Micro stamping, just another anti-gun tactic

Microstamping is a farce. All I have to do is replace the firing pin and the records are no longer up to date. Takes about ten minutes. Relatively cheap, too.
Just one scrape with a file does the same thing...
 
Serial numbers aren't good enough? What the hell is micro stamping anyway? If the garden variety liberal was really interested in tracking guns used in crimes they might consider something known as "Operation Fast and Furious" that sent thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels. Isn't it logical to indict former president Hussein Obama for the murder of a Border Patrol agent who was killed with one of the Fast/Furious weapons that had Obama's name on it??
 
Last edited:
In my law enforcement career, I never solved a case through fingerprints, nor was I aware of anyone that did.

After reading this I can't take anything the person says as serious.

Perhaps you should attempt your own argument which is what you are supposed to do anyway.
Why? With DNA, finger prints are not that important.
 
Isn't this onerous to the right of gun ownership ... where gun ownership is constitutionally protected? ... nevermind the 2nd Amendment, I have Article I, Section 6 of the Michigan State Constitution:

"Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state."

No mention of medical waivers ... my understanding is this language appears in 44 of the 50 State Constitutions ... so this only works in California ...

Is taking guns away from Californians such a bad idea? ...

Joey does not care. He wants guns limited to the rich, the well-connected, criminals, and police.

I agree, let's make it hard for those people to get guns.

You don't actually want that.

No, guy, here's the mistake.

Joker Holmes can buy a gun.

Because a DOCTOR did not do her job!

Awake the Rapper can buy a gun.

Because THE POLICE fucked up. They didn't actually do their jobs.

That nut at VA Tech can buy a gun.

Poorly worded Federal and VA laws, already changed.

Nicholas Cruz can buy a gun and shoot up his old school.

Expelled, should have been locked in a mental ward, but someone dropped the ball.

This is the mistake.

Not a bunch of legalistic nonsense that flies in the face of fucking common sense.

Bla, bla, bla.
 
Joey does not care. He wants guns limited to the rich, the well-connected, criminals, and police.



You don't actually want that.



Because a DOCTOR did not do her job!



Because THE POLICE fucked up. They didn't actually do their jobs.



Poorly worded Federal and VA laws, already changed.



Expelled, should have been locked in a mental ward, but someone dropped the ball.



Bla, bla, bla.
DItchweed, the very fact you are running around free is an example of why "lock up the crazies" isn't an option.

But not giving them guns should be.
 
DItchweed, the very fact you are running around free is an example of why "lock up the crazies" isn't an option.

But not giving them guns should be.
Look, Joey, we get it: you dream of being in charge of the NKVD, and declaring anyone who disagrees with you "crazy." Sorry, Lavernty, that's not how it works!
 
Our gun control laws from 40 years ago were perfectly acceptable and fine as they were. We don't need any laws beyond those if we have a society of decent people.

Which would we all want?

1 a country with heavily regulated gun laws?

2 a country that doesn't need heavily regulated gun laws because we don't allow the few people that use guns to hurt people like dopeheads, criminals and crazy people to be in our society?

Me personally? I pick number 2 because I'd rather live in a country that doesn't need gun control because that country takes people who would use guns to hurt others and remove them from the society.

More gun control doesn't make us safer, removing people who make things unsafe is what makes us safe.
 
Our gun control laws from 40 years ago were perfectly acceptable and fine as they were. We don't need any laws beyond those if we have a society of decent people.

Which would we all want?

1 a country with heavily regulated gun laws?

2 a country that doesn't need heavily regulated gun laws because we don't allow the few people that use guns to hurt people like dopeheads, criminals and crazy people to be in our society?

Me personally? I pick number 2 because I'd rather live in a country that doesn't need gun control because that country takes people who would use guns to hurt others and remove them from the society.

More gun control doesn't make us safer, removing people who make things unsafe is what makes us safe.
We already lock up 2 million people, more than any country in the world, including Communist China.

If guns and prisons made us safer, we'd have the lowest crime rates in the free world, not the highest.

The problem with gun laws from 40 years ago is you didn't have a gun industry intent on selling guns to maniacs.

You see, the big change happened when the gun industry changed its focus from hunting weapons to handguns and assault rifles. That meant selling to people they shouldn't be selling to create an atmosphere of fear.
 
Anti-gunners try all kinds of low profile methods. Their favorite is putting all kinds of taxes and high taxes on ammunition. Sure, you can have your firearm, but good luck trying to load it.

They did the same with smoking. I was astounded to see a carton of cigarettes going for well over $100. But I guess I should not be surprised.
 
This column explains why micro-stamping is just another scam by the anti-gunners to attack the ability to own and carry guns….

What, you might ask, is the point? Is microstamping a valid crime fighting tool? No. The point is making firearms more expensive, and harassing law-abiding gun owners in any way possible. In my law enforcement career, I never solved a case through fingerprints, nor was I aware of anyone that did. Trying to solve a crime with a microstamped primer would be even less productive
————-
Any microstamping scheme is of necessity a gun registration scheme, because without a massive national database containing an image of a microstamped case from every gun in America, there’s no way to identify from which gun that case came. For now, it’s against federal law for government to maintain a gun registry, which doesn’t mean government isn’t trying to do it under the radar. Even so, the only case images they’d have on file are from semiautomatic handguns manufactured after a federal microstamping law went into effect. Hundreds of millions of handguns would be unaffected and essentially untraceable.

