Liberals have a tiger by the tail with their big push for homosexual marriage. Let go of the tail and the tiger might turn to the connection between abortion and incest.
One must begin with incest to fully understand abortion.
For centuries, organized religions priesthoods led the way in trying to stop incest; first by moral taboo, then by influencing governments. For the most part, priests represented the first and only group that could honestly be called an educated class.
Early on, priesthoods understood that children born of incestuous unions are the victims injured most grievously both physically and emotionally. There are still no doubts on that score in spite of what todays permissive educated class in academe promotes. Having said that, I want to try and make the connection between abortion and incest in todays world.
My reasoning for stopping all abortion is uncomplicated. Infanticide is the cruelest form of murder. In addition to infanticide incest is the unintended consequence of abortion.
Legal abortion removes the fear of pregnancy. Then funding organizations like Planned Parenthood removes the burden of paying for an abortion making it easier for incestuous individuals at the lower end of the economic ladder to abuse children who are close relations. It is those children who need the most protection, but get the least from Democrats male and female. No elected Democrat will offend a major constituency just to protect children.
Next
Abortion-on-demand encourages incest because those who might not engage in the practice realize that abortion is available to eliminate their mistake without fear of exposure. Its the same as a person who wont steal when theres a chance of getting caught. If killing children in the womb is not enough rational to stop all abortion then giving incest fertile ground should be.
Until the loopholes can be closed, those who are against abortion except in the case of rape, or incest, or the life of the mother do no service to their cause. So long as the loopholes in enforcement exist, every exception is an open door to exploitation by pro-abortion activists. It is the exception that ultimately negates the argument against all abortion. The reason being: If one kind of abortion is acceptable then all abortion should be a matter of choice and legal. Roe v. Wade showed that the High Court leaned in that direction anyway. And lets not underestimate the influence exercised by the pro-abortion media.
On top of everything else promoting legal abortion made population controls morally acceptable in Christian countries as it did in Communist China.
Mankind will be lucky if the genocide crowd controlling governments stops at abortion. Twentieth century governments used more direct methods of killing when they did not have abortion as moral justification for slaughtering their own people. One can only cringe at the methods governments will adopt when they claim abortion gives them the moral high ground.
Back alleys
Democrats will never admit that fifty million or so babies aborted since Roe v. Wade has been a high price to pay for halting back alley abortions. The number of women who died in such procedures is minuscule when compared to legal infanticide. And those women had two choices: Choose not to get pregnant, and dont abort if they do get pregnant.
Im not foolish enough to think that all unwanted pregnancies can be stopped. Nor do I believe that illegal abortions are gone forever should Roe v. Wade be overturned. Abortion-on-demand is not the solution to either problem.
Bottom line: The camouflage abortion gives to incest is a price no civilized society can pay.
Finally, anyone reading this thread who doubts that the infanticide crowd are murderers should have no trouble justifying this:
