Mosque On Ground Zero. An Act Of Aggression: Yea Or Nay?

[Modbert]

That's great news Bert,you whipped her ass in wheel of fortune.

Now for the bad news. You don't have a sex life, well unless you count jerking off to the muppets.

The better question is why you talk about what kind of sex life I have on at least a weekly basis?

 

[Woyzeck]

Join Bert in attacking someone who actually does blame all Muslims. That isn't me , nor has it ever been. I merely suggest that the perception does not help their cause at all if they are truly wanting to build bridges.

Putting word's in Kevo Kennedy's mouth doesn't help the perception of you.

Not being able to read doesn't help yours. Notice the little punctuation that looks like an upside down fishhook , that is called a question mark and denotes that the sentence was asking a wait for it...................... QUESTION.

Clearly since we were talking about is this group tied into 9/11 when kevin makes a comment that no crime was committed the first thing someone is going to want clarified is "are you saying 9/11 wasn't a crime."

Thank you for playing.

That's going to be the first thing someone thinks if they weren't paying attention what Kevin was posting about at all. It's pretty clear he wasn't talking about 9/11 when he said there was no crime.

One more thing, there is no question mark in that phrase "So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime". So, hey, congrats you're full of shit for the billionth time this month. I'm sure you get some sort of small plastic trophy for that.

 

[Toro]

I think the building of the mosque at that site is representative of all things that are great about America.

 

[WillowTree]

That's not an answer Willow, and you should know it.

Are you seriously of the opinion that your fear of Muslims should trump the First Amendment and the freedoms of religion and assembly?

I asked the serious question why don't you answer it. IF you know that your enemy will destroy you using your constitution what would you do? I know, I know, you would bend over and kiss their ass and tell them thank YOU.

Once again, you're taking the affirmative and claiming you have no burden of proof.

What makes you think building this center is going to be using the Constitution to destroy us all?

And for the record, I made a few very detailed posts on exactly what you're asking me a few pages back. It's all on the record how I feel about perception vs. principle.

I am not going back over this entire insane thread. What I have gotten is the opposers oppose because of the proximity to 9-11 and the horrors of that day. The proponents say **** you, we are siding with the terrorist. That's all I need to know. So for libturds it is as usual. screw the Americans and let the terrorists rule the day. If they truly wanted peace and not terror they would be sensitive to what their brethren did that day and build elsewhere, but they are not and neither are you.

 

[Woyzeck]

I asked the serious question why don't you answer it. IF you know that your enemy will destroy you using your constitution what would you do? I know, I know, you would bend over and kiss their ass and tell them thank YOU.

Once again, you're taking the affirmative and claiming you have no burden of proof.

What makes you think building this center is going to be using the Constitution to destroy us all?

And for the record, I made a few very detailed posts on exactly what you're asking me a few pages back. It's all on the record how I feel about perception vs. principle.

I am not going back over this entire insane thread. What I have gotten is the opposers oppose because of the proximity to 9-11 and the horrors of that day. The proponents say **** you, we are siding with the terrorist. That's all I need to know. So for libturds it is as usual. screw the Americans and let the terrorists rule the day. If they truly wanted peace and not terror they would be sensitive to what their brethren did that day and build elsewhere, but they are not and neither are you.

So what proof do you have to offer that they're terrorists?

Is it the not liking the gay club going in next door to it?

 

[WillowTree]

Once again, you're taking the affirmative and claiming you have no burden of proof.

What makes you think building this center is going to be using the Constitution to destroy us all?

And for the record, I made a few very detailed posts on exactly what you're asking me a few pages back. It's all on the record how I feel about perception vs. principle.

I am not going back over this entire insane thread. What I have gotten is the opposers oppose because of the proximity to 9-11 and the horrors of that day. The proponents say **** you, we are siding with the terrorist. That's all I need to know. So for libturds it is as usual. screw the Americans and let the terrorists rule the day. If they truly wanted peace and not terror they would be sensitive to what their brethren did that day and build elsewhere, but they are not and neither are you.

So what proof do you have to offer that they're terrorists?

Is it the not liking the gay club going in next door to it?

Prove that they are not.

 

[ConHog]

That's great news Bert,you whipped her ass in wheel of fortune.

Now for the bad news. You don't have a sex life, well unless you count jerking off to the muppets.

The better question is why you talk about what kind of sex life I have on at least a weekly basis?

I don't talk about your sex life on a weekly basis, I talk about your lack of a sex life on a weekly basis.

The reason I do is simple. I think that once you get that cherry popped you will wake up from your little self delusion and join us in reality.

I'll throw in $20 for a hooker to help get you there.

 

[WillowTree]

That's great news Bert,you whipped her ass in wheel of fortune.

Now for the bad news. You don't have a sex life, well unless you count jerking off to the muppets.

