para bellum
Diamond Member
I tend to agree with this. Or at least to the extent that legal immigrants need to take a safety course, and restrict their shooting to licensed gun ranges for a period of time so that gun safety rules are ingrained.No one in America that isn't a American citizen should be allowed to possess or carry a firearm. That is an AMERICAN right. I don't even think people who immigrate here legally should be allowed to own a firearm in the first 5 years of living here.
I have seen too many people from countries that don't have a culture of civilian gun ownership, they come here and the first thing they do is go buy a gun, then post pictures of themselves on their facebook page waving it around like an idiot, ignoring all basic rules of gun handling.
Those people are AD's just waiting to happen.
And Form 4473 expressly prohibits illegals from buying a gun, and 18 USC 922 has been upheld several times post-Bruen.Besides, if you're here illegally how can you legally own a firearm? You need a drivers license, social security number and so on to purchase a gun. Hell I couldn't even buy a shotgun last month without doing a background check.
Imo this judge misapplied the first test in Bruen, because "the people" as defined in Heller does not include illegal aliens. Failing the first test, there is no reason for her to go further.
As a practical matter, Flores itself is frequently cited as precedent, so reversing Flores will open the door for a lot of those other convictions to be revisited.
I know there are 14th amendment implications- there is some tension between "the people" in the 2nd and "any person" in the 14th, but 18 USC 922 does not strike me as an obvious violation of the 2A.