You need one of those belt-fed uppers.I have a Class III M-16. I bought it in the early 70s.
I put aside the original parts but use the stripped lower with modern parts and upper.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You need one of those belt-fed uppers.I have a Class III M-16. I bought it in the early 70s.
I put aside the original parts but use the stripped lower with modern parts and upper.
You need one of those belt-fed uppers.
M249 links are reasonably cheap.The problem is finding belt ammo. It was available back in the 1980s but hard to get nowadays.
M249 links are reasonably cheap.
And?
Military court rulings have no bearing on civilian courts, no bearing on state and local governments, no bearing on the Federal government.
Trump’s bump-stock ban remains in place.
I had a binary trigger for one of my ARs.
One hundred times more accurate and more reliable than a bump stock.
However, still nothing more than a range toy.
It could put a lot of rounds down range. Almost as fast as full auto. However, it could never be a serious tactical weapon.
I am an experienced shooter. I could get the pull shot on target but the release was always way off. Like 8-10 inches at 100 yds off.
If you were using it for suppression fire then it would work but unless you practiced a whole lot you were never going to do double taps with it.
I probably shot close to a thousand rounds trying to develop the skill to control the release shot and was never successful. I'm sure there are some people who could do it but I don't think a normal shooter could.
The Las Vegas shooter would have been much more deadly from his position if he used a binary trigger instead of a bump stock.
You don't need a bump stock to bump fire a semi automatic rifle.Bump stocks are amusing toys for the most part. Most people recognize you can't aim whatsoever with one.
Having said that, it can be used to provide devastating mass injury if firing into a crowd as the shooter in Las Vegas did by killing 9 people in under 30 seconds and a total of 58 dead with 411 injuries.
Bump stocks are and should ALWAYS continue to be strictly forbidden.
And I am a gun supporter with 3 guns in my home.
You're a FuddYou sir, are full of shit.
And to be clear, I'm a proud gun owner.
So beat it
Absolutely a slippery slope. They won't be satisfied with banning bump stocks. They want to ban everything.Why is this even an argument?
You guys seriously want Bump stocks to be legal??
And if you have absolutely no interest in one, like all normal people, than why do you care?
Slippery slope maybe?
The M2 machine gun is basically a bump fire weapon. It's one of the best weapons ever.What idiot is equipping our military with that crap?
It's illegal for cops to use automatic fire on US citizens anyway.That's the problem with the police having M16s. They're made for suppressive fire or sweeping an area. There is no case where the police should be doing that against civilian targets. Given a revolution or civil war, the Army could conceivably need that against Americans but never the police.
So, you want to ban semi automatic firearms. Go figureThat was the point of my post. Instead of trying to determine every way possible to make a gun fire that fast, we need to just ban guns that are capable of rapid fire at that level. If it can fire that fast, by whatever means, it should be banned. Of course, existing guns would probably have to be grandfathered in, just like machine guns were, but any future manufactured guns would have to limt the rate of fire.
A. WW1 technology.The M2 machine gun is basically a bump fire weapon. It's one of the best weapons ever.
No. I have no problem with semi automatic guns that aren't capable of such a high rate of fire. A design that limits how fast the gun can fire. Similar in function to a rev limiter on a car.So, you want to ban semi automatic firearms. Go figure
No. I have no problem with semi automatic guns that aren't capable of such a high rate of fire. A design that limits how fast the gun can fire. Similar in function to a rev limiter on a car.
It would have no effect on guns being fired at a normal, lower rate.You are a moron........simple as that.
These dumb ideas of yours would also apply to hand guns as well...and it is simply another stupid idea meant to irritate normal gun owners who do not use their guns for crime or violence.
You hate guns, you hate gun owners, so anything you can do to make their life more difficult makes you happy....you are sick.
If you really want to lower gun crime, lock up actual criminals who use guns.....stop letting them out of jail and prison over and over again...that solves the problem.....
It would have no effect on guns being fired at a normal, lower rate.
It would have no effect on guns being fired at a normal, lower rate.
Any semi automatic rifle can be bump fired.No. I have no problem with semi automatic guns that aren't capable of such a high rate of fire. A design that limits how fast the gun can fire. Similar in function to a rev limiter on a car.
You keep claming I want people guilty of gun crimes released, when I have told you repetedly that is not the case. Are you capable of not lying?What is it with your mental illness that you don't want to actually keep known, repeat gun offenders locked up? You are fine with felons with multiple felonies for not only gun possession but for firing guns at people in public being released over and over again from prison...
Keeping them locked up would stop gun crime...........fucking around with guns they don't use doesn't do anything.....
These criminals use handguns, not rifles.