Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Even after I was convicted and sentenced I was allowed to remain on bail while waiting for a bed to open up in the prison. AT 16 YEARS OLD.Oh Really?
If faced with the certainty of spending his remaining years in prison you think he would simply acquiesce?
Why?
I have no idea how that answers the question.Even after I was convicted and sentenced I was allowed to remain on bail while waiting for a bed to open up in the prison. AT 16 YEARS OLD.
Wouldn't someone like me be a natural flight risk?
It appears you have absolutely zero knowledge of how our courts work or the judicial system in general.
Also bond conditions can be REVOKED OR MODIFIED AT ANY TIME if the court sees potential problems or risks.
Had Hunter been treated differently, more harshly, THEN there would be a case to be made for a double standard. As it is he was charged for a gun application offense that rarely results in charges for anyone else.Same with Hunter. He paid the taxes, so we’re left with the paperwork issue of not filing. Also, he lied on a gun permit application, another paperwork issue. However, neither instance rises to the level of criminality seen in the Trump documents case.
HIS EGOI have no idea how that answers the question.
What makes you think that Trump facing prison for the rest of his life wouldn't flee to ...say...Russia?
Also not surprised that you were in prison
His ego would keep him from fleeing?HIS EGO
And of course you're not surprised. I've referenced it many times over the years.
All of those people in prison or are felons feel the same way. We keep testing how much loyalty we are supposed to have for this nation. Are people supposed to die defending this? This man is a walking, talking felon prison term from all of the photographs, videos and audios alone. His worth is estimated at a couple of hundred million supposedly. So, if this is the movie History of the World...Joe would say...It's good to be the king. Hunter is the Prince in waiting. What a corrupted family. And what is worse, a corrupted and ought for central government with its security departments in control of extremists or something hideous.huh?
explain??
Hunter is getting probation for some misdemeanors, which is standard operating procedure. Hunter got no special treatment at all, whereas Trump is getting all the special treatment.
Everything you post is a total joke, with no credibility at all.
Dude, seriously? Can you hear yourself?What a corrupted family.
thehill.com
All of those people in prison or are felons feel the same way. We keep testing how much loyalty we are supposed to have for this nation. Are people supposed to die defending this? This man is a walking, talking felon prison term from all of the photographs, videos and audios alone. His worth is estimated at a couple of hundred million supposedly. So, if this is the movie History of the World...Joe would say...It's good to be the king. Hunter is the Prince in waiting. What a corrupted family. And what is worse, a corrupted and ought for central government with its security departments in control of extremists or something hideous.
AHAHAHAHAH !All of those people in prison or are felons feel the same way. We keep testing how much loyalty we are supposed to have for this nation. Are people supposed to die defending this? This man is a walking, talking felon prison term from all of the photographs, videos and audios alone. His worth is estimated at a couple of hundred million supposedly. So, if this is the movie History of the World...Joe would say...It's good to be the king. Hunter is the Prince in waiting. What a corrupted family. And what is worse, a corrupted and ought for central government with its security departments in control of extremists or something hideous.
A rich white guy get preferential treatment, how shocking! I posted the same line yesterday over Biden’s sweet plea deal. Let us know when you have a real story, rich white guys getting a break is not news.Jonathan Goodman, the magistrate judge assigned to handle Donald J. Trump’s arraignment, did something of a double take during the proceeding on Tuesday, when the Justice Department offered the former president a bond deal that was not merely lenient but imposed virtually no restrictions on him at all. Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the prosecution for the department, opted not to request conditions routinely imposed on other defendants seeking to be released from custody, like cash bail, limits on domestic travel or turning in his passport.
But Judge Goodman, tasked with hashing out a bond agreement during a one-day cameo appearance on the case, was not entirely on board. He suggested that Mr. Trump be compelled to “avoid all contact with co-defendants, victims and witnesses except through counsel.” Mr. Smith’s deputy, David Harbach, joined Mr. Trump’s lawyers in opposing that idea — but the judge imposed a version of it anyway.
Mr. Smith’s decision not to demand any conditions at the arraignment, people familiar with the situation said, reflected a belief that prosecutors should avoid impairing Mr. Trump’s ability to campaign.
In Trump Prosecution, Special Counsel Seeks to Avoid Distracting Fights
A Washington Post investigation found that more than a year would pass before prosecutors and FBI agents jointly embarked on a formal probe of actions directed from the White House to try to steal the election. Even then, the FBI stopped short of identifying the former president as a focus of that investigation.
A wariness about appearing partisan, institutional caution, and clashes over how much evidence was sufficient to investigate the actions of Trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace. Garland and the deputy attorney general, Lisa Monaco, charted a cautious course aimed at restoring public trust in the department while some prosecutors below them chafed, feeling top officials were shying away from looking at evidence of potential crimes by Trump and those close to him, The Post found.
Not to mention the multiple opportunities the Orange Menace was afforded to return the classified docs he stole. As well as the assignment of a judge to his case with a history of bending if not breaking the law to aid his defense.
Far from being persecuted, Trump left the DoJ no choice but to investigate and eventually indict him. To not do so would have been a dereliction of Garland's duty to the country. Because Trump's actions involve a compromise of the nation's security and an existential threat to the core of our democracy. But most of all because they involve violations of law.
It doesn’t matter, we see this everywhere, rich and white you get better treatment, look it up on the internet, surprised you didn’t know that. Do you need examples of this? Biden, Baldwin, are just two but we could go on. Ask the poor black guy in prison for marijuana possession.You understand The Following thinks he's getting the shaft, right? Try to keep up.
Smith is no liberal , moronLet's not forget that smith is a liberal hack who was excoriated by the SC over the bob mcdonnel case. Smiths entire case was thrown out.
When the Democrat-run prosecution has a very weak case but desperately wants to pin something on someone, they offer a passive plea deal with the hope that the persecuted political opponent will accept and tarnish his name. When the persecuted political opponent doesn't accept the "deal" because he knows he's not guilty of anything, then the Democrat-run Inquisitors must push on with the case to save face.Jonathan Goodman, the magistrate judge assigned to handle Donald J. Trump’s arraignment, did something of a double take during the proceeding on Tuesday, when the Justice Department offered the former president a bond deal that was not merely lenient but imposed virtually no restrictions on him at all. Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the prosecution for the department, opted not to request conditions routinely imposed on other defendants seeking to be released from custody, like cash bail, limits on domestic travel or turning in his passport.
But Judge Goodman, tasked with hashing out a bond agreement during a one-day cameo appearance on the case, was not entirely on board. He suggested that Mr. Trump be compelled to “avoid all contact with co-defendants, victims and witnesses except through counsel.” Mr. Smith’s deputy, David Harbach, joined Mr. Trump’s lawyers in opposing that idea — but the judge imposed a version of it anyway.
Mr. Smith’s decision not to demand any conditions at the arraignment, people familiar with the situation said, reflected a belief that prosecutors should avoid impairing Mr. Trump’s ability to campaign.
In Trump Prosecution, Special Counsel Seeks to Avoid Distracting Fights
A Washington Post investigation found that more than a year would pass before prosecutors and FBI agents jointly embarked on a formal probe of actions directed from the White House to try to steal the election. Even then, the FBI stopped short of identifying the former president as a focus of that investigation.
A wariness about appearing partisan, institutional caution, and clashes over how much evidence was sufficient to investigate the actions of Trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace. Garland and the deputy attorney general, Lisa Monaco, charted a cautious course aimed at restoring public trust in the department while some prosecutors below them chafed, feeling top officials were shying away from looking at evidence of potential crimes by Trump and those close to him, The Post found.
Not to mention the multiple opportunities the Orange Menace was afforded to return the classified docs he stole. As well as the assignment of a judge to his case with a history of bending if not breaking the law to aid his defense.
Far from being persecuted, Trump left the DoJ no choice but to investigate and eventually indict him. To not do so would have been a dereliction of Garland's duty to the country. Because Trump's actions involve a compromise of the nation's security and an existential threat to the core of our democracy. But most of all because they involve violations of law.
Durham opening hearing. Only on FOX. Get it yet.Had Hunter been treated differently, more harshly, THEN there would be a case to be made for a double standard. As it is he was charged for a gun application offense that rarely results in charges for anyone else.
Smith is no liberal , moron
Trump is NOT getting preferential treatment. Trump is getting deferential treatment.A rich white guy get preferential treatment, how shocking! I posted the same line yesterday over Biden’s sweet plea deal. Let us know when you have a real story, rich white guys getting a break is not news.
You Progressive Jihadists won’t stop until there’s blood in the streetsJonathan Goodman, the magistrate judge assigned to handle Donald J. Trump’s arraignment, did something of a double take during the proceeding on Tuesday, when the Justice Department offered the former president a bond deal that was not merely lenient but imposed virtually no restrictions on him at all. Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the prosecution for the department, opted not to request conditions routinely imposed on other defendants seeking to be released from custody, like cash bail, limits on domestic travel or turning in his passport.
But Judge Goodman, tasked with hashing out a bond agreement during a one-day cameo appearance on the case, was not entirely on board. He suggested that Mr. Trump be compelled to “avoid all contact with co-defendants, victims and witnesses except through counsel.” Mr. Smith’s deputy, David Harbach, joined Mr. Trump’s lawyers in opposing that idea — but the judge imposed a version of it anyway.
Mr. Smith’s decision not to demand any conditions at the arraignment, people familiar with the situation said, reflected a belief that prosecutors should avoid impairing Mr. Trump’s ability to campaign.
In Trump Prosecution, Special Counsel Seeks to Avoid Distracting Fights
A Washington Post investigation found that more than a year would pass before prosecutors and FBI agents jointly embarked on a formal probe of actions directed from the White House to try to steal the election. Even then, the FBI stopped short of identifying the former president as a focus of that investigation.
A wariness about appearing partisan, institutional caution, and clashes over how much evidence was sufficient to investigate the actions of Trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace. Garland and the deputy attorney general, Lisa Monaco, charted a cautious course aimed at restoring public trust in the department while some prosecutors below them chafed, feeling top officials were shying away from looking at evidence of potential crimes by Trump and those close to him, The Post found.
Not to mention the multiple opportunities the Orange Menace was afforded to return the classified docs he stole. As well as the assignment of a judge to his case with a history of bending if not breaking the law to aid his defense.
Far from being persecuted, Trump left the DoJ no choice but to investigate and eventually indict him. To not do so would have been a dereliction of Garland's duty to the country. Because Trump's actions involve a compromise of the nation's security and an existential threat to the core of our democracy. But most of all because they involve violations of law.
Jonathan Goodman, the magistrate judge assigned to handle Donald J. Trump’s arraignment, did something of a double take during the proceeding on Tuesday, when the Justice Department offered the former president a bond deal that was not merely lenient but imposed virtually no restrictions on him at all. Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the prosecution for the department, opted not to request conditions routinely imposed on other defendants seeking to be released from custody, like cash bail, limits on domestic travel or turning in his passport.
But Judge Goodman, tasked with hashing out a bond agreement during a one-day cameo appearance on the case, was not entirely on board. He suggested that Mr. Trump be compelled to “avoid all contact with co-defendants, victims and witnesses except through counsel.” Mr. Smith’s deputy, David Harbach, joined Mr. Trump’s lawyers in opposing that idea — but the judge imposed a version of it anyway.
Mr. Smith’s decision not to demand any conditions at the arraignment, people familiar with the situation said, reflected a belief that prosecutors should avoid impairing Mr. Trump’s ability to campaign.
In Trump Prosecution, Special Counsel Seeks to Avoid Distracting Fights
A Washington Post investigation found that more than a year would pass before prosecutors and FBI agents jointly embarked on a formal probe of actions directed from the White House to try to steal the election. Even then, the FBI stopped short of identifying the former president as a focus of that investigation.
A wariness about appearing partisan, institutional caution, and clashes over how much evidence was sufficient to investigate the actions of Trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace. Garland and the deputy attorney general, Lisa Monaco, charted a cautious course aimed at restoring public trust in the department while some prosecutors below them chafed, feeling top officials were shying away from looking at evidence of potential crimes by Trump and those close to him, The Post found.
Not to mention the multiple opportunities the Orange Menace was afforded to return the classified docs he stole. As well as the assignment of a judge to his case with a history of bending if not breaking the law to aid his defense.
Far from being persecuted, Trump left the DoJ no choice but to investigate and eventually indict him. To not do so would have been a dereliction of Garland's duty to the country. Because Trump's actions involve a compromise of the nation's security and an existential threat to the core of our democracy. But most of all because they involve violations of law.
