Minimum Wage Increase: They Never Talks About the SALES

[paulitician]

Angry greedy white Republican dudes are just plain ole assholes. Who cares if a McDonalds worker gets $15? Good for them. All the bitchin & moanin coming from the angry white dudes is ridiculous. Get a life for God's sake.

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr. And yes, that goes for burger flippers too.

You base this assessment upon what, exactly?

Upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Life is hard in today's America. Rent alone, is a real killer.

Mawkish appeal to emotion. Meaningless.

Between $10-$15 could help an American at least survive.

I don't disagree, but upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Yes, appealing to emotion would be 'Mawkish' to a fat greedy old white Republican dude such as yourself. And therein lies the problem. No one should ever trust you guys to do the right thing for anyone. You're greedy assholes. It is what it is.

 

[paulitician]

Ha, i'll bet anything none of those businesses cited, went under due to the Minimum Wage. Absolute Bullshite.

But it is a convenient excuse for them.

None of those cited went under due to the Minimum Wage. It's just another greedy wanker lie. Bet on it.

 

[Andylusion]

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr. And yes, that goes for burger flippers too.

You base this assessment upon what, exactly?

Upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Life is hard in today's America. Rent alone, is a real killer.

Mawkish appeal to emotion. Meaningless.

Between $10-$15 could help an American at least survive.

I don't disagree, but upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Yes, appealing to emotion would be 'Mawkish' to a fat greedy old white Republican dude such as yourself. And therein lies the problem. No one should ever trust you guys to do the right thing for anyone. You're greedy assholes. It is what it is.

You are making our point, while claiming otherwise. Sadly, you can't even see it. Although that is par for the course with leftists.

 

[Andylusion]

Ha, i'll bet anything none of those businesses cited, went under due to the Minimum Wage. Absolute Bullshite.

But it is a convenient excuse for them.

So in your world, drastically raising the cost of doing business...... could not possibly be a reason the business closes? You really don't know anything about business at all, do you?

 

[Andylusion]

Ha, i'll bet anything none of those businesses cited, went under due to the Minimum Wage. Absolute Bullshite.

But it is a convenient excuse for them.

None of those cited went under due to the Minimum Wage. It's just another greedy wanker lie. Bet on it.

Yeah, of course not. Can't trust the word of people actually being affected by the minimum wage. But a politician who has never run a lemonade stand.... Trustworthy to a leftist.

 

[Mr Natural]

None of those cited went under due to the Minimum Wage. It's just another greedy wanker lie. Bet on it.

It resolves them of the shame of failure.

 

[hadit]

Ha, i'll bet anything none of those businesses cited, went under due to the Minimum Wage. Absolute Bullshite.

But it is a convenient excuse for them.

So in your world, drastically raising the cost of doing business...... could not possibly be a reason the business closes? You really don't know anything about business at all, do you?

That is reinforced by the abject reluctance of the MW raisers to address the glaring fallacy in their "Raising the MW doesn't hurt anything, anywhere, at any time" malarkey. If that were true, we could just bump it to $100/hr and eliminate poverty, right? They usually fall silent right about the time you mention that, or act like they didn't hear you.

 

[LOki]

Which only proves my point Todd...It's not a big enough portion of the economy to cause inflation, it will not hurt the overall economy to raise the minimum to $10.10 which Congress is suggesting.

It will cause some businesses to go under. It will cause more to reduce head count. People who think it will be a boost to the economy are morons. Especially the op.

Yet you 'Sky is Falling' whiners have yet to present even one example of a business going under due to the Minimum Wage. So, once again you'll be proven wrong. Just like all the other times you predicted the sky falling over the Minimum Wage. You guys just don't have the credibility to make such predictions.

Legendary Palace

Borderlands Books

Zpizza

Chicken of the Sea, American Samoa

The evidence for the negative impact of the minimum wage is massive. Hundreds of examples. But the left hide themselves in an echo chamber, and pretend nothing outside their tiny little world exists.

It s the Final Nail to the Coffin Chinatown Businesses Struggle Over Oakland s New Minimum Wage NBC Bay Area

By the way, I had to point this one out. The minimum wage went from $9.25 to $12.50.

That's only about $6,000 a year that the employee would see in higher pay.

But.... Notice what the business man said. The cost of labor, would increase on the business by $10,000 per employee. We've been saying this over and over. The cost to employees is massively more than the flat wage.

You left-wing fruits have added on cost after cost, and then you wonder why business isn't hiring more, why more jobs are not created? Why is this business is closing, and laying off all it's employees who will now earn the real minimum wage of zero?

