Michigan School Shooting, 3 dead.

You can allow something to happen through your negligence.

They were told their son was drawing pictures of people being shot and looking up ammo on his phone and they never thought to look and see if the gun they bought on Black Friday was in the house or not?
The father went home after the school meeting and discovered the gun was gone. He immediately notified the police, but that was too late to stop the shootings.
 
The father went home after the school meeting and discovered the gun was gone. He immediately notified the police, but that was too late to stop the shootings.

The timeline I heard is the father did not go home and look until after the shooting had started, then he called the police....almost as if he was trying to cover his own ass.
 
Why should the military pay for something the education monopoly is responsible for?
You were trying to trim the fat. There’s plenty of fat in our military spending. We spend far more on that than we do on education.

Once again, it’s abundantly clear that IF we were to spend money on additional security, then you would not approve of where that money is pulled from. Unfortunately for you, you don’t get to decide these things. Are you still for it? You probably won’t answer.

Just as you continue to pathetically avoid discussion of the parents. Because you’re a coward.
 
Here it is for like the 5th time.


You may be criminally and civilly liable for any harm caused by a person less than 18 years of age who lawfully gains unsupervised access to your firearm if unlawfully stored.
Gator, you really need to fix that inability to read! There is nothing in that linked Michigan law that says what you think it says!

From your link:

(8) This section does not create a civil action or liability for damages arising from the use or misuse of a firearm or ammunition for a person, other than a federally licensed firearms dealer, who produces a firearm or ammunition.

That's a close as it gets to your claim!

Getting in the Marines with a GED was quite an accomplishment, but you simply cannot read.
 
The timeline I heard is the father did not go home and look until after the shooting had started, then he called the police....almost as if he was trying to cover his own ass.
Their demeanor about the whole situation would lead to that logical conclusion. You are most likely correct in your that assumption. The dilemma is proving that in court. I hope it all comes together so they can. These parents were totally irresponsible.
 
The timeline I heard is the father did not go home and look until after the shooting had started, then he called the police....almost as if he was trying to cover his own ass.
My God, you stupid piece of shit! That's almost word-for word exactly what I said! Who gives a shit when he went to look?

Do you have a keeper? If not, you apparently need one.
 
The school did the right thing by calling the parents in to make them aware. The parents did not take responsibility to remove the kid from school. Is the school culpable because the parents would not take the child home? Parents are responsible for their children. If the school is liable to remove the kid from school and the parents won't take him what then?
Why would the parents remove him from the school if they had a meeting with the school and the school did not suspend him for any of those alleged violations? I believe no one is responsible except the kid.
 
My God, you stupid piece of shit! That's almost word-for word exactly what I said! Who gives a shit when he went to look?

Do you have a keeper? If not, you apparently need one.

When he went to look is vital to their defense. The fact he did not bother to look until his son was already killing people does not help him, that was a cover your ass move nothing more. Then he claimed it was stolen even though his wife had posted on social media that the gun was a present for the son...cannot steal what is yours
 
When he went to look is vital to their defense. The fact he did not bother to look until his son was already killing people does not help him, that was a cover your ass move nothing more. Then he claimed it was stolen even though his wife had posted on social media that the gun was a present for the son...cannot steal what is yours
:linky::linky::linky::linky::linky:

Get someone else to read it to see if it says what you think it says!
 
Another unfounded claim?

:linky: :linky: :linky: :linky: :linky:



  • Several hours before the shooting: A teacher noticed and photographed an alarming note on the teenager’s desk that included a drawing of a semi-automatic handgun, a bullet, a bleeding figure with two gunshot wounds, and several quotes including “The world is dead.” A school counselor escorted him to the school office with the drawing, which had since been altered to scratch out the violent scene and some of the words including, “My life is useless.” The school summoned the Crumbleys.
  • Three hours before the shooting: The parents arrived for a meeting where they declined to take their son home with them and failed to ask him where the gun was.
 
You realize the school did want to send him home--they told the parents to take him home and the parents refused. The school only failed at that last step, which would have involved the police forcibly removing the student from the school.
:linky: :linky: :linky: :linky: :linky:

Many of the posters on this thread seem to be making shit up as they go!
 
Yup. Went quietly when police confronted him, even though he still had 7 bullets in his gun. And immediately asked for a lawyer, wouldn't speak. He had this all planned. Why he wants to spend his life in prison, I don't know, but he does.
No think he maybe wants to be a hero like Kyle.
 

Forum List

Back
Top