Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,159
- 198
Not if anyone actually reads your tripe. But, you can fool the other denier idiots on this board.Nah, just smarter than you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not if anyone actually reads your tripe. But, you can fool the other denier idiots on this board.Nah, just smarter than you!
You’re just jealous. You ran out of depends didn’t you.You're pretty fucking dumb.
In your case, Alzheimers would be a blessing. You don’t seem to have a clue how many times you make ignorant and irrational statements..Burlington, you stupid Alzheimer's victim.
You’re just jealous. You ran out of depends didn’t you.
Probably because I’m smarter then you. Burlington doesn’t have to “store” any electricity they contract out for. They are users for that subset, idiot. Read 851 again. This time with your eyes open.At least you can't keep lying about Burlington storing any power.
You are legend in your own idiot mind. I find arguing with idiots tiring.Post #851
Probably because I’m smarter then you. Burlington doesn’t have to “store” any electricity they contract out for. They are users for that subset, idiot. Read 851 again. This time with your eyes open.
I don't give a shit about your appeals to worthless ass clowns who are putting out what the politicians want them too. They are as worthless as you are.Ok, let’s do the math. The magic number is one. Just give us one University, Govt or related corporation, that doesn’t think we should move to more renewables and use less fossil fuel. Just one, do the math, just one.
Btw, I see no link. None, not a one. You posted made up shit.
Probably because I’m smarter then you. Burlington doesn’t have to “store” any electricity they contract out for. They are users for that subset, idiot. Read 851 again. This time with your eyes open.
Nothing in that says they store electricity. The whole point is, They depend upon electricity from renewables, 100%.View attachment 744550
You said they did it. Now you say they don't have to.
Were you lying or just stupid?
And so we are back to the massive scientist conspiracy theory.I don't give a shit about your appeals to worthless ass clowns who are putting out what the politicians want them too. They are as worthless as you are.
So, you literally, can’t come up with one govt, university or research facility in the whole world that agrees with your tripe. Denying AGW is the bellwether for passing the asylum entrance exam.I don't give a shit about your appeals to worthless ass clowns who are putting out what the politicians want them too. They are as worthless as you are.
Yup.And so we are back to the massive scientist conspiracy theory.
Nothing in that says they store electricity. The whole point is, They depend upon electricity from renewables, 100%.
It’s you who keep sounding idiotic about no one can store electricity. Foolish, it’s the contractor that manages the electricity they then sell in part to Burlington. You are stooooopid. Why are you still on this storage kick. Talk about Hillary. At least you won’t sound so ignorant.
You’re an idiot. The contractors manage electricity just like fossil fuel user contractors do. I just go a kick out of you thinking Burlington does all this shit….they do something’s…..we’ll let you guess what it is.Nothing in that says they store electricity.
You lied. You said they did it. They don't.
It’s you who keep sounding idiotic about no one can store electricity.
I never said no one can store electricity. I asked you to prove your claim that Burlington, or your local utility, did.
Why are you still on this storage kick.
Why do you keep lying about green utilities using storage?
You’re an idiot. The contractors manage electricity just like fossil fuel user contractors do. I just go a kick out of you thinking Burlington does all this shit….they do something’s…..we’ll let you guess what it is.
ha ha
Tell us again how people store “power”.
Let's say, we throw out all scientific data, and projections based on that data and for the sake of argument, we go with the old unproven schtick of saying, "the climate is always changing, nothing to worry about," and assume climate change isn't real, what is the worse (sic) possible scenario that could happen from the government simply wanting cleaner for future generations? I can't think of a single thing.
Let's say, we throw out all scientific data, and projections based on that data and for the sake of argument, we go with the old unproven schtick of saying, "the climate is always changing, nothing to worry about," and assume climate change isn't real, what is the worse possible scenario that could happen from the government simply wanting cleaner for future generations? I can't think of a single thing. Now let's assume climate change is actually real, and you naysayers are all wrong, what would be the consequences of not doing anything then? Which option seems the most sensible for anyone who has two halves of a brain?
…getting upset I see. Try to control yourself. Maybe if you read post 851 it would help calm you down.Burlington's contractors store power?
Or are you making shit up again?
I just go a kick out of you thinking Burlington does all this shit….
I get a kick out of you lying about Burlington. And then crying when I call you on it. LOL!
Liar.