This is why. You idiots are the cause.

Ha, i'll bet anything none of those businesses cited, went under due to the Minimum Wage. Absolute Bullshite.

"Prove" it, Cupcake.

 

[LOki]

That's exactly what MW laws are all about.

Workers don't exist to be personal slaves.

Of course not. Workers whose work is worth more than the statutory minimum wage should not have their productivity taken at gunpoint to subsidize the wages of those whose work is worth less than the statutory minimum.

And no one is forced to hire workers.

Of course not.

And no one should be forced to pay an employee more than what their work is worth... after all no one is forcing workers to work either.

You don't wanna pay em, do the work yourself. Or get family members to volunteer their time to better your business.

No one is talking about not paying workers for their work, Princess.

Workers are people too.

Not in dispute.

They have bills and families to support.

How will your "statutory minimum wage or nothing" be of help to those who don't get the statutory minimum?

Where two consenting adults voluntarily and mutually agree to what some bit of work is worth; upon what moral authority do you declare such an agreement illegal if it says the work is worth less than what you think it's worth?

Why do you object to simply basing a worker's wage upon what that worker's work is worth?

Workers don't exist to make you wealthier.

Of course not.

They're not slaves.

I'm not the one enslaving anyone... those who demand that work worth less than the statutory minimum be subsidized by the wages of those whose work is work more than the statutory minimum are the slave holders.

So, pay em a survivable wage or simply do the work yourself. It's as simple as that.

Why can't I just pay them what their work is worth?

Already been explained numerous times.

No. You all present rationalizations for basing wages on anything but what the work is worth, but NOT ONCE have you explained why a workerscwages should not simply be based upon what the worker's work is worth.

So, you either pay, or just do the work yourself.

Who is talking about NOT paying?

Upon what moral authority do YOU decide for OTHERS what their work (either offered or performed is worth?

No one's pointing a gun to your head forcing you to hire workers.

No one is pointing a gun at people and forcing them to work.

Upon what moral authority do YOU decide for OTHERS what their work (either offered or performed is worth?

If I wish to accept wages below the level you deem proper, upon what moral authority do you declare it illegal for me to accept such wages? Upon what moral authority do you deny someone else my services? Upon what moral authority do you deny me that employment?

Answer me Cupcake.

That's your call.

No. Apparently that is YOUR call.

Upon what moral authority do YOU decide for OTHERS what their work (either offered or performed is worth?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yeah, higher costs, whether raw materials, energy or wages never put a business under. LOL!
You're such a fuck wit.

Now you're finally gettin it. Various numerous more significant variables, play a part in causing a business to go under. You have not presented even one example of a business going under due to the Minimum Wage. Because it doesn't happen. There a lots of reasons businesses go under, but Minimum Wage isn't one of them.

I can find dozens of storefronts of closed businesses near my home, because they didn't earn enough to pay their minimum wage workers. Durr.

Did you ask them? Because i seriously doubt the Minimum Wage has caused them to go under. They're going under because they failed. Minimum Wage isn't to blame for that. They are.

When you can't pay your workers,what is there to ask?

Minimum Wage isn't to blame. They are. They failed. That's all on them.

And when a business that currently nets $1000 a month has to raise wages by $2000 a month, idiots like you will still claim no business goes under because of the minimum wage. Because you're an idiot.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr. And yes, that goes for burger flippers too. Life is hard in today's America. Rent alone, is a real killer. Between $10-$15 could help an American at least survive.

Sorry you have a hard time paying your rent.

No you're not. Fat greedy old white Republicans don't give a shit about anyone but themselves. So who you kiddin?

No, really, I'm sorry you never acquired any needed skills, and have to whine about it here. Really.

 

[Skull Pilot]

I agree; Only the Right likes to complain about Individual Responsibility, but Only when it is about the least wealthy.

Spot On. And i swear, i'll never get why angry white Republican dudes especially, are so angry. I mean they've always had it much better than non-white Americans have. They're so upset and panicked because someone at McDonalds might get $15. It's ridiculous. Such greedy hateful little wankers.

Which brings up racism. That's right; the minimum wage is racist. In this country minimum wage means being white is worth no less than $7.25/hr. How does this work? Like this: If 2 prospective employees--one black, one white, but otherwise equal--apply for a minimum wage job, Mr. AryanFront employer can hire white guy with a crew cut and golf shirt at no financial cost--none. He doesn't even have to worry about his competitors picking up the aspiring black worker for less, because they too have to pay him $7.25/hr. If this black worker were allowed to contract his labor for $5.00/hr, or $7.24 even, choosing the white guy would cost RacistJackass $2.25/hr (or $0.01 depending). Moreover, his competitors, if not racist, have the opportunity to hire the black worker at a cost advantage.

