Montana Supreme Court Nixes Extremist Anti Abortion laws, Citing onstitutional Privacy Rights

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

You are pathetic.

You don’t stand by anything you say, and all you do is spews lies and disinformation in service of your deplorable Nazi values.

I'm shocked that the Texas law still stands. It's a disgrace, using Nazi enforcement laws on civilians.

Oh the ironing.

 

[Stann]

You don’t stand by anything you say, and all you do is spews lies and disinformation in service of your deplorable Nazi values.

Oh the ironing.

Now you get it those are the tactics your side keeps using lies, misinformation and Nazi deciet.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

" Texas Civil Prosecution Laws Seeking To Goad Male Clown Shoes "

* Individualism Premises Of Us Republic For Political Science Neophytes *

A major problem is that there is not a social civil contract of agreement made valid through informed consent .

There is not a writ of law , that a ritual of sex , provides a rite of entitlement to a male to deprive a female of the self ownership or self determination elements of individualism .

Where is this writ for rites as a social civil agreement from ritual , between the male and the female , made valid through informed consent , that the consequences of consent to copulate , in the event of fertilization , are that a natural processes of pregnancy must follow through to parturition , or that an agreement is made where the pregnancy must be terminated ?

The us republic is founded upon principles of individualism , through a credo of e pluribus unum , which requires equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , where individual necessarily implies live birth .


* Us Republic For Individualism Challenges Against Traitors *

The us declaration of independence states that all men are created equal , which surreptitiously implies that women are not equal with men , and see us 19th amendment as proof .

An etymology of the term person is per - as in countable by census , and son - as in male by sex , when combined with a us 14th amendment stating that any per son may become a us citizen , those imply that females would not technically be citizens of us republic .

To correct the error of diction , the term person should be replaced with the term individual , thereby removing sex as a distinguishing characteristic for citizenship .

By the principles of individualism , the self ownership element relates that a female is entitled to free roam , to free association and to progeny , while the self determination element relates that a female is entitled to own private property and to exercise willful intents by entering into social civil agreements made valid through informed consent .


* Goof Ball Central For Egomaniacs *

There are perceptions in some males that the physical inferiority of frailty in females necessarily implies fealty , whereby any female consenting to a ritual of sex becomes subjugated to superior rites of males to dictate conformance with its domination .

That a male might be justified in a civil tort against a female for having an abortion without consent of the male was anticipated by https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.171.htm#171.208 .

The scotus and texas courts have established precedence that any plaintiff in a suit must have valid damages and not simply be aware that an abortion has occurred .

Sec. 171.208. CIVIL LIABILITY FOR VIOLATION OR AIDING OR ABETTING VIOLATION. (a) Any person, other than an officer or employee of a state or local governmental entity in this state, may bring a civil action against any person who:
(1) performs or induces an abortion in violation of this subchapter;
(2) knowingly engages in conduct that aids or abets the performance or inducement of an abortion, including paying for or reimbursing the costs of an abortion through insurance or otherwise, if the abortion is performed or induced in violation of this subchapter, regardless of whether the person knew or should have known that the abortion would be performed or induced in violation of this subchapter; or
(3) intends to engage in the conduct described by Subdivision (1) or (2).

Legal semantic weeds. Make something obvious and simple into something disingenuously and unnecessarily complicated.
Abortion was not considered when most law was established.
Copulation is a contract. Duh.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" On Political Science Perspectives Of Dick Brains "

* On Simpletons Wanting To Get Rid Of Grading Systems *

Legal semantic weeds. Make something obvious and simple into something disingenuously and unnecessarily complicated.

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

www.usmessageboard.com

Notice For Public Record : Foundational Nuances Of Us 9th Versus Us 10th Amendments For Individuals States And Federal Interests

" Notice For Public Record : Foundational Nuances Of Us 9th Versus Us 10th Amendments For Individuals States And Federal Interests " * Negative Liberties Represent Protections Independence Individualism * Prologue : Below is a set of posted tweets intend to establish which wrights , not...

www.usmessageboard.com

* Notes On Incompetence Of Social Foundations *

Abortion was not considered when most law was established.

This moniker is uncovering more than a small amount of missed perceptions and blathering stupidity ingrained into the lexicon of society .

Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction

* Applying The Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of A Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction * * Opening Post Subjective Objective Sew Gnomon * The term right is a faux pas of diction , as to equivocate the term right with a mathematical norm leads to a contradiction ...

www.usmessageboard.com

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

* Nothing Necessarily Owed *

Copulation is a contract. Duh.

Copulation is a contract for copulation with nothing else implied , duh .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Posture Of Malevolence Willing To Invoke Violence Against Illegitimate Aggression "

* Tirade Trade Of Censorship Considers Itself A Hero *

You are pathetic. You can't seem to reason anything out. You just keep ranting and raving. Grow up already.

CarsomyrPlusSix solicits for https://twitter.com/nrlc .

CarsomyrPlusSix is moniker for the voice of cowardice and and traitor to us 1st , 14th , 9th and 10th amendments .

The shallow pool of its intellect is to block accounts that represent a formidable challenge to the inanity of the abortion anti-choice trope of pathetically educated dolts , significantly lacking in information that is pertinent to a comprehensive understanding of most aspects necessary for informed consent of the public for competently applying public policy in the abortion issue .

* Equitable Doctrine Rule Of Individualism For Equal Protection Of Negative Liberties *

I'm m shocked that the Texas law still stands. It's a disgrace, using Nazi enforcement laws on civilians.

An accurate and sufficient pejorative to reference denoting the law and its officiates is authoritarian , where authoritarian and libertarian are political science antonyms , where authoritarianism establishes collective dictates of a state , and where libertarianism establishes independence of the individual .

As to how a a national socialist state of germany for germans would be interjected here is uncertain .

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is In A State Of Sedition Because Of Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion

" Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is Under Sedition By States As A Result Of US Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion " * Constitutional Originalism Versus Judicial Activism * Blackmun wrote this - ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on...

www.usmessageboard.com

Bought And Paid For Fee Press Reckoning With Consistency Of Language

" Bought And Paid For Fee Press Reckoning With Consistency Of Language " * An Applicable Vernacular To Describe The Modern Lexicon * The swastika wielding collectivism for a german state for germans were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS . Most of the LEFT WING are NATIONAL SOCIALISTS and the rest are full...

www.usmessageboard.com

Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians

" Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians " * Lying Under Cover Of Pretending To Liberate Through Domination * The right wing outlets must ttop referring to the left as liberals and call them either authoritarians , or conservatives . The term liberal is synonymous with...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[mikegriffith1]

Montana’s Republican-controlled legislature abrogated privacy rights guaranteed by the state constitution, the court ruled:

“nder Montana’s Constitution, the right of individual privacy—that is, the right of personal autonomy or the right to be let alone—is fundamental.

“It is, perhaps, one of the most important rights guaranteed to the citizens of this State, and its separate textual protection in our Constitution reflects Montanans’ historical abhorrence and distrust of excessive governmental interference in their personal lives.”

The high court sided with an advanced practice nurse practitioner and a clinician who challenged a 2005 law, styled “Control of Practice of Abortion,” that limited who could provide health services.

The health professionals also are called advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), family nurse practitioners (FNPs), certified nurse-midwifes (CNMs), and physician assistants (PAs).

The district court ruled that the legislature violated a woman’s “fundamental right of privacy to seek abortion care from a qualified health care provider of her choosing” when enacting the 2005 law.

Montana Supreme Court nixes extremist anti-abortion laws, citing constitutional privacy rights

Montana’s highest court unanimously upheld a a district court ruling that overturned a 2005 law restricting who could provide abortion services. The 7-0 decision cited privacy rights enumerated in Montana’s constitution, in a ruling that likely also...

www.dailykos.com

Hang on America. We will get rid of these anti American extremist assholes, state by state. Election by election.

It's coming, and may take longer in certain areas of the country where the most extreme anti American fringe lunatics are. But it's coming.

"Privacy rights"?! How about the unborn baby's right not to be exterminated simply for his mother's convenience? Getting poisoned via an injection and then being sucked out with a power vacuum is a pretty serious violation of privacy rights, wouldn't you say?

"Extremist anti-abortion laws"?! You must be kidding.
House Bill 136 banned abortions at 20 weeks, so it gave mothers 19 weeks and 6 days to decide whether or not to have their babies killed. That's "extreme"?

House Bill 171 banned abortions via telehealth, imposed a 24-hour waiting period, requiring a patient to use a state form that had various notifications, and required new credentialing for medical providers who perform abortions to ensure safety and health standards were being maintained. What's "extreme" about any of that?

House Bill 140 required abortion clinics to provide two forms of ultrasound and fetal heart tones, and imposed civil penalties for providers who refused to comply. Oh, heaven forbid that a mother see the baby and hear his/her heartbeat before finally deciding to kill him/her. "Extreme"? I truly wonder how people like you can consider yourselves "humane," "enlightened," and "progressive.":

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

"Privacy rights"?! How about the unborn baby's right not to be exterminated simply for his mother's convenience? Getting poisoned via an injection and then being sucked out with a power vacuum is a pretty serious violation of privacy rights, wouldn't you say?

"Extremist anti-abortion laws"?! You must be kidding.
House Bill 136 banned abortions at 20 weeks, so it gave mothers 19 weeks and 6 days to decide whether or not to have their babies killed. That's "extreme"?

House Bill 171 banned abortions via telehealth, imposed a 24-hour waiting period, requiring a patient to use a state form that had various notifications, and required new credentialing for medical providers who perform abortions to ensure safety and health standards were being maintained. What's "extreme" about any of that?

House Bill 140 required abortion clinics to provide two forms of ultrasound and fetal heart tones, and imposed civil penalties for providers who refused to comply. Oh, heaven forbid that a mother see the baby and hear his/her heartbeat before finally deciding to kill him/her. "Extreme"? I truly wonder how people like you can consider yourselves "humane," "enlightened," and "progressive.":

Your claptrap is not why you are in power.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Anthropocentric Psychopathy "

* Banal Of Conceited Damned Dirty Apes *

"Privacy rights"?! How about the unborn baby's right not to be exterminated simply for his mother's convenience? Getting poisoned via an injection and then being sucked out with a power vacuum is a pretty serious violation of privacy rights, wouldn't you say?
"Extremist anti-abortion laws"?! You must be kidding.
House Bill 136 banned abortions at 20 weeks, so it gave mothers 19 weeks and 6 days to decide whether or not to have their babies killed. That's "extreme"?
House Bill 171 banned abortions via telehealth, imposed a 24-hour waiting period, requiring a patient to use a state form that had various notifications, and required new credentialing for medical providers who perform abortions to ensure safety and health standards were being maintained. What's "extreme" about any of that?
House Bill 140 required abortion clinics to provide two forms of ultrasound and fetal heart tones, and imposed civil penalties for providers who refused to comply. Oh, heaven forbid that a mother see the baby and hear his/her heartbeat before finally deciding to kill him/her. "Extreme"? I truly wonder how people like you can consider yourselves "humane," "enlightened," and "progressive.":

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

" Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ? " * Environmentalism Advocates Getting Ugly About Apex Predator Gluttony * An anthropocentric psychosis may be characterized as anthropocentrism which has become dysfunctional . *...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[otto105]

"Privacy rights"?! How about the unborn baby's right not to be exterminated simply for his mother's convenience? Getting poisoned via an injection and then being sucked out with a power vacuum is a pretty serious violation of privacy rights, wouldn't you say?

"Extremist anti-abortion laws"?! You must be kidding.
House Bill 136 banned abortions at 20 weeks, so it gave mothers 19 weeks and 6 days to decide whether or not to have their babies killed. That's "extreme"?

House Bill 171 banned abortions via telehealth, imposed a 24-hour waiting period, requiring a patient to use a state form that had various notifications, and required new credentialing for medical providers who perform abortions to ensure safety and health standards were being maintained. What's "extreme" about any of that?

House Bill 140 required abortion clinics to provide two forms of ultrasound and fetal heart tones, and imposed civil penalties for providers who refused to comply. Oh, heaven forbid that a mother see the baby and hear his/her heartbeat before finally deciding to kill him/her. "Extreme"? I truly wonder how people like you can consider yourselves "humane," "enlightened," and "progressive.":

So, you like being a ghoul.

Are women supposed to hide from your religion in public and walk behind men?

 

[0311]

"Privacy rights"?! How about the unborn baby's right not to be exterminated simply for his mother's convenience? Getting poisoned via an injection and then being sucked out with a power vacuum is a pretty serious violation of privacy rights, wouldn't you say?

