Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 65,291
- 16,439
- 2,190
Ahh you think Krebs is a deep stater out to get Trump only to have fooled the Don into giving him power over the elections so he could cover up all the corruption. Of course you do. Hahahahaha.That guy has 0 credibility. He did not do anything before the election to ensure security. That has been proven. No one believes Deep Staters, but you.That is a very fun video but I don’t know what it is supposed to convince me of. The mock elections with machines that he bought and programmed were made to change the votes. So what? In a national election they have layers and layers of safeguards... some of which were missed and resulted in inaccurate results in some areas. These were identified and explained. But that’s why we do recounts and compare paper ballots with machine counts. All of this was done for the 2020 election. Trumps own election fraud director debunked the Texas report in front of congress calling it misleading and inaccurate. So why are you standing so firm behind it? What evidence has you so convinced?! Because logic, reason, and the risk reward involved in the kind of conspiracy it would take to actually do what the fraudsters claim happened, it just doesn’t add up.I’m engaging with you about it in the thread where you made your commentsI already did. You glossed over it.
But you still have dodged the primary issue I brought up.
For instance. . . in prima facie post # 20, where evidence is initially laid out for both sides, there was a quote from that Michigan's SoS defense's primary source of expertise, Halderman.
Halderman’s report is a rebuttal to a previous election analysis conducted by Allied Security Operations Group, a Dallas-based cyber-security company with Republican ties that was hired by Bailey to analyze Antrim County’s results in December. That disputed report said Dominion Voting Systems software and machines are “intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
Halderman’s report rebuts many of the Allied Security Operations Group findings.
So. . . Halderman's report rebuts the findings of Allied Security Operations Group huh?
And then I subsequently asked those who would trust him, to GO AND WATCH HIS VIDEO, and READ HIS LITERATURE. DID YOU?
If not, please, do watch the video embedded at that link.
How can we take his rebut seriously?
‘I hacked an election. So can the Russians.’
by Nicole Casal Moore
April 9, 2018
Professor Alex Halderman and the New York Times staged a mock election to demonstrate voting machine vulnerability.
‘I hacked an election. So can the Russians.’
Professor Alex Halderman and the New York Times staged a mock election to demonstrate voting machine vulnerability.news.engin.umich.edu
Former election security chief for Trump knocks down Antrim County report
Chris Krebs, who worked for Homeland Security, called the Allied Security Operations Group report on Antrim County "factually inaccurate."www.freep.com