The Democrat Search Has Begun

Trump cut taxes, inherited a falling unemployment rate, got TRILLIONS in help from the Fed, begged them for more, and his GDP was only 2.3% when COVID hit.

2.3%. After ALL THAT.

He STILL called it "the greatest economy ever", of course, and the rubes ate it up like they eat everything ELSE up that he says.

And again: There is no better illustration of the Dunning-Kruger Effect than a Trumpster lecturing others on economics & markets.
Liar.


Democrats lie about everything.





It's a lie.


Obama did a terrible job with his Democrat policies:

"...the economy was stagnating in 2016 after the weakest recovery from a recession since the Great Depression.



In fact, The New York Times itself described Obama's economy this way in August 2016: "For three quarters in a row, the growth rate of the economy has hovered around a mere 1%. In the last quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, the economy expanded at feeble annual rates of 0.9% and 0.8%, respectively. The initial reading for the second quarter of this year, released on Friday, was a disappointing 1.2%."



...GDP growth decelerated in each of the last three quarters of 2016."



And on January 27, 2017, after the government reported that GDP growth for all 2016 was a mere 1.6% — the weakest in five years —"
www.investors.com



The stronger the economy gets under President Trump, the more desperate his critics are to hand credit for the economic boom to Obama. Even if that entails changing the past.

www.investors.com

www.investors.com




Trump picked up an revitalized the economy:



"In short, there was no upward trajectory to the economy on anyone's radar when Trump took office.ā€ Economic Boom: Media Rewrite History To Credit Obama Instead Of Trump




The only bigger lie I recall was that Clinton had a "budget surplus.'



Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against that

Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.

Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.

Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.

Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.

Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.

Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.

Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.

Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.

Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, Putin didn’t invade Ukraine….but you voted against that

Under Trump, the savages of Hamas didn’t dare to slaughter concert goers….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, peace in the Middle East….but you voted against that.

Under Trump, three peace treaties between Israel and their Arab neighbors…..but you voted against that.

Under Trump, securing our borders and not waiving in murderous MS13 gang members…..but you voted against that

Under Trump we avoided some 100,000 fatal drug overdoses…but you voted against that.

Under Trump we didn’t have lawfare, a legal system corrupted to use fake charges against political enemies….but you voted for Lawfare.

Under Trump, his side didn’t try to imprison or assassinate opponents.
 
The only bigger lie I recall was that Clinton had a "budget surplus.'
There you go alternative facting again.
Clinton's budget surpluses are FACT whether princess PoliticalChica chooses to believe it or not.


1743794978873.webp



Under Trump gasoline was about $1.80 a gallon….but you voted against that
1743795473989.webp

Under Trump we were energy independent….but you voted against that.

By the time President Trump took office in 2017, U.S. net energy imports had fallen 75% from the 2005 level. In 2019, net energy imports turned negative, meaning the U.S. had become energy independent. So, while it is technically correct to say that the U.S. became energy independent while President Trump was in office, the reason was the shale boom that had begun in earnest in 2005
.

Under Trump 80% of illegal alien were kept in Mexico….but you voted against that.
:link:
Under Trump inflation was 1.4%….but you voted against that.
Try 2.46 %

Under Trump crime was far lower, as were homicides….but you voted against that.
Wrong again.
The actual stats tell just the opposite story.

Under Trump Iran was kept in a box….but you voted against that.
Wrong again.
For god's sake please try to EDUCATE yourself on these topics before just spouting off this inane crap!

Not surprisingly, Trump’s ill-conceived ā€œmaximum pressureā€ campaign, which involves reimposing sanctions that were lifted when Iran met key JCPOA requirements, has done nothing to force changes in Iran’s regional behavior or push Iran into accepting new U.S. demands. Rather, the policy has sharply increased tensions in the Persian Gulf and decreased Iran’s incentives to continue compliance with the JCPOA.

In response to U.S. moves to further tighten sanctions earlier this spring, Iran announced on May 8 that it would no longer adhere to JCPOA limits on stockpiling heavy water and low-enriched uranium. Iran also gave the other parties to the agreement (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union) 60 days to help it thwart U.S. sanctions on oil sales and banking transactions, or else it will take additional measures with more significant proliferation implications.

