I am a German. I know who is Adolf Hilter. I like to know when this untypical picture of Hitler was made in which context. Specially I like to know (or to get a feeling. an intuition for) whether sucvch a foto is a propaganda foto from the Nazis (perhaps made from Goebels and his ministery for professional lies ,... ah 'sorry': political propaganda) or whether this was a situation where Hitler felt himselve in a very uncomfortable situation and how it came to this situation. An assassinator had been easily able to kill Hitler there.
No idea who is Rudolf Caracciola and what this picturte means. The man in the white clothing could also be easyily "photoshoped" into this picture from evcery diletant: a foto without a concrete time mark and a description of the concrete situation of a reliable source is sometimes worth less than nothing. Never heard the sentence "Truth is the first victim of war"?
Rudolf Caraciola became in 1931 a member of the NSKK - a translation could be: "national socialistic car corps". I am tznoable t6o sdee anyhtign what made this man for the Nazis important - except that he had been a racing cyclist (one of the most successful Germans in this sport) - what he anyway had been. He lived during the Nazi rulership in Switzerland where he lost in 1934 his wife in an avalanche accident. He died in 1959 in Kassel inthe age of 59 yeras: reason cirrhosis of teh liver so I think perhaps he became an alcoholics somewhen during his life.
So what is you8rnerpoernm with this man? That he had been a German who made a wrong political decision in a time when nearly everyone in the whole world made wrong decsdsion - if you take a look at Mussolini. Franko, Stalin, Mao of the situai9on of the KKK in the USA.
? Also a very untypical foto from Adolf Hitler.-
... one momentl. Could it be this foto is a foto from the Italian region OF Italy where at this time of history only Germans lived? Hitler wil vbetqary all this people because of he needed Mussolini and so he didn not bring them back to Germany ("heim ins Reich>") as he did do with Austria and Bohemia.
What a nonsense to call the Nazis "socialist". Never anyone did do so in histroy because the Nazios had been clear enemiesd of all left wing Socialists and Communists. The main part of their propaganda had been a weird form of a Darwinism (racism), "Loyalism" fits much better than socialism. Slogan of the military party army of the Nazis had been "Meine Ehre heisst Treue" = "My honour is called loyalty". Sounds Trump-like, isn't it?
?