Mosque On Ground Zero. An Act Of Aggression: Yea Or Nay?

Willow wants someone to prove a negative, silly Willow! I guess she hasn't heard about the whole "Innocent, before proven guilty" philosophy we have in this country. :eusa_whistle:
 
This was the question.[/B]

Bumped and bolded for Willow.

I answered that. I asked him to prove they weren't. last I checked we were at impasse' course I have three thousand reasons to say I probably would not trust their good intentions towards America, it just seems very suspicious that they chose "THAT" particular place for their shrine of tolerance.. just call me cynical.

That's not an answer Willow, and you should know it.

Are you seriously of the opinion that your fear of Muslims should trump the First Amendment and the freedoms of religion and assembly?
 
Willow wants someone to prove a negative, silly Willow! I guess she hasn't heard about the whole "Innocent, before proven guilty" philosophy we have in this country. :eusa_whistle:

piss off boy If I have to prove they are behind it then you can prove they are not.
 
I believe in the old adage of "innocent until proven guilty." I also try not to accuse people of something that I have no evidence of.

This is more of a civil type case than a criminal case, innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply. It's more like innocent until I suspect not.

Actually it's not a case at all, since there's been no crime.

So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!
 
Bumped and bolded for Willow.

I answered that. I asked him to prove they weren't. last I checked we were at impasse' course I have three thousand reasons to say I probably would not trust their good intentions towards America, it just seems very suspicious that they chose "THAT" particular place for their shrine of tolerance.. just call me cynical.

That's not an answer Willow, and you should know it.

Are you seriously of the opinion that your fear of Muslims should trump the First Amendment and the freedoms of religion and assembly?

I asked the serious question why don't you answer it. IF you know that your enemy will destroy you using your constitution what would you do? I know, I know, you would bend over and kiss their ass and tell them thank YOU.
 
I answered that. I asked him to prove they weren't. last I checked we were at impasse' course I have three thousand reasons to say I probably would not trust their good intentions towards America, it just seems very suspicious that they chose "THAT" particular place for their shrine of tolerance.. just call me cynical.

That's not an answer Willow, and you should know it.

Are you seriously of the opinion that your fear of Muslims should trump the First Amendment and the freedoms of religion and assembly?

I asked the serious question why don't you answer it. IF you know that your enemy will destroy you using your constitution what would you do? I know, I know, you would bend over and kiss their ass and tell them thank YOU.

Once again, you're taking the affirmative and claiming you have no burden of proof.

What makes you think building this center is going to be using the Constitution to destroy us all?

And for the record, I made a few very detailed posts on exactly what you're asking me a few pages back. It's all on the record how I feel about perception vs. principle.
 
don't pity me boy, you won't find me kissing my enemies ass and bowing in supplication to them in the hopes they will love me.. you libturds are just pathetic peices of piss poor protoplasam. that is all.

Oh Oh! Look at the time! Time to watch Wheel of Fortune Willow. I'll be right over for our weekly game of seeing who can get the puzzles first. :cool:

How will you squeeze that in when Sesame Street is on BabyTV right now?
 
This is more of a civil type case than a criminal case, innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply. It's more like innocent until I suspect not.

Actually it's not a case at all, since there's been no crime.

So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!

If you're really going to hold all Muslims accountable for the actions of a few, I can hardly see how you can respect any religion at all. Or any large group of people with a belief, nationality or culture in common. You must be one hell of a misanthrope.
 
Actually it's not a case at all, since there's been no crime.

So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!

If you're really going to hold all Muslims accountable for the actions of a few, I can hardly see how you can respect any religion at all. Or any large group of people with a belief, nationality or culture in common. You must be one hell of a misanthrope.

Join Bert in attacking someone who actually does blame all Muslims. That isn't me , nor has it ever been. I merely suggest that the perception does not help their cause at all if they are truly wanting to build bridges.
 
Hit the road Jack lyrics! Go me!

Figured it out, 2-0.
 
15th post
So now you contend that 9/11 wasn't a crime. How special.

BUT for record, not all cases are about crimes, hence civil court. DOH!!!

If you're really going to hold all Muslims accountable for the actions of a few, I can hardly see how you can respect any religion at all. Or any large group of people with a belief, nationality or culture in common. You must be one hell of a misanthrope.

Join Bert in attacking someone who actually does blame all Muslims. That isn't me , nor has it ever been. I merely suggest that the perception does not help their cause at all if they are truly wanting to build bridges.

Putting word's in Kevo Kennedy's mouth doesn't help the perception of you.
 
If you're really going to hold all Muslims accountable for the actions of a few, I can hardly see how you can respect any religion at all. Or any large group of people with a belief, nationality or culture in common. You must be one hell of a misanthrope.

Join Bert in attacking someone who actually does blame all Muslims. That isn't me , nor has it ever been. I merely suggest that the perception does not help their cause at all if they are truly wanting to build bridges.

Putting word's in Kevo Kennedy's mouth doesn't help the perception of you.

Not being able to read doesn't help yours. Notice the little punctuation that looks like an upside down fishhook , that is called a question mark and denotes that the sentence was asking a wait for it...................... QUESTION.

Clearly since we were talking about is this group tied into 9/11 when kevin makes a comment that no crime was committed the first thing someone is going to want clarified is "are you saying 9/11 wasn't a crime."

Thank you for playing.
 
A Hearty Appetite!

Edit: Woo, 3-0 Willow. Great try tonight though as always!
 
A Hearty Appetite!

Edit: Woo, 3-0 Willow. Great try tonight though as always!

That's great news Bert,you whipped her ass in wheel of fortune.

Now for the bad news. You don't have a sex life, well unless you count jerking off to the muppets.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom