tinydancer
Diamond Member
Obama is putting Isis in charge of both Syria and Iraq
Links?
Absolutely TEAM OBAMA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Obama is putting Isis in charge of both Syria and Iraq
Links?
This thread is a good example of conservatives having no interest in a bad situation that they cannot really blame on Obama.
This comes down to a real simple problem
Obama is good at arming the folks he wants to 'save' and then remove
.
-Geaux
Yup.Anyone who actually keeps up with these things knows that Malaki's days as president are numbered.
Meanwhile, just who is Obama supporting? I can't keep up with his endless moving targets
-Geaux
Maliki was chosen by Bush, the President has been quite open in his request that Maliki step down; Maliki has chosen not to do so. Bad choice by Bush, yes. Zero Hedge is........not worth -0- on this; Maliki called in the troops to be available when he announces he is running for a third term. There was a thread on this yesterday.
A bullet in the head...appoint a strongman...get back to the way LIBTARDS are happy with.
A bullet in the head...appoint a strongman...get back to the way LIBTARDS are happy with.
A bullet in the head...appoint a strongman...get back to the way LIBTARDS are happy with.
It is pretty obvious at this point that a strongman is best for most countries in the region of the world in question. They aren't ready for democracy.
A bullet in the head...appoint a strongman...get back to the way LIBTARDS are happy with.
It is pretty obvious at this point that a strongman is best for most countries in the region of the world in question. They aren't ready for democracy.
Then why is Obama determined to oust Assad ? Doesn't he get it ?
It is pretty obvious at this point that a strongman is best for most countries in the region of the world in question. They aren't ready for democracy.
Then why is Obama determined to oust Assad ? Doesn't he get it ?
I have no idea what Obama's plans are for Syria and Iraq. He's, unfortunately, continuing the policies started by those before him.
Meanwhile, just who is Obama supporting? I can't keep up with his endless moving targets
-Geaux
Maliki was chosen by Bush, the President has been quite in his request that Malaki step down; Maliki has chosen not to do so. Bad choice by Bush, yes.
Yet, Obama is supporting Maliki?
-Geaux
Then why is Obama determined to oust Assad ? Doesn't he get it ?
I have no idea what Obama's plans are for Syria and Iraq. He's, unfortunately, continuing the policies started by those before him.
Weren't you listening to his demands that Assad is a baby killer and must go ? That wasn't anything Bush was involved in.
I have no idea what Obama's plans are for Syria and Iraq. He's, unfortunately, continuing the policies started by those before him.
Weren't you listening to his demands that Assad is a baby killer and must go ? That wasn't anything Bush was involved in.
Well Assad was ever involved in a civil war/insurgency during the Bush era. I was speaking of the overall meddling in the ME by the US which goes back many years, I wasn't referring to Bush only.
Anyone who actually keeps up with these things knows that Malaki's days as president are numbered.
Meanwhile, just who is Obama supporting? I can't keep up with his endless moving targets
-Geaux
Maliki was chosen by Bush, the President has been quite open in his request that Maliki step down; Maliki has chosen not to do so. Bad choice by Bush, yes. Zero Hedge is........not worth -0- on this; Maliki called in the troops to be available when he announces he is running for a third term. There was a thread on this yesterday.
Maliki was chosen by Bush, the President has been quite in his request that Malaki step down; Maliki has chosen not to do so. Bad choice by Bush, yes.
Yet, Obama is supporting Maliki?
-Geaux
Actually, the President of Iraq. At this time, ISIS is the greater concern, allowing al Qaeda to remain had its risk, and here they are.
Maliki is out, according to the President of Iraq:
Iraqi President Fouad Massoum called on Haider al-Abadi, a member of Maliki's ruling party and currently the deputy speaker of parliament, to form a new government.
Iraqi president names Haider al-Abadi new prime minister, defying Maliki - The Washington Post
Maliki is out, according to the President of Iraq:
Iraqi President Fouad Massoum called on Haider al-Abadi, a member of Maliki's ruling party and currently the deputy speaker of parliament, to form a new government.
Iraqi president names Haider al-Abadi new prime minister, defying Maliki - The Washington Post
So the far left rants about Maliki was all for not just so they can blame Booooosshhh!
Once again the reality does not fit far left lore.
Meanwhile, just who is Obama supporting? I can't keep up with his endless moving targets
-Geaux
Maliki was chosen by Bush, the President has been quite open in his request that Maliki step down; Maliki has chosen not to do so. Bad choice by Bush, yes. Zero Hedge is........not worth -0- on this; Maliki called in the troops to be available when he announces he is running for a third term. There was a thread on this yesterday.
Hello.
Republicans own this one.