Matt Damon Puts His Kids In Private School, Despite His Advocacy For Public Schools

They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

Not true. I haven't insulted anyone.

Even questioning moonbat dogma is insulting to them.

Then they have to go to a moonbat website and dig up some "fact" that either distracts from the issue, or blames Bush.

Don't inconvenience these bed wetters like that.

No Asterism is fine. You are playing the "everyone" game. I say girls like pink and the rules of the game you say "Not ALL of them".

Dogs like meat - "Not all of them"

But you know when I say things it's not meant as 100% of all of (add group) do this. Its generally speaking. For example: Pete said questioning is insulting to liberals.

Not to me.
 
If I support gays do I have to **** a guys ass? No don't be stupid

redacted...

Stupid analogy anyway, but we'll work with it.

It would be hypocritical if you promoted laws against ******* men in their asses, and then fucked men in their asses.

Or hypocritical to call anyone who isn't in favor of unlimited gay rights (including affirmative action) a bigot while shunning their own gay family members.

Or for that matter promoting the idea that a gay lifestyle is equal to a straight one, while telling your kids it isn't.
 
The humiliation for the liberals never ends

Republicans think they are humiliating famous people who protect their children. Famous people have to protect their children. Because they are "famous". Poor Republicans. Humiliated once again and don't even know it.
 
Nothing racist here, right? "O(w)n kind"(sic)?!?! If the Republicans really want to shake the tag, people are going to have to realize there's only one kind, human beings. Can't take the "Obama is a racist" charge seriously, when we still have to put up with this kind of thinking.

Lol, what did you want me to say? "*******"?

I wanted you to recognize your own racism. It's been a ploy on the right to recognize everyone else's, but not their own.

Your the one that made it a racial issue. Obama makes things into race issues also. I was making the point that obama does't want minories educated. You want to talk racisim. Lets look how black republicans are treated and the names they are called by liberals.
 
The kicker is when obama got into office he did away with charter schools in washington. Then had to reinstate it after the out cry of the minorities. Obama wanted to keep his on kind uneducated, wonder why.

Nothing racist here, right? "O(w)n kind"(sic)?!?! If the Republicans really want to shake the tag, people are going to have to realize there's only one kind, human beings. Can't take the "Obama is a racist" charge seriously, when we still have to put up with this kind of thinking.

Wow - really? So then why does every government form, financial form, medical form, and all other forms have check-boxes for "white", "black", "hispanic", and "other"? Why isn't there just one box which says "HUMAN BEING"?

Is there anything which isn't "racist" in the desperate minds of liberals who are getting humiliated on the battlefield of ideas and exposed in their lies?
:cuckoo:
 
Yet another fake controversy.



This too?

Then there’s NYTimes columnist Tom Wicker, who made a career of proclaiming that America was a deeply racist country. But Tom sent his own kids to lily-white private schools, and then retired to the whitest state in the nation, Vermont. Wicker being so right-thinking and the scourge of racists, people were curious about why he didn’t send his kids to New York public schools. Did he just screw up?

Asked about the hypocrisy of sending his own children to sanitized private schools, Wicker said, “It gives me a lot of intellectual discomfort, but I am not going to disadvantage my children to win more support for my views.”
Coulter, “Mugged,” p. 110.
 
Ok So how is Damon a hypocrite for supporting public schools then?
Where is he sending his kid?

They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

Private school....

Can you explain how that makes him a hypocrite or will you take option #2?
So, he supports gubmint schools so much that he deprived them of a student and the funds that would follow that student to the school.

Hypocrite...Sanctimonious....Two-faced....Take your pick.
 
Here we have yet another leer-jet, limousine Hollywood liberal screaming one thing but doing something else. "Do as I say, not as I do". Proving once again, "Socialism is for the people, not the Socialist".

Matt Damon Puts His Kids In Private School, Despite His Advocacy For Public Schools

Jealous?

I think Obama humiliated all of you wingnuts by beating your candidates up in that last two elections. The event even ran off some of the wingnuts who used to participate pretty heavily here.



So....you'd like to limit the discussion to Obama?
The guy who pushed ObamaCare on Americans....but gave waivers to all the Libs who asked for 'em?



How about these:

1. Only the Democrat Party could hysterically denounce a Supreme Court nominee for allegedly making unwanted sexual advances in the workplace and then applaud a president who was receiving oral sex from a White House intern. Who else but Dems could oppose Clarence Thomas, and block Supreme Court nominee Douglas Ginsburg (for marijuana use), and then run Bill Clinton for president.


2. How about Democrat senator Hillary’s denouncing George Bush’s commutation of Scooter Libby’s sentence, after her husband sold a pardon to Marc Rich.


3. Only liberals could tolerate a windbag like Al Gore lecturing us about our carbon footprint while he flies his private jet from energy-guzzling mansion to energy-guzzling mansion.


4. After Jared Loughner’s Tucson shooting spree, to whom did NBC (Meet the Press) [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...table_on_politics_after_tucson_shooting.html], NPR []Sharpton: Keep Debate Passionate, Not Poisonous : NPR, CNN and MSNBC turn to interview about how rhetoric can lead to violence? Al Sharpton. The Washington Post even ran an Op-Ed on the shootings by Sharpton.[ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/11/AR2011011104334.html]
His rhetoric actually inspired mobs to murder.



Care to respond?
 
The kicker is when obama got into office he did away with charter schools in washington. Then had to reinstate it after the out cry of the minorities. Obama wanted to keep his on kind uneducated, wonder why.

Nothing racist here, right? "O(w)n kind"(sic)?!?! If the Republicans really want to shake the tag, people are going to have to realize there's only one kind, human beings. Can't take the "Obama is a racist" charge seriously, when we still have to put up with this kind of thinking.

Spoken like a true ignorant communist. Nobody is different. Nobody is unique. There are no men and no women (any wonder the LGBT community aligns themselves with these buffoons?) - there are only "human beings" designed to be obedient sheep to the state.

Sorry stupid - Obama is black. And no amount of your closet-racism over-compensation bullshit will ever change that reality. And Obama has tried to ensure his fellow black man stays as uneducated and poverty-stricken as possible to keep them dependent on government. He - like you - views the black community as "useful *******" to the cause. It's a sad reality.
 
I just don't see hypocrisy in trying to make public schools better, but at the same time giving your kid every advantage you can afford.

See any hypocrisy here?



a. Champions women’s and gay right’s but ignores same in Muslim cultures.

b. Champions women’s right’s but ignores actions of Bill Clinton.

c. Claim it was a vicious slander to be called a communist in the 50’s- but didn’t see anything wrong with being a communist in the 50’s.

d. Advocates scientific research and debate, but then declares discussions about evolution and global warming a closed matter.

e. Demands clean alternative energy but opposes nuclear power.

f. Supports energy from offshore wind farms unless offshore wind farms obscure the view of Cape Cod.

g. Despises racial profiling and stereotyping unless a black conservative comes along, and then is labeled ‘unqualified,’ ‘stupid,’ a ‘house nigga,’ ‘an Uncle Tom,’ ‘Republican lawn jockey,’ or ‘window dressing.’



Copacetic?
 
Where is he sending his kid?

They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

Private school....

Can you explain how that makes him a hypocrite or will you take option #2?
So, he supports gubmint schools so much that he deprived them of a student and the funds that would follow that student to the school.

Hypocrite...Sanctimonious....Two-faced....Take your pick.

Snark is not a point. Like I said I support gays but I don't have to **** a guy and deprive him of the lack of penis to support their choice.

I support public smoking but doesn't mean I have to light up either.

You cant explain it, I'll ask someone else I guess
 
15th post
Here we have yet another leer-jet, limousine Hollywood liberal screaming one thing but doing something else. "Do as I say, not as I do". Proving once again, "Socialism is for the people, not the Socialist".

Matt Damon Puts His Kids In Private School, Despite His Advocacy For Public Schools

Jealous?

I think Obama humiliated all of you wingnuts by beating your candidates up in that last two elections. The event even ran off some of the wingnuts who used to participate pretty heavily here.



So....you'd like to limit the discussion to Obama?
The guy who pushed ObamaCare on Americans....but gave waivers to all the Libs who asked for 'em?



How about these:

1. Only the Democrat Party could hysterically denounce a Supreme Court nominee for allegedly making unwanted sexual advances in the workplace and then applaud a president who was receiving oral sex from a White House intern. Who else but Dems could oppose Clarence Thomas, and block Supreme Court nominee Douglas Ginsburg (for marijuana use), and then run Bill Clinton for president.


2. How about Democrat senator Hillary’s denouncing George Bush’s commutation of Scooter Libby’s sentence, after her husband sold a pardon to Marc Rich.


3. Only liberals could tolerate a windbag like Al Gore lecturing us about our carbon footprint while he flies his private jet from energy-guzzling mansion to energy-guzzling mansion.


4. After Jared Loughner’s Tucson shooting spree, to whom did NBC (Meet the Press) [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...table_on_politics_after_tucson_shooting.html], NPR []Sharpton: Keep Debate Passionate, Not Poisonous : NPR, CNN and MSNBC turn to interview about how rhetoric can lead to violence? Al Sharpton. The Washington Post even ran an Op-Ed on the shootings by Sharpton.[ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/11/AR2011011104334.html]
His rhetoric actually inspired mobs to murder.



Care to respond?


Not really because there is just as much hypocrisy on the right as there is on the left, PC.

It's just an exercise in fingerpointing where both sides are in the wrong.

Nothing to be gained from this except to vent.

Let's deal with real issues instead.

That is just my 2 cents for what little it is worth.
 
And Matt Damon promotes which laws against private schools? :lol:

Who said he did?

Ok So how is Damon a hypocrite for supporting public schools then?

No, he's an idiot for supporting public schools period.

Public education in this country is a disaster thanks to bed wetting indoctrination, teachers unions that protect incompetent teachers, "No Child Gets Ahead" curriculum, and a bloated federal bueracracy that rewards failing school districts with more money, and never demands improvement.

Bed wetters like Damon insist people should not use charter schools, excoriates vouchers that help people get out of shitty schools, while his limo driver takes his red diaper babies to expensive private schools.
 
They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

It has been explained bed wetter, just because you can't grasp simple concepts does not indicate failure on the part of those trying to penetrate that incredible density that exists between your ears.

It's like a black hole of ignorance.


Oh I'm sorry, that might be construed as racism...

Ehh... **** it I don't care.
 
Back
Top Bottom