Mayor Bill de Blasio punishes children for OVERT POLITICAL GAIN

[PaintMyHouse]

No handout, jerkoff.

Really? What do you call it?
(If personal insults are all the rebuttal you have ... then you really don't have much now do you?)

WHat do I call it? How about efficient use of resources? Remember that the charters are educating students the city would otherwise be responsible for. The charters are using facilities the city is not using.
I realize the distinction is probably lost on you. As long as "big eevul scary corporations" are involved you're knee jerk against it. Just like DiBlasio.

Well I have this great business idea. All it requires is the use of a government building rent-free. Am I approved?

 

[The Rabbi]

Really? What do you call it?
(If personal insults are all the rebuttal you have ... then you really don't have much now do you?)

WHat do I call it? How about efficient use of resources? Remember that the charters are educating students the city would otherwise be responsible for. The charters are using facilities the city is not using.
I realize the distinction is probably lost on you. As long as "big eevul scary corporations" are involved you're knee jerk against it. Just like DiBlasio.

Well I have this great business idea. All it requires is the use of a government building rent-free. Am I approved?

Will you be providing the government with something it already purchases at cheaper prices and/or more efficiently? Then yes.

 

[nodoginnafight]

No handout, jerkoff.

Really? What do you call it?
(If personal insults are all the rebuttal you have ... then you really don't have much now do you?)

WHat do I call it? How about efficient use of resources? Remember that the charters are educating students the city would otherwise be responsible for. The charters are using facilities the city is not using.
I realize the distinction is probably lost on you. As long as "big eevul scary corporations" are involved you're knee jerk against it. Just like DiBlasio.

Nope, what I am against is forking over taxpayer money to everyone who asks for it.

The only difference between Republicans and Democrats is who the checks are made out to.

We can't afford to keep going on like this.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Really? What do you call it?
(If personal insults are all the rebuttal you have ... then you really don't have much now do you?)

WHat do I call it? How about efficient use of resources? Remember that the charters are educating students the city would otherwise be responsible for. The charters are using facilities the city is not using.
I realize the distinction is probably lost on you. As long as "big eevul scary corporations" are involved you're knee jerk against it. Just like DiBlasio.

Well I have this great business idea. All it requires is the use of a government building rent-free. Am I approved?

Are you a public school?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

WHat do I call it? How about efficient use of resources? Remember that the charters are educating students the city would otherwise be responsible for. The charters are using facilities the city is not using.
I realize the distinction is probably lost on you. As long as "big eevul scary corporations" are involved you're knee jerk against it. Just like DiBlasio.

Well I have this great business idea. All it requires is the use of a government building rent-free. Am I approved?

Are you a public school?

Nope, and neither are they. See how that works?

 

[The Rabbi]

Really? What do you call it?
(If personal insults are all the rebuttal you have ... then you really don't have much now do you?)

WHat do I call it? How about efficient use of resources? Remember that the charters are educating students the city would otherwise be responsible for. The charters are using facilities the city is not using.
I realize the distinction is probably lost on you. As long as "big eevul scary corporations" are involved you're knee jerk against it. Just like DiBlasio.

Nope, what I am against is forking over taxpayer money to everyone who asks for it.

The only difference between Republicans and Democrats is who the checks are made out to.

We can't afford to keep going on like this.

How is supporting charter schools, which must pass rigorous standards, "handing out money to everyone who asks for it"?

 

[nodoginnafight]

WHat do I call it? How about efficient use of resources? Remember that the charters are educating students the city would otherwise be responsible for. The charters are using facilities the city is not using.
I realize the distinction is probably lost on you. As long as "big eevul scary corporations" are involved you're knee jerk against it. Just like DiBlasio.

Nope, what I am against is forking over taxpayer money to everyone who asks for it.

The only difference between Republicans and Democrats is who the checks are made out to.

We can't afford to keep going on like this.

How is supporting charter schools, which must pass rigorous standards, "handing out money to everyone who asks for it"?

It's not - it's handing out money to one organization that asks for it.

 

[The Rabbi]

Nope, what I am against is forking over taxpayer money to everyone who asks for it.

The only difference between Republicans and Democrats is who the checks are made out to.

We can't afford to keep going on like this.

How is supporting charter schools, which must pass rigorous standards, "handing out money to everyone who asks for it"?

It's not - it's handing out money to one organization that asks for it.

OK, so you're in favor of it then, right?

Charters are more than one organization. You get that, right?

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Where did he ban them? Oh right, he didn't.

Read the article about the re-location part.

An overt fascist supporting an overt fascist mayor. Not surprised.

So I have a great business idea but in order for it to work the government has to let me use one of its buildings, rent free. Am I approved?

