mexicans are people too

i think the fact that trump is blaming mexicans for all of the country's problems is kinda messed up. reminds me of hitler. pretty bad guy all around, but that's a thing that bugs me.
Failed punctuation we see
so you don't have a leg to stand on, and are instead attacking my sentence structure? just asking so i know if you lost this argument.
Lol you still can not form or punctuate a sentence. Not that an ignoramus like you will ever know
that sentence was structured perfectly but ok
 
i think the fact that trump is blaming mexicans for all of the country's problems is kinda messed up. reminds me of hitler. pretty bad guy all around, but that's a thing that bugs me.
Welcome to the boards latest lying imbecile.
ok bootlicker.
what color is pennsylvania right now by the way?
oh, wait sorry, what about georgia?
oh shoot, i forgot, that one's also blue...
What is your stock portfolio worth kid......

Yawn
 
i think the fact that trump is blaming mexicans for all of the country's problems is kinda messed up. reminds me of hitler. pretty bad guy all around, but that's a thing that bugs me.
Failed punctuation we see
so you don't have a leg to stand on, and are instead attacking my sentence structure? just asking so i know if you lost this argument.
Lol you still can not form or punctuate a sentence. Not that an ignoramus like you will ever know
that sentence was structured perfectly but ok
Lol that one was a word salad

Take your meds
 
" Owing Nothing To Others "

* Advocating Dissolution Of America *

i don't live in a very urban area. i don't think i've even met another person who's puerto rican in my town honestly. believe me, there's no immigrants here. if there were, i would offer asylum, but i have nobody to offer asylum to.
The best thing for america would be to be arrested for sedition and your citizenship revoked , and that is assuming you even are a citizen .

You do not understand the cost in real dollars and you figure it is okay that others be robbed of their private property and independence to satiate your laziness to get off your ass and fund your charity abroad .

You are the racist here , with a kill whitey agenda .
i was born in ohio. also you can't arrest and revoke citizenship for being of the mindset that our constitution should be honored.
 
i think the fact that trump is blaming mexicans for all of the country's problems is kinda messed up. reminds me of hitler. pretty bad guy all around, but that's a thing that bugs me.
Welcome to the boards latest lying imbecile.
ok bootlicker.
what color is pennsylvania right now by the way?
oh, wait sorry, what about georgia?
oh shoot, i forgot, that one's also blue...
What is your stock portfolio worth kid......

Yawn
aww, someone's getting sleepy? maybe it's time to cuddle up to that american flag blankie you have and take a nap
 
" Owing Nothing To Others "

* Advocating Dissolution Of America *

i don't live in a very urban area. i don't think i've even met another person who's puerto rican in my town honestly. believe me, there's no immigrants here. if there were, i would offer asylum, but i have nobody to offer asylum to.
The best thing for america would be to be arrested for sedition and your citizenship revoked , and that is assuming you even are a citizen .

You do not understand the cost in real dollars and you figure it is okay that others be robbed of their private property and independence to satiate your laziness to get off your ass and fund your charity abroad .

You are the racist here , with a kill whitey agenda .
i was born in ohio. also you can't arrest and revoke citizenship for being of the mindset that our constitution should be honored.
You ever smoke crack like hunter biden
 
" Owing Nothing To Others "

* Advocating Dissolution Of America *

i don't live in a very urban area. i don't think i've even met another person who's puerto rican in my town honestly. believe me, there's no immigrants here. if there were, i would offer asylum, but i have nobody to offer asylum to.
The best thing for america would be to be arrested for sedition and your citizenship revoked , and that is assuming you even are a citizen .

You do not understand the cost in real dollars and you figure it is okay that others be robbed of their private property and independence to satiate your laziness to get off your ass and fund your charity abroad .

You are the racist here , with a kill whitey agenda .
i was born in ohio. also you can't arrest and revoke citizenship for being of the mindset that our constitution should be honored.
You ever smoke crack like hunter biden
He's likely smoked bidens crack quite a bit.
 
