Migrant invasion brings UK to the verge of collapse

[georgephillip]

And? So? What's your point?

Migrant flows aren't the migrant's fault. It's Starmer's fault for letting them in.

Imperial ties created lasting migrant pathways like the Caribbean's Windrush generation which would have never existed without UK colonial occupations :

GoogleAI Overdiew:

"At its height, the British Empire governed large parts of Africa, South Asia, and the Caribbean. When empire receded after World War II, those ties didn’t disappear:

• "People in former colonies often had legal or preferential rights to move to Britain, especially before immigration laws tightened in the 1960s–80s.
• Shared institutions—language (English), education systems, and legal frameworks—made migration easier
  • Early migrants (e.g., the 'Windrush generation') created diaspora communities, which later migrants could join.
• 
  "Result: Migration today often follows the old imperial map. Countries like India, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Jamaica remain major sources of UK migrants."

 

[georgephillip]

Those places are much farther advanced today than they would have been without colonization

Which does not mean that colonization was ok

The Euro’s didnt have the right

But whats done is done, and is no excuse for the failures of those countries since colonization ended

Its really stupid for libs in the 21st Century to punish themselves for what happened in the past

Those places were looted for centuries in order to enrich their European (white supremacist) masters.

Economic factors like inequality, high unemployment, and labor abuses in colonies push people to seek higher wages, better employment opportunities, and higher standards of living in more developed nations.

There's also the Great Replacement incentive:

GoogleAI Overview

• "Demographic Imbalances: Aging populations in developed countries create labor shortages that attract workers, while rapid population growth in developing nations can outpace available local jobs."

 

[Mac-7]

Past? In which century did the destruction of prosperous Libya occur, when was it transformed into a slave-owning country as a result of Western aggression?

I dont miss Kadaffi

But if you do…

 

[Mac-7]

Those places were looted for centuries in order to enrich their European (white supremacist) masters.

Economic factors like inequality, high unemployment, and labor abuses in colonies push people to seek higher wages, better employment opportunities, and higher standards of living in more developed nations.

There's also the Great Replacement incentive:

GoogleAI Overview

• "Demographic Imbalances: Aging populations in developed countries create labor shortages that attract workers, while rapid population growth in developing nations can outpace available local jobs."

The Euro’s knew how to take advantage of natural resources whereas the natives had no clue

And that still applies in many parts of the 3rd World

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The UK is done. It is being dismantled at an astonishing rate. The latest casualty, William Shakespeare, denounced as a white supremacist.

Shakespeare's birthplace 'de-colonised' over white supremacy fears

William Shakespeare's birthplace will be de-colonised over fears that portraying his success as the 'greatest' playwright 'benefits the ideology of white European supremacy'.

www.dailymail.co.uk