No, if she wanted kids, then be thankful for them rather than complaining she had to tone her aspirations down. Which I wonder what she actually toned down. If she had said ‘I decided it was more important to put my kids first, and then later can pursue other dreams I have’. As it was when she became First Lady, her Mother was pretty much a live in nanny for her. Her words sound more like a complaint than grateful for her being able to be there for her kids. And to be honest, it really does seem like she sacrificed her ambitions that much.Wow-
'The thing that really changed it was the birth of our children. I wasn't really ready for that. That really made it harder.
'Something had to give and it was my aspirations and dreams.
'I made that concession not because he said "you have to quit your job" but it felt like "I can't do all of this so I have to tone down my aspirations, I have to dial it back,'" Michelle says.
Bet her girls were thrilled to hear that.
Meaning what?
You mean it would have been preferable to just hire a nanny and go do a career staying uninvolved?
Summa y'all should read your own posts because they just make zero sense. Need to get the fuck over your own partisan-poisoned psyche.
Oh poster PLEASE.
WHERE does she say she isn't thankful for the kids? Mind you I didn't even bother to read the link but without even doing that I know partisan bullshit when I hear it.