" Metaphors And Existentialism "

* Arguments From Delusions Of Grandeur *

Can you show me that caveat in the philosophy, or even in the rules (constitution)? I may have over looked it.
But, let me point out something- UNalienable rights can not be traded, or given, or granted nor are they a privilege. INalienable rights are grants and privileges per the "courts" so stating- unalienable rights can only be restricted and or ignored-
Now, proceed with your showing me the caveats.
The theory of unalienable wrights , just as a theory that another is entitled to remove them , both surmount to nothing more than " because i said so " - Argument from authority - Wikipedia .

A wright exists because a greater individual , perhaps as a state , is capable of issuing a retort for a violation of those wrights .

Thus a pretense that unalienable wrights exists ignores both that wrights can be alienated without retort or reprise and the theory as a whole relies upon a magnanimous theatrical dramatization for a day of final judgment .

There are many possible conceptual schemes, or perspectives in which judgment of truth or value can be made. This is often taken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively "true", but does not necessarily entail that all perspectives are equally valid.

Perspectivism rejects objective metaphysics, claiming that no evaluation of objectivity can transcend cultural formations or subjective designations.[6] Therefore, there are no objective facts, nor any knowledge of a thing-in-itself. Truth is separated from any particular vantage point, and so there are no ethical or epistemological absolutes.[7] Rules (i.e., those of philosophy, the scientific method, etc.) are constantly reassessed according to the circumstances of individual perspectives.[8] Truth is thus created by integrating different vantage points together.

This view is outlined in an aphorism from Nietzsche's posthumously-assembled collection The Will to Power:[11]

In so far as the word "knowledge" has any meaning, the world is knowable; but it is interpretable [emphasis in original] otherwise, it has no meaning behind it, but countless meanings.—"Perspectivism." It is our needs that interpret the world; our drives and their For and Against. [emphasis added] Every drive is a kind of lust to rule; each one has its perspective that it would like to compel all the other drives to accept as a norm.
— Friedrich Nietzsche; trans. Walter Kaufmann, The Will to Power, §481 (1883–1888)
[12]



The most prominent legal positivist writer in English has been H. L. A. Hart, who, in 1958, found common usages of "positivism" as applied to law to include the contentions that:
  • laws are commands of human beings;
  • there is not any necessary relation between law and morality, that is, between law as it is and as it ought to be;
  • analysis (or study of the meaning) of legal concepts is worthwhile and is to be distinguished from history or sociology of law, as well as from criticism or appraisal of law, for example with regard to its moral value or to its social aims or functions;
  • a legal system is a closed, logical system in which correct decisions can be deduced from predetermined legal rules without reference to social considerations;
  • moral judgments, unlike statements of fact, cannot be established or defended by rational argument, evidence, or proof ("noncognitivism" in ethics).[1]
Historically, legal positivism is in opposition to natural law's theories of jurisprudence, with particular disagreement surrounding the natural lawyer's claim that there is a necessary connection between law and morality.
 
Last edited:
" Cannot Contest Content Just Pretends Ad Hominem Is Sufficient As A Cheap Effort To Win A Debate "

* Anecdotal Evidence *

"wikipedia" :lmao:
Do you see those little brackets with numbers inline to the quotes ( ex . [11] ) ?

Those are references to links for actual documents from which the quotes are garnered .

My preferences for electives included a course on the works of nietzsche , another on philosophy of religion , another on philosophy of film , and another on formal logic among others , though my degree majors are in science .

Now , not all content on wikipedia is biased , or contentious , though much of it is , though much of it is factual and clearly explained .

Thus i do not have issue with providing references to useful information where it is factual ; and I often investigate the references .
 
Last edited:
" Cannot Contest Content Just Pretends Ad Hominem Is Sufficient As A Cheap Effort To Win A Debate "

* Anecdotal Evidence *

"wikipedia" :lmao:
Do you see those little brackets with numbers inline to the quotes ( ex . [11] ) ?

Those are references to links for actual documents from which the quotes are garnered .
...

And you are actually too fucking lazy to do any actual research. "Wikipedia" :lol:
 
....

