Mosque On Ground Zero. An Act Of Aggression: Yea Or Nay?

I don't see how building a building is an act of aggression. Especially when our nation was Founded on the principle of religious freedom.

It's not about religion. Would you let Japan build a shrine in Hawaii?

A religious shrine? Why not?

This is a flawed analogy.

A) Pearl Harbor was a military action confined to a military target. Sure it was a sneak attack, but it was on a legitimate military target by uniformed soldiers. 9/11 of course was a cowardly attack on civilians by a bunch of pussies.

B) Shinto does not have a twenty century history of building a religious structure on a site of victory.
 
It's not about religion. Would you let Japan build a shrine in Hawaii?

A religious shrine? Why not?

This is a flawed analogy.

A) Pearl Harbor was a military action confined to a military target. Sure it was a sneak attack, but it was on a legitimate military target by uniformed soldiers. 9/11 of course was a cowardly attack on civilians by a bunch of pussies.

B) Shinto does not have a twenty century history of building a religious structure on a site of victory.

you are of course correct, the muslim terrorists are just like the kkk they hide behind their despicable covered faces. cowards.
 
A religious shrine? Why not?

This is a flawed analogy.

A) Pearl Harbor was a military action confined to a military target. Sure it was a sneak attack, but it was on a legitimate military target by uniformed soldiers. 9/11 of course was a cowardly attack on civilians by a bunch of pussies.

B) Shinto does not have a twenty century history of building a religious structure on a site of victory.

you are of course correct, the muslim terrorists are just like the kkk they hide behind their despicable covered faces. cowards.

Muslim terrorists are like the KKK....so the KKK is like Muslim Terrorists.
 
This is a flawed analogy.

A) Pearl Harbor was a military action confined to a military target. Sure it was a sneak attack, but it was on a legitimate military target by uniformed soldiers. 9/11 of course was a cowardly attack on civilians by a bunch of pussies.

B) Shinto does not have a twenty century history of building a religious structure on a site of victory.

you are of course correct, the muslim terrorists are just like the kkk they hide behind their despicable covered faces. cowards.

Muslim terrorists are like the KKK....so the KKK is like Muslim Terrorists.

Agreed 100% and I would find it highly offensive if the KKK wanted to hang a giant "die ******" sign outside on of their buildings. They would be perfectly within their rights of course, and the truth is that there are probably very damned few KKK members around today that have actually committed any acts of violence on blacks, but the perception is there and I would highly frown upon their actions.

I don't doubt for one second that you would also.
 
A religious shrine? Why not?

This is a flawed analogy.

A) Pearl Harbor was a military action confined to a military target. Sure it was a sneak attack, but it was on a legitimate military target by uniformed soldiers. 9/11 of course was a cowardly attack on civilians by a bunch of pussies.

B) Shinto does not have a twenty century history of building a religious structure on a site of victory.

you are of course correct, the muslim terrorists are just like the kkk they hide behind their despicable covered faces. cowards.

Police say man wearing burqa robs Md. bank
(AP) – 5 hours ago
SILVER SPRING, Md. — Montgomery County police said a man wearing a burqa robbed a bank in Silver Spring. Police said the man who robbed a TD Bank branch on Briggs Chaney Road about 4:20 p.m. Tuesday was wearing a "long black burqa over his face." He also wore jeans and tan boots.
Authorities said the man showed a gun and demanded money. He took an undetermined amount of money and fled.
Police said the man spoke with what they described as "a Middle Eastern accent." They say a silver car, possibly a Chevrolet, was seen leaving the scene.
The FBI also is helping with the investigation.
 
This is a flawed analogy.

A) Pearl Harbor was a military action confined to a military target. Sure it was a sneak attack, but it was on a legitimate military target by uniformed soldiers. 9/11 of course was a cowardly attack on civilians by a bunch of pussies.

B) Shinto does not have a twenty century history of building a religious structure on a site of victory.

you are of course correct, the muslim terrorists are just like the kkk they hide behind their despicable covered faces. cowards.

Muslim terrorists are like the KKK....so the KKK is like Muslim Terrorists.

and your answer would be?
 
You lying little sack of shit. Post a SINGLE ******* link to ANY post of mine in which I have mentioned your dick, other than multiple requests from me towards you to prove I have talked about your dick. It's never happened.

******* little lair bertturd

Gee ConHog, you just told me I jerk it to the muppets. While in the same post that you talk about my sex life. Pretty sure that qualifies.

From a guy who's all over Yurt for talking about Mani's, you sure seem to be mentioning mine one way or another or my sex life on here often enough.

For all I know you jerk your clit dumbshit. And besides that when a man says another man is talking bout his cock, that is usually an oblique reference to that guy being gay. Posting about you jerking off is not talking about your cock, let alone making gay comments about your cock.

now go blow yourself.
 
This is more of a civil type case than a criminal case, innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply. It's more like innocent until I suspect not.

Actually it's not a case at all, since there's been no crime.

So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!

That's not what I contend at all. I do contend that the Muslims building this mosque are not responsible for 9/11, however.
 
Actually it's not a case at all, since there's been no crime.

So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!

That's not what I contend at all. I do contend that the Muslims building this mosque are not responsible for 9/11, however.

9/11 was a crime. A war crime. It was an act of war and a violation of International Law. Period.
 
15th post
Actually it's not a case at all, since there's been no crime.

So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!

That's not what I contend at all. I do contend that the Muslims building this mosque are not responsible for 9/11, however.

Thank you for the clarification, and I do NOT contend that the Muslims building this mosque are responsible for 9/11. I do however contend that they are being beyond insensitive by talking about building this mosque in light of the fact that 80% of Americans find it offensive.
 
This is a flawed analogy.

A) Pearl Harbor was a military action confined to a military target. Sure it was a sneak attack, but it was on a legitimate military target by uniformed soldiers. 9/11 of course was a cowardly attack on civilians by a bunch of pussies.

B) Shinto does not have a twenty century history of building a religious structure on a site of victory.

you are of course correct, the muslim terrorists are just like the kkk they hide behind their despicable covered faces. cowards.

Police say man wearing burqa robs Md. bank
(AP) – 5 hours ago
SILVER SPRING, Md. — Montgomery County police said a man wearing a burqa robbed a bank in Silver Spring. Police said the man who robbed a TD Bank branch on Briggs Chaney Road about 4:20 p.m. Tuesday was wearing a "long black burqa over his face." He also wore jeans and tan boots.
Authorities said the man showed a gun and demanded money. He took an undetermined amount of money and fled.
Police said the man spoke with what they described as "a Middle Eastern accent." They say a silver car, possibly a Chevrolet, was seen leaving the scene.
The FBI also is helping with the investigation.

Is this the world's first reported case of a Muslim cross dresser? Bet that son of a ***** gets stoned to death.
 
So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!

That's not what I contend at all. I do contend that the Muslims building this mosque are not responsible for 9/11, however.

Thank you for the clarification, and I do NOT contend that the Muslims building this mosque are responsible for 9/11. I do however contend that they are being beyond insensitive by talking about building this mosque in light of the fact that 80% of Americans find it offensive.

I know you don't, though it would seem WillowTree does.

As for 80% of Americans finding this offensive, that says more about them than it does those who are building it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom