Opinion is like a fart. Lots of wind, no substance. Give supported and good evidence, and we can talk.
I could make a comment about how liberals are fascinated with that part of the body, but I'll refrain... I'm kind of done talking to you, and have moved on to outright mocking.
Duly noted you were unable to refute my initial premise after a day of obfuscation and trying to change the subject.
Your judgement on Romney is wrong. I think Mormons are guilty of bad theology, but I think of evangelicals and Catholics and others, as well. None of that prevents me from voting for them. Jefferson's and Lincoln's lack of Christian witness would not have prevented me from voting for either one.
It's not "bad theology" (I'm an agnostic, there's no "good" theology in my mind), it's outright fraud. We know that Hebrews never settled in the Americas, that the Book of Mormon was a fraud written by Joseph Smith because scamming through religion was easier than scamming with gold finding schemes, which was his previous racket. And he did it so he could seduce teenage girls, for which his neighbors took him out and shot him.
I became an agnostic because I had to evaluate the logic of my beliefs and found them wanting. Romney, whom apparently is an intelligent guy, accepts this utter nonsense as true, which tells me I can't trust his reasoning skills. I also don't trust a cult that seems to want to hide what it is up to. For instance, they were the driving force behind Prop 8, but we didn't find that out until after the election. LDS families emptied their kid's college funds to keep gays from marrying (something you are supposedly for, right?) But you are going to trust one to run the country? Really?
I believe you are playing with definitions all of your own on Reagan and Kennedy, who are liberal by Tea Party standards.
No, not really. JFK and Reagan thought taxes were too high and too onerous. That puts them in with the TEA party. (I personally think we need to reform taxes, and maybe raise them after the economy recovers.) It's a pretty simple definition. How much agreement is there on issues.
You would rather believe your opinions than the polls. That is what I was waiting for.
No, man, what you are waiting for is some fool to believe you are really a Republican.
Good luck with that.
Polls don't mean anything at this point, because most people haven't thought about it that much. FURTHER- the polls don't say what you say they do.
The GOP is not hungering for another moderate. If you take a look at that poll, and add up the moderates (Guiliani and Romney) you get less than 30%. You add up the real conservatives (Palin, Perry, Bachmann, Cain, Santorum, Gingrich) you get a total of 49%.
Romney will lose the nomination, and then you'll show your true colors as an Obama supporter.