With its existing heavy-water production and uranium-enrichment capacities, Iran could soon breach some of these limits. Any violation of JCPOA restrictions is cause for concern, but Iran’s plan to exceed the agreement’s limits on storing more than 130 metric tons of heavy water and 300 kilograms of 3.67-percent enriched uranium-235 would not pose an immediate proliferation risk. By comparison, in June 2015 Iran had a stockpile of approximately 11,500 kilograms of LEU in all forms. It takes roughly 1,050 kilograms of LEU in gas form and enriched to weapons-grade to produce a significant quantity for one bomb.

A bigger problem would arise if Tehran resumes enriching uranium to 20-percent levels or restarts construction of the unfinished Arak heavy-water reactor. Although the reactor is years away from completion, it could provide enough plutonium for two nuclear weapons every year if the plant’s original blueprints are followed. More worrisome would be the resumption of enrichment to 20-percent levels, which would significantly decrease the time needed to acquire enough material for a bomb.

What is most tragic about the growing crisis is that Trump’s decision to violate U.S. commitments under the JCPOA appears to be based on a set of falsehoods and misconceptions that Trump and his senior officials continue to repeat
.

Under Trump America had an airbase near both China and Iran….but you voted against that.
Good grief!
Under Trump our President wasn’t on China’s payroll….but you voted against that.
You don't seem to mind your current president being on The Kremlin's payroll.
Why the double standard?
Under Trump cartels weren’t free to operate….but you voted against that.
Fake news.
"The cartels operated freely under Trump's first term and they are still operating freely now.
Do you just throw all this shit against the wall to see what will stick?
Under Trump government didn’t favor racism, CRT, gender mutilation….but you voted against that.
Better check again because Trump's (and Project 2025's) policies are the most racist and regressive our country has seen in nearly 70 years.
As for ""CRT," I challenge you to even define what that means. I'll bet you can't.
"Gender mutilation???"
WTF are you even trying to talk about?
Show me a credible link proving that "gender mutilation" was anywhere on any baot...ANYWHERE.
Again, you can't.
Are you just day drinking again?
Under Trump we didn’t have confiscatory tax policy….but you voted against that.
Care to try to define just what the hell "confiscatory tax policy" is supposed to mean?
You just make this garbage up as you go don't you?
Under Trump we didn’t have a government working with big tech to end free speech….but you voted against that.
Uh.....ever heard of a guy named Elon Musk?
Under Trump, Putin didn’t invade Ukraine….but you voted against that
Putin didn't need to invade Ukraine while he had a puppet in The White House.
By the way, Trump promised he could singlehandedly end the war in Ukraine.
How's that working out for you?
Under Trump, the savages of Hamas didn’t dare to slaughter concert goers….but you voted against that.
Fake news.
Under Trump, peace in the Middle East….but you voted against that.
Fake news.
Who the fuck tried to tell you there has EVER been peace in the middle east?
And why were you stupid enough to believe them?
Under Trump, three peace treaties between Israel and their Arab neighbors…..but you voted against that.
Didn't turn out to be worth much did they?
Just more smoke and mirrors from your favorite con man.
Under Trump, securing our borders and not waiving in murderous MS13 gang members…..but you voted against that
How's that wall that Mexico was gonna pay for working out for you simp?
Under Trump we avoided some 100,000 fatal drug overdoses…but you voted against that.
:link:
Under Trump we didn’t have lawfare, a legal system corrupted to use fake charges against political enemies….but you voted for Lawfare.
There was (and is) nothing "fake" about the multitude of criminal charges against Trump.
They are very real.

Under Trump, his side didn’t try to imprison or assassinate opponents.
 

Attachments

  • 1743795083989.webp
    1743795083989.webp
    31.6 KB · Views: 1
But 12 million un vaxxed, un checked, unmasked illegal aliens was spread out across American.


hyĀ·pocĀ·riĀ·sy
/hÉ™ĖˆpƤkrəsē/

noun

  1. the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
Trump has promised to rid the country of illegal aliens and, at the current rate of 600/day, will do that in a mere 54 years. What would you call that? Hypocrisy, incompetence, or a con job?
 
