MIDS harass Treasury Sec and chase him out of DC restaurant

[Lisa558]

Did they threaten him?

Yes. They said we’re going to spit in his food.

 

[Lisa558]

They're hypocritical phonies and, IMHO, dangerous.
They're not rational.
I'm not talking about liberals here. I'm talking about the dyed-in-the-wool off-their-chain TDS Far Leftist nut jobs. And there are a lot of them out there in the world nowadays.

The internet has both exposed a lot of them, and empowered a lot of them.

Good thing there was no internet in Hitler’s time.

 

[Lockback]

The internet has both exposed a lot of them, and empowered a lot of them.

Good thing there was no internet in Hitler’s time.

Amen to that, sister.

 

[Foxfyre]

Yes, agree with all that - but my point is that it is extra-bad when a Jewish woman goes after Jews with her nasty vitriol and threatening behavior. This was at a Jewish event.

It’s another example of radical left Jews prioritizing their liberalism over their Judaism.

IMO, honorable people condemn hateful, unacceptable behavior that is hateful and unacceptable regardless of who does it. It is just as bad when a Christian or Atheist woman, etc., goes after a Jewish woman because of that woman's opinion or beliefs as it is bad for a Jewish woman to go after other Jews or Christians or Atheists or anybody else for their opinions or beliefs.

The Constitution is clear that anybody has an unalienable right to disagree with me, a Christian on any topic imaginable. But nobody should EVER be free to disrupt my peace/unalienable rights because of the opinions/beliefs I hold. Or yours. Or anybody else.

Only the most despicable among us do not condemn that.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Bessett is a disgusting piece of maga shit, and you're pouting because somebody pointed that out. If he doesn't like what happened, he could always stop being such a piece of shit.

His being a "piece of shit" is irrelevant here as being a piece of shit is not against the law. All he was doing was having dinner. The idiots harassing him were the ones breaking the law and causing a ruckus.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

The owner of the bakery was prejudice. I’m not prejudiced against Bessent. I know he’s a piece of shit.

Nope. You can't pass off a personal opinion as fact.

 

[Lisa558]

Wow. That's your threshold for unacceptable behavior? Physical violence?

Only when it goes against someone he dislikes. Until blood is spilled, it’s all accceptable.

OTOH, for people whom he thinks deserve “protection,” a pancake syrup logo crosses the line.

 

[Lisa558]

Nope. You can't pass off a personal opinion as fact.

MIDs have difficulty making that distinction.

 

[Blaster]

Yes. They said we’re going to spit in his food.

Those crazy women should have been kicked out of that restaurant.

 

[Lisa558]

Those crazy women should have been kicked out of that restaurant.

The restaurant owner either was a MID himself, or he was scared of them.

 

[Marener]

Yes. They said we’re going to spit in his food.

So they threatened his food.

 

[Marener]

Nope. You can't pass off a personal opinion as fact.

fact. Restaurants can deny service to people when it’s not based on a protected class.

 

[Lisa558]

fact. Restaurants can deny service to people when it’s not based on a protected class.

ANd being a threatening, obnoxious, MID who is harassing one’s customers is not a protected class. The owner should have thrown the MID out.

WHY DIDNT HE, and why are you OK with that? The hateful MID - and as mentioned, Code Pink is one of the worst! - was allowed to rant and rave and disturb multiple customers’ dining experience.

The owner was WRONG. And you’re defending his behavior.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

fact. Restaurants can deny service to people when it’s not based on a protected class.

That's not what I was talking about. You can't present a personal opinion ("I’m not prejudiced against Bessent. I know he’s a piece of shit.") as if it is fact. Your personal opinion of the guy is not relevant to the fact that all he was doing was having dinner and a bunch of yahoos created a disturbance to harass him.

There is simply no way to spin this to justify harassing someone in public while doing nothing more than having dinner.

 

[Marener]

ANd being a threatening, obnoxious, MID who is harassing one’s customers is not a protected class. The owner should have thrown the MID out.

WHY DIDNT HE, and why are you OK with that? The hateful MID - and as mentioned, Code Pink is one of the worst! - was allowed to rant and rave and disturb multiple customers’ dining experience.

The owner was WRONG. And you’re defending his behavior.

It’s the owner’s restaurant and they decide who to throw out.

Not you.

And Bessent is still a piece of shit.

 

[22lcidw]

Same way a baker of cakes can refuse service to people whose sexuality they disagree with.
Free speech cuts both ways.

And hopefully we see more of the Prog media/entertainers leave the world like Reiner. And no Republicans have risen up to do it.

 

[Marener]

That's not what I was talking about. You can't present a personal opinion ("I’m not prejudiced against Bessent. I know he’s a piece of shit.") as if it is fact. Your personal opinion of the guy is not relevant to the fact that all he was doing was having dinner and a bunch of yahoos created a disturbance to harass him.

There is simply no way to spin this to justify harassing someone in public while doing nothing more than having dinner.

If I were the restaurant owner, my personal opinion of Bessent is all I need to refuse to seat him in my establishment.

 

[ThisIsMe]

It’s their restaurant. They’re free to make their own choices about who they serve and who they don’t.

Did anyone hurt Bessent?

Can a baker refuse to bake a cake for a gay couples wedding?

 

[ThisIsMe]

If I were the restaurant owner, my personal opinion of Bessent is all I need to refuse to seat him in my establishment.

So PA laws don’t apply?

 

[Marener]

Can a baker refuse to bake a cake for a gay couples wedding?

Depends on the state.