"Extremist anti-abortion laws"?! You must be kidding.
House Bill 136 banned abortions at 20 weeks, so it gave mothers 19 weeks and 6 days to decide whether or not to have their babies killed. That's "extreme"?

House Bill 171 banned abortions via telehealth, imposed a 24-hour waiting period, requiring a patient to use a state form that had various notifications, and required new credentialing for medical providers who perform abortions to ensure safety and health standards were being maintained. What's "extreme" about any of that?

House Bill 140 required abortion clinics to provide two forms of ultrasound and fetal heart tones, and imposed civil penalties for providers who refused to comply. Oh, heaven forbid that a mother see the baby and hear his/her heartbeat before finally deciding to kill him/her. "Extreme"? I truly wonder how people like you can consider yourselves "humane," "enlightened," and "progressive.":

How about all ******* men shut the **** up about trying to control a Woman's body. Abortion is NOT based on a whim or based convience.

A pregnancy that threatens the life of the Mother is a medical necessity. IF the fetus is NOT viable outside of the womb, abortion is a necessity. A Woman should NOT be forced to a baby that is the result rape and/or incest. Men have no right to determine a Woman's health care needs.

 

[Stann]

"Privacy rights"?! How about the unborn baby's right not to be exterminated simply for his mother's convenience? Getting poisoned via an injection and then being sucked out with a power vacuum is a pretty serious violation of privacy rights, wouldn't you say?

"Extremist anti-abortion laws"?! You must be kidding.
House Bill 136 banned abortions at 20 weeks, so it gave mothers 19 weeks and 6 days to decide whether or not to have their babies killed. That's "extreme"?

House Bill 171 banned abortions via telehealth, imposed a 24-hour waiting period, requiring a patient to use a state form that had various notifications, and required new credentialing for medical providers who perform abortions to ensure safety and health standards were being maintained. What's "extreme" about any of that?

House Bill 140 required abortion clinics to provide two forms of ultrasound and fetal heart tones, and imposed civil penalties for providers who refused to comply. Oh, heaven forbid that a mother see the baby and hear his/her heartbeat before finally deciding to kill him/her. "Extreme"? I truly wonder how people like you can consider yourselves "humane," "enlightened," and "progressive.":

Thank GOD. The government has NO right to intervene with sexual or reproductive rights. At least one of these crazy republican states has now been held accountable for their actions against the people.

 

[Stann]

" Anthropocentric Psychopathy "

* Banal Of Conceited Damned Dirty Apes *

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

" Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ? " * Environmentalism Advocates Getting Ugly About Apex Predator Gluttony * An anthropocentric psychosis may be characterized as anthropocentrism which has become dysfunctional . *...

www.usmessageboard.com

Unfortunately this is most likely way over most of the anti-abortion people's heads . They are way too emotional about sticking their heads into other people's business and imagining a full grown baby in that woman's belly. They are very simple folk and most are hopelessly lost in their religion on this issue too. No reason is involved , pure emotion.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

mikegriffith1 is quite male centric and ghoulish in trying to make fetuses the legal equivalent and independent to its host.

 

[Stann]

mikegriffith1 is quite male centric and ghoulish in trying to make fetuses the legal equivalent and independent to its host.

Can never happen , there is no equivalency , doesn't even come close.

 

[Stann]

It's not murder if it's legal.

Where's the body ? And what was the victim's name and birthdate, social security number , etc. Did such a " person " ever exist except in your mind. The law doesn't prosecute imaginary crimes.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Where's the body ? And what was the victim's name and birthdate, social security number , etc. Did such a " person " ever exist except in your mind. The law doesn't prosecute imaginary crimes.

50 years as a constitutional right thrown down the tubes because of an activist SCOTUS.

 

[Stann]

You prove my point. "Legal" doesn't make something right.

Coveting a woman's body you don't know or care about has to be a sin and or crime of some sort. It's none of your business.

 

[Stann]

50 years as a constitutional right thrown down the tubes because of an activist SCOTUS.

On the basis of a minority opinion.

 

[Stann]

You prove my point. "Legal" doesn't make something right.

Correct and these government officials shouldn't be taking rights away from women.

 

[Moonglow]

You prove my point. "Legal" doesn't make something right.

Depends where one lives.