Minnesota’s Democrat Governor quietly rescinds Hydroxychloroquine ban

I would not expect anything other than their typical uninformed dumbassery.

You give them too much credit - allowing them the excuse of being uninformed. They're very well informed and have been all along. They - government, Democrats, and even those on social media sites like this one - willingly caused the deaths of tens of thousands of human beings in the United States, hundreds of thousands globally, because Donald Trump said the word, hydroxychloroquine.

At the top, they know they fought it because their big pharma donors insisted that they not allow the inexpensive, off-patent, drug to solve this pandemic. But at the bottom, more so when you get to the social media level, it's purely out of hate for Donald Trump that they have supported, willingly and knowingly, the killing of hundreds of thousands of people.
 
Minnesota’s Democrat Governor Quietly Rescinds Hydroxychloroquine Ban



This includes Yale School of Public Health epidemiology professor Dr. Harvey A. Risch, who wrote, “When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.”



Miltimore notes other recent studies that land on the side of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating the coronavirus, especially in its early stages, which is “key,” according to Risch. Other proponents include:


  • Steven Hatfill, a veteran virologist and adjunct assistant professor at the George Washington University Medical Center, says the literature supporting hydroxychloroquine is overwhelming.
  • “There are now 53 studies that show positive results of hydroxychloroquine in COVID infections,” Hatfill wrote[.]
  • One of the positive studies, published by Henry Ford Health System, was a large-scale retrospective of six hospitals. Analyzing 2,541 patients, it found that those treated with hydroxychloroquine alone died at about half the rate of patients not treated with it.


Eat crow you leftist wankers.
Maybe she's hoping a lot of people like you will start taking it, it works so damn good.
 
Minnesota’s Democrat Governor Quietly Rescinds Hydroxychloroquine Ban



This includes Yale School of Public Health epidemiology professor Dr. Harvey A. Risch, who wrote, “When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.”



Miltimore notes other recent studies that land on the side of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating the coronavirus, especially in its early stages, which is “key,” according to Risch. Other proponents include:


  • Steven Hatfill, a veteran virologist and adjunct assistant professor at the George Washington University Medical Center, says the literature supporting hydroxychloroquine is overwhelming.
  • “There are now 53 studies that show positive results of hydroxychloroquine in COVID infections,” Hatfill wrote[.]
  • One of the positive studies, published by Henry Ford Health System, was a large-scale retrospective of six hospitals. Analyzing 2,541 patients, it found that those treated with hydroxychloroquine alone died at about half the rate of patients not treated with it.


Eat crow you leftist wankers.
Maybe she's hoping a lot of people like you will start taking it, it works so damn good.
Been around since WWII...........we had to take it to go to port in Kenya in the 80's.............we didn't die from it................it keeps you from getting Malaria.........and shitting yourself to death........it is a proven drug that has saved Millions.

I've taken it before............and would again...........Your FEAR FACTOR doesn't work here...............
 
It was available for inpatient treatment only. Outpatient treatment was restricted so that the drug supply could be utilized for people who actually needed it rather than shoveling it out to people who just wanted a placebo.

Since the drug is no longer being prescribed in any significant frequency for COVID because of lack of efficacy, there is no need for the restriction anymore.

And yet the proven efficacy was for early treatment; that's why it didn't help as much in the intensive care centers, idiot. The reason it's not being prescribed for Covid any more in Minnesota is because it was banned for use for Covid in Minnesota, idiot. Now, months later, probably a hundred thousand dead later across the country, there have been other, patented, far more expensive, treatments that the Democrat Party has approved for medical use for Covid so, rather than lose their jobs and not be able to treat anyone, doctors are choosing the expensive drug over the inexpensive drug.
Gilead............greases the palms of their favorite politicians........and are dirty to the core.

Not to mention the labs are making a fortune off the testing now...........imagine that.
Total nonsense. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
 
It was available for inpatient treatment only. Outpatient treatment was restricted so that the drug supply could be utilized for people who actually needed it rather than shoveling it out to people who just wanted a placebo.

Since the drug is no longer being prescribed in any significant frequency for COVID because of lack of efficacy, there is no need for the restriction anymore.

And yet the proven efficacy was for early treatment; that's why it didn't help as much in the intensive care centers, idiot. The reason it's not being prescribed for Covid any more in Minnesota is because it was banned for use for Covid in Minnesota, idiot. Now, months later, probably a hundred thousand dead later across the country, there have been other, patented, far more expensive, treatments that the Democrat Party has approved for medical use for Covid so, rather than lose their jobs and not be able to treat anyone, doctors are choosing the expensive drug over the inexpensive drug.
No, it hasn’t proven efficacy for “early treatment” whatever the bell that means.

Like I said, it was prescribed for inpatient use commonly in early days but due to lack of efficacy, no longer is being used. Doctors, good ones at least, don’t use medications when the data shows it doesn’t work.
 
It was available for inpatient treatment only. Outpatient treatment was restricted so that the drug supply could be utilized for people who actually needed it rather than shoveling it out to people who just wanted a placebo.

Since the drug is no longer being prescribed in any significant frequency for COVID because of lack of efficacy, there is no need for the restriction anymore.

And yet the proven efficacy was for early treatment; that's why it didn't help as much in the intensive care centers, idiot. The reason it's not being prescribed for Covid any more in Minnesota is because it was banned for use for Covid in Minnesota, idiot. Now, months later, probably a hundred thousand dead later across the country, there have been other, patented, far more expensive, treatments that the Democrat Party has approved for medical use for Covid so, rather than lose their jobs and not be able to treat anyone, doctors are choosing the expensive drug over the inexpensive drug.
Gilead............greases the palms of their favorite politicians........and are dirty to the core.

Not to mention the labs are making a fortune off the testing now...........imagine that.
Total nonsense. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
Yawn.......early on I posted about all of this..........including the orphan status on Gilead pushing to make a mint............you just don't like my opinions because you have a narrative of TDS.
 
This was probably the study that caused Walz to reverse his position but it is far from the only study that has shown hydroxychloroquine to be an effective therapy for covid 19 when administered early.
Going off one study is not how it’s done. This story is fine, but limited. It’s observational and retrospective, meaning it’s not well controlled. Not like a randomized placebo controlled prospective trial. Those trials are far less prone to error by confounding factors which probably existed in the Henry Ford study (the treatment arm received far more steroids than the controlled arm for example). The randomized controlled trials demonstrated no efficacy.
 
It was available for inpatient treatment only. Outpatient treatment was restricted so that the drug supply could be utilized for people who actually needed it rather than shoveling it out to people who just wanted a placebo.

Since the drug is no longer being prescribed in any significant frequency for COVID because of lack of efficacy, there is no need for the restriction anymore.

And yet the proven efficacy was for early treatment; that's why it didn't help as much in the intensive care centers, idiot. The reason it's not being prescribed for Covid any more in Minnesota is because it was banned for use for Covid in Minnesota, idiot. Now, months later, probably a hundred thousand dead later across the country, there have been other, patented, far more expensive, treatments that the Democrat Party has approved for medical use for Covid so, rather than lose their jobs and not be able to treat anyone, doctors are choosing the expensive drug over the inexpensive drug.
Gilead............greases the palms of their favorite politicians........and are dirty to the core.

Not to mention the labs are making a fortune off the testing now...........imagine that.
Total nonsense. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
Yawn.......early on I posted about all of this..........including the orphan status on Gilead pushing to make a mint............you just don't like my opinions because you have a narrative of TDS.
No, you’re posting information that you don’t understand and coming up with baseless conspiracies all to bend reality so that Trump can be right.
 
It was available for inpatient treatment only. Outpatient treatment was restricted so that the drug supply could be utilized for people who actually needed it rather than shoveling it out to people who just wanted a placebo.

Since the drug is no longer being prescribed in any significant frequency for COVID because of lack of efficacy, there is no need for the restriction anymore.

And yet the proven efficacy was for early treatment; that's why it didn't help as much in the intensive care centers, idiot. The reason it's not being prescribed for Covid any more in Minnesota is because it was banned for use for Covid in Minnesota, idiot. Now, months later, probably a hundred thousand dead later across the country, there have been other, patented, far more expensive, treatments that the Democrat Party has approved for medical use for Covid so, rather than lose their jobs and not be able to treat anyone, doctors are choosing the expensive drug over the inexpensive drug.
Gilead............greases the palms of their favorite politicians........and are dirty to the core.

Not to mention the labs are making a fortune off the testing now...........imagine that.
Total nonsense. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
Yawn.......early on I posted about all of this..........including the orphan status on Gilead pushing to make a mint............you just don't like my opinions because you have a narrative of TDS.
No, you’re posting information that you don’t understand and coming up with baseless conspiracies all to bend reality so that Trump can be right.
I studied this shit early on a over 5 months ago.............I was right then..........and right now.......

This is a safe drug......I've taken it.......and would again.............you are just a TDS moron looking for something to whine about.
 
It was available for inpatient treatment only. Outpatient treatment was restricted so that the drug supply could be utilized for people who actually needed it rather than shoveling it out to people who just wanted a placebo.

Since the drug is no longer being prescribed in any significant frequency for COVID because of lack of efficacy, there is no need for the restriction anymore.

And yet the proven efficacy was for early treatment; that's why it didn't help as much in the intensive care centers, idiot. The reason it's not being prescribed for Covid any more in Minnesota is because it was banned for use for Covid in Minnesota, idiot. Now, months later, probably a hundred thousand dead later across the country, there have been other, patented, far more expensive, treatments that the Democrat Party has approved for medical use for Covid so, rather than lose their jobs and not be able to treat anyone, doctors are choosing the expensive drug over the inexpensive drug.
Gilead............greases the palms of their favorite politicians........and are dirty to the core.

Not to mention the labs are making a fortune off the testing now...........imagine that.
Total nonsense. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
Yawn.......early on I posted about all of this..........including the orphan status on Gilead pushing to make a mint............you just don't like my opinions because you have a narrative of TDS.
No, you’re posting information that you don’t understand and coming up with baseless conspiracies all to bend reality so that Trump can be right.
I studied this shit early on a over 5 months ago.............I was right then..........and right now.......

This is a safe drug......I've taken it.......and would again.............you are just a TDS moron looking for something to whine about.

Yeah. Sure. “Studied” internet conspiracy theory forums?

You have no idea what you’re talking about.
 
This was probably the study that caused Walz to reverse his position but it is far from the only study that has shown hydroxychloroquine to be an effective therapy for covid 19 when administered early.
Going off one study is not how it’s done. This story is fine, but limited. It’s observational and retrospective, meaning it’s not well controlled. Not like a randomized placebo controlled prospective trial. Those trials are far less prone to error by confounding factors which probably existed in the Henry Ford study (the treatment arm received far more steroids than the controlled arm for example). The randomized controlled trials demonstrated no efficacy.
Retrospective studies are commonplace today and well respected within the medical community. This study was peer reviewed and published in a prestigious medical journal, it is being taken seriously by the medical profession even if it is not by CNN. Since there is no established dosage for the drug, studies can't be easily compared. They state that the dosage they used was different from studies that showed no improvement, and a retrospective study that has been carefully peer reviewed that used the right dosage is clearly more valuable than a randomized controlled study that used too low a dosage.
 
it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.”

Are you suggesting it should be taken at home like a vitamin supplement?

Trump took it for two weeks, then he stopped. Why?
 
it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.”

Are you suggesting it should be taken at home like a vitamin supplement?

Trump took it for two weeks, then he stopped. Why?
No..............it is prescribed...........and was prescribed when we took it to go to Kenya................It is not over the counter..........

It was required for Malaria protection.....and I've posted the 2005 study before this lunacy.
 
it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.”

Are you suggesting it should be taken at home like a vitamin supplement?

Trump took it for two weeks, then he stopped. Why?
Henry Ford Health System is currently also involved in a prophylactic hydroxychloroquine study: “Will Hydroxychloroquine Impede or Prevent COVID-19,” or WHIP COVID-19. The study is a 3,000-person, randomized, double-blinded look at whether hydroxychloroquine prevents healthcare and frontline workers from contracting the COVID-19 virus.


So perhaps, yes, depending on the outcome of the study.
 
Wrong as usual. When something has been shown to have no effectiveness, it's a safe thing to say.
Your Fake News Parroting is meaningless in reality ....

No one cares about how good you are at parroting the Fake News ....

It does not change the fact that you Useful Idiots live in some Alt Left Universe of Fake News ....

The Stupid Shit Leftist believe .... :rolleyes:

But, please ..... keep posting what you think is reality .....

It is SOOOO Entertaining.
 
it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.”

Are you suggesting it should be taken at home like a vitamin supplement?

Trump took it for two weeks, then he stopped. Why?

Peace Corps workers that I know, going to South America, would be on Hydroxychloroquine literally for years without a problem and without close heart monitoring. It's safe and it works prophylactically. Whether that prophylactic efficacy applies to the Wuhan virus might not be well understood at this point but I'd take it. Trump's doctor felt there was value in him taking it. Maybe he'd been exposed or in a high-risk situation so they gave it to him at that time.

The problem is that suddenly Democrat politicians, with the vocal public comfort and support of Democrats on social media, have suddenly made medical treatment a political question - something that has never happened in the history of the United States - and tens of thousands, perhaps over a hundred thousand, are dead because of it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top