Meadows Aide Spills The Beans

[Clipper]

By "disrupt" you mean keep them honest. And you want only Pelosi lackeys to ensure they aren't honest. Stalinists hate it when truth "disrupts" their schemes to railroad their opponents.

Hello! McCarthy the fool was offered 5 appointments on that panel. He threw a hissy fit & walked.

Tough shit. Sometimes when you're stupid life comes at you hard.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Wow. Must be the Idiot's Corner time again!

Even the most ignorant Trump supporter must know that Trump tried to get Mike Pence to do something on January 6 l.

When you’re in the cult are you allowed to know what Trump wanted Mike Pence to do?

John Eastman was Trump’s JAN6 lawyer.. He had his phone taken away by the justice department according to a search warrant. Do you know what he did that was not legal?

Eastman wrote the memo that Trump used in his attempt to overturn the election and the means to do that was to throw the entire 2020 election out. That means 9 out of 10 black American votes cast were to be thrown out.

You don’t think that is a racist?

 

[j-mac]

Hello! McCarthy the fool was offered 5 appointments on that panel. He threw a hissy fit & walked.

Tough shit. Sometimes when you're stupid life comes at you hard.

He wasn’t given ANY appointments if Nancy had to approve them to be on..

 

[toobfreak]

Because turds like you keep pretending that's it's some kind of legitimate legal proceeding. There's nothing legitimate about it.

If this were a legitimate legal proceeding, one might ask of the witness:

1. Cheney and Hutchison keep referring to The Beast, Trump getting into the Beast, yet the video of that day kindly provided by the J6 committee doesn't show Trump getting IN the Beast, he got in a presidential SUV. Why the discrepancy? And if you got this wrong, how much more is wrong you've presented?
2. How was the Ellipse Rally a secure enough place for the president to give a two-hour speech, yet the nation's capitol WASN'T a secure enough place ON THE DAY OF ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION BY CONGRESS for the president to even drive down to?
3. How was the Ellipse rally secure if the secret service knew the crowd was full of weapons?
4. Whose decision was it to allow 5,000 armed people near the POTUS?
5. When will that person be charged for federal crimes for risking the president's life as well as violating DC gun laws?
6. Do you think the J6 riot would have been kept under control not ever happening had either Trump's request for National Guard been heeded or had Trump been allowed at the Capitol where he could have easily told the crowd if it started getting too out of hand to stop? Is that why Trump was kept away?
7. Why would a girl who just happened to have a thing in for Trump because he rejected her efforts to tag along with him down to Florida be believed now suddenly, especially in giving hearsay evidence that many in government including the Secret Service and the WH attorney all say is a pure fabrication?
8. Why would what is essentially a coffee girl be in the loop in the WH to know personal details of the affairs of the Secret Service?
9. How plausible is it that a secret service agent charged with protecting the president of the USA be so flustered just returning from a rally a few blocks away to come back to the WH in tatters, exhaused, stagger into an office, then seek out a mere coffee girl for private consolation?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

How was the Ellipse Rally a secure enough place for the president to give a two-hour speech, yet the nation's capitol WASN'T a secure enough place ON THE DAY OF ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION BY CONGRESS for the president to even drive down to?

Trump’s mob was already violently
assaulting the Capitol before Trump wanted to go there.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

How was the Ellipse rally secure if the secret service knew the crowd was full of weapons?

Metal Detectors that Cassidy Hutchinson testified that DJT wanted taken down so his armed supporters could be on the ellipse with him and be able to March to the Capitol with their firearms.

The questions start on Nov4 2020 as the conspiracy to overturn the election began to materialize on two fronts - The Eastman/Pence/fake electors legalistic non-viokent front and the Oath Keeoer / Proud Boys / white Christian NationIIsts “physical assault on the members of Congress” viokent front.

AND There is the corrupt funding of both fronts by DJT himself.

AmericanPatriot wrote on another forum:

After Joe Biden was elected president Trump began a massive fundraising campaign. He told his jim crow rubes he was raising money to provide funds for legal expenses directed toward proving there was election fraud. Through this fraudulent money grab Trump raised over $250,000,000 (250 MILLION DOLLARS) donated by his followers. $204 MILLION DOLLARS went directly into propping up Trump's floundering hotel businesses. $44 MILLION DOLLARS went into the pockets of Trump's cronies. Less than $2 million went into any sort of legal battle in the attempted overthrow of the presidential election. Make no mistake little Donny's "Stop the Steal" movement was never about finding fraud. By Nov 4th, 2020 Donny knew he lost in a free and fair election. "Stop the Steal" was all about Trump finding a new way to grift his jim crow rabble to prop up his failing businesses and desperately trying to sow seeds of doubt about our American democratic electoral process in the minds of weak minded people so that he and his GOP thugs could usher in a fascist dictatorship.
Reply

 

[Staidhup]

OMG the nut cases are going bonkers. Rome is burning and all they can think about is January 6th.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

How was the Ellipse Rally a secure enough place for the president to give a two-hour speech, yet the nation's capitol WASN'T a secure enough place ON THE DAY OF ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION BY CONGRESS for the president to even drive down to?

The organizers of the January 6 stop the steal rally had a permit at the ellipse for a “rough” anticipated crowd size. The “ellipse” area forms a specific perimeter In front of the White House that law-enforcement and Secret Service are very experienced securing for presidential events. Cassidy Hutchinson testified at that around 10 AM on January 6 DJT had become antagonistic with his security team because the permitted area was not filling up with his supporters prior to his speech. That is when DJT was advised by everyone surrounding him his supporters have been observed carrying firearms which is against the law that gun free zone known as the mall area. And it was further advised to DJT prior to his speech that the reason the ellipse was not filling up with people is because they did not want to go through the magnetometers and have their guns taken away and likely be arrested. Trumps response to that was to order the Secret Service and park police to take the magnetometers down and let the people in because they were not there to harm him as he the great American Putin.

So we have a case because the president wanted his armed supporters up close and personal with him so they all could be together and march to the Capitol as one body. And that was the first hint of POTUS lawlessness on the morning of January 6 because the rally that he called into being was not permitted to include a march to the Capitol.

You need to keep in mind that at the time Trump wanted the magnetometers pulled down, his white nationalist militia supporters l, namely the proud boys around 200 strong, started their very own march to the Capitol. They were not interested in hearing DJ T tell the big lie anymore because they all believed it and were there to do some thing violent about it. The proud boy attack force of 200 went to the capital and cased it for entry.

It also needs to be noted that the proud boys and the OATH Keepers leaders made an organizational decision not to use firearms during the assault on the Capitol. They planned on using the million strong MAGA mob and makeshift pitchforks to overwhelm the Capitol police security.

Trump was to supply the angry masses because as you know 209 white nationalist without guns probably would not have been able to break in. They needed stupid people like Ashley Babbitt following behind them.

That’s only part of why your questions are so freaking ignorant and irrelevant Because you refuse to observe the June 6 committee hearings before you attack them.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Whose decision was it to allow 5,000 armed people near the POTUS?

POTUS

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Do you think the J6 riot would have been kept under control not ever happening had either Trump's request for National Guard been heeded

Trump did not ever put In a request for the National Guard to be present on January 6 .

 

[bripat9643]

Trump did not ever put In a request for the National Guard to be present on January 6 .

Another bald faced lie.

 

[kaz]

I’m not supporting a former president who lost his attempt for a second term But refused to concede. He trying to stay in power by throwing out the votes of nine out of 10 black Americans who voted for Joseph Biden. That is racism dude and you support him.

You're lost in irrational hate, FooledByEVERYONE. No wonder you're such a racist

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump did not ever put In a request for the National Guard to be present on January 6 .

Correct.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Another bald faced lie.

Wrong as usual.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

P

You're lost in irrational hate,

What is irrational about hating a president who lost the election because me and 80 million others voted against him for someone else, but he attempted to overturn the election by throwing my vote out telling me I do not count as an American.

Yes I hate the worthless lying racist asshole pile of fat scum, Donald J Trump. a liar .

if you were a great American and patriot you would hate him too. He tried to throw your vote out too, but the difference is you love him for that.

 

[Esdraelon]

From what I've seen, they're hoping that she'll come close to the John Dean model. I wonder if she's spoken to the DOJ.

The real question is whether the DOJ is willing to act like hearsay is worthy of charges. They might do so even though the primary accusation she made has been PROVEN to be a lie by a couple of SS agents who were in the car with him that day.

 

[Esdraelon]

You clearly do not know what the word hearsay means.

No, I does note mean, "I heard him say...."

You might want to read up before attempting to use that word again.

Why is hearsay often excluded as evidence?

• Why is hearsay often excluded as evidence? In general, hearsay is excluded from all court cases. This is primarily because hearsay is considered to be unreliable information that cannot be verified by direct cross-examination of the person purporting to have direct knowledge. What is an example of hearsay in the Court of law? Hearsay evidence is typically inadmissible in a court of law.
• IT MEANS THE "EVIDENCE" IS NOT FIRST-HAND.

 

[Mac1958]

The real question is whether the DOJ is willing to act like hearsay is worthy of charges. They might do so even though the primary accusation she made has been PROVEN to be a lie by a couple of SS agents who were in the car with him that day.

I doubt that little story is very high on the DOJ's radar, comparatively.

It's just fluff in the big picture. He wanted to go to the capitol to "lead" this thing.

 

[struth]

until the committee calls the secret service agents it lacks credibly

 

[NotfooledbyW]

The real question is whether the DOJ is willing to act like hearsay is worthy of charges. They might do so even though the primary accusation she made has been PROVEN to be a lie by a couple of SS agents who were in the car with him that day.

Grab some bench. Nothing has been proven that any thing Hutchinson testified to is a lie.

Tony Ornato may be in a bit of a fix if he told others besides Hutchinson that DJT assaulted a secret service agent in Jan 6.

So I doubt his lawyers will allow him to go back to the Committee to say something different than he did in previous testimony before Committee.