No. He had the right to defend himself from assault, but then so did Zimmerman.I don't see how they are comparable.
First off Martin was clearly self defense from the story of the only eye witness. And it didn't involve police officers.
Second, Brown is not clearly self defense from the multiple eye witnesses. It may be if the facts are significantly different than what has been reported. Precisely why we need an investigation. this case does involve police officers.
Let the investigation be conducted and then let's make decisions based on facts.
Trayvon doesn't have the right to defend himself from armed stalkers?