Mitt Romney 2016

Troll.

Can't you think of some other, less obvious, way of provoking us?

Maybe the message would be more effective if I droned on with mindless rhetorical nonsense the way you do.

No, maybe you'd try to educate Americans and save America.

Like I do.
I can't begin to tell you how much safer I feel with rhetorical warriors like you around.

You can't be an American.

And if you had the sense of the average American you would read and think about the facts I post.

And if you were the average American you would recognize you are wrong on most every count.

So, don't you even think of assuming yourself to be smarter or better informed than the average American.

You are a poseur.

And a simp of a poster.
I don't have to be better informed than the average American to know more than you.
 
Hillary could ask Mitt about his tax returns - which he only provided to McCain - who then rejected him for Palin.
 
Willard might be the only hope the RW has ... a loser x2
The greatest president of our time lost how many times?


no fair counting on your fingers

That's a rule YOU invented because your fingers were always too busily gouging out hot snot boogers from your nose...these molten delights you find delectable.

Almost as delectable as the fingers you love to lick after they have been pulled from your anus.
 
If Romney runs again Hillary will win simply because of her position - slightly to Romney's right.

On which issues?

I believe many of his detractors are victims of the Liberal media.

I'm here to help point this out if you are in doubt about the accuracy and reliability of your own knowledge bank.

:)
The poor unfortunate hapless victims. Good thing we have the completely unbiased view point of FOX News to counter balance this inequity.
 
Willard might be the only hope the RW has ... a loser x2
The greatest president of our time lost how many times?


no fair counting on your fingers

That's a rule YOU invented because your fingers were always too busily gouging out hot snot boogers from your nose...these molten delights you find delectable.

Almost as delectable as the fingers you love to lick after they have been pulled from your anus.
Who could possibly argue with such eloquent articulation?
 
Willard might get by as a moderate Republican ... the Republicans have him labeled as a RINO right now, the right fringe groups steal enough votes to hoist him to a 3x loser award .. nobody will beat Hillary anyway soooooooo
 
Willard might get by as a moderate Republican ... the Republicans have him labeled as a RINO right now, the right fringe groups steal enough votes to hoist him to a 3x loser award .. nobody will beat Hillary anyway soooooooo

Romney isn't nearly extreme enough for so called conservatives. He needs to make his rhetoric more angry sounding to appeal to the base constituency of retards.
 
Willard might be the only hope the RW has ... a loser x2
The greatest president of our time lost how many times?


no fair counting on your fingers

That's a rule YOU invented because your fingers were always too busily gouging out hot snot boogers from your nose...these molten delights you find delectable.

Almost as delectable as the fingers you love to lick after they have been pulled from your anus.
Who could possibly argue with such eloquent articulation?

Hey, he's just "try[ing] to educate Americans and save America".

:lmao:

As for Mittens, there's always more room in the Clown Car. The more the merrier on that debate stage. He was great fun last time and we've still got binders full of those great Mitt The Man graphics we could dust off.

3396586408_b41e9c67a7_m_d.jpg
 
Last edited:
Willard might be the only hope the RW has ... a loser x2
The greatest president of our time lost how many times?


no fair counting on your fingers

That's a rule YOU invented because your fingers were always too busily gouging out hot snot boogers from your nose...these molten delights you find delectable.

Almost as delectable as the fingers you love to lick after they have been pulled from your anus.
Who could possibly argue with such eloquent articulation?

Hey, he's just "try[ing] to educate Americans and save America".

:lmao:

As for Mittens, there's always more room in the Clown Car. The more the merrier on that debate stage. He was great fun last time and we've still got binders full of those great Mitt The Man graphics we could dust off.

3396586408_b41e9c67a7_m_d.jpg

A Romney/Cruz ticket would be miles of entertainment......many fun possibilities to consider.
 
If Romney runs again Hillary will win simply because of her position - slightly to Romney's right.

But then that depends on who Mitt is addressing.
I might have voted for the guy in 2012 if he hadn't adapted the same style of addressing crowds and issues that his fellow Bay Stater John Kerry used in 2004.. I could never figure out what Romney stood for because it changed all the time. So I wrote in Jon Huntsman on my 2012 election ballot because I wanted some consistency.
 
I wonder if Rove and Co thinks the "buyer's remorse" narrative they have righty media pushing is a better strategy than running someone that wouldn't conjure up the "lost once already" perceptions.

Nobody is polling better than Hillary from the GOP right now, as far as I know. So...maybe Giving America a second chance to give Mitt a try could be the lesser of their current bad options

The GOP doesn't have a better strategy to fall back on. They can't because they've painted themselves into a corner, their strict adherence to ideological dogma won't allow them to go off script. If they do deviate from the standard approved rhetoric they can expect to be crucified by the extreme elements in their own party.
 
Republicans will never nominate Jeb Bush because he's too reasonable and intelligent......and they just can't tolerate that.

Not to mention that inconvenient, vote-killing last name.
There is that, although I think everyone recognizes that he was always the smarter brother.

Agree but that's not saying much.

At least Jeb seems like a real person......Romney appears to be made of wood.
 
If Romney runs again Hillary will win simply because of her position - slightly to Romney's right.

But then that depends on who Mitt is addressing.
I might have voted for the guy in 2012 if he hadn't adapted the same style of addressing crowds and issues that his fellow Bay Stater John Kerry used in 2004.. I could never figure out what Romney stood for because it changed all the time. So I wrote in Jon Huntsman on my 2012 election ballot because I wanted some consistency.
The Democrats thank you for Obama's second term.
 
If Romney runs again Hillary will win simply because of her position - slightly to Romney's right.

But then that depends on who Mitt is addressing.
I might have voted for the guy in 2012 if he hadn't adapted the same style of addressing crowds and issues that his fellow Bay Stater John Kerry used in 2004.. I could never figure out what Romney stood for because it changed all the time. So I wrote in Jon Huntsman on my 2012 election ballot because I wanted some consistency.
The Democrats thank you for Obama's second term.

Yeah, my single vote was the national and state game changer alright! :disbelief::lol: Obama carried Minnesota 52.6 percent to 45 percent.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says I have to vote for either the Democratic or Republican parties's candidates even when neither candidate represents my interests, which is strengthening the middle class. I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils, when there are better candidates than what the Dems or GOP offer up.
But hey, thanks for your opinion about my freedom to vote for who I want to vote for.
 
If Romney runs again Hillary will win simply because of her position - slightly to Romney's right.

But then that depends on who Mitt is addressing.
I might have voted for the guy in 2012 if he hadn't adapted the same style of addressing crowds and issues that his fellow Bay Stater John Kerry used in 2004.. I could never figure out what Romney stood for because it changed all the time. So I wrote in Jon Huntsman on my 2012 election ballot because I wanted some consistency.
The Democrats thank you for Obama's second term.

Yeah, my single vote was the national and state game changer alright! :disbelief::lol: Obama carried Minnesota 52.6 percent to 45 percent.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says I have to vote for either the Democratic or Republican parties's candidates even when neither candidate represents my interests, which is strengthening the middle class. I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils, when there are better candidates than what the Dems or GOP offer up.
But hey, thanks for your opinion about my freedom to vote for who I want to vote for.

Your vote is barely relevant any way because the outcome is determined by the Electoral College.
 

Forum List

Back
Top