Median Household Incomes D O W N under Obama! I Do Mean D-O-W-N

[EconChick]

The fact that I disagree with left wing and right wing partisan ideologues is a very good sign.

.

its a good sign that you lack the intelligence to decide which ideology is correct. You should be ashamed but you lack the IQ for it.

Yes, the standard approach of partisan ideologues: "You don't agree with me, so you're dumb."

The grade-school playground approach to politics, very impressive.

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!

No thanks. I'll think for myself. It takes more effort, but it's more satisfying. And more honest.

.

Oh yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, you've been so ABOVE personal comments.

Hypocrite AND liar as well as stupid.

And incomes are STILL down compared to Bush.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I'd like to see the chart that proves that Mac doesn't understand the difference between mean and median.

How about it?

Do I need to hold your pee pee while you whiz, too?

Everyone else has been following it ever since you two morons started posting the MEAN graph. (One moron posted, the other moron agreed with it.)

I guess if I were as discredited and stupid as you two, I'd start with the deflection posts too.

You might sucker others into it, but I don't play your amateur games.

It isn't a game. I'd like to see the graph you are talking about that proves that Mac doesn't know the difference between mean and median. Just link to Mac's post, please.

Thanks.

 

[BlindBoo]

The 2001 recession started in 2001. The most significant propaganda lie from those days was that from the Right claiming that Bush INHERITED a recession from Clinton.

Dumb **** Bush had been in office 60 days when it started,using your logic THIS recession was Obama's. (Correction Stock Market Crash)

You don't get it both ways ass bite.

The Bush recessions began in 2001 and 2007.

If you want to argue that they didn't happen on his watch, by all means, entertain us.

The 2001 Recession started in March Bush had been in Office 60 days.

The Stock Market peaked in Oct 2007 (Under Bush) and Crashed in 2008(under Obama)....do the math.

2001 came out of Clinton,if you want to attribute it to Bush then using YOUR logic Obama gets the 2008 Stock Market crash sorry kid.

Logic never has been your strong point Carb but then it can never be a strong point fora hack.

Obama wasn't president in 2008 fuckwit.

Republican logic at it's finest.

 

[BlindBoo]

The Bush recessions began in 2001 and 2007.

If you want to argue that they didn't happen on his watch, by all means, entertain us.

The 2001 Recession started in March Bush had been in Office 60 days.

The Stock Market peaked in Oct 2007 (Under Bush) and Crashed in 2008(under Obama)....do the math.

2001 came out of Clinton,if you want to attribute it to Bush then using YOUR logic Obama gets the 2008 Stock Market crash sorry kid.

Obama wasn't President until 2009

You are correct, I am a year off there.

Makes no difference to the 2001 point though.

The stock market for the entire presidency of GW Bush was lower when he left than when he took office.

If you're claiming the stock market matters in assessing a president's performance.

You might want to compare that to the presidency of Bill Clinton, over which the stock market was up 200%.

Of course it was,but we weren't talking about that, we can if you like.

But we were talking about 2001, the "recession" started in March,Bush had only been in office for
two months,it simply doesn't work that way.

I am not a Bush guy, I will not defend him at "all costs" like you guys do with Obama.

The tech bubble started bursting early in 2000. It gathered real steam when Microsoft lost in court. Neither Bush nor Clinton had much to do with it either.

 

[Mac1958]

The fact that I disagree with left wing and right wing partisan ideologues is a very good sign.

.

its a good sign that you lack the intelligence to decide which ideology is correct. You should be ashamed but you lack the IQ for it.

Yes, the standard approach of partisan ideologues: "You don't agree with me, so you're dumb."

The grade-school playground approach to politics, very impressive.

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!

No thanks. I'll think for myself. It takes more effort, but it's more satisfying. And more honest.

.

And yet you're STILL wrong on this topic.

Could be that you're just not as smart as you think.

Um, wait, it IS that you're just not as smart as you think. Also you've no idea whom I've voted for, dum dum. Just like usual, you make stupid assumptions.

On what, precisely, was I wrong?

And precisely what is the point of your thread?

And by the way, I'm not the one claiming that I'm intelligent. I've never seen anyone here, ever, try as hard as you do. Not even close.

I look forward to your straight and clear answers to my questions above.

.

 

[BlindBoo]

And the harder you try to resist everyone on the left and right on this....the more you dig your hole, Mac.

Mac is correct. You lost this thread long ago.........

 

[Mac1958]

And the harder you try to resist everyone on the left and right on this....the more you dig your hole, Mac.

Mac is correct. You lost this thread long ago.........

She's in her own little world, creating it as she goes.

Fascinating psychological study.

.

 

[kiwiman127]

Regarding this thread and EconChick's wild assertions which many of us take with a grain of salt because she's so partisan.
Below is a historical chart of wages in Real Dollars. Please notice that in Real Dollars wages have been on the decrease and/or flat for over three decades. Neither workers or politicians decide what wages will be, that would be the corporation/business. Now just about everyone knows that since the Great Recession, only the uber-wealthy have been cashing in on the recovery as every economist will attest to. There have been some pretty good profits, unfortunately those profits didn't trickle down to the workers. That's a fact.
Yet, Little Miss Econ seems to think it's just one man's fault.
Honey, this whole demise of the middle class has been going on for over three decades. Please show us your great wisdom of economics and explain how an over three decade trend lies in the lap of one man.

 

[LoneLaugher]

And the harder you try to resist everyone on the left and right on this....the more you dig your hole, Mac.

Mac is correct. You lost this thread long ago.........

On page one.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!
.

dear, binary is not simple. Plato and Aristotle defined freedom versus govt in very very complex terms 2500 years ago. The modern voting booth gives us their choice very accurately as Democrat versus Republican.

That you don't know its a binary choice is testimony to your pure ignorance and illiteracy.
Of course, its 100% impossible for you to say something to support your "independence" from literacy and intelligence position and accordingly you at least know not to try.

 

[Mac1958]

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!
.

dear, binary is not simple. Plato and Aristotle defined freedom versus govt in very very complex terms 2500 years ago. The modern voting booth gives us their choice very accurately as Democrat versus Republican.

That you don't know its binary choice is testimony to your pure ignorance and illiteracy.
Of course its 100% impossible for you to say something to support your "independence" from literacy and of intelligence position and accordingly you at least kow not to try.

So we're back to "you're dumb".



Okay.

Obviously that's as good as this conversation is going to get.

.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yet, Little Miss Econ seems to think it's just one man's fault.

Well its certainly Obama's fault more than anyones but liberals in general can share the blame. We know from 132 failed countries or attempts that lib commie soviet socialist policies fail but our liberals want to keep trying simply becuase they lack the intelligence to understand how capitalism works. They believe in magical govt because it is the only option for that level of intelligence.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!
.

dear, binary is not simple. Plato and Aristotle defined freedom versus govt in very very complex terms 2500 years ago. The modern voting booth gives us their choice very accurately as Democrat versus Republican.

That you don't know its binary choice is testimony to your pure ignorance and illiteracy.
Of course its 100% impossible for you to say something to support your "independence" from literacy and of intelligence position and accordingly you at least kow not to try.

So we're back to "you're dumb".



Okay.

Obviously that's as good as this conversation is going to get.

.

100% substance free to perfectly reflect your intelligence.

 

[EconChick]

to

The fact that I disagree with left wing and right wing partisan ideologues is a very good sign.

.

its a good sign that you lack the intelligence to decide which ideology is correct. You should be ashamed but you lack the IQ for it.

Yes, the standard approach of partisan ideologues: "You don't agree with me, so you're dumb."

The grade-school playground approach to politics, very impressive.

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!

No thanks. I'll think for myself. It takes more effort, but it's more satisfying. And more honest.

.

And yet you're STILL wrong on this topic.

Could be that you're just not as smart as you think.

Um, wait, it IS that you're just not as smart as you think. Also you've no idea whom I've voted for, dum dum. Just like usual, you make stupid assumptions.

On what, precisely, was I wrong?

And precisely what is the point of your thread?

And by the way, I'm not the one claiming that I'm intelligent. I've never seen anyone here, ever, try as hard as you do. Not even close.

I look forward to your straight and clear answers to my questions above.

.

Dude, you've got to be the most insecure financial advisor I've ever seen. Are you sure that's what you do?

If you didn't care like you claim you don't.....you wouldn't be posting in this thread everyday trying to recover the credibility you lost. You're the one trying so hard. This is my thread...why do you feel a need to keep posting in it? Trying very, very hard, aren't ya? If you have an opinion, why can't you just post it, have your say, and move on. Why not??? Because YOU ARE THE ONE trying too hard.

LMAO. But hey, you libs have the DEFLECTION game down. I'll give you that. But your stupid ass deflection only serves my goals of keeping this thread alive.

Now, let's get something straight. What kind of a ******* idiot asks someone else to go chase down some IRRELEVENT discredited graph that the dumbass posted? You posted the wrong graph; I didn't.

We've been telling you for 30+ pages that you screwed up. Now you want me spending my precious time trying to find it when I first started pointing it out within a page of your stupid posts?

You're like a petulant child.

Show me where Obummer has gotten MEDIAN income up to $55,589? You can't.

And finally, I noticed you completely blew off the thread that talks about global economic malaise coming to America.

Why did you do that? I'll tell you why. BECAUSE IT PROVES MY POINT THAT BARRYS ECONOMY IS ABOUT TO GET EVEN WORSE.

I could care less what party you claim you have no association with. It's clear to all of us you're a Dumb.Ass.Liberal.

Got it?

 

[EconChick]

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!
.

dear, binary is not simple. Plato and Aristotle defined freedom versus govt in very very complex terms 2500 years ago. The modern voting booth gives us their choice very accurately as Democrat versus Republican.

That you don't know its binary choice is testimony to your pure ignorance and illiteracy.
Of course its 100% impossible for you to say something to support your "independence" from literacy and of intelligence position and accordingly you at least kow not to try.

So we're back to "you're dumb".



Okay.

Obviously that's as good as this conversation is going to get.

.

Wow. You have said exactly NOTHING but petty political or personal comments for about the last 5 pages.

So much for your professionalism.

Median income is STILL down.

IDIOT

 

[EconChick]

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!
.

dear, binary is not simple. Plato and Aristotle defined freedom versus govt in very very complex terms 2500 years ago. The modern voting booth gives us their choice very accurately as Democrat versus Republican.

That you don't know its binary choice is testimony to your pure ignorance and illiteracy.
Of course its 100% impossible for you to say something to support your "independence" from literacy and of intelligence position and accordingly you at least kow not to try.

So we're back to "you're dumb".



Okay.

Obviously that's as good as this conversation is going to get.

.

100% substance free to perfectly reflect your intelligence.

I feel sorry for his duped clients.

Macky runs around saying posts should never get personal. Yet that's all his posts do anymore. I haven't seen anything of substance in pages. LMFAO.

I love watching desperate libs come unraveled.

 

[EconChick]

I'd like to see the chart that proves that Mac doesn't understand the difference between mean and median.

How about it?

Do I need to hold your pee pee while you whiz, too?

Everyone else has been following it ever since you two morons started posting the MEAN graph. (One moron posted, the other moron agreed with it.)

I guess if I were as discredited and stupid as you two, I'd start with the deflection posts too.

You might sucker others into it, but I don't play your amateur games.

It isn't a game. I'd like to see the graph you are talking about that proves that Mac doesn't know the difference between mean and median. Just link to Mac's post, please.

Thanks.

Oh look, shit-for-brains is all of a sudden acting like I just started point this out.

MEDIAN INCOME DOWN under Barry and that eats you up!!

 

[EconChick]

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!
.

dear, binary is not simple. Plato and Aristotle defined freedom versus govt in very very complex terms 2500 years ago. The modern voting booth gives us their choice very accurately as Democrat versus Republican.

That you don't know its binary choice is testimony to your pure ignorance and illiteracy.
Of course its 100% impossible for you to say something to support your "independence" from literacy and of intelligence position and accordingly you at least kow not to try.

So we're back to "you're dumb".



Okay.

Obviously that's as good as this conversation is going to get.

.

Yeahhhh, YOUR conversation.

While the rest of us have shown with link after link what the OP says.

Ooops, makes you see red. Awwww.

 

[Mac1958]

to

The fact that I disagree with left wing and right wing partisan ideologues is a very good sign.

.

its a good sign that you lack the intelligence to decide which ideology is correct. You should be ashamed but you lack the IQ for it.

Yes, the standard approach of partisan ideologues: "You don't agree with me, so you're dumb."

The grade-school playground approach to politics, very impressive.

How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!

No thanks. I'll think for myself. It takes more effort, but it's more satisfying. And more honest.

.

And yet you're STILL wrong on this topic.

Could be that you're just not as smart as you think.

Um, wait, it IS that you're just not as smart as you think. Also you've no idea whom I've voted for, dum dum. Just like usual, you make stupid assumptions.

On what, precisely, was I wrong?

And precisely what is the point of your thread?

And by the way, I'm not the one claiming that I'm intelligent. I've never seen anyone here, ever, try as hard as you do. Not even close.

I look forward to your straight and clear answers to my questions above.

.

Dude, you've got to be the most insecure financial advisor I've ever seen. Are you sure that's what you do?

If you didn't care like you claim you don't.....you wouldn't be posting in this thread everyday trying to recover the credibility you lost. You're the one trying so hard. This is my thread...why do you feel a need to keep posting in it? Trying very, very hard, aren't ya? If you have an opinion, why can't you just post it, have your say, and move on. Why not??? Because YOU ARE THE ONE trying too hard.

LMAO. But hey, you libs have the DEFLECTION game down. I'll give you that. But your stupid ass deflection only serves my goals of keeping this thread alive.

Now, let's get something straight. What kind of a ******* idiot asks someone else to go chase down some IRRELEVENT discredited graph that the dumbass posted? You posted the wrong graph; I didn't.

We've been telling you for 30+ pages that you screwed up. Now you want me spending my precious time trying to find it when I first started pointing it out within a page of your stupid posts?

You're like a petulant child.

Show me where Obummer has gotten MEDIAN income up to $55,589? You can't.

And finally, I noticed you completely blew off the thread that talks about global economic malaise coming to America.

Why did you do that? I'll tell you why. BECAUSE IT PROVES MY POINT THAT BARRYS ECONOMY IS ABOUT TO GET EVEN WORSE.

I could care less what party you claim you have no association with. It's clear to all of us you're a Dumb.Ass.Liberal.

Got it?

I post in response to your posts to me. PLUS you have THANKED me MULTIPLE times for "bumping" your thread. Wow, that's about the weakest reason to whine I've ever seen here. But, I won't post any more in this thread. You're welcome.

As I have said multiple times, it's quite correct that income (mean or median, don't care) is less now than it was when Obama took office. That has never been in question. The point I have made multiple times is that it bottomed out due to the Meltdown and has increased for the last three years. You don't seem willing to admit that, but then again, it's you I'm dealing with here.

So you're "point" appears to be the standard right wing partisan ideologue line, that the economy is all Obama's fault. Okay. That is precisely what I would expect. By all means, enjoy pretending that you're an "economist" going forward, we both know that's not true. You're just another hardcore partisan ideologue, dime a dozen.

Still tickled by the fact that you would whine about me posting in your thread after you posted to me so many times, and thanked me multiple times for posting.

You're a hoot, and that was easy.

*** /unsubscribe, per your whining ***

 

[EconChick]

Regarding this thread and EconChick's wild assertions which many of us take with a grain of salt because she's so partisan.
Below is a historical chart of wages in Real Dollars. Please notice that in Real Dollars wages have been on the decrease and/or flat for over three decades. Neither workers or politicians decide what wages will be, that would be the corporation/business. Now just about everyone knows that since the Great Recession, only the uber-wealthy have been cashing in on the recovery as every economist will attest to. There have been some pretty good profits, unfortunately those profits didn't trickle down to the workers. That's a fact.
Yet, Little Miss Econ seems to think it's just one man's fault.
Honey, this whole demise of the middle class has been going on for over three decades. Please show us your great wisdom of economics and explain how an over three decade trend lies in the lap of one man.

Yo dimwit, there's a reason we economists use apples to apples comparisons.