Liz Cheney caught again "behaving like Dick Cheney"

Pretty sure neither of them support tRump.


That Dick Cheney supports Kamala is one of the best things going for Trump. It clarifies

1. all traitors support Kamala
2. all warmongers support Kamala
3. all CHICKENHAWKS support Kamala, included Dick Cheney and Tim Walz
 
So you are PROUD that you and Dick Cheney both support the most unqualified major Prez nominee ever...

LOL!!!

What else do you and Dick Cheney agree on...
...That Trump is a POS
 
This Cheney woman is beneath contempt. Her behavior as part of the J6 committee was disgraceful, going along with the Pelosi kangaroo court, suppressing all evidence in Trump's favor and riding along with ridiculous bullshit against him.

The only reason she doesn't formally change parties is because the Democrats want nothing to do with her either. She is the political successor of the infamous Arlen Specter.
 
 
Deliberately altering sworn testimony to cover up a treasonous hate hoax,
I didn't know that.
What testimony was "deliberately altered"?
How do you know?
What can you prove?
Or even what will you provide that is persuasive to this forum?


-----------------------------------------------

Whoa, this kid ^ has completely lost his alleged mind.
.......A complete and utter whack-job.
So you feel like she shot you in the face?



----------------------------------------------------------------
Correlation is causation?
No disrespect intended towards one of my fav posters, EMH.


-----------------------------------------------------
"EMH is on to every one of Zionist Fascism's acts of treason against America,"

Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap.......

( I love this bar.)


------------------------------------------------------



"...suppressing all evidence in Trump's favor..."
I didn't know that.
What evidence was suppressed?
How do you know?
What will you prove or even just cogently explain to this forum?
 
This woman may have got herself in some hot water... now we know why she is so anti Trump winning... she has broke her oath of office and may have broke the law bordering on treason...
 
I didn't know that.
What testimony was "deliberately altered"?
How do you know?
What can you prove?
Or even what will you provide that is persuasive to this forum?


-----------------------------------------------



Correlation is causation?
No disrespect intended towards one of my fav posters, EMH.


-----------------------------------------------------


Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap.......

( I love this bar.)


------------------------------------------------------




I didn't know that.
What evidence was suppressed?
How do you know?
What will you prove or even just cogently explain to this forum?
If that loony is one of your favorite posters you need to seriously re-evaluate your standards.
 
Actually she is.

It's you who isn't.

You're just a bloody tRumpling.
Ronald Reagan was the last President who had any semblance of conservatism. And he was not a war hawk.
 
Recap:

Breaking: Liz Cheney contacted controversial J6 witness on encrypted app behind lawyer's back, messages show
 
"As a licensed attorney in Washington D.C., Cheney is bound by the D.C. Bar rules, which state that a lawyer must not communicate about the subject of representation with someone known to be represented by another lawyer without prior consent from that lawyer or authorization by law or court order.

- Unauthorized Communication: Cheney allegedly contacted Cassidy Hutchinson, who was represented by attorney Stefan Passantino, without his knowledge or consent. Passantino stated he was unaware of these communications until informed by the media and did not authorize Cheney to speak with his client without his presence[1].- Influencing Testimony: The communications reportedly occurred just before Hutchinson changed her testimony, leading to accusations that Cheney may have influenced a witness outside of proper legal protocols. This could be seen as undermining the integrity of the investigation and violating ethical responsibilities as an attorney.- Potential Consequences: While it remains unclear whether these ethical rules could be enforced against a member of Congress acting in an official capacity, experts suggest that such actions could lead to disciplinary measures from the D.C. Bar if proven. Additionally, these actions might raise questions about the legitimacy of the investigation conducted by the January 6 committee.Overall, if proven true, Cheney's actions could be viewed as a significant breach of legal ethics, potentially impacting her standing as an attorney and raising broader implications for the investigations surrounding January 6."
 
Reminder -

It was simply a poorly produced infomercial
 


October 15, 2024​

WASHINGTON - Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (GA-11) obtained never-before-seen correspondence between January 6 Select Committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson and in 2022, while Hutchinson was still a subject of the Select Committee’s investigation.

In the months prior to Hutchinson’s explosive private and public testimony, Cheney communicated with Hutchinson, both directly and through an intermediary—Alyssa Farah Griffin—while Hutchinson was represented by her attorney, Stefan Passantino. The Select Committee conducted six transcribed interviews of Hutchinson in total. Passantino represented Hutchinson for the first three interviews.
Cheney began communicating with Hutchinson in April 2022.
Hutchinson reached out to Farah Griffin following Hutchinson’s second transcribed interview. Farah Griffin and Hutchinson knew each other from their time working together in the White House. Farah Griffin was one of the first former Trump administration officials to publicly criticize Trump in January 2021, and was publicly working with the Select Committee on its investigation.

When Hutchinson reached out to Farah Griffin, she invited Hutchinson over to her Georgetown townhome to talk on April 26, 2022. That evening, Hutchinson told Farah Griffin she had more information she could provide to the Select Committee, according to statements by both Hutchinson and Farah Griffin. During their conversation, Farah Griffin agreed to “[contact] Liz Cheney on [Hutchinson’s] behalf about scheduling another interview.” Hutchinson’s new testimony would include her never-before-heard story that alleged that President Trump agreed with rioters chanting “Hang Mike Pence.”

According to text messages, that appear to be from the encrypted messaging app “Signal,” between Hutchinson and Farah Griffin obtained by the Subcommittee, Cheney agreed to communicate with Hutchinson through Farah Griffin.However, it appears that Cheney knew communicating with Hutchinson while Hutchinson was represented by an attorney and a subject of the Select Committee’s investigation, without going through Hutchinson’s attorney, would be unethical. This is evident by Farah Griffin’s text to Hutchinson that Cheney’s “one concern was so long as [sic] you have counsel, she can’t really ethically talk to you without him.”?

After Hutchinson switched attorneys at Cheney’s direction, the Select Committee needed to ensure Hutchinson’s credibility as a witness and explain away her changed testimony. To do this, the Select Committee needed to create a new narrative that would make Passantino the scapegoat. They manufactured the story that Passantino gave Hutchinson faulty advice — such as instructing Hutchinson to withhold information, to misrepresent her testimony, and even that Passantino implied he would help Hutchinson with employment in return for favorable testimony. Contrary to the Select Committee’s and Hutchinson’s narrative, however, the Subcommittee obtained messages between Farah Griffin and Hutchinson where Hutchinson admits that Passantino was acting in her best interest and that she agreed with his counsel.





At some point, the amount of lying by those hyping 1/6 as an "insurrection" completely exposes 1/6 as the hate hoax it really was


It was exposed from the start.
 
Back
Top Bottom