playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 58,093
- 51,596
- 3,645
Wrong again.
ooooOOOoooo... so it wasn't a caller - & it was a long time ago. but go ahead & try saying he didn't play it on his radio program.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong again.
Garland reeks leftist whore and statist bootlick. Reeks of it!
Been there done that mac, you failed.
You don't get a do over.
You are exposed as the fraud you are.
“Well, Senator, my own definition, which is about the same as the statutory definition, is the use of violence or threats of violence in an attempt to disrupt democratic processes,” he said.
“So, an attack on a courthouse while in operation, trying to prevent judges from actually deciding cases that blatantly is domestic extremism, domestic terrorism,” he continued.
“An attack simply on a government property at night or any other kind of circumstances is a clear crime and a serious one and should be punished. I don’t know enough about the facts of the example you’re talking about but that’s where I draw the line,” he added.
According to 18 USC § 2331(5), this is the definition of it.
domestic terrorism
(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States;
Nothing made up, dumbfuck.
Now go drink his piss, you pathetic hack.
He said "while in operation" makes it different.
Because it does. That would be true of it were in operation at night as well.
If you want to pretend to be too stupid to understand that, go right ahead. Or maybe you are not pretending.
Thanks for doing my light work, by the way.
Oh wow, the one maggot on the board I have even LESS respect for than coward mac...
Its INTENT, by the very definition. Fucking piss drinker.He didn't. It is literally a judge's job to interpret and describe the law. It is literally what he was asked to do.
And he correctly said an attack on a government building alone does not constitute domestic terrorism.
Funny thing is, if you didn't have a dump truck of sand in your giney, you would agree.
Has anyone caught on to the irony that Merrick Garland, a former pawn in a hyper-partisan battle for a Supreme Court position, is now in charge of the powerful department that is investigating the insurrection, and those who planned and organized it? I wonder what McConnell thinks of this. Hell, he might LIKE it.
And let's remember: This is not about the pawns who were used to carry out the attack, or the many innocent, misguided, paranoid souls who were also there because of the orange con. They will get some basic charges and some punishment because that has to happen. This is about the elites and their lieutenants who manufactured and enabled and planned and incited the whole thing. If that's what happened, of course.
So anyway, this attorney and former prosecutor has been following this whole thing, and addresses the concern (which I've shared) that Garland and the DOJ have been moving too slowly or not at all. Some pretty interesting and hopeful stuff here regarding Garland's methods and history. His point is that Garland is masterful at working behind the scenes and being so thorough and meticulous with his final conclusions that there is little wiggle room for the criminals:
Trump supporters, please note, disclaimer: All of this is fake news and lies and commies and Hitler. Anything the DOJ finds or charges is China and Deep State Nazi Swamp and will be summarily thrown out and laughed at. Nothing to see here. We're just kidding. This is just for fun 'n stuff.
No, you are both embarrassing yourselves as usual.What a pathetic lying pile of shit you are,
You lied, you got busted.
Man up, buttercup.
Wrong. Sorry. Purposely damaging government property does not,all by itself, constitute domestic terrorism..Its INTENT, by the very definition. Fucking piss drinker.
You are boring and predictable.
No you fucking idiot.Wrong. Sorry. Purposely damaging government property does not,all by itself, constitute domestic terrorism..
Obviously..
I think you are starting to realize how desperate and stupid your spoonfed talking point is.
Cute whining.No you fucking idiot.
They were doing it to try and influence policy. Which is the definition of... DRUM ROLL PLEASE... TERRORISM
Dumbass
Dumb people shouldnt be so self righteous. It just makes you look more dumb.
Im going by the legal definition and you are yapping on about something he made up lol.Cute whining.
But his point was that attacking a government building alone does not constitute domestic terrorism.
The difference between trying to stop or influence an official proceeding and not.
It's pretty simple.
But think what you want. This is all a bad act by you anyway. You willscour the white wing blogosphere for something else. Enjoy.
No, you are interpreting it. I will go with the career judge over the internet shill plagiarizing white wing blogs.Im going by the legal definition
No, you are both embarrassing yourselves as usual.
"Still trying to push the insurrection hoax...Hilariously desperate."
--------------------------------------------------------------------".....making a case that a fabricated insurrection..."
------------------------------------------"It's Mueller Time!" Oh...sorry... that was left over from the last leftist hoax..."