Mission Accomplished!!! My liberal pro-Hillary daughter will not be voting!!!

[PK1]

Pumpkin, are you referring to this reference that you omitted from your post's thread?

An ABC News/Washington Post poll finds Donald Trump crushes Hillary Clinton among white men without college degrees 76 percent to 17 percent—a 59-point lead.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...rcent-among-white-men-without-college-degrees

If you're only 16-17 years old, then you likely have not had a college education and referring to it as "indoctrination" is not only ignorant, but cute ... at your age. It depends on the classes & major one pursues, but in many cases, a college student is exposed to various academic subjects that expand one's mind and provide analytical tools on top of evidentiary material for self thought (not indoctrination) to critically & logically evaluate claims made by others.

Those statistics i cited reflect the data pattern that white men who support Trump are much less likely to have a college degree.

Actually, if you check the quotes in my post, your post is that I was referring to is up there, and you two were still discussing it, so there was no reason for me to add it to my main post.

I don't really think indoctrination is 'cute', but since Lefties have been using the 'education' system for that purpose for years, it wouldn't surprise me that they would find it 'cute'.

Oh sure, they're taught various subjects, expanding their knowledge in various areas, HOWEVER they are also introduced to various left wing ideals through certain required classes and side notes in textbooks. You know, as if DNC-controlled CNN wasn't enough.

I also don't feel that indoctrination is "cute"; i was referring to your conclusion that college education equates to left wing "indoctrination" when you probably have not had experience at the college level.

Why do you wear biased lenses when evaluating the value of college education? Many successful and/or powerful right wing thinkers attended universities. I don't think you would say they were "indoctrinated", would you?
At the college level, one is EXPOSED to a variety of ideas, but it's up to the individual to make sense of them with their free-thinking brain.
What "left wing ideals" do you think are glorified in required classes?

Oh look, spinning and we're only two posts into the discussion. You truly are incapable of having a normal conversation, aren't you?

You already know this, but what I said was that indoctrination comes WITH it, as in they're exposed to it ALSO. As in it's separate information that's provided with the education experience. Your obvious and failed spinning aside, now, a great example is Georgia Perimeter College. They have a required class called "First Semester Experience", a friend of mine had to attend that class, and part of that class involved information regarding Gender Identity and homosexuality, concepts the lefties push as 'normal' so that they can gain votes from the LGBT community. Just one example of indoctrination being involved in a college. People are also exposed to other left wing ideals, like Socialism, my friend noticed this ideology being presented in a positive light in his history class, another left wing ideal.

You also seem to be under the impression that presentation and content have absolutely nothing to do with influencing a person's perspective, but why would you? You've already been indoctrinated, so of course you wouldn't notice it since it aligns with your perspective.

Spinning goes both ways. Pumpkin.
How do you define a normal conversation?

Each college/university has its own graduation requirements, and graduates are often judged on which institution they attended.
YOU CHOOSE where you want to go for higher education. You don't like Georgia Perimeter College, then go elsewhere, like a right-wing religious/dogma school if you prefer.

Colleges should & usually offer classes that EXPOSE students to various ideas & information. It's up to the student to make up their own minds. I don't see a problem being exposed to subjects covering various philosophies or reviews of various behavioral patterns, such as LBGT. You learn about REALITY, and you should be able to argue your logical thoughts.

Except you're the only one spinning, but you're right, it sure can go both ways.

The amount of choices depends on location and how many are controlled by lefttards. A friend of mine was recently fired as a substitute because all of the colleges in his area wanted to "Diversify" their staff. Wonder how many of those are controlled by lefttards.

It's not simply exposing someone to something if the way it's worded implies it's completely normal. I bet you'd be all over it if it was mentioned that it's a mental illness.

You know, even if you had a point here, I'm sure these statistics are just as accurate as the election statistics libtards were throwing around.

I prefer to maintain an open-minded position that makes decisions & forms beliefs based on information & evidence from various sources.
Higher education can expand a student's mind toward that objective viewpoint. And you're right, polls are often inaccurate.

However, if you already hold an extreme viewpoint, calling those with different views "libtards", then maybe college is not for you.
I'm curious, do you call yourself a "contard"?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Actually, if you check the quotes in my post, your post is that I was referring to is up there, and you two were still discussing it, so there was no reason for me to add it to my main post.

I don't really think indoctrination is 'cute', but since Lefties have been using the 'education' system for that purpose for years, it wouldn't surprise me that they would find it 'cute'.

Oh sure, they're taught various subjects, expanding their knowledge in various areas, HOWEVER they are also introduced to various left wing ideals through certain required classes and side notes in textbooks. You know, as if DNC-controlled CNN wasn't enough.

I also don't feel that indoctrination is "cute"; i was referring to your conclusion that college education equates to left wing "indoctrination" when you probably have not had experience at the college level.

Why do you wear biased lenses when evaluating the value of college education? Many successful and/or powerful right wing thinkers attended universities. I don't think you would say they were "indoctrinated", would you?
At the college level, one is EXPOSED to a variety of ideas, but it's up to the individual to make sense of them with their free-thinking brain.
What "left wing ideals" do you think are glorified in required classes?

Oh look, spinning and we're only two posts into the discussion. You truly are incapable of having a normal conversation, aren't you?

You already know this, but what I said was that indoctrination comes WITH it, as in they're exposed to it ALSO. As in it's separate information that's provided with the education experience. Your obvious and failed spinning aside, now, a great example is Georgia Perimeter College. They have a required class called "First Semester Experience", a friend of mine had to attend that class, and part of that class involved information regarding Gender Identity and homosexuality, concepts the lefties push as 'normal' so that they can gain votes from the LGBT community. Just one example of indoctrination being involved in a college. People are also exposed to other left wing ideals, like Socialism, my friend noticed this ideology being presented in a positive light in his history class, another left wing ideal.

You also seem to be under the impression that presentation and content have absolutely nothing to do with influencing a person's perspective, but why would you? You've already been indoctrinated, so of course you wouldn't notice it since it aligns with your perspective.

Spinning goes both ways. Pumpkin.
How do you define a normal conversation?

Each college/university has its own graduation requirements, and graduates are often judged on which institution they attended.
YOU CHOOSE where you want to go for higher education. You don't like Georgia Perimeter College, then go elsewhere, like a right-wing religious/dogma school if you prefer.

Colleges should & usually offer classes that EXPOSE students to various ideas & information. It's up to the student to make up their own minds. I don't see a problem being exposed to subjects covering various philosophies or reviews of various behavioral patterns, such as LBGT. You learn about REALITY, and you should be able to argue your logical thoughts.

Except you're the only one spinning, but you're right, it sure can go both ways.

The amount of choices depends on location and how many are controlled by lefttards. A friend of mine was recently fired as a substitute because all of the colleges in his area wanted to "Diversify" their staff. Wonder how many of those are controlled by lefttards.

It's not simply exposing someone to something if the way it's worded implies it's completely normal. I bet you'd be all over it if it was mentioned that it's a mental illness.

You know, even if you had a point here, I'm sure these statistics are just as accurate as the election statistics libtards were throwing around.

I prefer to maintain an open-minded position that makes decisions & forms beliefs based on information & evidence from various sources.
Higher education can expand a student's mind toward that objective viewpoint. And you're right, polls are often inaccurate.

However, if you already hold an extreme viewpoint, calling those with different views "libtards", then maybe college is not for you.
I'm curious, do you call yourself a "contard"?

The fact that you're a Liberal already debunks that claim.

It depends on what that student is told. Incorrect information won't help you at all, and you're proof of that.

Misusing the word "extreme", I see.

 

[PK1]

I also don't feel that indoctrination is "cute"; i was referring to your conclusion that college education equates to left wing "indoctrination" when you probably have not had experience at the college level.

Why do you wear biased lenses when evaluating the value of college education? Many successful and/or powerful right wing thinkers attended universities. I don't think you would say they were "indoctrinated", would you?
At the college level, one is EXPOSED to a variety of ideas, but it's up to the individual to make sense of them with their free-thinking brain.
What "left wing ideals" do you think are glorified in required classes?

Oh look, spinning and we're only two posts into the discussion. You truly are incapable of having a normal conversation, aren't you?

You already know this, but what I said was that indoctrination comes WITH it, as in they're exposed to it ALSO. As in it's separate information that's provided with the education experience. Your obvious and failed spinning aside, now, a great example is Georgia Perimeter College. They have a required class called "First Semester Experience", a friend of mine had to attend that class, and part of that class involved information regarding Gender Identity and homosexuality, concepts the lefties push as 'normal' so that they can gain votes from the LGBT community. Just one example of indoctrination being involved in a college. People are also exposed to other left wing ideals, like Socialism, my friend noticed this ideology being presented in a positive light in his history class, another left wing ideal.

You also seem to be under the impression that presentation and content have absolutely nothing to do with influencing a person's perspective, but why would you? You've already been indoctrinated, so of course you wouldn't notice it since it aligns with your perspective.

Spinning goes both ways. Pumpkin.
How do you define a normal conversation?

Each college/university has its own graduation requirements, and graduates are often judged on which institution they attended.
YOU CHOOSE where you want to go for higher education. You don't like Georgia Perimeter College, then go elsewhere, like a right-wing religious/dogma school if you prefer.

Colleges should & usually offer classes that EXPOSE students to various ideas & information. It's up to the student to make up their own minds. I don't see a problem being exposed to subjects covering various philosophies or reviews of various behavioral patterns, such as LBGT. You learn about REALITY, and you should be able to argue your logical thoughts.

Except you're the only one spinning, but you're right, it sure can go both ways.

The amount of choices depends on location and how many are controlled by lefttards. A friend of mine was recently fired as a substitute because all of the colleges in his area wanted to "Diversify" their staff. Wonder how many of those are controlled by lefttards.

It's not simply exposing someone to something if the way it's worded implies it's completely normal. I bet you'd be all over it if it was mentioned that it's a mental illness.

You know, even if you had a point here, I'm sure these statistics are just as accurate as the election statistics libtards were throwing around.

I prefer to maintain an open-minded position that makes decisions & forms beliefs based on information & evidence from various sources.
Higher education can expand a student's mind toward that objective viewpoint. And you're right, polls are often inaccurate.

However, if you already hold an extreme viewpoint, calling those with different views "libtards", then maybe college is not for you.
I'm curious, do you call yourself a "contard"?

The fact that you're a Liberal already debunks that claim.

It depends on what that student is told. Incorrect information won't help you at all, and you're proof of that.

Misusing the word "extreme", I see.

Until you educate yourself on how to evaluate the merit of "information", your premature notions of "incorrect information" are immature, especially if you are not even exposed to that information.
You can keep your non-extreme "contard" head in the sand; it's up to you.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Oh look, spinning and we're only two posts into the discussion. You truly are incapable of having a normal conversation, aren't you?

You already know this, but what I said was that indoctrination comes WITH it, as in they're exposed to it ALSO. As in it's separate information that's provided with the education experience. Your obvious and failed spinning aside, now, a great example is Georgia Perimeter College. They have a required class called "First Semester Experience", a friend of mine had to attend that class, and part of that class involved information regarding Gender Identity and homosexuality, concepts the lefties push as 'normal' so that they can gain votes from the LGBT community. Just one example of indoctrination being involved in a college. People are also exposed to other left wing ideals, like Socialism, my friend noticed this ideology being presented in a positive light in his history class, another left wing ideal.

You also seem to be under the impression that presentation and content have absolutely nothing to do with influencing a person's perspective, but why would you? You've already been indoctrinated, so of course you wouldn't notice it since it aligns with your perspective.

Spinning goes both ways. Pumpkin.
How do you define a normal conversation?

Each college/university has its own graduation requirements, and graduates are often judged on which institution they attended.
YOU CHOOSE where you want to go for higher education. You don't like Georgia Perimeter College, then go elsewhere, like a right-wing religious/dogma school if you prefer.

Colleges should & usually offer classes that EXPOSE students to various ideas & information. It's up to the student to make up their own minds. I don't see a problem being exposed to subjects covering various philosophies or reviews of various behavioral patterns, such as LBGT. You learn about REALITY, and you should be able to argue your logical thoughts.

Except you're the only one spinning, but you're right, it sure can go both ways.

The amount of choices depends on location and how many are controlled by lefttards. A friend of mine was recently fired as a substitute because all of the colleges in his area wanted to "Diversify" their staff. Wonder how many of those are controlled by lefttards.

It's not simply exposing someone to something if the way it's worded implies it's completely normal. I bet you'd be all over it if it was mentioned that it's a mental illness.

You know, even if you had a point here, I'm sure these statistics are just as accurate as the election statistics libtards were throwing around.

I prefer to maintain an open-minded position that makes decisions & forms beliefs based on information & evidence from various sources.
Higher education can expand a student's mind toward that objective viewpoint. And you're right, polls are often inaccurate.

However, if you already hold an extreme viewpoint, calling those with different views "libtards", then maybe college is not for you.
I'm curious, do you call yourself a "contard"?

The fact that you're a Liberal already debunks that claim.

It depends on what that student is told. Incorrect information won't help you at all, and you're proof of that.

Misusing the word "extreme", I see.

Until you educate yourself on how to evaluate the merit of "information", your premature notions of "incorrect information" are immature, especially if you are not even exposed to that information.
You can keep your non-extreme "contard" head in the sand; it's up to you.

Hey, just because you're uninformed, it doesn't mean I'm wrong about what information is incorrect~

I'd ask how the view is from that glass house of yours, but I already lost interest.

 

[PK1]

Spinning goes both ways. Pumpkin.
How do you define a normal conversation?

Each college/university has its own graduation requirements, and graduates are often judged on which institution they attended.
YOU CHOOSE where you want to go for higher education. You don't like Georgia Perimeter College, then go elsewhere, like a right-wing religious/dogma school if you prefer.

Colleges should & usually offer classes that EXPOSE students to various ideas & information. It's up to the student to make up their own minds. I don't see a problem being exposed to subjects covering various philosophies or reviews of various behavioral patterns, such as LBGT. You learn about REALITY, and you should be able to argue your logical thoughts.

Except you're the only one spinning, but you're right, it sure can go both ways.

The amount of choices depends on location and how many are controlled by lefttards. A friend of mine was recently fired as a substitute because all of the colleges in his area wanted to "Diversify" their staff. Wonder how many of those are controlled by lefttards.

It's not simply exposing someone to something if the way it's worded implies it's completely normal. I bet you'd be all over it if it was mentioned that it's a mental illness.

You know, even if you had a point here, I'm sure these statistics are just as accurate as the election statistics libtards were throwing around.

I prefer to maintain an open-minded position that makes decisions & forms beliefs based on information & evidence from various sources.
Higher education can expand a student's mind toward that objective viewpoint. And you're right, polls are often inaccurate.

However, if you already hold an extreme viewpoint, calling those with different views "libtards", then maybe college is not for you.
I'm curious, do you call yourself a "contard"?

The fact that you're a Liberal already debunks that claim.

It depends on what that student is told. Incorrect information won't help you at all, and you're proof of that.

Misusing the word "extreme", I see.

Until you educate yourself on how to evaluate the merit of "information", your premature notions of "incorrect information" are immature, especially if you are not even exposed to that information.
You can keep your non-extreme "contard" head in the sand; it's up to you.

Hey, just because you're uninformed, it doesn't mean I'm wrong about what information is incorrect~

I'd ask how the view is from that glass house of yours, but I already lost interest.

If it makes you feel better thinking that I am uninformed, that's your problem. Feel free to test any information you think is valid.
Otherwise, good luck for your possible transformation toward maturity .

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Except you're the only one spinning, but you're right, it sure can go both ways.

The amount of choices depends on location and how many are controlled by lefttards. A friend of mine was recently fired as a substitute because all of the colleges in his area wanted to "Diversify" their staff. Wonder how many of those are controlled by lefttards.

It's not simply exposing someone to something if the way it's worded implies it's completely normal. I bet you'd be all over it if it was mentioned that it's a mental illness.

You know, even if you had a point here, I'm sure these statistics are just as accurate as the election statistics libtards were throwing around.

I prefer to maintain an open-minded position that makes decisions & forms beliefs based on information & evidence from various sources.
Higher education can expand a student's mind toward that objective viewpoint. And you're right, polls are often inaccurate.

However, if you already hold an extreme viewpoint, calling those with different views "libtards", then maybe college is not for you.
I'm curious, do you call yourself a "contard"?

The fact that you're a Liberal already debunks that claim.

It depends on what that student is told. Incorrect information won't help you at all, and you're proof of that.

Misusing the word "extreme", I see.

Until you educate yourself on how to evaluate the merit of "information", your premature notions of "incorrect information" are immature, especially if you are not even exposed to that information.
You can keep your non-extreme "contard" head in the sand; it's up to you.

Hey, just because you're uninformed, it doesn't mean I'm wrong about what information is incorrect~

I'd ask how the view is from that glass house of yours, but I already lost interest.

If it makes you feel better thinking that I am uninformed, that's your problem. Feel free to test any information you think is valid.
Otherwise, good luck for your possible transformation toward maturity .

It doesn't make me feel better, the sheer amount of stupid people in the world is worrisome. You really should educate yourself.

 

[PK1]

I prefer to maintain an open-minded position that makes decisions & forms beliefs based on information & evidence from various sources.
Higher education can expand a student's mind toward that objective viewpoint. And you're right, polls are often inaccurate.

However, if you already hold an extreme viewpoint, calling those with different views "libtards", then maybe college is not for you.
I'm curious, do you call yourself a "contard"?

The fact that you're a Liberal already debunks that claim.

It depends on what that student is told. Incorrect information won't help you at all, and you're proof of that.

Misusing the word "extreme", I see.

Until you educate yourself on how to evaluate the merit of "information", your premature notions of "incorrect information" are immature, especially if you are not even exposed to that information.
You can keep your non-extreme "contard" head in the sand; it's up to you.

Hey, just because you're uninformed, it doesn't mean I'm wrong about what information is incorrect~

I'd ask how the view is from that glass house of yours, but I already lost interest.

If it makes you feel better thinking that I am uninformed, that's your problem. Feel free to test any information you think is valid.
Otherwise, good luck for your possible transformation toward maturity .

It doesn't make me feel better, the sheer amount of stupid people in the world is worrisome. You really should educate yourself.

You remind me of this humor: