Liz Cheney caught again "behaving like Dick Cheney"
- Thread starter EMH
- Start date
okfine
Diamond Member
DGS49
Diamond Member
This Cheney woman is beneath contempt. Her behavior as part of the J6 committee was disgraceful, going along with the Pelosi kangaroo court, suppressing all evidence in Trump's favor and riding along with ridiculous bullshit against him.
The only reason she doesn't formally change parties is because the Democrats want nothing to do with her either. She is the political successor of the infamous Arlen Specter.
The only reason she doesn't formally change parties is because the Democrats want nothing to do with her either. She is the political successor of the infamous Arlen Specter.
shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 37,593
- 36,046
- 2,905
The Cheneys are back baby!
skye
Diamond Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 66,938
- 71,470
- 3,635
- Mar 31, 2009
- 105,951
- 88,894
- 3,605
Chillicothe
Platinum Member
- Feb 14, 2021
- 11,182
- 7,138
- 938
I didn't know that.
What testimony was "deliberately altered"?
How do you know?
What can you prove?
Or even what will you provide that is persuasive to this forum?
-----------------------------------------------
Correlation is causation?
No disrespect intended towards one of my fav posters, EMH.
-----------------------------------------------------
Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap.......
( I love this bar.)
------------------------------------------------------
I didn't know that.
What evidence was suppressed?
How do you know?
What will you prove or even just cogently explain to this forum?
Rambunctious
Diamond Member
- Jan 19, 2010
- 78,339
- 76,999
- 3,605
This woman may have got herself in some hot water... now we know why she is so anti Trump winning... she has broke her oath of office and may have broke the law bordering on treason...
Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 92,748
- 129,495
- 3,615
If that loony is one of your favorite posters you need to seriously re-evaluate your standards.
Ronald Reagan was the last President who had any semblance of conservatism. And he was not a war hawk.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,101
- 31,659
- 3,545
Recap:
Breaking: Liz Cheney contacted controversial J6 witness on encrypted app behind lawyer's back, messages show
Breaking: Liz Cheney contacted controversial J6 witness on encrypted app behind lawyer's back, messages show
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,101
- 31,659
- 3,545
"As a licensed attorney in Washington D.C., Cheney is bound by the D.C. Bar rules, which state that a lawyer must not communicate about the subject of representation with someone known to be represented by another lawyer without prior consent from that lawyer or authorization by law or court order.
- Unauthorized Communication: Cheney allegedly contacted Cassidy Hutchinson, who was represented by attorney Stefan Passantino, without his knowledge or consent. Passantino stated he was unaware of these communications until informed by the media and did not authorize Cheney to speak with his client without his presence[1].- Influencing Testimony: The communications reportedly occurred just before Hutchinson changed her testimony, leading to accusations that Cheney may have influenced a witness outside of proper legal protocols. This could be seen as undermining the integrity of the investigation and violating ethical responsibilities as an attorney.- Potential Consequences: While it remains unclear whether these ethical rules could be enforced against a member of Congress acting in an official capacity, experts suggest that such actions could lead to disciplinary measures from the D.C. Bar if proven. Additionally, these actions might raise questions about the legitimacy of the investigation conducted by the January 6 committee.Overall, if proven true, Cheney's actions could be viewed as a significant breach of legal ethics, potentially impacting her standing as an attorney and raising broader implications for the investigations surrounding January 6."
- Unauthorized Communication: Cheney allegedly contacted Cassidy Hutchinson, who was represented by attorney Stefan Passantino, without his knowledge or consent. Passantino stated he was unaware of these communications until informed by the media and did not authorize Cheney to speak with his client without his presence[1].- Influencing Testimony: The communications reportedly occurred just before Hutchinson changed her testimony, leading to accusations that Cheney may have influenced a witness outside of proper legal protocols. This could be seen as undermining the integrity of the investigation and violating ethical responsibilities as an attorney.- Potential Consequences: While it remains unclear whether these ethical rules could be enforced against a member of Congress acting in an official capacity, experts suggest that such actions could lead to disciplinary measures from the D.C. Bar if proven. Additionally, these actions might raise questions about the legitimacy of the investigation conducted by the January 6 committee.Overall, if proven true, Cheney's actions could be viewed as a significant breach of legal ethics, potentially impacting her standing as an attorney and raising broader implications for the investigations surrounding January 6."
