Going back for a second:
From where do you get the power you use for that TV. I know it can`t be wind or solar because in your previous posts it was clear you have no clue what`s involved in either.
You have little info about my life but you sure seem to know anyway. Your assumptions that I own a car or at least drive regularly is simply false. But you aren't concerned about what really goes on, your concerned about how you can throw mud and name call. Sounds like you also have a real egocentric problem.
But that misses the point: I don't deny I use modern technology to live like a stove. But what makes you think I'm demanding humanity be 100% green or nothing? Clearly you cannot conceive of reasonable action towards restoring the environment. To you AGW means one thing: lunacy. In the same vein, change is also lunacy. Then its no wonder it's all or nothing.
I encourage re-evaluation for how humanity approaches life, as all AGW advocates. This includes thinking about resources extraction to human consumption and waste. Undeniably humanity has degraded the environment through simply living. So if mere living brings about environmental problems that in turn hinder human survival, we need to re-think our efforts. This is not a demand to halt all human activity just so we appease the lunatic dichotomy you have set forth: either do not harm or **** it, business as usual till we collapse the global economy by bringing about repeated environmental disasters.
just a while ago you criticized me for eating in a restaurant...
Never said that. I think you should eat what you like but I'd hope you'd have reasonable limits--like not eating $100 entrées for every meal or eating a very rare fish every night.
You're whole game is to piss people off and to make unfounded assertions about their personality. It's pretty sad what you take away from
that post was I thought you shouldn't eat out peroid.
You basically said: "I will do what I want including drive my car and eat." There is nothing inherently wrong with this. Where I criticized it was you used it like a good reason to ignore environmental concerns. That fact you can do something is not a good indicator to its value, just because I can ejaculate on a woman in public is not a good indication its appropriate or healthy. But just for the record, I'm glad you have the money to eat out. Currently I don't eat out for the simple fact I am saving as much money as possible...but would I eat out if I really wanted to? Yes. Have I? Double Yes. Maybe you could take me out sometime...since you hope I'm effeminate, maybe I could dress up like your date!
while you heaped praise on yourself that you don`t
I'll just wait here for you to show me where I praised myself for not eating out... quoting made up stuff imaginative interpretation doesn't count...
Right...that`s what all the school dropouts and losers prefer to do.
Although I have 2 baccalaureates with a 3.6 overall GPA I'll play devils advocate: Hell yes Ima dropout and lazy MFer. Why would you do something rather than nothing? Doing nothing is the easy route and I take it every day. JOKING!
Sounds like you ought to be familiar with this concept given your denial of our impact on the planet. Doing nothing is the cheapest easiest way to address environmental degradation from hog lagoons to melting ice to climate change.
The real problem is you are repulsed by our existence because you operate based on hate and division. I do not share this view and have mildly poked fun in jest only. Nothing serious but you however go into a spill about the psychology of egocentricity and calling everyone fags. You sound pretty dedicated to undermining the credibility of your opponents and want nothing to do with above-board thought.
Even if everyone is a ***, it doesn't undermine the fact humans are damaging our environment faster than it can restore itself.
Since you obviously are not egocentric you must be the most altruistic person alive. Oh? You're admitting you have egocentric problems too? Oh, no, that must have been the wind and my imagination. You'd never admit you are very demanding or your ego is larger than you: the first sign of ego is denying an ego. I admit I have an ego but its not an ego that denies its own existence in order to retain power. That is an American grade ego that takes high octane ignorance and hate in order to thrive.
So why don`t you join some primitive tribe in the Amazon jungle.
I know because you KNOW what's best for me and that's not egocentric on your part.
By the way my attention span is just fine and I recall somebody who said the exact same thing you just said,...and also said that he lives off his "45 acre pristine back-yard" with his "partner"...and posted exactly the same garbage you are.
So now you (and your *** "partner"?) are back here again with a brand new user name posting the same garbage as before over and over again.
Haven't heard of it but you must be right. Despite your speculation and paranoia, I assure you they have medication for that--there's no need to fear. But since you fear loosing and express such conspiracies, and I'd think your ego did some gymnastics there in order to stabilize the threat to your superiority.
All the "effeminate" this, "***" that, "looser" this and "stupid" that surely have no connection to your ego. Certainly name calling has nothing to do with an ego that's out of control and feels threatened. No, you prefer hate and anger--it's your game.
If I had not better things to do I`ld dig it up and stick it back into your face.
That sounds like someone who NEEDS to be right all the time. And we all know that ain't egocentric.
By the way, next time you walk to town, get yourself some "petroleum lifestyle" meds and calm down, so that you don`t get confused how to spell simple words like "pertroluem" when you have your next tantrum.
I know misspelling petroleum is a huge crux in your argument so I'll let it stand. JOKING! But you know so much about me, I wish you were my doctor. I wasn't aware I had a "tantrum."
Clearly I need your brand of anger to calm me down.