My preferences for electives included a course on the works of nietzsche [sic] , another on philosophy of religion , another on philosophy of film , and another on formal logic among others .

.....


Wow, so impressive! :lmao:
 
" More Drivel From The Fecal Fan "

* Pretending The Insulting Short Quips Substitute For Intellect *

And you are actually too fucking lazy to do any actual research. "Wikipedia" :lol:
Are you anything but a simpleton critic ?

I am already well learned and well researched and all i am needing is an expedient way to communicate what others need to know .
 
" Quibble "

* Extent Of The Clown Brilliance *

,
= you are too fucking lazy to do any real research, and probably wouldn't know how if you tried
,
= you are too fucking lazy to do any real research, and probably wouldn't know how if you tried
 
" Quibble "

* Extent Of The Clown Brilliance *

,
= you are too fucking lazy to do any real research, and probably wouldn't know how if you tried
,
= you are too fucking lazy to do any real research, and probably wouldn't know how if you tried

The only reference you EVER provide is Wikipedia :)lol:), you constantly misuse terms you clearly do not understand, and your OCD compels you to put every post in some stupid format that you apparently think is 'fancy' or some such bullshit. You're a ridiculous buffoon.
 
" Childish Debates About Simpleton Drivel "

* Discussions With A Loser Without Ambition *

The only reference you EVER provide is Wikipedia :)lol:), you constantly misuse terms you clearly do not understand, and your OCD compels you to put every post in some stupid format that you apparently think is 'fancy' or some such bullshit. You're a ridiculous buffoon.
You are butt hurt , i know , so you pretend and troll .

You really are a neophyte and a simpleton , and nothing i have ever read from you demonstrates otherwise ; i do not respect you .

You agree or issue short quips with a pretentious and obnoxious arrogance that you are too clever , but you are actually a coward fearful of presenting content that would make you vulnerable to piss ant critics such as yourself .

As stated , you are a critic and nothing more .
 
" Childish Debates About Simpleton Drivel "

* Discussions With A Loser Without Ambition *

The only reference you EVER provide is Wikipedia :)lol:), you constantly misuse terms you clearly do not understand, and your OCD compels you to put every post in some stupid format that you apparently think is 'fancy' or some such bullshit. You're a ridiculous buffoon.
You are butt hurt , i know , so you pretend and troll .

You really are a neophyte and a simpleton , and nothing i have ever read from you demonstrates otherwise ; i do not respect you .

You agree or issue short quips with a pretentious and obnoxious arrogance that you are too clever , but you are actually a coward fearful of presenting content that would make you vulnerable to piss ant critics such as yourself .

As stated , you are a critic and nothing more .


Hey, there's that 'fancy' format again! So cool! Tell us more about your "electives," dilettante douchebag. :rolleyes:
 
" Look Everyone Who Ever Wondered Which Degenerate Smears Shit On The Walls Of A Public Restroom "

* All Admire Anal Expulsive Poo Finger Unkotare Who Writes Fecal Wisdom On The Walls For Someone Else To Clean *

Hey, there's that 'fancy' format again! So cool! Tell us more about your "electives," dilettante douchebag. :rolleyes:
Yeah , i am doing my best to try to find at least one thread you have started , just to convince myself that you are not an entirely pathetic imbecile .

And thus by evidence , you continue to demonstrate dumbness with which you are regarded .

Japanese. Roughly translated as dripping poop. This word is used to describe a pornographic genre commonly known as Scat.
 
" Look Everyone Who Ever Wondered Which Degenerate Smears Shit On The Walls Of A Public Restroom "

* All Admire Anal Expulsive Poo Finger Unkotare Who Writes Fecal Wisdom On The Walls For Someone Else To Clean *

Hey, there's that 'fancy' format again! So cool! Tell us more about your "electives," dilettante douchebag. :rolleyes:
Yeah , i am doing my best to try to find at least one thread you have started ,...


Hey, there's that 'fancy' format again! So cool! Tell us more about your "electives," dilettante douchebag. :rolleyes:

Have fun with the threads, Wiki. Maybe you'll find some new topics to pretend you know anything about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top