Moral of Nietzsche.

[JGalt]

That is what I thought, but when I looked it up, the syphilis prostitute thing is what I found. Amazing revisionism to move him up from doing his 5-year-old sister multiple times, to only having sex once in his life and being a man of such judgement that he picks a syphilitic prostitute, catches the disease and in his best philosophic manor says, never again, they all suck, but not this.
No matter how you slice, nobody to take judgement calls, philosophy or life lessons from. Just sayin...

That Nietsche guy sounds like a real poopy head.

 

[rupol2000]

That is what I thought, but when I looked it up, the syphilis prostitute thing is what I found. Amazing revisionism to move him up from doing his 5-year-old sister multiple times, to only having sex once in his life and being a man of such judgement that he picks a syphilitic prostitute, catches the disease and in his best philosophic manor says, never again, they all suck, but not this.
No matter how you slice, nobody to take judgement calls, philosophy or life lessons from. Just sayin...

I do not know, maybe this is fiction, but it is believed that after he lost his mind, he wrote the book "Me and My Sister", where he confessed that his little sister climbed into his bed at night and masturbated his penis.
He wrote that his aunt before death warned him that it would end up losing his soul, she did not immediately decide on this.
It is clear that his psyche has been out of order since childhood. But this does not mean that he was an idiot, he said very deep questions.
I think that such seductions are not uncommon in our time, it is simply not customary to talk about it. We do nothing to isolate children of different sexes from each other, so that they grow up in a healthy atmosphere. I don't blame him for that. This is largely the fault of the left scum, who disintegrated traditional society.
As they matured, they had a political conflict. Nietzsche quarreled with her and Wagner because he loved Jews and they were anti-Semitic.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

All the chatter of this nonentity can be reduced to one thing: the justification of predation. This ideology is not new, it is no coincidence that he praised the bloody Dionysianism. This is the morality of Old Europe, which was destroyed several times by the Aryan peoples, which is reflected in the symbolism of the Serpent-fighting myth.

Nietzsche deftly manipulated concepts, hiding the Aryan history. The real superman is precisely the superpredator that killed the Nietzschean predator. The superman of Nietzsche is not in the future, but in the past, but with the feet of the Snake-fighters Indra, Zeus, Apollo, Jupiter, Perun and Taranis, this is all you need to know about the insignificance of his philosophy.

How This Inadvertently Led to Naziism

Nietzsche challenged his followers to assert themselves, not realizing that those who do that on their own are spoiled conceited aristocrats and predatory bullies. Like Nietzsche himself, his followers would wind up admiring those people, thinking that watching but not doing is enough to qualify for his ideal.

 

[rupol2000]

How This Inadvertently Led to Naziism

Nietzsche challenged his followers to assert themselves, not realizing that those who do that on their own are spoiled conceited aristocrats and predatory bullies. Like Nietzsche himself, his followers would wind up admiring those people, thinking that watching but not doing is enough to qualify for his ideal.

Nietzsche directly praised predation and justified evil, these were not mere metaphors.

He was the first to do it so blatantly, but he wasn't the first to do it at all. It was apparently common enough at the time as an implicit opposition to the romanticism of the Spring of Nations. Goethe was also an advocate of evil, the Bolsheviks brought up their own Goethe - Bulgakov. He wrote a fork - "The Master and Margarita", where Evil is also justified, although very delicately.
This is all beneficial to the slave owners, so that the slaves do not resent when they are sent to the bloody altars.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I don't think Nietzsche was into Aryans.

The whole Nazi Aryan thing was pseudo history. Fake history.

The Nazis Were As If the South American Indians Identified Themselves As Spanish Conquistadors

The Germans are predominately of pre-Aryan blood. They were easily conquered by a small group of Aryans fleeing the Caucasus Mountains around 3,000 BC. Many Germanic words are from their original Old European language and falsely classified as Indo-European.

Their civilization took 2,000 years to catch up to the way the Greeks and Romans were in the Classical Era. They sent history reeling backwards during the Dark Ages.

 

[rupol2000]

Dostoevsky did this too. That is why he was equally loved by the Boleshviks and the Nazis. Goebels was crazy about him.
Although Dostoevsky was formally always considered not to be involved in either one or the other, and even the opposite.
His Christian preaching boiled down to the fact that there is no need to fight against evil, otherwise there will be trouble, as happened with his Raskolnikov.
Dostoevsky himself was a dissolute immoral creature.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

This is the meaning of the concept of esotericism, the common people have an exoteric (false) knowledge of the state of affairs

Academonics

Instilling that self-deluding snobbery is the main focus of university classes.

 

[rupol2000]

The Nazis Were As If the South American Indians Identified Themselves As Spanish Conquistadors

The Germans are predominately of pre-Aryan blood. They were easily conquered by a small group of Aryans fleeing the Caucasus Mountains around 3,000 BC. Many Germanic words are from their original Old European language and falsely classified as Indo-European.

Their civilization took 2,000 years to catch up to the way the Greeks and Romans were in the Classical Era. They sent history reeling backwards during the Dark Ages.