Even if a criminal doesn’t file the engraving off a firing pin, all they have to do is replace the firing pin, use a revolver, or stop a few seconds to collect their expended cases. Even better, they can visit a range, collect a variety of cases, and spread them around their crime scenes, sending hapless police on wild goose chases.


Use a revolver, it doesn't eject the shells. Gun grabbers are morons.
 
This column explains why micro-stamping is just another scam by the anti-gunners to attack the ability to own and carry guns….

What, you might ask, is the point? Is microstamping a valid crime fighting tool? No. The point is making firearms more expensive, and harassing law-abiding gun owners in any way possible. In my law enforcement career, I never solved a case through fingerprints, nor was I aware of anyone that did. Trying to solve a crime with a microstamped primer would be even less productive
————-
Any microstamping scheme is of necessity a gun registration scheme, because without a massive national database containing an image of a microstamped case from every gun in America, there’s no way to identify from which gun that case came. For now, it’s against federal law for government to maintain a gun registry, which doesn’t mean government isn’t trying to do it under the radar. Even so, the only case images they’d have on file are from semiautomatic handguns manufactured after a federal microstamping law went into effect. Hundreds of millions of handguns would be unaffected and essentially untraceable.

Even if a criminal doesn’t file the engraving off a firing pin, all they have to do is replace the firing pin, use a revolver, or stop a few seconds to collect their expended cases. Even better, they can visit a range, collect a variety of cases, and spread them around their crime scenes, sending hapless police on wild goose chases.


Sounds pointless for solving a crime.
 
Sounds pointless for solving a crime.

It is .....but it does make it easier to ban guns because they don't have the made up technology that does not exist, and wouldn't work if it did exist....
 
In my law enforcement career, I never solved a case through fingerprints, nor was I aware of anyone that did.
That's because you A-Holes never try to actually try to solve crime. You were too busy shaking people down for money.
 
This column explains why micro-stamping is just another scam by the anti-gunners to attack the ability to own and carry guns….

What, you might ask, is the point? Is microstamping a valid crime fighting tool? No. The point is making firearms more expensive, and harassing law-abiding gun owners in any way possible. In my law enforcement career, I never solved a case through fingerprints, nor was I aware of anyone that did. Trying to solve a crime with a microstamped primer would be even less productive
————-
Any microstamping scheme is of necessity a gun registration scheme, because without a massive national database containing an image of a microstamped case from every gun in America, there’s no way to identify from which gun that case came. For now, it’s against federal law for government to maintain a gun registry, which doesn’t mean government isn’t trying to do it under the radar. Even so, the only case images they’d have on file are from semiautomatic handguns manufactured after a federal microstamping law went into effect. Hundreds of millions of handguns would be unaffected and essentially untraceable.

Even if a criminal doesn’t file the engraving off a firing pin, all they have to do is replace the firing pin, use a revolver, or stop a few seconds to collect their expended cases. Even better, they can visit a range, collect a variety of cases, and spread them around their crime scenes, sending hapless police on wild goose chases.


Hey gun bubbas, good week for you people , death count rose big time this week , you should be proud . the clown act of supporting the ownership of guns that are designed to shoot people limbs off. Or put a whole in someone the size of a fist. I believe they buy them to kill chipmunks,can't really hunt anything with them. Just kill uneatable. That's the kill kill kill thing!
 
Use a revolver, it doesn't eject the shells. Gun grabbers are morons.
and Gun BUbbas are a joke. They will shoot themselves in the foot long before they ever get a chance to use their gun to defend themselves/ No one lies more then a Gun Bubba. There foot would be fine but it's the next door neighbors child or their own kids that get filled with the lead. These people are the last people in the world that should ever be allowed to even have a gun. Households are getting rid of guns big time but the number of guns being sold has gone through the ceiling. These guns are going to Gun Bubbas that have a household full of guns. Is that goofball enough for you. These shits think they need guns to kill democrats for Trump. Biggest threat to the second by far are the gun bubbas in this country, Gun Bubbas that most Americans would just assume shouldn't even have a gun.
 
Hey gun bubbas, good week for you people , death count rose big time this week , you should be proud . the clown act of supporting the ownership of guns that are designed to shoot people limbs off. Or put a whole in someone the size of a fist. I believe they buy them to kill chipmunks,can't really hunt anything with them. Just kill uneatable. That's the kill kill kill thing!
Now that you mention it, where is 2AGuy? The guy hasn't posted since August 20th, and usually when there's a school shooting, he's on here like they sent up the Bat-Signal, spamming all the threads on the incident with NRA propaganda about how guns aren't to blame for mass shootings.
 
Now that you mention it, where is 2AGuy? The guy hasn't posted since August 20th, and usually when there's a school shooting, he's on here like they sent up the Bat-Signal, spamming all the threads on the incident with NRA propaganda about how guns aren't to blame for mass shootings.
So now this group has another hero, The NRA hero list is puke. Are they handing out trophy's for kills yet/
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom