Mass Stabbing In Sacramento

Violence against white conservatives is acceptable in the Orwellian world of Obama and his Ministry of Truth liberal news media.

So neo-Nazis are "conservatives" now?

I coulda sworn I've been told that they're really "liberals".
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.
 



Notice people like this have a need to force their worldview on others, even at the point of a gun. They are never content just living their lives and separating themselves as they would see fit. It is about having dominant power over other groups of primates (humans). This is Isis, this is the Nazis. In the end they are people that are threatened by other humans who don't view life as they do.
 
Violence against white conservatives is acceptable in the Orwellian world of Obama and his Ministry of Truth liberal news media.

So neo-Nazis are "conservatives" now?

I coulda sworn I've been told that they're really "liberals".
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.

"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
 
Look at all these poor, persecuted white conservatives:

11025189_1594850437397062_3692759095671937117_n.jpg
I see the Iron Cross. No swastika. I see an American flag.So Black Lives Matter are just angels. Nothing racist about them. Lol.
 
Violence against white conservatives is acceptable in the Orwellian world of Obama and his Ministry of Truth liberal news media.

So neo-Nazis are "conservatives" now?

I coulda sworn I've been told that they're really "liberals".
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.

"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
And the people that attacked them were socialist and communist anti-American free traders.
 
Violence against white conservatives is acceptable in the Orwellian world of Obama and his Ministry of Truth liberal news media.

So neo-Nazis are "conservatives" now?

I coulda sworn I've been told that they're really "liberals".
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.

"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
And the people that attacked them were socialist and communist anti-American free traders.

No, they were crusty punks and black-bloc anarchists.
 
Look at all these poor, persecuted white conservatives:

11025189_1594850437397062_3692759095671937117_n.jpg
I see the Iron Cross. No swastika. I see an American flag.So Black Lives Matter are just angels. Nothing racist about them. Lol.

When you can't respond, deflect to BLM!
When liberals can't respond play race card. Answer me...do these people have constitutional right to free speech and assembly? See ACLU v. Skokie my ignorant friend.
 
Look at all these poor, persecuted white conservatives:

11025189_1594850437397062_3692759095671937117_n.jpg
I see the Iron Cross. No swastika. I see an American flag.So Black Lives Matter are just angels. Nothing racist about them. Lol.

When you can't respond, deflect to BLM!
When liberals can't respond play race card. Answer me...do these people have constitutional right to free speech and assembly? See ACLU v. Skokie my ignorant friend.

No one violated their "rights". The government didn't shut down their protest, or prevent them from assembling.
 
Violence against white conservatives is acceptable in the Orwellian world of Obama and his Ministry of Truth liberal news media.

So neo-Nazis are "conservatives" now?

I coulda sworn I've been told that they're really "liberals".
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.

"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
And the people that attacked them were socialist and communist anti-American free traders.

No, they were crusty punks and black-bloc anarchists.
They were your typical Bernie Sanders supporters that the media adores. Left always "assumes" moral high ground and any opposition is evil and they are the heroes stopping imagined injustice. And liberal media is active in the ruse.
 
So neo-Nazis are "conservatives" now?

I coulda sworn I've been told that they're really "liberals".
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.

"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
And the people that attacked them were socialist and communist anti-American free traders.

No, they were crusty punks and black-bloc anarchists.
They were your typical Bernie Sanders supporters that the media adores. Left always "assumes" moral high ground and any opposition is evil and they are the heroes stopping imagined injustice. And liberal media is active in the ruse.

:lol:

No, they were crusty punks and anarchists, not "Bernie supporters".
 
Look at all these poor, persecuted white conservatives:

11025189_1594850437397062_3692759095671937117_n.jpg
I see the Iron Cross. No swastika. I see an American flag.So Black Lives Matter are just angels. Nothing racist about them. Lol.

When you can't respond, deflect to BLM!
When liberals can't respond play race card. Answer me...do these people have constitutional right to free speech and assembly? See ACLU v. Skokie my ignorant friend.

No one violated their "rights". The government didn't shut down their protest, or prevent them from assembling.
They were attacked. Where's the media outrage. They were stopped by a group whose members should be arrested. The government did shut down their protest by allowing them to be attacked.
 
Look at all these poor, persecuted white conservatives:

11025189_1594850437397062_3692759095671937117_n.jpg
I see the Iron Cross. No swastika. I see an American flag.So Black Lives Matter are just angels. Nothing racist about them. Lol.

When you can't respond, deflect to BLM!
When liberals can't respond play race card. Answer me...do these people have constitutional right to free speech and assembly? See ACLU v. Skokie my ignorant friend.

No one violated their "rights". The government didn't shut down their protest, or prevent them from assembling.
They were attacked. Where's the media outrage. They were stopped by a group whose members should be arrested. The government did shut down their protest by allowing them to be attacked.

Plenty of people were arrested, on both sides.
 
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.

"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
And the people that attacked them were socialist and communist anti-American free traders.

No, they were crusty punks and black-bloc anarchists.
They were your typical Bernie Sanders supporters that the media adores. Left always "assumes" moral high ground and any opposition is evil and they are the heroes stopping imagined injustice. And liberal media is active in the ruse.

:lol:

No, they were crusty punks and anarchists, not "Bernie supporters".
Wrong. Pretty obvious you live in la-la land. Sanders supporters are radical leftist who often harass Trump rallies.
 
Violence against white conservatives is acceptable in the Orwellian world of Obama and his Ministry of Truth liberal news media.

So neo-Nazis are "conservatives" now?

I coulda sworn I've been told that they're really "liberals".
Do they have constitutional rights? These people were "white nationalist." Nowhere does it say they were members of the American Nazi Party. Had the table been flipped the liberal news media and Obama administration would have went ballistic. Hitlers Nazi Party were indeed leftist socialist.

"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
And the people that attacked them were socialist and communist anti-American free traders.

:rofl: ..... Link(s)?
 
I see the Iron Cross. No swastika. I see an American flag.So Black Lives Matter are just angels. Nothing racist about them. Lol.

When you can't respond, deflect to BLM!
When liberals can't respond play race card. Answer me...do these people have constitutional right to free speech and assembly? See ACLU v. Skokie my ignorant friend.

No one violated their "rights". The government didn't shut down their protest, or prevent them from assembling.
They were attacked. Where's the media outrage. They were stopped by a group whose members should be arrested. The government did shut down their protest by allowing them to be attacked.

Plenty of people were arrested, on both sides.
Why? Who were the provocateurs?
 
When you can't respond, deflect to BLM!
When liberals can't respond play race card. Answer me...do these people have constitutional right to free speech and assembly? See ACLU v. Skokie my ignorant friend.

No one violated their "rights". The government didn't shut down their protest, or prevent them from assembling.
They were attacked. Where's the media outrage. They were stopped by a group whose members should be arrested. The government did shut down their protest by allowing them to be attacked.

Plenty of people were arrested, on both sides.
Why? Who were the provocateurs?

Why were people on both sides arrested? For fighting, and stabbing each other.

Both sides came to fight.
 
"These people" were the Golden State Skinheads. As seen in my picture. Poor, persecuted white conservative neo-nazi skinheads.
And the people that attacked them were socialist and communist anti-American free traders.

No, they were crusty punks and black-bloc anarchists.
They were your typical Bernie Sanders supporters that the media adores. Left always "assumes" moral high ground and any opposition is evil and they are the heroes stopping imagined injustice. And liberal media is active in the ruse.

:lol:

No, they were crusty punks and anarchists, not "Bernie supporters".
Wrong. Pretty obvious you live in la-la land. Sanders supporters are radical leftist who often harass Trump rallies.

:lol:

It's pretty obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about. I know a number of people who were fighting in Sacramento today, none of them are "Bernie supporters".
 

Forum List

Back
Top