the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'll relax when I see evidence that the Supreme Court is doing their job.
Lets hope the Fed Judge shifts the Dominion findings to the SC.
With the MSM in lockstep on their reporting "baseless" and enshrining Biden, it won't matter.This just in! The sun is very hot and bright.
Yes, I'm grateful that this forensic audit of Dominion vote changing machines has been released
and now it's perfectly obvious that the election was corrupt and unethical, to say the least.
But what is the practical upshot? The Supreme Court could step in and block the presidency of
corrupt Joe Biden, if they had the guts and honesty to do the right thing. And if the so called conservative
justices would get spine transplants.
The MSM can pick the winner and ignore all other claims/counts/certifications/etc. As long as enough people let the MSM do their thinking for them, elections are no longer so, but selections.
Making sure the presidency isn't stolen is. They turned around and ran away when the Texas law suitI'll relax when I see evidence that the Supreme Court is doing their job.
Voter disenfranchisement isn't the SC's job.
Making sure the presidency isn't stolen is. They turned around and ran away when the Texas law suitI'll relax when I see evidence that the Supreme Court is doing their job.
Voter disenfranchisement isn't the SC's job.
was in their lap. Shameful gutless cowards.
The democrats have worked for years to make cheating and illegitimate elections a very attainable goalMeanwhile, Biden's mail in votes were rejected at a rate of below one tenths of a percent. A historical impossibility.... because they did not check the signatures properly.
Recall, an election was recalled earlier this year in NJ, 20% of votes were thrown out. And now supposedly everyone knows how to file and is not committing fraud in the newly added states, who also sent ballots EVERYWHERE without requests.
Yeah...NOW there are! And it's all unnecessary when the Supreme Court already threw away a chance toTrump team knew that The Texas case may be refused on precedent....and as I said, there are at least 4 other separate case in the works.
Look. We've proven with several witnesses and video evidence the timeline of events that took place--from November 3rd election night when Trump was winning, the vote counting stopped, and by morning the lead had changed to Biden on the 4th.Yeah...NOW there are! And it's all unnecessary when the Supreme Court already threw away a chance toTrump team knew that The Texas case may be refused on precedent....and as I said, there are at least 4 other separate case in the works.
end this corrupt farce.
Except for Alito and Thomas the gutless wonders on the court all have their own reasons for closing their
eyes and pretending the election wasn't hijacked.
John Roberts and the two Obama judges were never going to do the right thing. No way in hell!
Amy Coney Barrett will have to answer for her actions to the God she claims to follow.
Good luck with that. Same with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch too, I guess.
No, it actually is not. That is the states job.Making sure the presidency isn't stolen is. They turned around and ran away when the Texas law suitI'll relax when I see evidence that the Supreme Court is doing their job.
Voter disenfranchisement isn't the SC's job.
was in their lap. Shameful gutless cowards.
Me too. That's not what the Texas law suit asked for.That the party of states rights now wants the federal government to control local elections is beyond me.
We'll see about this part. While we would like to think the court cannot overlook the evidence for a stolenThey cannot by law overlook such compelling and overwhelming evidence.
Depending on the magnitude of the forensic side, the court could rule for Trump or take the easy way out and demand a new election.
So TX was not asking the SCOTUS to interfere in another states electors? Do tell.Me too. That's not what the Texas law suit asked for.That the party of states rights now wants the federal government to control local elections is beyond me.
Derp.....
No. Maybe you should read about the suit and actually get informed.So TX was not asking the SCOTUS to interfere in another states electors? Do tell.
I notice you are not saying anything other than no.No. Maybe you should read about the suit and actually get informed.So TX was not asking the SCOTUS to interfere in another states electors? Do tell.
No, it actually is not. That is the states job.
That the party of states rights now wants the federal government to control local elections is beyond me. Should a state decide that electors will be chose by a die roll, that is their option and the SCOTUS has squat to say about it. That is at the very heart of our system.