So the government has a deplorable education system, but in order for it go on destroying the minds of our children it has to block school choice and all at the expense of the taxpayers who don't want the government schools for their children. Can we have our money back?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well I have this great business idea. All it requires is the use of a government building rent-free. Am I approved?

Are you a public school?

Nope, and neither are they. See how that works?

But the public schools get rent free use of a building, the Charter schools want the same deal

See how that works?

 

[Jarhead]

First...I think deBlasio is wrong for NYC. He is as close to a socialist we will see in a position as high as his.

But he is not punishing children for overt political gain as the title says.

he is simply keeping his campaign promise.

People forgot to think when they voted him in.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

LOLberals hate competition. Unless it is internet speed. Then they want more capitalism.



Liars and hypocrites.

perhaps you should just acknowledge that you don't understand the issue and stop randing about liberals.

oh wait... that would require actual thought.

And here's the resident moron with a typically moronic post.
We do understand the issue. The issue is that libs want to deny poor kids an equal opportunity to get a good education so they can get off the gov't plantation.

Why do you hate poor black children?

Bingo!

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

How dare someone have a better solution to education....

How dare my tax dollars be used to fund private schools. If you want to have private education raise your own damn money.

Mindless prattle of the statist kind. If you leftists want to have government schools in order to impose your failures on children, how about you leftists pony up the funds, keep the lunacy to yourselves and give the rest of us our tax dollars back?

See how that works?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Are you a public school?

Nope, and neither are they. See how that works?

But the public schools get rent free use of a building, the Charter schools want the same deal

See how that works?

Rent free? Hardly. The taxpayers paid for that, with bonds and property taxes, so that children could go to school for free. You want a school building, pass a bond or raise capital another way. We had to and they don't get a break.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Read the article about the re-location part.

An overt fascist supporting an overt fascist mayor. Not surprised.

So I have a great business idea but in order for it to work the government has to let me use one of its buildings, rent free. Am I approved?

So the government has a deplorable education system, but in order for it go on destroying the minds of our children it has to block school choice and all at the expense of the taxpayers who don't want the government schools for their children. Can we have our money back?

Mine first. I never had kids. You owe me thirty years of property taxes, 20 of them on two or more properties. I'll be on the lookout for your check.

 

[The Rabbi]

Nope, and neither are they. See how that works?

But the public schools get rent free use of a building, the Charter schools want the same deal

See how that works?

Rent free? Hardly. The taxpayers paid for that, with bonds and property taxes, so that children could go to school for free. You want a school building, pass a bond or raise capital another way. We had to and they don't get a break.

So the kids who go to charters dont go to school for free?

Your inconsistency is showing. Zip it up.

 

[The Rabbi]

So I have a great business idea but in order for it to work the government has to let me use one of its buildings, rent free. Am I approved?

So the government has a deplorable education system, but in order for it go on destroying the minds of our children it has to block school choice and all at the expense of the taxpayers who don't want the government schools for their children. Can we have our money back?

Mine first. I never had kids. You owe me thirty years of property taxes, 20 of them on two or more properties. I'll be on the lookout for your check.

The doctor treating you was educated in schools you paid for. You're welcome.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

But the public schools get rent free use of a building, the Charter schools want the same deal

See how that works?

Rent free? Hardly. The taxpayers paid for that, with bonds and property taxes, so that children could go to school for free. You want a school building, pass a bond or raise capital another way. We had to and they don't get a break.

So the kids who go to charters dont go to school for free?

Your inconsistency is showing. Zip it up.

The kids who go to Charter schools shouldn't go for free. We have Public schools for that, bought and mostly paid for, and I want them there, for a whole host of reasons that start with meeting the rest of their fellow citizens.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So the government has a deplorable education system, but in order for it go on destroying the minds of our children it has to block school choice and all at the expense of the taxpayers who don't want the government schools for their children. Can we have our money back?

Mine first. I never had kids. You owe me thirty years of property taxes, 20 of them on two or more properties. I'll be on the lookout for your check.

The doctor treating you was educated in schools you paid for. You're welcome.

And I happily did so don't make the stupid argument shouldn't have had to pay since we all do. Education is not about making a buck, nor is it supposed to be.

 

[The Rabbi]

Rent free? Hardly. The taxpayers paid for that, with bonds and property taxes, so that children could go to school for free. You want a school building, pass a bond or raise capital another way. We had to and they don't get a break.

So the kids who go to charters dont go to school for free?

Your inconsistency is showing. Zip it up.

The kids who go to Charter schools shouldn't go for free. We have Public schools for that, bought and mostly paid for, and I want them there, for a whole host of reasons that start with meeting the rest of their fellow citizens.

Why shouldn't they go free? The public schools suck and fail the kids miserably. The same kids who would be sitting in public schools are sitting in charters.
Your reasons start with "the unions oppose them" and end with "I hate kids."