2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,976
- 52,248
- 2,290
Laws holding people responsible for what their guns do have not been found unconstitutional as far as I know.
Didn't say that....I stated Heller found mandatory gun locks UnConstitutional.......likely any form of mandatory storage laws as well...
3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment.
----
We must also address the District’s requirement (as applied to respondent’s handgun) that firearms in the home be rendered and kept inoperable at all times. This makes it impossible for citizens to use them for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitu tional. The District argues that we should interpret this element of the statute to contain an exception for self- defense. See Brief for Petitioners 56–57. But we think that is precluded by the unequivocal text, and by the presence of certain other enumerated exceptions: “Except for law enforcement personnel . . . , each registrant shall keep any firearm in his possession unloaded and disas sembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device unless such firearm is kept at his place of business, or while being used for lawful recreational purposes within the District of Columbia.” D. C. Code §7–2507.02. The non existence of a self-defense exception is also suggested by the D. C. Court of Appeals’ statement that the statute forbids residents to use firearms to stop intruders, see McIntosh v. Washington, 395 A. 2d 744, 755–756 (1978).2
-----
In sum, we hold that the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful fire arm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.