocent civilian non-combatants I most loudly and firmly condemn that belief system. IF I EVER hear any Israeli or Jew suggest that the deliberate targeting and murder of innocent civilian non-combatants is in anyway desirable or acceptable I will most loudly and publicly condemn that belief system to their faces.

Are we clear?


Yes. You do not condemn the callous celebration of the bombing of Gaza - knowing civilians and children will be among those killed. I'm sorry but I just can not see what is a necessary but regrettable action as worthy of celebration. Celebrating it in such a manner, is nothing more than dehumanizing of the other. because the loss of life becomes entertainment.

I find that disturbing - no matter who it is. Whether it's Vietnam, or Gaza, or Israel. I think it encourages a sense that some lives are less than (civilians). Is that a good thing, or is it excusable because it's war? Does that mean it's ok for Palestinians to celebrate the bombings that target IDF but include massive civilian casualties? Why is celebrating death an excusable thing?

This is what was happening beneath the pretty fireworks (and no, I'm not going to post photos of dead bodies): GZA: A Burning Legacy - White Phosphorus in Gaza - Images | Warrick Page Photography






Are we going back to this again after it was proven to have been used legally and within the guides available at the time. How about you balance it with the reports on hamas sending people out to collect W.P. that was on the ground and to use it as part of the warheads in qassams aimed at Israeli children.

Remember you said google is your friend, well it is there on google that hamas used W.P. illegally after it was taken of the list of legal substances.

It's not my job to prove YOUR claims.








Hamas launches first phosphorus rocket at Negev; no injuries reported
 
A few things come to mind (no particular order):

1. If you stopped doing morally reprehensible things, would you be safer?
2. If you stopped using violence would your children be safer?
3. If your children stopped stabbing innocent people, would they not be shot?
4. If you stopped planning terrorist attacks, would you not be arrested and imprisoned?
5. If you stopped sending suicide bombers, would you not have to suffer checkpoints?
6. If you stopped building illegal homes, would your home not be demolished?
7. If you stopped attacking Israel, would your city not be bombed?
8. If you stopped permitting rockets being set up next to your kid's school, would your kids be safer?

I'm going to address this part on it's own.

#1 is too vague.
#2 would they? For example, would non-violence halt the settler violence since? Doubt it.
#3 agree
#4. people are arrested for many reasons, often they don't know what they are charged with when they are detained. Israel's treatment of (and abuse of) Palestinian minors under it's military justice system has been the discussion of other topics. So, imo opinon - no.
#5 agree
#6 technically true but unequally applied, so the choice is often overcrowding or illegal construction.
#7 true
#8 that is an assumption that they have any choice in "permitting".
 
You made the claim, it's your job to prove it.

Note - I have never disputed the fact that rockets have been fired at Israeli civilians nor have I disputed Israel's right to defend itself.

My point is that it is obscene to celebrate with something like a picnic and binoculars, what is inevitably going to be causing the death and serious injury of thousands of civilians including children no matter how well calibrated. Is that truly something to celebrate and if so, how is it any different than the Paletinians celebrating slaughter? It's all grotesque.






And you link proves none of the above does it, as they are the words of another person. This is where we differ as you will believe everything that is bad about Israel, even after it has been proven false. I will check the evidence and make no claims until the evidence is all in.

In this case I note you forget to mention that the group was from Sderot that has faced the brunt of Palestinian terrorism over the years, so it is only to be expected they want to see justice done. Looking at the pictures I see less than 40 people sitting around looking to the distance.
Most as in this one are sombre and quiet

BsyQ9pUCIAMrIBb.jpg


Israelis gather on hillsides to watch and cheer as military drops bombs on Gaza

Bsi4-gNCUAACC-6.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg


2331149172.jpg

alalam_635407683158793260_25f_4x3.jpg



They look like they're having a good time to me.






You know your second picture down, what would you say if I told you it was a fake. You see the young man in the white shirt and black trousers, well he is a member of the British monarchy. Next to him as a British actor and lastly is another British celebrity. The lines for that part of the picture are blurred and out of focus, as if they have been altered at the pixel level.

On top of this you are adding 2 and 2 and being told the answer is 5 because this is what you want to see. The dialogue does not match the action

Prove it.





prince-william-prince-william-33458985-792-1222.jpg



Prince William

actor-leonard-rossiter-attending-a-black-tie-event-circa-1980-picture-id550414715



Leonard Rossiter.



