georgephillip
Diamond Member
Economics professor Costas Lapavitsas argues in this TRNN interview with Gregory Wilpert the recent shocking results from Great Britain are a direct result of the EU's lack of Democracy:
Story
"WILPERT: ... There's been a lot of kind of confusion as to why even would David Cameron risk his prime ministership on such an important issue. And, I mean, he didn't have to call for a referendum. So how did this whole vote come about in Britain?
"LAPAVITSAS: I think that politically this represents a gross miscalculation by David Cameron. He had a longstanding political problem within the Tory Party. He thought that he would fix it by calling a referendum, which he thought that he would win easily, and that would settle the internal disputes within the Tory Party.
"He miscalculated very badly.
"And the reason why he miscalculated--and with him the entire British establishment--is because of course the question of the referendum touched upon a real, deep class divide in Britain, which came to the fore on this question.
"The people who voted for exit are basically the lower social strata--working class, poor people, essentially the people who would be the lower end of the income and other distribution in the country, together with some lower middle class strata who also voted in favor of exit.
"The people who voted in favor of remaining in the country are rich, the well off, the most powerful concentrations of capital, and the upper middle class.
"This divide came to the fore, and Exit won because the discontent of the poorer, the lower social strata was too strong to be held back. It came to the fore and it prevailed.
"So we've got a deep class divide that's behind British exit. We should never lose sight of that."
A deep class divide requiring a new left-wing commitment to democracy and national sovereignty coupled with progressive economic programs like nationalizing the banks, steel industry, and the railways.
Who knew?
Story
"WILPERT: ... There's been a lot of kind of confusion as to why even would David Cameron risk his prime ministership on such an important issue. And, I mean, he didn't have to call for a referendum. So how did this whole vote come about in Britain?
"LAPAVITSAS: I think that politically this represents a gross miscalculation by David Cameron. He had a longstanding political problem within the Tory Party. He thought that he would fix it by calling a referendum, which he thought that he would win easily, and that would settle the internal disputes within the Tory Party.
"He miscalculated very badly.
"And the reason why he miscalculated--and with him the entire British establishment--is because of course the question of the referendum touched upon a real, deep class divide in Britain, which came to the fore on this question.
"The people who voted for exit are basically the lower social strata--working class, poor people, essentially the people who would be the lower end of the income and other distribution in the country, together with some lower middle class strata who also voted in favor of exit.
"The people who voted in favor of remaining in the country are rich, the well off, the most powerful concentrations of capital, and the upper middle class.
"This divide came to the fore, and Exit won because the discontent of the poorer, the lower social strata was too strong to be held back. It came to the fore and it prevailed.
"So we've got a deep class divide that's behind British exit. We should never lose sight of that."
A deep class divide requiring a new left-wing commitment to democracy and national sovereignty coupled with progressive economic programs like nationalizing the banks, steel industry, and the railways.
Who knew?