The better question is why you talk about what kind of sex life I have on at least a weekly basis?

I don't talk about your sex life on a weekly basis, I talk about your lack of a sex life on a weekly basis.

The reason I do is simple. I think that once you get that cherry popped you will wake up from your little self delusion and join us in reality.

I'll throw in $20 for a hooker to help get you there.

He's too dumb to know the difference.

 

[Modbert]

I don't talk about your sex life on a weekly basis, I talk about your lack of a sex life on a weekly basis.

The reason I do is simple. I think that once you get that cherry popped you will wake up from your little self delusion and join us in reality.

I'll throw in $20 for a hooker to help get you there.

Huh uh. You've talked more about my dick in your 2 months here than I have in my 2 years on this board which is pretty much never. Question is why?

 

[bodecea]

I asked the serious question why don't you answer it. IF you know that your enemy will destroy you using your constitution what would you do? I know, I know, you would bend over and kiss their ass and tell them thank YOU.

Once again, you're taking the affirmative and claiming you have no burden of proof.

What makes you think building this center is going to be using the Constitution to destroy us all?

And for the record, I made a few very detailed posts on exactly what you're asking me a few pages back. It's all on the record how I feel about perception vs. principle.

I am not going back over this entire insane thread. What I have gotten is the opposers oppose because of the proximity to 9-11 and the horrors of that day. The proponents say **** you, we are siding with the terrorist. That's all I need to know. So for libturds it is as usual. screw the Americans and let the terrorists rule the day. If they truly wanted peace and not terror they would be sensitive to what their brethren did that day and build elsewhere, but they are not and neither are you.

You will need to explain how supporting property rights in this country turns into supporting the terrorist.


Give us the rundown on how that is.

 

[Woyzeck]

I am not going back over this entire insane thread. What I have gotten is the opposers oppose because of the proximity to 9-11 and the horrors of that day. The proponents say **** you, we are siding with the terrorist. That's all I need to know. So for libturds it is as usual. screw the Americans and let the terrorists rule the day. If they truly wanted peace and not terror they would be sensitive to what their brethren did that day and build elsewhere, but they are not and neither are you.

So what proof do you have to offer that they're terrorists?

Is it the not liking the gay club going in next door to it?

Prove that they are not.

Well, there's no evidence to indicate they participate in terrorist activities. If anyone involved had a history of terrorism, it probably would've come out by now.

But really, asking someone questioning you to disprove your assertion when you haven't even proved it is just lazy.

That's great news Bert,you whipped her ass in wheel of fortune.

Now for the bad news. You don't have a sex life, well unless you count jerking off to the muppets.

The better question is why you talk about what kind of sex life I have on at least a weekly basis?

I don't talk about your sex life on a weekly basis, I talk about your lack of a sex life on a weekly basis.

The reason I do is simple. I think that once you get that cherry popped you will wake up from your little self delusion and join us in reality.

I'll throw in $20 for a hooker to help get you there.

Your still talking about his sex life. And his young age compared to you an awful lot. Some might consider this odd fixation on those aspects of Moddie's life a bit weird.

 

[ConHog]

I don't talk about your sex life on a weekly basis, I talk about your lack of a sex life on a weekly basis.

The reason I do is simple. I think that once you get that cherry popped you will wake up from your little self delusion and join us in reality.

I'll throw in $20 for a hooker to help get you there.

Huh uh. You've talked more about my dick in your 2 months here than I have in my 2 years on this board which is pretty much never. Question is why?

You lying little sack of shit. Post a SINGLE ******* link to ANY post of mine in which I have mentioned your dick, other than multiple requests from me towards you to prove I have talked about your dick. It's never happened.

******* little lair bertturd

 

[WillowTree]

I don't talk about your sex life on a weekly basis, I talk about your lack of a sex life on a weekly basis.

The reason I do is simple. I think that once you get that cherry popped you will wake up from your little self delusion and join us in reality.

I'll throw in $20 for a hooker to help get you there.

Huh uh. You've talked more about my dick in your 2 months here than I have in my 2 years on this board which is pretty much never. Question is why?

you don't have a dick and everyone knows it.

 

[goldcatt]

I asked the serious question why don't you answer it. IF you know that your enemy will destroy you using your constitution what would you do? I know, I know, you would bend over and kiss their ass and tell them thank YOU.

Once again, you're taking the affirmative and claiming you have no burden of proof.

What makes you think building this center is going to be using the Constitution to destroy us all?

And for the record, I made a few very detailed posts on exactly what you're asking me a few pages back. It's all on the record how I feel about perception vs. principle.