Third man 's name eludes me

That's quite a stretch to claim they are in the picture. Do you have a photo identifying them as those people? If not, no cigar.
 
Yet you will not or can not condemn people celebrating the deaths of innocent people.

That is how one sided these arguments are.

You are not allowed to criticize Israel's behavior.

I'm sorry, what, exactly, is it that you want me to condemn that I have not already most strongly condemned? Shall I say it again?

Here goes:

IF ANY Israeli desires, condones, applauds, cheers, celebrates or otherwise approves of the deliberate targeting and murder of innocent civilian non-combatants I most loudly and firmly condemn that belief system. IF I EVER hear any Israeli or Jew suggest that the deliberate targeting and murder of innocent civilian non-combatants is in anyway desirable or acceptable I will most loudly and publicly condemn that belief system to their faces.

Are we clear?


Yes. You do not condemn the callous celebration of the bombing of Gaza - knowing civilians and children will be among those killed. I'm sorry but I just can not see what is a necessary but regrettable action as worthy of celebration. Celebrating it in such a manner, is nothing more than dehumanizing of the other. because the loss of life becomes entertainment.

I find that disturbing - no matter who it is. Whether it's Vietnam, or Gaza, or Israel. I think it encourages a sense that some lives are less than (civilians). Is that a good thing, or is it excusable because it's war? Does that mean it's ok for Palestinians to celebrate the bombings that target IDF but include massive civilian casualties? Why is celebrating death an excusable thing?

This is what was happening beneath the pretty fireworks (and no, I'm not going to post photos of dead bodies): GZA: A Burning Legacy - White Phosphorus in Gaza - Images | Warrick Page Photography






Are we going back to this again after it was proven to have been used legally and within the guides available at the time. How about you balance it with the reports on hamas sending people out to collect W.P. that was on the ground and to use it as part of the warheads in qassams aimed at Israeli children.

Remember you said google is your friend, well it is there on google that hamas used W.P. illegally after it was taken of the list of legal substances.

It's not my job to prove YOUR claims.








Hamas launches first phosphorus rocket at Negev; no injuries reported

They should be absolutely condemned for it.

Do you condemn Israel's use of white phospherous?
 
I'm sorry, what, exactly, is it that you want me to condemn that I have not already most strongly condemned? Shall I say it again?

Here goes:

IF ANY Israeli desires, condones, applauds, cheers, celebrates or otherwise approves of the deliberate targeting and murder of innocent civilian non-combatants I most loudly and firmly condemn that belief system. IF I EVER hear any Israeli or Jew suggest that the deliberate targeting and murder of innocent civilian non-combatants is in anyway desirable or acceptable I will most loudly and publicly condemn that belief system to their faces.

Are we clear?


Yes. You do not condemn the callous celebration of the bombing of Gaza - knowing civilians and children will be among those killed. I'm sorry but I just can not see what is a necessary but regrettable action as worthy of celebration. Celebrating it in such a manner, is nothing more than dehumanizing of the other. because the loss of life becomes entertainment.

I find that disturbing - no matter who it is. Whether it's Vietnam, or Gaza, or Israel. I think it encourages a sense that some lives are less than (civilians). Is that a good thing, or is it excusable because it's war? Does that mean it's ok for Palestinians to celebrate the bombings that target IDF but include massive civilian casualties? Why is celebrating death an excusable thing?

This is what was happening beneath the pretty fireworks (and no, I'm not going to post photos of dead bodies): GZA: A Burning Legacy - White Phosphorus in Gaza - Images | Warrick Page Photography






Are we going back to this again after it was proven to have been used legally and within the guides available at the time. How about you balance it with the reports on hamas sending people out to collect W.P. that was on the ground and to use it as part of the warheads in qassams aimed at Israeli children.

Remember you said google is your friend, well it is there on google that hamas used W.P. illegally after it was taken of the list of legal substances.

It's not my job to prove YOUR claims.








Hamas launches first phosphorus rocket at Negev; no injuries reported

They should be absolutely condemned for it.

Do you condemn Israel's use of white phospherous?

White phosphorous shells are not even close to what a phosphorous rocket is.
A phosphorous rocket is designed to melt hardened targets.
A white phosphorus shell is a non lethal smoke bomb designed to mark a location or create a smoke screen.

Even the Red Cross says no problem.

Red Cross: Israel's use of white phosphorus not illegal - Democratic Underground

Now tell us what Palestinians have been arrested for direct violations of the Geneva Conventions for intentionally targeting civilians.

You have decades of history, tell us just one name. Just one. Uno.

But you can't, because Palestinians are all vermin.
 
Last edited:
Yes. You do not condemn the callous celebration of the bombing of Gaza - knowing civilians and children will be among those killed. I'm sorry but I just can not see what is a necessary but regrettable action as worthy of celebration. Celebrating it in such a manner, is nothing more than dehumanizing of the other. because the loss of life becomes entertainment.

I find that disturbing - no matter who it is. Whether it's Vietnam, or Gaza, or Israel. I think it encourages a sense that some lives are less than (civilians). Is that a good thing, or is it excusable because it's war? Does that mean it's ok for Palestinians to celebrate the bombings that target IDF but include massive civilian casualties? Why is celebrating death an excusable thing?

This is what was happening beneath the pretty fireworks (and no, I'm not going to post photos of dead bodies): GZA: A Burning Legacy - White Phosphorus in Gaza - Images | Warrick Page Photography






Are we going back to this again after it was proven to have been used legally and within the guides available at the time. How about you balance it with the reports on hamas sending people out to collect W.P. that was on the ground and to use it as part of the warheads in qassams aimed at Israeli children.

Remember you said google is your friend, well it is there on google that hamas used W.P. illegally after it was taken of the list of legal substances.

It's not my job to prove YOUR claims.








Hamas launches first phosphorus rocket at Negev; no injuries reported

They should be absolutely condemned for it.

Do you condemn Israel's use of white phospherous?

White phosphorous shells are not even close to what a phosphorous rocket is.
A phosphorous rocket is designed to melt hardened targets.
A white phosphorus shell is a non lethal smoke bomb designed to mark a location or create a smoke screen.

Even the Red Cross says no problem.

Red Cross: Israel's use of white phosphorus not illegal - Democratic Underground

Now tell us what Palestinians have been arrested for direct violations of the Geneva Conventions for intentionally targeting civilians.

You have decades of history, tell us just one name. Just one. Uno.

But you can't, because Palestinians are all vermin.


Umh...no. Red Cross did NOT say it was no problem. Only not illegal.

ICRC service

Does the use of weapons containing white phosphorous, in particular incendiary weapons, in a populated area give rise to any specific humanitarian concerns?

Yes. White phosphorous weapons spread burning phosphorous, which burns at over 800 degrees centi grade (about 1,500 degrees fahrenheit), over a wide area, up to several hundred square metres. The burning will continue until the phosphorous has been completely depleted or until it no longer is exposed to oxygen. The weapon has a potential to cause particularly horrific and painful injuries or slow painful death. Medical personnel must be specially trained to treat such injuries and may themselves be exposed to phosphorous burns. If used against military targets in or near populated areas, weapons containing this substance must be used with extreme caution to prevent civilian casualties.

It is contraindicated in urban areas, particularly when other materials that could do the job more safely, were available.

Israel: White Phosphorus Use Evidence of War Crimes

When used properly in open areas, white phosphorus munitions are not illegal, but the Human Rights Watch report concludes that the IDF repeatedly exploded it unlawfully over populated neighborhoods, killing and wounding civilians and damaging civilian structures, including a school, a market, a humanitarian aid warehouse, and a hospital.


Israel at first denied it was using white phosphorus in Gaza but, facing mounting evidence to the contrary, said that it was using all weapons in compliance with international law. Later it announced an internal investigation into possible improper white phosphorus use.

Have any Israeli's been arrested for violating the Geneva Conventions? International law? No.
 
White phospherous produces horrific injuries, and I'm not going to post photographs but you can google it. It's contraindicated for use in urban areas. Israel had alternatives it could have used. Dismissing it, laughing at it because it's just "Palestinian vermin" is disgusting. These are civilians. I don't see anyone jumping up and defending Hamas for firing a WP rocket but people sure jump to Israel's defense.
 
Yes. You do not condemn the callous celebration of the bombing of Gaza - knowing civilians and children will be among those killed. I'm sorry but I just can not see what is a necessary but regrettable action as worthy of celebration. Celebrating it in such a manner, is nothing more than dehumanizing of the other. because the loss of life becomes entertainment.

I find that disturbing - no matter who it is. Whether it's Vietnam, or Gaza, or Israel. I think it encourages a sense that some lives are less than (civilians). Is that a good thing, or is it excusable because it's war? Does that mean it's ok for Palestinians to celebrate the bombings that target IDF but include massive civilian casualties? Why is celebrating death an excusable thing?

This is what was happening beneath the pretty fireworks (and no, I'm not going to post photos of dead bodies): GZA: A Burning Legacy - White Phosphorus in Gaza - Images | Warrick Page Photography






Are we going back to this again after it was proven to have been used legally and within the guides available at the time. How about you balance it with the reports on hamas sending people out to collect W.P. that was on the ground and to use it as part of the warheads in qassams aimed at Israeli children.

Remember you said google is your friend, well it is there on google that hamas used W.P. illegally after it was taken of the list of legal substances.

It's not my job to prove YOUR claims.








Hamas launches first phosphorus rocket at Negev; no injuries reported

They should be absolutely condemned for it.

Do you condemn Israel's use of white phospherous?

White phosphorous shells are not even close to what a phosphorous rocket is.
A phosphorous rocket is designed to melt hardened targets.
A white phosphorus shell is a non lethal smoke bomb designed to mark a location or create a smoke screen.

Even the Red Cross says no problem.

Red Cross: Israel's use of white phosphorus not illegal - Democratic Underground

Now tell us what Palestinians have been arrested for direct violations of the Geneva Conventions for intentionally targeting civilians.

You have decades of history, tell us just one name. Just one. Uno.

But you can't, because Palestinians are all vermin.

White phosphorous is extremely lethal. There is no difference how it is delivered.

"These weapons are particularly nasty because white phosphorus continues to burn until it disappears. If service members are hit by pieces of white phosphorus, it could burn right down to the bone."

Prohibited under weapons convention

Though it can also be used to light up enemy positions, the munitions are also effective when used to firebomb opposing forces.

While the use of the material is not specifically banned, it is covered by Protocol III of the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons, which prohibits use of the substance as an incendiary weapon against civilian populations and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas."

White phosphorus 'burns to the bone'
 
According to HRW report:

  • Israel had safer alternatives available for smoke that they manufactured and that DOES NOT BURN.
  • If they didn't want those alternatives, they could have opted for ground-exploded white phosphorous, which creates a much more effective smokescreen than shells detonated in the air but they chose NOT employ it.
  • It is even questionable as to WHY the military deemed it necessary to create smokescreens since there were no Israeli troops on the ground in those areas at the time.


There were many ways it could have been effectively avoided and the mission accomplished. Why wasn't it and why would you defend the use of something so horrific to civilians caught up in the conflict when there are alternatives? It's like defending terrorism. It's not defensible.
 
Odd how our pro terrorists are arguing about white phosphorous when its been used by the terrorists right and left.

So whats your point anyway, That we've lost all semblance of the topic ?

Speaking of which I still think the method of questioning the Arab Muslims was flawed as a face to face interview isn't exactly conducive to a full disclosure of ones views; particularly in an atmosphere of so much distrust.
 
Odd how our pro terrorists are arguing about white phosphorous when its been used by the terrorists right and left.

So whats your point anyway, That we've lost all semblance of the topic ?

Speaking of which I still think the method of questioning the Arab Muslims was flawed as a face to face interview isn't exactly conducive to a full disclosure of ones views; particularly in an atmosphere of so much distrust.

Who here is supporting ANY white phosporous use?
 
Odd how our pro terrorists are arguing about white phosphorous when its been used by the terrorists right and left.

So whats your point anyway, That we've lost all semblance of the topic ?

Speaking of which I still think the method of questioning the Arab Muslims was flawed as a face to face interview isn't exactly conducive to a full disclosure of ones views; particularly in an atmosphere of so much distrust.

Who here is supporting ANY white phosporous use?

Apparently the ICRC which seems to be saying tis fine in flairs and smoke markers.
 
Back
Top Bottom