Mayor Bill de Blasio punishes children for OVERT POLITICAL GAIN

[bripat9643]

And I happily did so don't make the stupid argument shouldn't have had to pay since we all do. Education is not about making a buck, nor is it supposed to be.

Why should I have to pay for educating your kid or anyone else's?

They are your future but when I get my money back you can have yours.

You don't ever get your money back, numskull. Your kid is not my future.

All you've done is spout meaningless slogans.

 

[Lovebears65]

He is bowing down for the unions just like Obama has in the past. UNIONS need to be stop they are bad for the country in the PUBLIC sector .. I can care less if you are in one in the private sector .

Liberal Love and Tolerance at it's best:

The three charter schools no longer approved for co-locations belong to the Success Academy network, run by Eva Moskowitz, de Blasio’s political rival. In New York City, Success Academy ranks in the top 1 percent for math and top 7 percent for English.

schools after de Blasio boots them

By Mary C. Tillotson
Published March 05, 2014
watchdog.org
Facebook74 Twitter51 Gplus1
De Blasio State City.jpg

Feb. 10, 2014: New York Mayor Bill de Blasio delivers his State of the City address at LaGuardia Community College in the Queens borough of New York.ap

The 3,000 or so charter school supporters who rallied Tuesday in Albany, N.Y., want Gov. Andrew Cuomo to toss them a lifeline.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio last week stopped three charter schools from co-locating with district public schools, leaving some children with no option but their district schools.

Charter schools that can’t co-locate have little recourse, as the schools receive less money than traditional district schools. Per-pupil operating funding for charter schools is significantly lower, and charter schools don’t get money to build brick-and-mortar schools

Thousands rally to support NYC charter schools after de Blasio boots them | Fox News

 

[bripat9643]

The kids who go to Charter schools shouldn't go for free. We have Public schools for that, bought and mostly paid for, and I want them there, for a whole host of reasons that start with meeting the rest of their fellow citizens.

Charter schools are public schools, numskull.

We already have Public schools nitwit, we call them Public Schools, and they already have buildings unlike your Charter schools.

So your theory is that there can't be more than one kind of public school? And this claim is based on what?

 

[The Rabbi]

Charter schools are public schools, numskull.

We already have Public schools nitwit, we call them Public Schools, and they already have buildings unlike your Charter schools.

So your theory is that there can't be more than one kind of public school? And this claim is based on what?

Stupidity? Low information? Lack of imagination? I'm just guessing, help me out here.

 

[FA_Q2]

We already have Public schools nitwit, we call them Public Schools, and they already have buildings unlike your Charter schools.

So your theory is that there can't be more than one kind of public school? And this claim is based on what?

Stupidity? Low information? Lack of imagination? I'm just guessing, help me out here.

Idiocy?

You forgot that one.

More than likely it is a complete inability to recognize anything that is not supported by the democrat party – partisanship.

 

[The Rabbi]

So your theory is that there can't be more than one kind of public school? And this claim is based on what?

Stupidity? Low information? Lack of imagination? I'm just guessing, help me out here.

Idiocy?

You forgot that one.

More than likely it is a complete inability to recognize anything that is not supported by the democrat party – partisanship.

I'm not sure how to distinguish between stupidity and idiocy here.
But I suspect you've nailed it: blind partisanship loyalty to whatever the Dem talking points are.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

[MENTION=39768]hazlnut[/MENTION]

Have you gone to this website yet:

?* Gays with Guns *?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

First...I think deBlasio is wrong for NYC. He is as close to a socialist we will see in a position as high as his.

But he is not punishing children for overt political gain as the title says.

he is simply keeping his campaign promise.

People forgot to think when they voted him in.

[MENTION=22181]Jarhead[/MENTION]

Although I know you're being light-hearted, there actually is a personal vendetta going on. De Blasio targeted those schools because of their affiliation with his chief political rival.

He besieged the children to destroy a political opponent.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

I was half-watching something on FNC last night and a guest told the host that he was raised in the same tenement building as Justice Sotomayor.

But that her parents cared enough to pull her out of the Public Schools and send her to a Catholic School.

She is now a Supreme Court Justice.

Our Public School system is a joke. A sick joke.

It is run by Unions who care only about themselves and it is propped up by the scum of the motherfucking earth, dimocrap scumbags, who care NOTHING for children and only for their own greed and power.

"When schoolchildren start paying union dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of school children." ~ Albert Shanker, Head of Teachers Unions for 43 years

DeBlowsio is doing this for one reason and one reason only..... The Teachers Union Backed him and the Charter Schools are not Union.

Just like the Horse and Buggy Union in New Yawk Shitty? Their Union didn't back him so he's shutting them down.

Guys and gals, I'm telling you.... dimocraps are the scum of the earth.

ALL of them.

They would sacrifice your children.... Hell, they would sacrifice their OWN children to stay in power.

Sick motherfuckers. scumbags. ALL of them

Even the ones they elect

They do sacrifice children, more than 55,000,000 abortions since Roe v Wade. Did you see the rituals they perform in the Bohemian Grove?

 

[bripat9643]

Stupidity? Low information? Lack of imagination? I'm just guessing, help me out here.

Idiocy?

You forgot that one.

More than likely it is a complete inability to recognize anything that is not supported by the democrat party – partisanship.

I'm not sure how to distinguish between stupidity and idiocy here.
But I suspect you've nailed it: blind partisanship loyalty to whatever the Dem talking points are.

The only kind of public school allowed is the kind that is run by the NEA and the NTA. They pretty much run the Democrat party, so what they want is reality for Democrats. Any school that hires non-union teachers is not a "public school" in their eyes.

That is pretty much an admission that Democrats will never reform education, because any genuine reform is predicated on getting rid of teacher's unions.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Charter schools are public schools, numskull.

We already have Public schools nitwit, we call them Public Schools, and they already have buildings unlike your Charter schools.

So your theory is that there can't be more than one kind of public school? And this claim is based on what?

Common Sense. Public Schools, Public Parks, Public Transportation. Public, paid for by us, for us, and best used when run by us, not a Private party trying to make a buck.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

We already have Public schools nitwit, we call them Public Schools, and they already have buildings unlike your Charter schools.

So your theory is that there can't be more than one kind of public school? And this claim is based on what?

Common Sense. Public Schools, Public Parks, Public Transportation. Public, paid for by us, for us, and best used when run by us, not a Private party trying to make a buck.

Question for [MENTION=47594]PaintMyHouse[/MENTION]

You claim that you're not a paid agent (you've made thousands of posts in less 30-40 days). Although all your [myriads] of posts (thoughts) on this forum are fully in defense of this Government, I will take you word for it, that you're not a paid agent.

So, let's assume you're just a regular person then. You seem to believe that everything is fine and that status-quo should be defended at all costs. Thus, you are extremely pleased, content and comfortable with the current situation/circumstances in America.

Since you are so pleased and content with the present, what Force of Nature compels you to lay siege to the internet? If you're so happy with your life, why are you here?

Ordinary people come to forums to argue about things they DO NOT like, and to debate the differences between their solutions (and guiding philosophies) to today's problem.

Yet, you are at peace with present condition of the United States. So far as you're concerned, there are no problems to address, and thus no solutions to give. So what compels you to visit these boards (or any other political forum) to begin with?

You love the NSA and defend it with you dying breathe. You claim we have nothing to hide.

So let me make a request: Since you have nothing to hide, I would like you to open a conversation with me in another medium (AIM or something else) so I can locate your IP. I would like to see from where you get hours and hours of time to defend the Elite; afterall, you got nothing to hide, right?
[MENTION=29100]bripat9643[/MENTION]
[MENTION=20947]The Rabbi[/MENTION]

 

[bripat9643]

We already have Public schools nitwit, we call them Public Schools, and they already have buildings unlike your Charter schools.

So your theory is that there can't be more than one kind of public school? And this claim is based on what?

Common Sense. Public Schools, Public Parks, Public Transportation. Public, paid for by us, for us, and best used when run by us, not a Private party trying to make a buck.

Charter schools are not private and they don't earn a profit, numskull. They are "paid for by us, for us." What part of that don't you get?