I am not going back over this entire insane thread. What I have gotten is the opposers oppose because of the proximity to 9-11 and the horrors of that day. The proponents say **** you, we are siding with the terrorist. That's all I need to know. So for libturds it is as usual. screw the Americans and let the terrorists rule the day. If they truly wanted peace and not terror they would be sensitive to what their brethren did that day and build elsewhere, but they are not and neither are you.

If you'd read what I wrote you'd know why I say you have some ******* nerve making those accusations, Willow.

But since you won't, and I've already put it out there once and am not about to do it again because you're either too damn lazy to read a thread you're replying to or are too afraid you might have to actually engage in a debate instead of throwing hack bombs, I'll just shake my head and sigh.

Carry on!

 

[ConHog]

So what proof do you have to offer that they're terrorists?

Is it the not liking the gay club going in next door to it?

Prove that they are not.

Well, there's no evidence to indicate they participate in terrorist activities. If anyone involved had a history of terrorism, it probably would've come out by now.

But really, asking someone questioning you to disprove your assertion when you haven't even proved it is just lazy.

The better question is why you talk about what kind of sex life I have on at least a weekly basis?

I don't talk about your sex life on a weekly basis, I talk about your lack of a sex life on a weekly basis.

The reason I do is simple. I think that once you get that cherry popped you will wake up from your little self delusion and join us in reality.

I'll throw in $20 for a hooker to help get you there.

Your still talking about his sex life. And his young age compared to you an awful lot. Some might consider this odd fixation on those aspects of Moddie's life a bit weird.

Some might, others might just consider it to be internet ball busting. Decide for yourself which one you think it is ,and we'll go from there.

 

[Modbert]

You lying little sack of shit. Post a SINGLE ******* link to ANY post of mine in which I have mentioned your dick, other than multiple requests from me towards you to prove I have talked about your dick. It's never happened.

******* little lair bertturd

Gee ConHog, you just told me I jerk it to the muppets. While in the same post that you talk about my sex life. Pretty sure that qualifies.

From a guy who's all over Yurt for talking about Mani's, you sure seem to be mentioning mine one way or another or my sex life on here often enough.

 

[WillowTree]

Once again, you're taking the affirmative and claiming you have no burden of proof.

What makes you think building this center is going to be using the Constitution to destroy us all?

And for the record, I made a few very detailed posts on exactly what you're asking me a few pages back. It's all on the record how I feel about perception vs. principle.

I am not going back over this entire insane thread. What I have gotten is the opposers oppose because of the proximity to 9-11 and the horrors of that day. The proponents say **** you, we are siding with the terrorist. That's all I need to know. So for libturds it is as usual. screw the Americans and let the terrorists rule the day. If they truly wanted peace and not terror they would be sensitive to what their brethren did that day and build elsewhere, but they are not and neither are you.

If you'd read what I wrote you'd know why I say you have some ******* nerve making those accusations, Willow.

But since you won't, and I've already put it out there once and am not about to do it again because you're either too damn lazy to read a thread you're replying to or are too afraid you might have to actually engage in a debate instead of throwing hack bombs, I'll just shake my head and sigh.

Carry on!

all you have to do is prove me wrong but you cannot or will not, in either case Kerry ON.

 

[WillowTree]

You lying little sack of shit. Post a SINGLE ******* link to ANY post of mine in which I have mentioned your dick, other than multiple requests from me towards you to prove I have talked about your dick. It's never happened.

******* little lair bertturd

Gee ConHog, you just told me I jerk it to the muppets. While in the same post that you talk about my sex life. Pretty sure that qualifies.

From a guy who's all over Yurt for talking about Mani's, you sure same to be mentioning mine one way or another or my sex life on here often enough.

what are you whining about you little dishonest pissant? you talk about whatever pleasures you, why so ******* dishonest?? oh! I see,, ya needs ya some cheese.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Can you post a vdieo, or audio, or written testimony of any Americans who cheered over the deaths of women and children in Iraq?

If not, you fail. Again.

I could if the archives of some forums were around from 2003.

But, oh, you're right, I forgot, the revised version of Conservatopian history is that no conservatives supported the Iraq war.

I did not say anything about supporting the war. DO try to be honest here. You contended that some Americans cheered the deaths of women and children, the onus is on you to prove your point. I can surely show you video of Muslims cheering the killing of completely innocent people on 9/11/2001.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTYoV-_GlNs]YouTube - ‪Palestinians Celebrate 9/11 Attacks‬‎[/ame]

Didn't we just give the Palestinians another $500 Million in American Tax Payer cash? So steal from hard working American Tax Payers and then give it to these cretins? What a silly & bizarre f*cking Foreign Policy. Have they even thanked us for that $500 Million yet? Probably not. How sad.

 

[Avatar4321]

I don't see how building a building is an act of aggression. Especially when our nation was Founded on the principle of religious freedom.

It's not about religion. Would you let Japan build a shrine in Hawaii?

A religious shrine? Why not?