Dark Ages is not entirely accurate. These are very cunning dodgy people. All that they call "dark ages" was just the times of Aryan influence and prosperity. This applies to Olympian Greece after the Bronze Collapse, and the Middle Ages from the fall of Imperial Rome to the Gothic period after the Plague. They do not classify the time of obscurantism and the Inquisition as the dark ages

According to their classification, the Dark Ages of the Middle Ages are the time of chivalry, the time of the Romanesque in art. This is not German age of Europe

 

[rupol2000]

Concerning New time there the same forgery. They associate the flourishing of science and art with Enlightenment, although Enlightenment is exactly what disappeared after the Great Revolutions, replaced by Romanticism. Enlightenment corresponds to the absolutism and slavery of the Old Order, which was destroyed by the Revolution.

 

[rupol2000]

Their history is a solid forgery for the sake of praising German rule.
In Russian history, the same picture. The 18th century, when Prussian whores sat on the throne and traded people like cattle, the age of dirt, court debauchery and lawlessness of the masses they represent as the Great Age, and they sweep the hussar 19th century of Freedom under the carpet.

Russian power is actually also German power, Rus was a German tribe. The Russian state did not have a great influence on the territory of the Russian Federation, they were only in the west. But in the Russian Federation, the official history is the history of Russia, not the Golden Horde.

 

[rupol2000]

The same is true in Germany and France. The German peoples are a nation, and not a single people. They were captured by the Germans and Prussians. France is Celtica, captured by the German Franks. Holland was apparently western Austrasia, captured by the Golinds, Britain is the Celts, Angles and Saxons, captured by the Brits / Normans. Finland is Suomi, this is the land captured by the Venetes, who, obviously, were also Germans. And so it is all over Europe.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Dark Ages is not entirely accurate. These are very cunning dodgy people. All that they call "dark ages" was just the times of Aryan influence and prosperity. This applies to Olympian Greece after the Bronze Collapse, and the Middle Ages from the fall of Imperial Rome to the Gothic period after the Plague. They do not classify the time of obscurantism and the Inquisition as the dark ages

According to their classification, the Dark Ages of the Middle Ages are the time of chivalry, the time of the Romanesque in art. This is not German age of Europe

Postmodern Puts Us Back to 476 AD

A datum that tells how horrible that gloomy chaos was is the fact that before its collapse, Rome's population was one million. During the Dark Ages (it is projective that decadent academics refuse to use that term), Rome's population decreased to 20,000!

 

[rupol2000]

Now they say that Mexican Texas is inhabited by Germans, and taiga is growing in New Mexico. It's not just a lying leftist plague, it's a displacement of indigenous peoples. Austria-Hungary was never German either. But they had colonists there and declared it German on this base.

 

[rupol2000]

Postmodern Puts Us Back to 476 AD

A datum that tells how horrible that gloomy chaos was is the fact that before its collapse, Rome's population was one million. During the Dark Ages (it is projective that decadent academics refuse to use that term), Rome's population decreased to 20,000!

Before Gothic there was no terror. Perhaps the plague played a role

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Concerning New time there the same forgery. They associate the flourishing of science and art with Enlightenment, although Enlightenment is exactly what disappeared after the Great Revolutions, replaced by Romanticism. Enlightenment corresponds to the absolutism and slavery of the Old Order, which was destroyed by the Revolution.

France's Greatest Contribution to Human Progress Was the Guillotine

You really love your old Czarist nobility, don't you?

 

[rupol2000]

France's Greatest Contribution to Human Progress Was the Guillotine

You really love your old Czarist nobility, don't you?

the old nobility is the German power of the old order before the revolution. Nobility and aristocracy are two different things. The nobility is the trade and slave-owning courtiers, and the aristocrats are the military caste.

 

[rupol2000]

Bismarck's Prussian bureaucracy hatched from servants. It was originally the servants of the Teutonic Order - Vitings.

 

[rupol2000]

The Prussians had big appetites. They said that the Prussians are the masters of Germany, Germany is the mistress of the world.

Modern Germany was created precisely on this ideology and created precisely by the Prussians

 

[rupol2000]

Do not forget that America itself is a child of the revolution. The American Revolution even preceded the French Revolution, and the heroes of the French Revolution were the heroes of the American Revolution.
Jefferson is the founder of the United States and is a hero of the Revolution and a follower of revolutionary ideas. In Europe, they strangled the revolution as early as the beginning of the 20th century, and in the US, they strangled it only in 2009-14, when they destroyed the GOP. Maybe not completely.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Do not forget that America itself is a child of the revolution. The American Revolution even preceded the French Revolution, and the heroes of the French Revolution were the heroes of the American Revolution.
Jefferson is the founder of the United States and is a hero of the Revolution and a follower of revolutionary ideas. In Europe, they strangled the revolution as early as the beginning of the 20th century, and in the US, they strangled it only in 2009-14, when they destroyed the GOP. Maybe not completely.

Inherit the Wind

There is only one revolution, and it's never happened. Cut off the children of the rich from Daddy's Money at age 18. Otherwise, the fake revolutions, all led by those same spoiled bossy brats, will continue to just run history in circles.