I would very much like to save you, make you an American.....consider this as outlandish as it may sound: what if I am correct and you have been manipulated and co-opted by the enemies of America and Americans?

What if?

I'm a Dem-bot lol.
 
There you go alternative facting again.
Clinton's budget surpluses are FACT whether princess PoliticalChica chooses to believe it or not.



View attachment 1096762



:link:

Try 2.46 %


Wrong again.
The actual stats tell just the opposite story.


Wrong again.
For god's sake please try to EDUCATE yourself on these topics before just spouting off this inane crap!

Not surprisingly, Trump’s ill-conceived ā€œmaximum pressureā€ campaign, which involves reimposing sanctions that were lifted when Iran met key JCPOA requirements, has done nothing to force changes in Iran’s regional behavior or push Iran into accepting new U.S. demands. Rather, the policy has sharply increased tensions in the Persian Gulf and decreased Iran’s incentives to continue compliance with the JCPOA.

In response to U.S. moves to further tighten sanctions earlier this spring, Iran announced on May 8 that it would no longer adhere to JCPOA limits on stockpiling heavy water and low-enriched uranium. Iran also gave the other parties to the agreement (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union) 60 days to help it thwart U.S. sanctions on oil sales and banking transactions, or else it will take additional measures with more significant proliferation implications.

With its existing heavy-water production and uranium-enrichment capacities, Iran could soon breach some of these limits. Any violation of JCPOA restrictions is cause for concern, but Iran’s plan to exceed the agreement’s limits on storing more than 130 metric tons of heavy water and 300 kilograms of 3.67-percent enriched uranium-235 would not pose an immediate proliferation risk. By comparison, in June 2015 Iran had a stockpile of approximately 11,500 kilograms of LEU in all forms. It takes roughly 1,050 kilograms of LEU in gas form and enriched to weapons-grade to produce a significant quantity for one bomb.

A bigger problem would arise if Tehran resumes enriching uranium to 20-percent levels or restarts construction of the unfinished Arak heavy-water reactor. Although the reactor is years away from completion, it could provide enough plutonium for two nuclear weapons every year if the plant’s original blueprints are followed. More worrisome would be the resumption of enrichment to 20-percent levels, which would significantly decrease the time needed to acquire enough material for a bomb.

What is most tragic about the growing crisis is that Trump’s decision to violate U.S. commitments under the JCPOA appears to be based on a set of falsehoods and misconceptions that Trump and his senior officials continue to repeat
.


Good grief!

You don't seem to mind your current president being on The Kremlin's payroll.
Why the double standard?

Fake news.
"The cartels operated freely under Trump's first term and they are still operating freely now.
Do you just throw all this shit against the wall to see what will stick?

Better check again because Trump's (and Project 2025's) policies are the most racist and regressive our country has seen in nearly 70 years.
As for ""CRT," I challenge you to even define what that means. I'll bet you can't.
"Gender mutilation???"
WTF are you even trying to talk about?
Show me a credible link proving that "gender mutilation" was anywhere on any baot...ANYWHERE.
Again, you can't.
Are you just day drinking again?

Care to try to define just what the hell "confiscatory tax policy" is supposed to mean?
You just make this garbage up as you go don't you?

Uh.....ever heard of a guy named Elon Musk?

Putin didn't need to invade Ukraine while he had a puppet in The White House.
By the way, Trump promised he could singlehandedly end the war in Ukraine.
How's that working out for you?

Fake news.

Fake news.
Who the fuck tried to tell you there has EVER been peace in the middle east?
And why were you stupid enough to believe them?

Didn't turn out to be worth much did they?
Just more smoke and mirrors from your favorite con man.

How's that wall that Mexico was gonna pay for working out for you simp?

:link:

There was (and is) nothing "fake" about the multitude of criminal charges against Trump.
They are very real.



I told this imbecile that everything he believes is a lie, and that any news or reports that favor Democrats is a lie.


One great lie was that the "brilliant" Bill Clinton took time away from the ladies to provide a budget surplus.



He didn't.....it was a lie.....



Watch me eviscerate it



  1. In 2000, President Clinton stated that the recent surplus ā€œrepresented the largest one-year debt reduction in the history of the United States…the $5.7 trillion national debt has been reduced by $360 billion in the last three years -- $223 billion this year alone.ā€ President Clinton announces another record budget surplus - September 27, 2000
a. CNN stated ā€œThe federal budget surplus for fiscal year 1999 was $122.7 billion, and $69.2 billion for fiscal year 1998. Those back-to-back surpluses, the first since 1957, allowed the Treasury to pay down $138 billion in national debt.ā€ Ibid.
b. So, it seems, not only did President Clinton run a surplus, but he reduced the national debt!

2. Would you like to see the actual national debt figures?

1993

4,351,044
1994
4,643,307
1995
4,920,586
1996
5,181,465
1997
5,369,206
1998
5,478,189
1999
5,605,523
2000
5,628,700
end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)
The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!


Do you see a surplus anywhere in there??????????


But I do want to thank you for constantly proving that I am never wrong.
 
Last edited:
I told this imbecile that everything he believes is a lie, and that any news or reports that favor Democrats is a lie.


One great lie was that the "brilliant" Bill Clinton took time away from the ladies to provide a budget surplus.



He didn't.....it was a lie.....



Watch me eviscate it



  1. In 2000, President Clinton stated that the recent surplus ā€œrepresented the largest one-year debt reduction in the history of the United States…the $5.7 trillion national debt has been reduced by $360 billion in the last three years -- $223 billion this year alone.ā€ President Clinton announces another record budget surplus - September 27, 2000
a. CNN stated ā€œThe federal budget surplus for fiscal year 1999 was $122.7 billion, and $69.2 billion for fiscal year 1998. Those back-to-back surpluses, the first since 1957, allowed the Treasury to pay down $138 billion in national debt.ā€ Ibid.
b. So, it seems, not only did President Clinton run a surplus, but he reduced the national debt!

2. Would you like to see the actual national debt figures?

1993

4,351,044
1994
4,643,307
1995
4,920,586
1996
5,181,465
1997
5,369,206
1998
5,478,189
1999
5,605,523
2000
5,628,700
end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)
The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!





But I do want to thank you for constantly proving that I am never wrong.
You sure eviscated that didn't you?
:auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
 
Can't be reconciled with...



I think you need to stop watching Fox News. And OANN. Stop reading X, too.
If it wasn't a hoax designed to shut down Trump's economy, why did the Democrats invite some 12 million unvaxxed, un masked, not socially distance illegal immigrants in.......and, while forbidding Americans from gathing even in family meeting, dump millions of the migrants all over the nation?


You'd best stop getting your news and perspective from NPR.
 
Analogy that explains the bogus "Clinton Surplus"

1. You go to the bank and borrow $5,000 to take a trip to the Bahamas

2. You cancel the daily paper while you're away

3.When you return, you look at the household budget, and note that you saved $10 by not getting the paper delivered....never considering the Bahamas loan you're going to have to pay back $5,000 for the trip....

...you begin hooping and hollering 'I have a surplus! Yippee!'

4. You function this way because you're an idiot.







President Bill Clinton: the national debt increase.....no surplus in sight.​

Jan. 20, 1993*: $4,188,092,107,183.60

Jan. 20, 2001: $5,727,776,738,304.64

Days in Office: 2,922​


Increase of 37%
 

Amount Added to the Debt for Each Fiscal Year​

Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32% increase to the $4.4 trillion debt level at the end of Bush's last budget, FY 1993.

  • FY 2001 - $133 billion.
  • FY 2000 - $18 billion.
  • FY 1999 - $130 billion.
  • FY 1998 - $113 billion.
  • FY 1997 - $188 billion.
  • FY 1996 - $251 billion.
  • FY 1995 - $281 billion.
  • FY 1994 - $281 billion.


The propaganda continues: Democrats are just soooooo smart. But, in reality, they simply lie.
 
Clinton surplus, Obama didn't hate Jews, Russia Russia Russia, the Covid Hoax, the Biden was on top of his game, ......


Just get ready for the next lie or hoax.
 
Analogy that explains the bogus "Clinton Surplus"

1. You go to the bank and borrow $5,000 to take a trip to the Bahamas

2. You cancel the daily paper while you're away

3.When you return, you look at the household budget, and note that you saved $10 by not getting the paper delivered....never considering the Bahamas loan you're going to have to pay back $5,000 for the trip....

...you begin hooping and hollering 'I have a surplus! Yippee!'

4. You function this way because you're an idiot.







President Bill Clinton: the national debt increase.....no surplus in sight.​

Jan. 20, 1993*: $4,188,092,107,183.60

Jan. 20, 2001: $5,727,776,738,304.64

Days in Office: 2,922​


Increase of 37%
You can't lie your way out of being busted as full of shit here.
You don't know what you're talking about.
You need to go back to the kiddie table.
 
You can't lie your way out of being busted as full of shit here.
You don't know what you're talking about.
You need to go back to the kiddie table.
Everytime I defeat one of the Democrat serfs they default to vulgarity.


Clearly he is sulking because I just debunked the Clinton Surplus lie.
 
Everytime I defeat one of the Democrat serfs they default to vulgarity.


Clearly he is sulking because I just debunked the Clinton Surplus lie.
You didn't "debunk" anything princess.
You're letting your imagination run away with you again.
And toughen up snowflake. Don't be offended by my fuckin' vulgarity.
Maybe you'd be more comfortable on the Sunday School thread?
:laughing0301:
 
Democrats lower deficits, Republicans explode deficits.

Democrats make for a booming economy, Republicans always crater the economy.

That's what Democrats need to keep pounding on, the simple facts. And we enjoy how triggered those facts make Trump cultists.
 
If it wasn't a hoax designed to shut down Trump's economy, why did the Democrats invite some 12 million unvaxxed, un masked, not socially distance illegal immigrants in

Okay, that did not happen.

.......and, while forbidding Americans from gathing even in family meeting

That also did not happen.

For maybe a few weeks to a few months, numerous local governments prohibited or restricted public gatherings over a certain number of people to slow the spread of the disease, which wasn't well-understood.

You'd best stop getting your news and perspective from NPR.

I rarely read/listen to it.
 
You didn't "debunk" anything princess.
You're letting your imagination run away with you again.
And toughen up snowflake. Don't be offended by my fuckin' vulgarity.
Maybe you'd be more comfortable on the Sunday School thread?
:laughing0301:
OK, Einstein.....where is the "surpluss" when the debt went up every single year?

Pretend you aren't as stupid as we both know you are.


Amount Added to the Debt for Each Fiscal Year​

Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32% increase to the $4.4 trillion debt level at the end of Bush's last budget, FY 1993.

  • FY 2001 - $133 billion.
  • FY 2000 - $18 billion.
  • FY 1999 - $130 billion.
  • FY 1998 - $113 billion.
  • FY 1997 - $188 billion.
  • FY 1996 - $251 billion.
  • FY 1995 - $281 billion.
  • FY 1994 - $281 billion.


The national debt went up every single year Democrat Clinton was in office.

Yes, I debunked one more Democrat lie.



It's my avocation.
 
Democrats lower deficits, Republicans explode deficits.

Democrats make for a booming economy, Republicans always crater the economy.

That's what Democrats need to keep pounding on, the simple facts. And we enjoy how triggered those facts make Trump cultists.
Let's check


Clinton ran deficits throughout all 8 years of his term, and one can go to the US Treasury Department and looking through the history of the total outstanding debt through Clintons term.

Every year Clinton was in office, the total national debt continued to climb.

How Clinton managed to claim a surplus was that while the general operating budgets ran deficits but Clinton borrowed from numerous off budget
funds to make the on budget fund a surplus.