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,101
- 31,659
- 3,545
Reminder -
It was simply a poorly produced infomercial
It was simply a poorly produced infomercial
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,101
- 31,659
- 3,545
New Texts Reveal Liz Cheney Communicated with Cassidy Hutchinson About Her Select Committee Testimonyâwithout Hutchinsonâs Attorneyâs KnowledgeâDespite Cheney Knowing it was Unethical
U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administrationcha.house.gov
October 15, 2024
WASHINGTON - Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (GA-11) obtained never-before-seen correspondence between January 6 Select Committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson and in 2022, while Hutchinson was still a subject of the Select Committeeâs investigation.
In the months prior to Hutchinsonâs explosive private and public testimony, Cheney communicated with Hutchinson, both directly and through an intermediaryâAlyssa Farah Griffinâwhile Hutchinson was represented by her attorney, Stefan Passantino. The Select Committee conducted six transcribed interviews of Hutchinson in total. Passantino represented Hutchinson for the first three interviews.
Cheney began communicating with Hutchinson in April 2022.
Hutchinson reached out to Farah Griffin following Hutchinsonâs second transcribed interview. Farah Griffin and Hutchinson knew each other from their time working together in the White House. Farah Griffin was one of the first former Trump administration officials to publicly criticize Trump in January 2021, and was publicly working with the Select Committee on its investigation.
When Hutchinson reached out to Farah Griffin, she invited Hutchinson over to her Georgetown townhome to talk on April 26, 2022. That evening, Hutchinson told Farah Griffin she had more information she could provide to the Select Committee, according to statements by both Hutchinson and Farah Griffin. During their conversation, Farah Griffin agreed to â[contact] Liz Cheney on [Hutchinsonâs] behalf about scheduling another interview.â Hutchinsonâs new testimony would include her never-before-heard story that alleged that President Trump agreed with rioters chanting âHang Mike Pence.â
According to text messages, that appear to be from the encrypted messaging app âSignal,â between Hutchinson and Farah Griffin obtained by the Subcommittee, Cheney agreed to communicate with Hutchinson through Farah Griffin.However, it appears that Cheney knew communicating with Hutchinson while Hutchinson was represented by an attorney and a subject of the Select Committeeâs investigation, without going through Hutchinsonâs attorney, would be unethical. This is evident by Farah Griffinâs text to Hutchinson that Cheneyâs âone concern was so long as [sic] you have counsel, she canât really ethically talk to you without him.â?
After Hutchinson switched attorneys at Cheneyâs direction, the Select Committee needed to ensure Hutchinsonâs credibility as a witness and explain away her changed testimony. To do this, the Select Committee needed to create a new narrative that would make Passantino the scapegoat. They manufactured the story that Passantino gave Hutchinson faulty advice â such as instructing Hutchinson to withhold information, to misrepresent her testimony, and even that Passantino implied he would help Hutchinson with employment in return for favorable testimony. Contrary to the Select Committeeâs and Hutchinsonâs narrative, however, the Subcommittee obtained messages between Farah Griffin and Hutchinson where Hutchinson admits that Passantino was acting in her best interest and that she agreed with his counsel.
At some point, the amount of lying by those hyping 1/6 as an "insurrection" completely exposes 1/6 as the hate hoax it really was
It was exposed from the start.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
No More Tariffs? Rand Paul allegedly has the votes to stop them.- Started by TemplarKormac
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
Democrat Dick Durbin goes all out to bring down Trump nominee
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 2
