- Feb 22, 2017
- 113,741
- 40,359
- 2,290
This is not right. This is all politics.
Actually it is right, it in in the Michigan law. If you allow your gun to be used to commit a crime you can be held responsible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is not right. This is all politics.
But he says he's innocent!
I'm impressed with how you can ignore the evidence to the contrary from every other developed nation. I suppose I should be used to it by now but it still makes an impression.
Too, other people's school kids are such a bargain when it comes to the price to be paid for easy access to firearms.
Actually it is right, it in in the Michigan law. If you allow your gun to be used to commit a crime you can be held responsible.
So.....they said here Tommy..... take this and shoot people?
How did they store the weapon? Did they know he was going to steal it?
They didn't "allow" it. It was taken (stolen) without their permission.Actually it is right, it in in the Michigan law. If you allow your gun to be used to commit a crime you can be held responsible.
He had the gun in his backpack when his parents were called to the school because of some disturbing drawings he made. He should have been sent home. He wasn't. The school should have searched his backpack BECAUSE OF THE DRAWINGS.. They didn't.So.....they said here Tommy..... take this and shoot people?
How did they store the weapon? Did they know he was going to steal it?
They didn't "allow" it. It was taken (stolen) without their permission.
The kid is being tried as an adult, meaning he knew what he was doing.
If someone has a knife, you could tackle them or run. Pretty hard for them to harm you if they're a distance away and you run.7 years ago, and no deaths. Wouldn't it be great if we could go 7 years between school shootings and have everyone survive?
Suppose the kid had taken the family car without permission and used it to run down and kill 5 people?Actually it is right, it in in the Michigan law. If you allow your gun to be used to commit a crime you can be held responsible.
Suppose the kid had taken the family car without permission and used it to run down and kill 5 people?
In both cases the parents broke no law
Screw the DA in michiganThe DA in Michigan disagrees with you.
The school should be sued by the victims.....He had the gun in his backpack when his parents were called to the school because of some disturbing drawings he made. He should have been sent home. He wasn't. The school should have searched his backpack BECAUSE OF THE DRAWINGS.. They didn't.
If we're gonna play this game, then the school should be charged
Good point. If the shooter is being charged as an adult, how can the parents be held responsible? not for manslaughter.They didn't "allow" it. It was taken (stolen) without their permission.
The kid is being tried as an adult, meaning he knew what he was doing.
Please tell me how this woman is responsible for the shooting??Screw the DA in michigan
He probably got elected thanks to george soros
But either way he’s just a democrat flunky
Next to the shooter the school board is the most to blame for what happened
Protecting children from mass shootings is reactionary?Please tell me how this woman is responsible for the shooting??
View attachment 571351
Or the guy standing behind her....
View attachment 571350
Or either woman standing right next to her...
You reactionary right-wing cucks just love saying goofy shit