If you think this is not the case, you should check out how the white dominated unions in apartheid South Africa complained that the lack of minimum wage regulations led employers to hire cheap black laborers over better trained and better paid white folks. Which, coincidentally was exactly the same argument (check the congressional record) used by Robert Bacon when he wrote the Davis-Bacon Act (the first minmum wage law) in response to Southern contractors bringing black labor to a federal project in his Long Island district; a labor regulation which forces contractors engaged in government contracts to pay employees union wage scale (unions, which incidently were, at the time, usually exclusively white); effectively barring Southern blacks and immigrants from working on plush, government funded construction projects.

Minimum wage doesn't neccessarily have to be racist; on it's best day, minimum wage is only a state sponsored protection for older, higher paid workers from the competition of anyone who would accept less pay for the same work. The surprise for me was that though I understood that minimum wage and Davis-Bacon were, in observable and measurable effect, racist policies--I just had no idea that they were racist in intent.

So why is it that proponents for statutory minimum wage object to simply basing a worker's wage upon what the worker's work is worth? Why won't they explain their objection to us? Why don't they tell us the reason for refusing to explain their objection?

Maybe the answer is that they're racists. Maybe the're just ashamed to be outed so. Seems legit.

Angry greedy white Republican dudes are just plain ole assholes. Who cares if a McDonalds worker gets $15? Good for them. All the bitchin & moanin coming from the angry white dudes is ridiculous. Get a life for God's sake.

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Sorry little sheep but I am not a republican.

And no one ever gave me anything. I worked 2 and 3 jobs at a time right through my 30s. I paid my own bills and never sucked onthe public tit.

I risked everything we had to start a business 10 years ago and I do mean everything if we failed we would have been sleeping in our car.

So yeah I have a problem with whiny fucks like you who do absolutely nothing to improve themselves who risk nothing and yet cry that they deserve more.

If you want more get off your acre wide ass and get it yourself.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Which brings up racism. That's right; the minimum wage is racist. In this country minimum wage means being white is worth no less than $7.25/hr. How does this work? Like this: If 2 prospective employees--one black, one white, but otherwise equal--apply for a minimum wage job, Mr. AryanFront employer can hire white guy with a crew cut and golf shirt at no financial cost--none. He doesn't even have to worry about his competitors picking up the aspiring black worker for less, because they too have to pay him $7.25/hr. If this black worker were allowed to contract his labor for $5.00/hr, or $7.24 even, choosing the white guy would cost RacistJackass $2.25/hr (or $0.01 depending). Moreover, his competitors, if not racist, have the opportunity to hire the black worker at a cost advantage.

If you think this is not the case, you should check out how the white dominated unions in apartheid South Africa complained that the lack of minimum wage regulations led employers to hire cheap black laborers over better trained and better paid white folks. Which, coincidentally was exactly the same argument (check the congressional record) used by Robert Bacon when he wrote the Davis-Bacon Act (the first minmum wage law) in response to Southern contractors bringing black labor to a federal project in his Long Island district; a labor regulation which forces contractors engaged in government contracts to pay employees union wage scale (unions, which incidently were, at the time, usually exclusively white); effectively barring Southern blacks and immigrants from working on plush, government funded construction projects.

Minimum wage doesn't neccessarily have to be racist; on it's best day, minimum wage is only a state sponsored protection for older, higher paid workers from the competition of anyone who would accept less pay for the same work. The surprise for me was that though I understood that minimum wage and Davis-Bacon were, in observable and measurable effect, racist policies--I just had no idea that they were racist in intent.

So why is it that proponents for statutory minimum wage object to simply basing a worker's wage upon what the worker's work is worth? Why won't they explain their objection to us? Why don't they tell us the reason for refusing to explain their objection?

Maybe the answer is that they're racists. Maybe the're just ashamed to be outed so. Seems legit.

Angry greedy white Republican dudes are just plain ole assholes. Who cares if a McDonalds worker gets $15? Good for them. All the bitchin & moanin coming from the angry white dudes is ridiculous. Get a life for God's sake.

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr. And yes, that goes for burger flippers too. Life is hard in today's America. Rent alone, is a real killer. Between $10-$15 could help an American at least survive.

what is their skill level worth?

A person who has no skill cannot sell his labor for 15 an hour.

It's up to each person to do what it takes to make his labor worth more

IOW get off your ass and improve yourself instead of whining.

 

[LOki]

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr. And yes, that goes for burger flippers too.

You base this assessment upon what, exactly?

Upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Life is hard in today's America. Rent alone, is a real killer.

Mawkish appeal to emotion. Meaningless.

Between $10-$15 could help an American at least survive.

I don't disagree, but upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Yes, appealing to emotion would be 'Mawkish' to a fat greedy old white Republican dude such as yourself. And therein lies the problem. No one should ever trust you guys to do the right thing for anyone. You're greedy assholes. It is what it is.

Which brings up racism. That's right; the minimum wage is racist. In this country minimum wage means being white is worth no less than $7.25/hr. How does this work? Like this: If 2 prospective employees--one black, one white, but otherwise equal--apply for a minimum wage job, Mr. AryanFront employer can hire white guy with a crew cut and golf shirt at no financial cost--none. He doesn't even have to worry about his competitors picking up the aspiring black worker for less, because they too have to pay him $7.25/hr. If this black worker were allowed to contract his labor for $5.00/hr, or $7.24 even, choosing the white guy would cost RacistJackass $2.25/hr (or $0.01 depending). Moreover, his competitors, if not racist, have the opportunity to hire the black worker at a cost advantage.

If you think this is not the case, you should check out how the white dominated unions in apartheid South Africa complained that the lack of minimum wage regulations led employers to hire cheap black laborers over better trained and better paid white folks. Which, coincidentally was exactly the same argument (check the congressional record) used by Robert Bacon when he wrote the Davis-Bacon Act (the first minmum wage law) in response to Southern contractors bringing black labor to a federal project in his Long Island district; a labor regulation which forces contractors engaged in government contracts to pay employees union wage scale (unions, which incidently were, at the time, usually exclusively white); effectively barring Southern blacks and immigrants from working on plush, government funded construction projects.

Minimum wage doesn't neccessarily have to be racist; on it's best day, minimum wage is only a state sponsored protection for older, higher paid workers from the competition of anyone who would accept less pay for the same work. The surprise for me was that though I understood that minimum wage and Davis-Bacon were, in observable and measurable effect, racist policies--I just had no idea that they were racist in intent.

So why is it that proponents for statutory minimum wage object to simply basing a worker's wage upon what the worker's work is worth? Why won't they explain their objection to us? Why don't they tell us the reason for refusing to explain their objection?

Maybe the answer is that they're racists. Maybe the're just ashamed to be outed so. Seems legit.

Angry greedy white Republican dudes are just plain ole assholes. Who cares if a McDonalds worker gets $15? Good for them. All the bitchin & moanin coming from the angry white dudes is ridiculous. Get a life for God's sake.

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

 

[LOki]

Which brings up racism. That's right; the minimum wage is racist. In this country minimum wage means being white is worth no less than $7.25/hr. How does this work? Like this: If 2 prospective employees--one black, one white, but otherwise equal--apply for a minimum wage job, Mr. AryanFront employer can hire white guy with a crew cut and golf shirt at no financial cost--none. He doesn't even have to worry about his competitors picking up the aspiring black worker for less, because they too have to pay him $7.25/hr. If this black worker were allowed to contract his labor for $5.00/hr, or $7.24 even, choosing the white guy would cost RacistJackass $2.25/hr (or $0.01 depending). Moreover, his competitors, if not racist, have the opportunity to hire the black worker at a cost advantage.

If you think this is not the case, you should check out how the white dominated unions in apartheid South Africa complained that the lack of minimum wage regulations led employers to hire cheap black laborers over better trained and better paid white folks. Which, coincidentally was exactly the same argument (check the congressional record) used by Robert Bacon when he wrote the Davis-Bacon Act (the first minmum wage law) in response to Southern contractors bringing black labor to a federal project in his Long Island district; a labor regulation which forces contractors engaged in government contracts to pay employees union wage scale (unions, which incidently were, at the time, usually exclusively white); effectively barring Southern blacks and immigrants from working on plush, government funded construction projects.

Minimum wage doesn't neccessarily have to be racist; on it's best day, minimum wage is only a state sponsored protection for older, higher paid workers from the competition of anyone who would accept less pay for the same work. The surprise for me was that though I understood that minimum wage and Davis-Bacon were, in observable and measurable effect, racist policies--I just had no idea that they were racist in intent.

So why is it that proponents for statutory minimum wage object to simply basing a worker's wage upon what the worker's work is worth? Why won't they explain their objection to us? Why don't they tell us the reason for refusing to explain their objection?

Maybe the answer is that they're racists. Maybe the're just ashamed to be outed so. Seems legit.

Angry greedy white Republican dudes are just plain ole assholes. Who cares if a McDonalds worker gets $15? Good for them. All the bitchin & moanin coming from the angry white dudes is ridiculous. Get a life for God's sake.

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr. And yes, that goes for burger flippers too. Life is hard in today's America. Rent alone, is a real killer. Between $10-$15 could help an American at least survive.

Upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth? If I wish to accept wages below the level you deem proper, upon what moral authority do you declare it illegal for me to accept such wages? Upon what moral authority do you deny someone else my services? Upon what moral authority do you deny me that employment?

 

[LOki]

Entitled whiny libs want to be paid top dollar even when they have ZERO skills and can be replaced in about 10 seconds

Why don't all you burger baggers aspire to bigger and better things?

That's especially hilarious coming from entitled fat greedy old white Republican dude. No one in this country is more entitled than you. So quit your bitchin and pay up.

Upon what moral authority do you determine for EVERYONE what their work (either offered or performed for wages) is worth?

I already told you, i think a human's 'worth' right now in America should be somewhere between $10-$15 an hr. And yes, that goes for burger flippers too.

You base this assessment upon what, exactly?

Upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Life is hard in today's America. Rent alone, is a real killer.

Mawkish appeal to emotion. Meaningless.

Between $10-$15 could help an American at least survive.

I don't disagree, but upon what moral authority do you decide for others what their work (either offered or performed) is worth?

Yes, appealing to emotion would be 'Mawkish' to a fat greedy old white Republican dude such as yourself.

While appeals to emotion are considered rational arguments by retards like yourself.

And therein lies the problem. No one should ever trust you guys to do the right thing for anyone. You're greedy assholes. It is what it is.

Just more mawkish appeals to emotion.

The fact is, assholes like you are not to be trusted. You'll resort to anything that will empower you to assert your will upon your fellow human beings. No one is fooled by your insincere "concern" for folks "just trying to get by." You don't give fuck one about them beyond their usefulness as a mob that you can use to threaten those who disagree with you, and your authority-hugging, totalitarian ambition.

Upon what moral authority do YOU decide for OTHERS what their work (either offered or performed) is worth? If I wish to accept wages below the level you deem proper, upon what moral authority do YOU declare it illegal for me to accept such wages? Upon what moral authority do YOU deny someone else my services? Upon what moral authority do YOU deny me that employment?

 

[danielpalos]

Now you're finally gettin it. Various numerous more significant variables, play a part in causing a business to go under. You have not presented even one example of a business going under due to the Minimum Wage. Because it doesn't happen. There a lots of reasons businesses go under, but Minimum Wage isn't one of them.

I can find dozens of storefronts of closed businesses near my home, because they didn't earn enough to pay their minimum wage workers. Durr.

Did you ask them? Because i seriously doubt the Minimum Wage has caused them to go under. They're going under because they failed. Minimum Wage isn't to blame for that. They are.

When you can't pay your workers,what is there to ask?

Minimum Wage isn't to blame. They are. They failed. That's all on them.

And when a business that currently nets $1000 a month has to raise wages by $2000 a month, idiots like you will still claim no business goes under because of the minimum wage. Because you're an idiot.

Maybe they can refuse service to more customers to cut costs?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I can find dozens of storefronts of closed businesses near my home, because they didn't earn enough to pay their minimum wage workers. Durr.

Did you ask them? Because i seriously doubt the Minimum Wage has caused them to go under. They're going under because they failed. Minimum Wage isn't to blame for that. They are.

When you can't pay your workers,what is there to ask?

Minimum Wage isn't to blame. They are. They failed. That's all on them.

And when a business that currently nets $1000 a month has to raise wages by $2000 a month, idiots like you will still claim no business goes under because of the minimum wage. Because you're an idiot.

Maybe they can refuse service to more customers to cut costs?

Firing idiots like you would be a better idea.

 

[paulitician]

Ha, i'll bet anything none of those businesses cited, went under due to the Minimum Wage. Absolute Bullshite.

But it is a convenient excuse for them.

So in your world, drastically raising the cost of doing business...... could not possibly be a reason the business closes? You really don't know anything about business at all, do you?

Prove the businesses cited, went under due to the Minimum Wage.

 

[paulitician]

None of those cited went under due to the Minimum Wage. It's just another greedy wanker lie. Bet on it.

It resolves them of the shame of failure.

Yup, blame the worker for everything. Easy convenient target. They're cowardly liars. Businesses fail everyday. And it's never because of the Minimum Wage.