McDonald's to Raise Wages

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The reason a bill of rights was not part of the original draft of the constitution was because a small group of individuals .

actually dear is was not a small group but rather the same majority that agreed to every word of the Constitution which excluded a Bill of Rights.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. Nobody wanted to create a constitution that would proclaim drastic limitations upon the rights of the people,.

too stupid is admitting that there was great fear that a Bill of Rights, in the hands of the govt, would be enforced as a " drastic limitation on the rights of the people."

 

[SwimExpert]

The reason a bill of rights was not part of the original draft of the constitution was because a small group of individuals .

actually dear is was not a small group but rather the same majority that agreed to every word of the Constitution which excluded a Bill of Rights.

No, you're just an idiot. You really have no idea what the **** you are talking about. You may as well be making up stories about Martians landing in Philadelphia.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You may as well be making up stories about Martians landing in Philadelphia.

sorry dear, it's a fact that Founders did not put a Bill of Rights in original Constitution out of fear that a liberal govt would find a way use it to take away rights rather than to insure them. That gives you an idea of how afraid of liberal government they were, and that was before seeing the great 20th Century liberals: Hitler Stalin and Mao.

 

[SwimExpert]

sorry dear, it's a fact that Founders did not put a Bill of Rights in original Constitution out of fear that a liberal govt would find a way use it to take away rights rather than to insure them.

No, that is a lie. You are the only person in the world who has ever come up with this bullshit. No historian anywhere has ever drawn such a conclusion. You are a ******* joke.

 

[Muhammed]

Not the whey the assembly trays are set up...

I have no idea what curds, whey, or cottage cheese have to do with this.

But McDondalds has been edging toward greater automation, such as auto-fryers, clam-shell grills, and self-serve ordering kiosks for years. This announcement will coincide with the roll out.

Conservatives are HORRIBLE prognosticators, PLEASE one policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history on in the US? lol

The most significant was when FDRs Republican opponent pridicted that FDR would get us into a war if he was re-elected. Then FDR got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed.

 

[Moonglow]

Not the whey the assembly trays are set up...

I have no idea what curds, whey, or cottage cheese have to do with this.

But McDondalds has been edging toward greater automation, such as auto-fryers, clam-shell grills, and self-serve ordering kiosks for years. This announcement will coincide with the roll out.

Conservatives are HORRIBLE prognosticators, PLEASE one policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history on in the US? lol

The most significant was when FDRs Republican opponent pridicted that FDR would get us into a war if he was re-elected. Then FDR got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed.

Yeah, after Pearl Harbor we should have negotiated a peace treaty...ahem....

 

[Muhammed]

Not the whey the assembly trays are set up...

I have no idea what curds, whey, or cottage cheese have to do with this.

But McDondalds has been edging toward greater automation, such as auto-fryers, clam-shell grills, and self-serve ordering kiosks for years. This announcement will coincide with the roll out.

Conservatives are HORRIBLE prognosticators, PLEASE one policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history on in the US? lol

The most significant was when FDRs Republican opponent pridicted that FDR would get us into a war if he was re-elected. Then FDR got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed.

Yeah, after Pearl Harbor we should have negotiated a peace treaty...ahem....

Or better yet, we shouldn't have took sides in the Sino-Japanese war or the war in Europe in the first place.

 

[Moonglow]

Not the whey the assembly trays are set up...

I have no idea what curds, whey, or cottage cheese have to do with this.

But McDondalds has been edging toward greater automation, such as auto-fryers, clam-shell grills, and self-serve ordering kiosks for years. This announcement will coincide with the roll out.

Conservatives are HORRIBLE prognosticators, PLEASE one policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history on in the US? lol

The most significant was when FDRs Republican opponent pridicted that FDR would get us into a war if he was re-elected. Then FDR got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed.

Yeah, after Pearl Harbor we should have negotiated a peace treaty...ahem....

Or better yet, we shouldn't have took sides in the Sino-Japanese war in the first place.

Yeah I guess...

 

[Dad2three]

Not the whey the assembly trays are set up...

I have no idea what curds, whey, or cottage cheese have to do with this.

But McDondalds has been edging toward greater automation, such as auto-fryers, clam-shell grills, and self-serve ordering kiosks for years. This announcement will coincide with the roll out.

Conservatives are HORRIBLE prognosticators, PLEASE one policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history on in the US? lol

The most significant was when FDRs Republican opponent pridicted that FDR would get us into a war if he was re-elected. Then FDR got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed.

Don't know what policy is? Or Japan attacking on Pearl Harbor? But no, the isolationists you conservatives were during both WW's were wrong then too!

 

[Dad2three]

. My posit is the Founders chose a BIG FEDERAL Gov't Constitution

how can 1% the size of todays on a per capita inflation adjusted basis be termed big by anyone except dumbto3 ??

In fact, the fear of govt was so great that the original Constitution had no Bill of Rights out of fear that if govt was empowered to protect rights it would instead subvert that power and use it to take away rights.

MORON:



The Debate over Ratification

The debate polarized the new nation. Those who supported the Constitution became known as federalists and those who opposed its ratification were called antifederalists. The federalists supported a strong national government to preserve order. The antifederalists favored strong state governments and believed that the national government created by the Constitution was too strong.



George Mason was one of the leading figures in creating the Bill of Rights. After storming out of the Constitutional Convention because the Constitution didn't contain a declaration of human rights, he worked to pass amendments that would protect citizens from an intrusive government.


In many ways the argument was the same old debate about the proper balance between order and liberty. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote compelling arguments in favor of ratification in a series of essays known as the Federalist Papers. There were probably more antifederalists in America, but the federalists were better organized, controlled more newspapers, and were in greater positions of power. The two sides finally reached an acceptable compromise when they agreed to add some amendments to the Constitution that protected individual liberties and rights.

The Bill of Rights ushistory.org

 

[Muhammed]

Not the whey the assembly trays are set up...

I have no idea what curds, whey, or cottage cheese have to do with this.

But McDondalds has been edging toward greater automation, such as auto-fryers, clam-shell grills, and self-serve ordering kiosks for years. This announcement will coincide with the roll out.

Conservatives are HORRIBLE prognosticators, PLEASE one policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history on in the US? lol

The most significant was when FDRs Republican opponent pridicted that FDR would get us into a war if he was re-elected. Then FDR got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed.

Don't know what policy is? Or Japan attacking on Pearl Harbor? But no, the isolationists you conservatives were during both WW's were wrong then too!

No, enslaving over a million Americans and sending hundreds of thousands of Americans to their deaths was wrong.

You pro-slavery warmongering Democrats have no morals whatsoever.

 

[Dad2three]

Not the whey the assembly trays are set up...

I have no idea what curds, whey, or cottage cheese have to do with this.

But McDondalds has been edging toward greater automation, such as auto-fryers, clam-shell grills, and self-serve ordering kiosks for years. This announcement will coincide with the roll out.

Conservatives are HORRIBLE prognosticators, PLEASE one policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history on in the US? lol

The most significant was when FDRs Republican opponent pridicted that FDR would get us into a war if he was re-elected. Then FDR got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed.

Don't know what policy is? Or Japan attacking on Pearl Harbor? But no, the isolationists you conservatives were during both WW's were wrong then too!

No, enslaving over a million Americans and sending hundreds of thousands of Americans to their deaths was wrong.

You pro-slavery warmongering Democrats have no morals whatsoever.

Yet conservatives have NEVER been on the correct side of ANY policy in the US. Go figure!

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yet conservatives have NEVER been on the correct side of ANY policy in the US. Go figure!

Even for an assclown, you're jaw-droppingly stupid, Dumb2three.

 

[Dad2three]

Yet conservatives have NEVER been on the correct side of ANY policy in the US. Go figure!

Even for an assclown, you're jaw-droppingly stupid, Dumb2three.

So no, you can't think of even one policy either. Got it Bubba

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yet conservatives have NEVER been on the correct side of ANY policy in the US. Go figure!

1) conservatives since Jefferson have always supported freedom while liberals spied for Stalin(Uncle Joe to liberals) and gave him the bomb?
2) conservatives opposed to near genocidal Great Society liberal war on American blacks
3) conservatives opposed the extreme liberal intervention that led to Depression and current never ending recession.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. My posit is the Founders chose a BIG FEDERAL Gov't Constitution

how can 1% the size of todays on a per capita inflation adjusted basis be termed big by anyone except dumbto3 ??

In fact, the fear of govt was so great that the original Constitution had no Bill of Rights out of fear that if govt was empowered to protect rights it would instead subvert that power and use it to take away rights.

MORON:



The Debate over Ratification

The debate polarized the new nation. Those who supported the Constitution became known as federalists and those who opposed its ratification were called antifederalists. The federalists supported a strong national government to preserve order. The antifederalists favored strong state governments and believed that the national government created by the Constitution was too strong.



George Mason was one of the leading figures in creating the Bill of Rights. After storming out of the Constitutional Convention because the Constitution didn't contain a declaration of human rights, he worked to pass amendments that would protect citizens from an intrusive government.


In many ways the argument was the same old debate about the proper balance between order and liberty. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote compelling arguments in favor of ratification in a series of essays known as the Federalist Papers. There were probably more antifederalists in America, but the federalists were better organized, controlled more newspapers, and were in greater positions of power. The two sides finally reached an acceptable compromise when they agreed to add some amendments to the Constitution that protected individual liberties and rights.

The Bill of Rights ushistory.org

In fact, the fear of govt was so great that the original Constitution had no Bill of Rights out of fear that if govt was empowered to protect rights it would instead subvert that power and use it to take away rights.