For example, in 2000, Clinton claimed a $230B surplus, but Clinton borrowed
$152.3B from Social
Security
$30.9B from Civil Service Retirement Fund
$18.5B from Federal Supplementary Medical
insurance Trust Fund
$15.0B from Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund
$9.0B from the Federal Unemployment Trust Fund
$8.2B from Military Retirement Fund
$3.8B from Transportation Trust Funds
$1.8B from Employee
Life Insurance & Retirement fund
$7.0B from others

Total borrowed from off budget funds $246.5B, meaning that his $230B surplus is actually a $16.5B deficit.
($246.5B borrowed - $230B claimed surplus = $16.5B actual deficit).

If there is ever a true surplus, then the national debt will go down.


the national debt did not go down one year during the Clinton administration.

When Bill Clinton left office what was the surplus? - Answers

The claim is generally made that Clinton had a surplus of $69 billion in FY1998, $123 billion in FY1999 and $230 billion in FY2000 . In that same link, Clinton claimed that the national debt had been reduced by $360 billion in the last three years, presumably FY1998, FY1999, and FY2000--though, interestingly, $360 billion is not the sum of the alleged surpluses of the three years in question ($69B + $123B + $230B = $422B, not $360B).

While not defending the increase of the federal debt under President Bush, it's curious to see Clinton's record promoted as having generated a surplus.
It never happened. There was never a surplus and the facts support that position. In fact, far from a $360 billion reduction in the national debt in FY1998-FY2000, there was an increase of $281 billion.
Townhall


  1. In 2000, President Clinton stated that the recent surplus ā€œrepresented the largest one-year debt reduction in the history of the United States…the $5.7 trillion national debt has been reduced by $360 billion in the last three years -- $223 billion this year alone.ā€ President Clinton announces another record budget surplus - September 27, 2000
a. CNN stated ā€œThe federal budget surplus for fiscal year 1999 was $122.7 billion, and $69.2 billion for fiscal year 1998. Those back-to-back surpluses, the first since 1957, allowed the Treasury to pay down $138 billion in national debt.ā€ Ibid.
b. So, it seems, not only did President Clinton run a surplus, but he reduced the national debt!
2. Would you like to see the actual national debt figures?

1993

4,351,044
1994
4,643,307
1995
4,920,586
1996
5,181,465
1997
5,369,206
1998
5,478,189
1999
5,605,523
2000
5,628,700

end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)
The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!
 
Okay, that did not happen.



That also did not happen.

For maybe a few weeks to a few months, numerous local governments prohibited or restricted public gatherings over a certain number of people to slow the spread of the disease, which wasn't well-understood.



I rarely read/listen to it.
Liar......of course it happend.


Washington Examiner

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com › news › 2455010 › illegal-border-crossers-total-over-10-million-since-biden-inauguration

Illegal border crossers total over 10 million since Biden inauguration ...

Oct 30, 2023Since January 2021, total illegal border crossers apprehended nationwide were 8,396,198. Combined with at least 1,678,979 gotaways, the number increases to over 10 million (at least 10,075,177).





Democrats were ringing the dinner bell in Mexico.
All comers....walk right in.


Not only are illegals welcome.....but Democrats promise them free welfare, just come in and vote Democrat.



Shocking US government leaflet tells Mexican immigrants they can collect food stamp benefits without admitting they're in the country illegally

A Spanish-language leaflet that the U.S. Department of Agriculture has provided to the Mexican Embassy in Washington advises border-crossing Mexicans that they can collect taxpayer-funded food stamp benefits for their children without admitting that they're illegal immigrants.

Underlined and in boldface type, the document tells immigrants who are unlawfully in the United States that, 'You need not divulge information regarding your immigration status in seeking this benefit for your children.'

Read more: Shocking US government leaflet tells Mexican immigrants they can collect food stamp benefits without admitting they're in the country illegally
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook





"Omnibus Spending Bill Continues Funding Food Stamp Ads in Mexico"
Omnibus Spending Bill Continues Funding Food Stamp Ads in Mexico - Breitbart
 

Attachments

  • 1743811519603.webp
    1743811519603.webp
    364 bytes · Views: 1
Back
Top Bottom