Missiles From Syria Shot Down In The Golan

[Hossfly]

Iron Dome continues to prove it's value.

In a first, the Iron Dome anti-missile defense system was used in Israel’s north to intercept projectiles fired from Syria.


The Iron Dome anti-missile defense system intercepted two projectiles fired from Syria into the Israeli Golan Heights on Saturday.

No injures or damage were reported in the incidents.

Iron Dome intercepts Syrian rockets in northern Israel | World Israel News

 

[Bleipriester]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

 

[Phoenall]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

More LIES abdul, when will you learn to stop LYING as you tie yourself in knots trying to cover your tracks

 

[Bleipriester]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

More LIES abdul, when will you learn to stop LYING as you tie yourself in knots trying to cover your tracks

How can there be a lie, there is not even a Statement?

 

[Hollie]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

An airstrike would not necessarily be required. Israel has responded previously to attacks from Syria with artillery fire.

But let's be honest. If israel does retaliate, you and the identifiable Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers will be quick to react with feverish, sweaty, screeching posts (typed in bold text), about Zionist Jew aggression™

 

[Phoenall]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

More LIES abdul, when will you learn to stop LYING as you tie yourself in knots trying to cover your tracks

How can there be a lie, there is not even a Statement?

Read your own words again, no evidence a plane was lost making your post a LIE.

If I said Assad had been beheaded by a 7 year old boy because it was on the internet would this be true ? That is the same with your claims

 

[Bleipriester]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

An airstrike would not necessarily be required. Israel has responded previously to attacks from Syria with artillery fire.

But let's be honest. If israel does retaliate, you and the identifiable Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers will be quick to react with feverish, sweaty, screeching posts (typed in bold text), about Zionist Jew aggression™

The problems with the Israeli responses are:

1. A mortar shell or rocket accidentally going down on the occupied Golan does not intend to hit anyone (rare case).
2. A mortar shell or rocket fired by the terrorists on the occupied Golan intends to provoke an Israeli strike on the Syrian army (regular case).
3. All Israeli responses targeted the Syrian army or allies and not a single time the terrorists.

 

[Phoenall]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

An airstrike would not necessarily be required. Israel has responded previously to attacks from Syria with artillery fire.

But let's be honest. If israel does retaliate, you and the identifiable Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers will be quick to react with feverish, sweaty, screeching posts (typed in bold text), about Zionist Jew aggression™

The problems with the Israeli responses are:

1. A mortar shell or rocket accidentally going down on the occupied Golan does not intend to hit anyone (rare case).
2. A mortar shell or rocket fired by the terrorists on the occupied Golan intends to provoke an Israeli strike on the Syrian army (regular case).
3. All Israeli responses targeted the Syrian army or allies and not a single time the terrorists.

Then why was it pointing that way ?

You mean Syrian forces pretending to be terrorists and failing

Because that is the source of the weapons fired at Israel

 

[Bleipriester]

You mean Syrian forces pretending to be terrorists and failing

Nope, asshole.

Because that is the source of the weapons fired at Israel

Nope, asshole.

 

[Hollie]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

An airstrike would not necessarily be required. Israel has responded previously to attacks from Syria with artillery fire.

But let's be honest. If israel does retaliate, you and the identifiable Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers will be quick to react with feverish, sweaty, screeching posts (typed in bold text), about Zionist Jew aggression™

The problems with the Israeli responses are:

1. A mortar shell or rocket accidentally going down on the occupied Golan does not intend to hit anyone (rare case).
2. A mortar shell or rocket fired by the terrorists on the occupied Golan intends to provoke an Israeli strike on the Syrian army (regular case).
3. All Israeli responses targeted the Syrian army or allies and not a single time the terrorists.

I don't believe you're looking at this objectively. I'm not aware that isreali responses to attacks from Golan have anything to do with accidental mortar or artillery strikes by Israeli forces. Israeli responses to attacks are targeted to eliminate the threat. That means the Israeli response is directed at the immediate threat. If you are suggesting that israel indiscriminately fires into Golan, that makes no sense.

Attacks from Golan (regardless who the attacker is), will likely trigger a prompt retaliatory strike from Israeli forces as a way to protect Israeli citizens. A requirement of any responsible government is to protect its citizens.

I have no reason to accept your comment in item three as accurate. It's reasonable to hold the Syrian government responsible for attacks committed from Syrian territory but the attackers, whoever they are, are subject to retaliatory strikes.

 

[Bleipriester]

I don't believe you're looking at this objectively. I'm not aware that isreali responses to attacks from Golan have anything to do with accidental mortar or artillery strikes by Israeli forces.

I didn´t say anything about mortar or artillery strikes by Israeli forces.

Israeli responses to attacks are targeted to eliminate the threat. That means the Israeli response is directed at the immediate threat. If you are suggesting that israel indiscriminately fires into Golan, that makes no sense.

If they intended to address the threat, they would offer Syria help against the terrorists and not shell the Syrian army.

Attacks from Golan (regardless who the attacker is), will likely trigger a prompt retaliatory strike from Israeli forces as a way to protect Israeli citizens. A requirement of any responsible government is to protect its citizens.

A responsible government does not support al-Qaeda and occupy other´s land. There are Syrian citizens in the occupied Golan, the SAA would never fire at them or other civilians.
Golan Druze attack Israeli army ambulance, Syrian casualty dies

I have no reason to accept your comment in item three as accurate. It's reasonable to hold the Syrian government responsible for attacks committed from Syrian territory but the attackers, whoever they are, are subject to retaliatory strikes.

Israel is responsible. The Israeli government is fuelling the war, supporting Islamist terrorism. Everyone killed by the terrorists in the region must be added to Netanyahu´s account.
Asia Times Online :: Israel lends al-Nusra a hand in Syria

 

[Phoenall]

You mean Syrian forces pretending to be terrorists and failing

Nope, asshole.

Because that is the source of the weapons fired at Israel

Nope, asshole.

Still denying the truth I see, how much has the butcher offered you for LYING

 

[Phoenall]

"The IDF has not responded to the incident."

Um, why not? Fear to lose another plane?

An airstrike would not necessarily be required. Israel has responded previously to attacks from Syria with artillery fire.

But let's be honest. If israel does retaliate, you and the identifiable Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers will be quick to react with feverish, sweaty, screeching posts (typed in bold text), about Zionist Jew aggression™

The problems with the Israeli responses are:

1. A mortar shell or rocket accidentally going down on the occupied Golan does not intend to hit anyone (rare case).
2. A mortar shell or rocket fired by the terrorists on the occupied Golan intends to provoke an Israeli strike on the Syrian army (regular case).
3. All Israeli responses targeted the Syrian army or allies and not a single time the terrorists.

I don't believe you're looking at this objectively. I'm not aware that isreali responses to attacks from Golan have anything to do with accidental mortar or artillery strikes by Israeli forces. Israeli responses to attacks are targeted to eliminate the threat. That means the Israeli response is directed at the immediate threat. If you are suggesting that israel indiscriminately fires into Golan, that makes no sense.

Attacks from Golan (regardless who the attacker is), will likely trigger a prompt retaliatory strike from Israeli forces as a way to protect Israeli citizens. A requirement of any responsible government is to protect its citizens.

I have no reason to accept your comment in item three as accurate. It's reasonable to hold the Syrian government responsible for attacks committed from Syrian territory but the attackers, whoever they are, are subject to retaliatory strikes.

Israel will have satellite imagery that they can use to pin point the position the weapons were fired from, we can use a similar system called google maps or google Earth. With this you can see exactly where a weapon was fired from and who fired it. The arab muslims have stopped denying they were doing it after the video evidence was made public, and leave it up to their stooges and morons to do the denying.

 

[Phoenall]

LIAR the butcher has given orders to fire on the Syrians that oppose his rule, and he is facing legal action once this little war is over.

 

[Bleipriester]

LIAR the butcher has given orders to fire on the Syrians that oppose his rule, and he is facing legal action once this little war is over.

Allah akbar, right?

 

[Hollie]

I don't believe you're looking at this objectively. I'm not aware that isreali responses to attacks from Golan have anything to do with accidental mortar or artillery strikes by Israeli forces.

I didn´t say anything about mortar or artillery strikes by Israeli forces.

Israeli responses to attacks are targeted to eliminate the threat. That means the Israeli response is directed at the immediate threat. If you are suggesting that israel indiscriminately fires into Golan, that makes no sense.

If they intended to address the threat, they would offer Syria help against the terrorists and not shell the Syrian army.

Attacks from Golan (regardless who the attacker is), will likely trigger a prompt retaliatory strike from Israeli forces as a way to protect Israeli citizens. A requirement of any responsible government is to protect its citizens.

A responsible government does not support al-Qaeda and occupy other´s land. There are Syrian citizens in the occupied Golan, the SAA would never fire at them or other civilians.
Golan Druze attack Israeli army ambulance, Syrian casualty dies

I have no reason to accept your comment in item three as accurate. It's reasonable to hold the Syrian government responsible for attacks committed from Syrian territory but the attackers, whoever they are, are subject to retaliatory strikes.

Israel is responsible. The Israeli government is fuelling the war, supporting Islamist terrorism. Everyone killed by the terrorists in the region must be added to Netanyahu´s account.
Asia Times Online :: Israel lends al-Nusra a hand in Syria

Some confused thinking going on there. Why should israel feel a need to help Assad?

Hmm, let's see now:

§ Syria, an aggressive despotic state allied with Iran:

§ Which tyrannized Lebanon for decades,

§ Which is implacably hostile toward Israel,

§ Which is known to support Hizbollah and other Islamic terror groups,

§ Whose agents of insurrection have been captured inside Iraq,

§ And which is known to have received truck shipments of something from Saddam Hussein in the days before the inception of Operation Iraqi Freedom,

Any cause for alarm here?

Arab dictators / social misfits are de rigueur for the Moslem Middle East, a place where hatred is the animating force behind every event larger than a family dinner. Even those who appear completely innocent seldom are.

Your silly "israel is responsible" comment is nonsensical. The warring tribes of islamic savages are no different now than when the barbarian Islamic savages spilled out of the arabian peninsula after the death of muhammud (swish).

 

[Bleipriester]

Some confused thinking going on there. Why should israel feel a need to help Assad?

Hmm, let's see now:

§ Syria, an aggressive despotic state allied with Iran:

§ Which tyrannized Lebanon for decades,

§ Which is implacably hostile toward Israel,

§ Which is known to support Hizbollah and other Islamic terror groups,

§ Whose agents of insurrection have been captured inside Iraq,

§ And which is known to have received truck shipments of something from Saddam Hussein in the days before the inception of Operation Iraqi Freedom,

Any cause for alarm here?

Arab dictators / social misfits are de rigueur for the Moslem Middle East, a place where hatred is the animating force behind every event larger than a family dinner. Even those who appear completely innocent seldom are.

Your silly "israel is responsible" comment is nonsensical. The warring tribes of islamic savages are no different now than when the barbarian Islamic savages spilled out of the arabian peninsula after the death of muhammud (swish).

Given that the Israeli government supports al-Qaeda and ISIS, your points look very silly. But lets expand on your points as we now assume an Israeli people and government that do not want to live next to ISIS or al-Qaeda:

§ Syria, an aggressive despotic state [..]

Wrong. Syria is a free country:

"“The uniqueness of this great nation is its freedom; the right how to dress, speak and live according to one’s own choice.”"
SYRIA BANS THE BURKA

§ Which tyrannized Lebanon for decades,

Wrong. Syria has protected Lebanon from Israeli aggressions. Without Syria, Lebanon would be like Palestine.

§ Which is implacably hostile toward Israel,

What goes around, comes around.

§ Which is known to support Hizbollah and other Islamic terror groups,

Wrong. Hezbollah is not a terror group and Syria does not support terror groups.

§ Whose agents of insurrection have been captured inside Iraq,

Silly.

§ And which is known to have received truck shipments of something from Saddam Hussein in the days before the inception of Operation Iraqi Freedom,

What a shame

Arab dictators / social misfits are de rigueur for the Moslem Middle East, a place where hatred is the animating force behind every event larger than a family dinner. Even those who appear completely innocent seldom are.

Is this supposed to be an actual point? My Enigma fails.

Your silly "israel is responsible" comment is nonsensical. The warring tribes of islamic savages are no different now than when the barbarian Islamic savages spilled out of the arabian peninsula after the death of muhammud (swish).

We are talking about global terrorism, not tribes. An inner Islamist enemy without foreign support would have been defeated by the SAA already in 2011. Some tribes would not have dared to revolt.

Lets sum up:
In your opinion, you prefer to idly watch Islamist terrorism taking over Syria because you don´t like Syria. Is that right? Regardless of your accusations, wouldn´t it be better to have a reasonable, secular neighbor?



I also have a hint for you, a tut, so to say.
In order to create multiple quotes to itemize parts of a post, you simply have to put the parts you want to quote between the highlighted commands for each part:

This applies for all over this forum.

 

[Phoenall]

LIAR the butcher has given orders to fire on the Syrians that oppose his rule, and he is facing legal action once this little war is over.

Allah akbar, right?

If you say so, I prefer insh allah

 

[Phoenall]

Some confused thinking going on there. Why should israel feel a need to help Assad?

Hmm, let's see now:

§ Syria, an aggressive despotic state allied with Iran:

§ Which tyrannized Lebanon for decades,

§ Which is implacably hostile toward Israel,

§ Which is known to support Hizbollah and other Islamic terror groups,

§ Whose agents of insurrection have been captured inside Iraq,

§ And which is known to have received truck shipments of something from Saddam Hussein in the days before the inception of Operation Iraqi Freedom,

Any cause for alarm here?

Arab dictators / social misfits are de rigueur for the Moslem Middle East, a place where hatred is the animating force behind every event larger than a family dinner. Even those who appear completely innocent seldom are.

Your silly "israel is responsible" comment is nonsensical. The warring tribes of islamic savages are no different now than when the barbarian Islamic savages spilled out of the arabian peninsula after the death of muhammud (swish).

Given that the Israeli government supports al-Qaeda and ISIS, your points look very silly. But lets expand on your points as we now assume an Israeli people and government that do not want to live next to ISIS or al-Qaeda:

§ Syria, an aggressive despotic state [..]

Wrong. Syria is a free country:

"“The uniqueness of this great nation is its freedom; the right how to dress, speak and live according to one’s own choice.”"
SYRIA BANS THE BURKA

§ Which tyrannized Lebanon for decades,

Wrong. Syria has protected Lebanon from Israeli aggressions. Without Syria, Lebanon would be like Palestine.

§ Which is implacably hostile toward Israel,

What goes around, comes around.

§ Which is known to support Hizbollah and other Islamic terror groups,

Wrong. Hezbollah is not a terror group and Syria does not support terror groups.

§ Whose agents of insurrection have been captured inside Iraq,

Silly.

§ And which is known to have received truck shipments of something from Saddam Hussein in the days before the inception of Operation Iraqi Freedom,

What a shame

Arab dictators / social misfits are de rigueur for the Moslem Middle East, a place where hatred is the animating force behind every event larger than a family dinner. Even those who appear completely innocent seldom are.

Is this supposed to be an actual point? My Enigma fails.

Your silly "israel is responsible" comment is nonsensical. The warring tribes of islamic savages are no different now than when the barbarian Islamic savages spilled out of the arabian peninsula after the death of muhammud (swish).

We are talking about global terrorism, not tribes. An inner Islamist enemy without foreign support would have been defeated by the SAA already in 2011. Some tribes would not have dared to revolt.

Lets sum up:
In your opinion, you prefer to idly watch Islamist terrorism taking over Syria because you don´t like Syria. Is that right? Regardless of your accusations, wouldn´t it be better to have a reasonable, secular neighbor?



I also have a hint for you, a tut, so to say.
In order to create multiple quotes to itemize parts of a post, you simply have to put the parts you want to quote between the highlighted commands for each part:

This applies for all over this forum.

So which islamonazi propaganda site did you get this from ?

 

[Bleipriester]

Some confused thinking going on there. Why should israel feel a need to help Assad?

Hmm, let's see now:

§ Syria, an aggressive despotic state allied with Iran:

§ Which tyrannized Lebanon for decades,

§ Which is implacably hostile toward Israel,

§ Which is known to support Hizbollah and other Islamic terror groups,

§ Whose agents of insurrection have been captured inside Iraq,

§ And which is known to have received truck shipments of something from Saddam Hussein in the days before the inception of Operation Iraqi Freedom,

Any cause for alarm here?

Arab dictators / social misfits are de rigueur for the Moslem Middle East, a place where hatred is the animating force behind every event larger than a family dinner. Even those who appear completely innocent seldom are.

Your silly "israel is responsible" comment is nonsensical. The warring tribes of islamic savages are no different now than when the barbarian Islamic savages spilled out of the arabian peninsula after the death of muhammud (swish).

Given that the Israeli government supports al-Qaeda and ISIS, your points look very silly. But lets expand on your points as we now assume an Israeli people and government that do not want to live next to ISIS or al-Qaeda:

§ Syria, an aggressive despotic state [..]

Wrong. Syria is a free country:

"“The uniqueness of this great nation is its freedom; the right how to dress, speak and live according to one’s own choice.”"
SYRIA BANS THE BURKA

§ Which tyrannized Lebanon for decades,

Wrong. Syria has protected Lebanon from Israeli aggressions. Without Syria, Lebanon would be like Palestine.

§ Which is implacably hostile toward Israel,

What goes around, comes around.

§ Which is known to support Hizbollah and other Islamic terror groups,

Wrong. Hezbollah is not a terror group and Syria does not support terror groups.

§ Whose agents of insurrection have been captured inside Iraq,

Silly.

§ And which is known to have received truck shipments of something from Saddam Hussein in the days before the inception of Operation Iraqi Freedom,

What a shame

Arab dictators / social misfits are de rigueur for the Moslem Middle East, a place where hatred is the animating force behind every event larger than a family dinner. Even those who appear completely innocent seldom are.

Is this supposed to be an actual point? My Enigma fails.

Your silly "israel is responsible" comment is nonsensical. The warring tribes of islamic savages are no different now than when the barbarian Islamic savages spilled out of the arabian peninsula after the death of muhammud (swish).

We are talking about global terrorism, not tribes. An inner Islamist enemy without foreign support would have been defeated by the SAA already in 2011. Some tribes would not have dared to revolt.

Lets sum up:
In your opinion, you prefer to idly watch Islamist terrorism taking over Syria because you don´t like Syria. Is that right? Regardless of your accusations, wouldn´t it be better to have a reasonable, secular neighbor?



I also have a hint for you, a tut, so to say.
In order to create multiple quotes to itemize parts of a post, you simply have to put the parts you want to quote between the highlighted commands for each part:

This applies for all over this forum.

So which islamonazi propaganda site did you get this from ?

www.phoenall.is