More abortion insanity

[BlackSand]

you are literally either insane or intentionally ignorant of const law. The 10th amend is irrelevant in Dobbs.

You are equating a prohibition on states making laws that affect abortion as a RIGHT. Govts don't have rights. They have powers, and rights of INDIVIDUALs limit those powers.

Dobbs holds that the const does not include any INDIVIDUAL right to limit a State's POWER to outlaw abortion, partially, totally, or anyway it sees fit.

A state cannot make any abortion law that doesn't affect women differently than men. But that was not an issue in Dobbs.

.

The Supreme Court did not write any Laws ... They didn't require States to either, and they didn't prohibit anything.
All they did in the Dobbs case was address the fact the Supreme Court cannot create Rights that don't exist.
They did however protect the ability of the States, or the People, to exercise their Tenth Amendment Right to govern themselves.

.​

 

[TNHarley]

That's an adorable take.

In reality, the Supreme Court ruined the principle of Stare Decisis forever, while also deleting a constitutionally protected right for half the population.

The first part is probably the worst of all.

The supreme court has reversed rulings before. You people act like its the end of the world. Its so fucking humorous!
I just LMAO at hacks like you!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Constitutionally Protected Rights don't apply to "half the population" .

They do when the cover the autonomy and privacy of someone with a uterus.

so, thanks for the painfully dumb comment.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The supreme court has reversed rulings before

Not in this manner. And if you don't know the difference or why that is, it means you don't know enough about that to comment on it. Go read up before commenting on it again.

 

[Ralph Norton]

Not in this manner. And if you don't know the difference or why that is, it means you don't know enough about that to comment on it. Go read up before commenting on it again.

And what would that "manner" be? Overturning a prior decision is either/ or - there is no gradation.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And what would that "manner" be?

You should go read up. It won't be a very short read. Don't beg strangers on the internet to spoonfeed it to you.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Ending the right to abortion was the DUMBEST thing the SC has done since the Dredd Scott ruling

^^^^
A statement of unfathomable ignorance.

 

[BlackSand]

They do when the cover the autonomy and provacy of someone with a uterus.

so, thanks for the painfully dumb comment.

.

The Supreme Court didn't require anyone to do anything.
They didn't write a single piece of Legislation or create any Laws ...
So just stop pretending that they did.

If you want a Law that addresses a woman's uterus, ask your Representatives to write one.
If you want a Constitutional Amendment that protects Abortion ...
All you need is a Supermajority in the House and Senate, and 38 States to agree.

That's not dumb ... Just what is required.

.​

 

[TNHarley]

Not in this manner. And if you don't know the difference or why that is, it means you don't know enough about that to comment on it. Go read up before commenting on it again.

What manner do you mean?

 

[TNHarley]

You should go read up. It won't be a very short read. Don't beg strangers on the internet to spoonfeed it to you.

So you have nothing. You are just being an emotional little bitch.
Again.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

.

The Supreme Court didn't require anyone to do anything.
They didn't write a single piece of Legislation or create any Laws ...
So just stop pretending that they did.

If you want a Law that addresses a woman's uterus, ask your Representatives to write one.
If you want a Constitutional Amendment that protects Abortion ...
All you need is a Supermajority in the House and Senate, and 38 States to agree.

That's not dumb ... Just what is required.

.​

I never stated or implied that they did any of that. So you are arguing with a fantasy opponent.

Second, they deleted a constitutionally right. I have every right and reason to criticize the historically derelict and deviant decision. And you have every right to continue to sit there and have apparently no idea what I am saying.

A law does not make something a constituional right. The constitution, an amendment, or the Supreme court does. Go brush up on Civics, thanks.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you have nothing. You are just being an emotional little bitch.
Again.

So , because your dumb ass doesn't know about something, it must not exist.

What a bizarre existence.

 

[ding]

You should go read up. It won't be a very short read. Don't beg strangers on the internet to spoonfeed it to you.

You were the one who made the claim, dummy.

 

[BlackSand]

I never stated or implied that they did any of that. So you are arguing with a fantasy opponent.

Second, they deleted a constitutionally right. I have every right and reason to criticize the historically derelict and deviant decision. And you have every right to continue to sit there and have apparently no idea what I am saying.

A law does not make something a constituional right. The constitution, an amendment, or the Supreme court does. Go brush up on Civics, thanks.

.

They cannot delete something that isn't there to start with.

If you want a Law ... Ask your Representatives.
If you want a Constitutionally Protected Right ... Ask your Representatives.

If you want to argue with me about it ... I don't care and the Supreme Court holds the same position ... It's your choice, so use it.

.​

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you want a Law ... Ask your Representatives

Thanks.

I want a right, though. So we will wait for some of the assholes to die off, replace them, reinstitute the right.

 

[ding]

So , because your dumb ass doesn't know about something, it must not exist.

What a bizarre existence.

You were the one who made the claim that SCOTUS has never reversed itself in this manner before. No one knows what this manner means except for you. We can't read your mind. What manner is this?

 

[TNHarley]

So , because your dumb ass doesn't know about something, it must not exist.

What a bizarre existence.

Apparently it doesnt. Because all you are doing is crying.
3 posts of it. Not ONE explaining your position.

 

[marvin martian]

Thanks.

I want a right, though. So we will wait for some of the assholes to die off, replace them, reinstitute the right.

You have rights. But killing children isn't one of them, and never was.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You were the one who made the claim that SCOTUS has never reversed itself in this manner before

That's right. Go read why. Or stay ignorant to spite a stranger on the internet, when really only achieving the effect of keeping yourself ignorant. Your call.

 

[TNHarley]

That's right. Go read why. Or stay ignorant to spite a stranger on the internet, when really only achieving the effect of keeping yourself ignorant. Your call.

4!