I understand the psychology of resorting to name-calling in a debate. It is a device used by some when they are losing the debate. It doesn't work. It shows your hand . And it's losing.You poopyhead. I win
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I understand the psychology of resorting to name-calling in a debate. It is a device used by some when they are losing the debate. It doesn't work. It shows your hand . And it's losing.You poopyhead. I win
You too ! I plan on it.Have a blessed day
How does science determine the father of a child?You obviously don't understand the simple idea of what an individual human being is.
Do you believe in presumption of innocence and the right to travel?Good luck with that.
Condescension is a tell that you're not comfortable with your argument.
I cannot count the number of times abortion choice proponents were contacted and admonished to confront any nominee for scotus to explain blackmun opinion !50 years as a constitutional right thrown down the tubes because of an activist SCOTUS.
The abortion choice failed to provide informed consent to us public that live birth is the only non incidental requirement to become a citizen and therefore , by equitable doctrine , a live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .So you are not familiar with the 9th amendment and unenumerated rights?
Do you want me to explain it to you or will you do the research yourself?
You are claiming an embryonic stage of a human being is a human being. That is the same as calling a seed a sapling. An egg a chick. It makes no sense.How does science determine the father of a child?
It uses DNA
And how are criminals singled out from the crowd?
By DNA
Of course its a human beingYou are claiming an embryonic stage of a human being is a human being. That is the same as calling a seed a sapling. An egg a chick. It makes no sense.
I am a us citizen with a single non incidental requirement to be born for the instantiation of my constitutional rites and any which has not is not entitled to equal protection with me !Privacy is more fundamental than life itself?
I dont think so
Boo fucking who , do not get down range mofo !Of course its a human being
Do you think unborn babies are like caterpillars that morph into butterflies?
Our unique DNA does not change from conception to death even 100 years later
Thats law, not science" Anthropocentric Quackery Of Damned Dirty Apes "
* Moral Relativism Of Nature *
I am a us citizen with a single non incidental requirement to be born for the instantiation of my constitutional rites and any which has not is not entitled to equal protection with me !
A state is comprised of citizens in whose interests of a state lay .
A citizen and their constitutional rites are instantiated through a live birth requirement .
A constitutional basis for abortion is based on " When do interests of a state begin ? " and not " When does life begin ? " .
There is not a sanctimonious altruism by a state to protect any and all lives !
Not a Constitutional rightDo you believe in presumption of innocence
14th Amendmentand the right to travel?
Really? Do you need someone to explain it to you, or will you do the research yourself?Also, it wasn't condescension.
Correct, it isn't. Welcome to the year 2024.A woman killing a man’s baby without informing him is not extremist. Right.
The fetus only has that potential.It is only a seed at this point.Of course its a human being
Do you think unborn babies are like caterpillars that morph into butterflies?
Our unique DNA does not change from conception to death even 100 years later
Damned straight it is law , because nature of nature has not changed !Thats law, not science
The law might change, but science does not
Sure. Thanks for your opinion and links that support your opinion." Arrogance Complacency Ignorance "
* Blame Abortion Choice Leadership For Incompetence *
I cannot count the number of times abortion choice proponents were contacted and admonished to confront any nominee for scotus to explain blackmun opinion !
Thus the abortion anti-choice are only partly to blame and contempt should be hurled at the imbeciles running the abortion choice movement !
There is no money for lawyers , or political campaigns , or charities with settled law on abortion and it makes me wonder whether the abortion choice leadership actually had any intention otherwise than to lose .
* Collective Groups Reviling The Us Citizen *
The abortion choice failed to provide informed consent to us public that live birth is the only non incidental requirement to become a citizen and therefore , by equitable doctrine , a live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .
A rite to privacy is incidental , it is not principle the basis for legality and public policy for abortion , so keep on promoting its stupidity and continue to fail .
When the abortion choice want to succeed they will follow directions that have been shoved in their face for +25 years !
![]()
Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade
" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...www.usmessageboard.com
* Charge Scotus With The Crime *
![]()
Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is In A State Of Sedition Because Of Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion
" Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is Under Sedition By States As A Result Of US Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion " * Constitutional Originalism Versus Judicial Activism * Blackmun wrote this - ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on...www.usmessageboard.com
Now that was intentionally condescending.Not a Constitutional right
14th Amendment
Really? Do you need someone to explain it to you, or will you do the research yourself?
Correct , our laws were still based on morals. Fortunately in the modern world we've become aware that morals are not a good foundation for laws as they are variable. Modern laws are properly based on ethics.Sure. Thanks for your opinion and links that support your opinion.
I can do that too but won't waste our time.
This is about facts. Abortion was a constitutional right before Dodd.
Not a Constitutional right
14th Amendment
No. I understand your attempt to malign me personally just to add credence to your arguement; I simply reject it for what it is.Really? Do you need someone to explain it to you, or will you do the research yourself?
The roe v wade decision is based on a live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen .Sure. Thanks for your opinion and links that support your opinion.
I can do that too but won't waste our time.
This is about facts. Abortion was a constitutional right before Dodd.
I disagreeThe fetus only has that potential.It is only a seed at this point.